#107: STEVE BASSETT TEARS UP THE HISTORICAL REPORT ON UFOS BY DoD RUN AARO
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-podcast--5975113/support.
CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —[email protected]
Special Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can’t do this WITHOUT YOU!
-COPYRIGHT-2020-
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
Qween have a look on the fa O god h against. All right,
guys, we are back here today with Total Disclosure live on this Sunday night.
I'm super excited to be here with my pal Stephen Bassett. Before we
get into that, guys, make sure to like share subscribe. We are
a little late, uh uh to start the We're having some issues on my
end, and you know that's my fault. So without further ado, we're
not gonna waste too much time tonight. Tonight's video is brought to you by
Identia Irbels in their product bio mind. All the links for that will be
in the description below. Arrow just dropped what what what what? I can
only call the just uh uh, I don't even know. I don't even
want to begin to describe it without Steven here, So before h like I
said, before we get into it, make sure it like share, subscribe
and we can start getting into this historical report that Arrow dropped via the d
O d uh deor Department of Defense. Steven, thank you so much for
being here. I know it's been a busy time, especially for someone like
you, who is is you know, really well versed in this kind of
stuff. But right off the bat, I just want to get your thoughts
on the report as a whole. I mean, it's it's just terrible.
Well, first of all, let me just be clear, none of it
was your fault. I had all kinds of problems on my end, and
part of that was my computer, which is about to be replaced by a
very new and provided by one of my supporters, brand new HP. But
my old acer I dropped it way too many times, ran over with my
you know whatever. Any of the point is is, it's not yet your
fault. Fault. Secondly, I'm going to have to take a break around
six oh four to do a quick UK interview and then I'm gonna come back.
Yeah, so we're to go on for a while tonight, all right,
much to say, okay, yeah, and yeah, I did forget
to mention that in the intro because what we decided was that we were going
to do that. So right around then, we'll take a quick break.
I'll leave the lime stream going, maybe I'll talk for a little bit,
and then you'll come back on and we'll continue the conversation from there. So
we have a really interesting conversation. I think a lot of people, you
know, The Good Trouble Show just add on. Gary Nolan and Ross Colthart
got their views about it. The consensus from UFO researchers, and I mean
the historical report on UFOs. It was delivered by the dd RUN program,
the Arrow Office or ARROW, which was tasked with scientific study of the UFO
phenomenon. It's safe to say that this report and how it was handled top
to bottom has been a modern day attempt at a project blue book. Is
it safe to say that we could start there? I was safe to say
we can start with the whole thing is total crap. Yeah, So let's
let's provide some background here. I need to bribe some background for some personal
background. When I was I love dogs, and I love them right they
love me. I always get along with a great any dogs around comes up,
you know, it's just why not. I was born in the Year
of the Dog, the Chinese of the door. My last name is Bassett,
so there's nothing really strange about that. However, when I was young,
I got bitten about six times, and what was unique about that was
I was bitten in the same place every time, and it was my right
hip. I guess that's what I just naturally went to right. The most
notable time I got bit, we were visiting some people I didn't know.
My parents were in the going in the front door. They're talking to them
inside the living room, and I'm just kind of cruising outside and I'm walking
around to the back and then I see that there's a dog in the back
there and tied up to the house. And I got a leash on it,
I mean, our chain where I'm gonna call it. And so I'm
just going, Hi, how you doing, you know? And all of
a sudden, this thing starts taking off at He's coming right at me,
but I'm not concerned because Scot's got a chain on him, until I began
to realize that chain was probably sixty eighty hundred feet. And so it's at
that point I said, and I turn and just at the time you know,
I almost got away, bites me in the side, right, and
a chain yanks them back. That was fun. I had to go back
to the house and walk in and my mother's gone, ah, and everybody's
going, ah, there's gonna be a lawsuit. Whatever the hell? All
right, So why am I telling you the story? Well, the only
thing to save me from being eaten alive. Was the dog had at least
a chain on them, even though the damn thing was one hundred feet long.
Right, the last twenty six years, I've had a chain on me.
It keeps me within a certain perimeter of the house. So, because
you know, you can be an activist and there's a broad range of things
you can say and do, but there needs to be appropriate limits depending upon
what you're trying to accomplish, and if you go outside those limits, there's
usually problems. Absolutely, when I was a teenager, when I was in
college, the anti war movement was was rocking. I was in college.
I really didn't get to participated as much until later. But as the movement
evolved, he got pretty intense. People kept pushing the envelope. Finally they
started blowing things up like ro rotc buildings and things and what have you.
That was too much. Okay, So there are limits and I pretty much
understood that, and nobody's accused me of being timid over the last four century.
But again, I'm trying to stay within the perimeter. The leash has
been taken off as of March the eighth, and I'm a leash, I'm
I'm prepared to bite everybody in the ass I can get a hold of right
that deserves to be bit in the ass. And I don't care whether they
like. And I don't care if anybody thinks it's inappropriate. I don't care.
Now that that's not that's metaphorical violence. I don't believe. I'm a
non violent person and I believe in non violent activism. And so I'm not
actually going to bite anybody in the air. Oh we know that. Yeah,
I just let you know this, right, Okay, So with that
in mind, and I'm going to enjoy this. I can tell you the
next months and whatever, I'm going to enjoy this. I can't I personally
can't wait for an unleashed Stephen Bass because I think what you're saying is absolutely
true. Let's let's I mean, it happens to me too. You don't
want to cross certain lines because you want to keep your access, you want
to keep this, you want to keep that. But it seems like you're
at the point where you're like, you know what, enough is enough?
No hold barred anymore. Again, there's still limits. I'm not blowing anything
up. But okay, now let me give you some more background. I
think was relevant. I was born in nineteen forty six. It was conceived
in February of nineteen forty six, which is an incredibly long time ago.
And as I've said in some earlier interviews, I was a nuclear child,
the classic case of a nuclear child, in the sense that my father was
in the Pacific. He was at gaudal Canal, he was on a hospital
ship most of the time. He wasn't in battle whatever, he was still
traumatized. I can assure you never talked about it. And so eventually the
warrant came to an end, and we know how it came to an end.
And when it did, they had to muster all these hundreds of thousands
of troops out, and a lot of them went through Australia. It took
a while. It wasn't like they all just jumped on a plane went home.
No, no, no, no. He didn't get back to the
US for a couple of months. And he got back. He came in
by a Mayor Island, and as soon as he was at Mare Island,
which is north of San Francisco, he was assigned to Bethesta, to the
naval hospital. There. He made his way across country early nineteen forty six.
He'd been in the Pacific for several years, not a lot of dating
opportunities, and so since he got to the hospital, he had it run
down to some lounges there in downtown Bethesta where my very attractive mother was hanging
out, met her, and wasted no time in doing whatever you do when
you made a beautiful woman. After two years or I was conceived, they
were married, the order of which is not necessarily important. Boom, and
that's it. Nine months later I'm born. So essentially there was a direct
line back from my conception literally to the dropping of the bombs on Japan.
I'm a nuclear child. Not everybody can say that. I'm also a baby
boomer, a quintessential baby boomer. I'm not as close to that as you
can get, right, us that were born of the guys coming home home
and having babies like crazy, which helped drive you me. Okay, right,
So where am I going with this? Here's where I'm going. Here's
some history, folks. I'm going to remind you some things. Now.
Part of the reason that I'm very mad and I'm going to be biting people
metaphor, the reason that bombs were dropped on human beings in Japan in August
of nineteen forty five. Is because a number of people around President Truman convinced
him that the proper course of action was to drop these bombs on a city,
right and ultimately basically two cities. There was recommendations to drop them on
just military facilities. There was recommendations to drop them on offshore or in the
Tokyo Bay. Make it clear, this is what we got right, you
need to surrender. But ultimately they convinced him, now you could get adopt
them on two cities to make a real powerful point. But what is lesser
known is that convincing Truman to do this involved lying to him. Key people
around him lied to him and gave him a false understanding of our ability to
quickly make additional nuclear bombs, or whether we even had a couple in production,
and convinced him that we had to make an e spectacular impression because there
weren't anymore and there couldn't be anymore for a while, and that wouldn't end
the war. They lied to him to help him convince incinerating two hundred thirty
some thousand Japanese, the vast majority of which were women and children. That
was nineteen forty five. I didn't know that, didn't know that till many,
many years later. And then we march forward in history, right,
And what we have seen in that seventy five years since Nagasaki and Hiroshima is
nations all around the world lying, lying, lying in order to invade here,
invade there, blow this up, bomb that whatever, and millions of
people have been killed. And it is difficult to find a circumstance where any
of these millions of people, and by the way, predominantly civilians. Understand,
more civilians are killed in wars and battles than this kind of crapt than
actual combatants. Always it's difficult to find in the circumstance where they were killed
and lies were not involved, lies from other countries. Fine, I don't
need to go there. I'm talking about my country, the one that I
was born into, the citizens which I have, and just to name a
few, I won't get into. The Korean War very complicated. But as
you move past that toward the sixties, things got a little wobbly, primarily
because the nuclear threat. The nuclear threat and the potential of the nuclear annihilation
was a pretty big deal, and the arms race was a pretty big deal.
And we had managed to create a situation where the Soviets were our absolute
mortal enemy and we were their mortal enemy. Pretty much standard stuff, right,
go back five thousand years, ten thousand years, pretty much the same,
okay. And so what happens. A series of lies took place that
helped us launch a war into Southeast Asia that was catastrophic. In other words,
the annihilation of several million people in Southeast Asia, in which we were
a direct part, was based substantially on lies right by our government, by
our Department of Defense, and by our president, who I think is almost
certainly in hell. Okay. Infected my life pretty profoundly, totally changed my
life. I was a Navy kid. It's all happening as I'm in college.
Everything I thought about my country was completely shattered. I don't know what
the hell to think anymore, didn't know what to do. All things are
going crazy, all the protests were developing, and I'm just a physics major
trying to figure out what to do with my life and that. And so
we move forward in time, right, and we have nuclear standoffs, and
we nearly had a nuclear event in nineteen sixty two with the Cuban missile crisis.
Cuban Missile crisis, A lot of people don't know there were a lot
of lies involved in that missile crisis. I mean, it was nothing but
lies. Well again, I don't want to say something that strong. It's
not that there's more than there's truth and there's lies. The point is,
when it comes to death, destruction and nuclear weapons, you want as few
lies as possible. One of the biggest lies of all leading up to that
was the fact that the DoD was lying to the President of the United States
about the capabilities of Russian nuclear Russian nuclear capabilities. Not only did they led
to to Eisenhower about it, they lied to Kennedy about it. Kennedy,
I mean absolutely. I mean, so we almost had clear war that would
be bad, and so we move on. I don't want to hit all
the high notes, but there's one more, one more, butte all right.
Oh, by the way, one of the reasons that the Vietnam more
extended much longer than it did is that the Nickson administration or the Nixon people
lied about quite a few things in the process of getting himself elected. Oh
yeah, him being elected and the war continued on, and that's one of
the reasons that Nixon is in hell right now, Okay. And then we
move and by the way, McNamara absolutely in hell. Quite a few people
went the hell on that one. And then we move forward. And of
course, now my sense of Jesus, what does it mean to be a
a norn American for truth and justice for all? What does it mean?
What does moral authority mean in America? Because it looks like it's full of
holes and not much that much better than all the other individuals and countries that
we point out and scream evil evil, Okay. So I mean, I'm
struggling with this. It's not helping me. It's not helping me feel comfortable.
I you move forward, and then nine eleven happens nine one one rather
not eleven, okay, and I'm going this is not going to go well.
And the lie after that was a big one. It was massive.
George Bush, George Bush lied to US, Rumsfeld lied to US about weapons
of mass destruction in Iraq and use that as the basis the launch a full
scale invasion of the Middle East that ended up involving six countries and killing untold
hundred, well eventually max of people. That's why he's going to help Rumsfeld's
already in hell and a few others. Lies, destruction, slaughter that has
been going on in our country since the time I was born, and the
American people have not seen fit to use their political power, the power of
the vote, to stop this. Now, it doesn't help that all of
that line coming out of the military intelligence world kind of incentivized a lot of
other people, like the Congress, to look, hey, that lying is
working really well, and they got away with it. Let's let's see what
we can do. Let's see how much how many lies we can we can
do. And while all that was going on, there was another lie,
the big lie, the ultimate lie. It was literally riding along with all
of those serial lines, the serial lying, and like a sidecar in a
motorcycle. It was a lie about the extraterrestrial presence. Now, this is
not a lie that directly resulted in hundreds of thousands of women in chural of
children being slaughtered, though connected to how the new the arms race wanted gone.
You could make it aout yeah, but it was a big lie that
ultimately was going to affect the world in capitalist ways, and this was an
ambitious one. You know, lying about weapons, lying about some pet boat
incursion and the golf of concent that's easy. But lying about the present the
reality of an extraterrestrial president when their craft are literally falling, flying all over
the place and being seen around the world year after year after year that increasingly,
and not only are they being seen, but they're interacting with our most
secure facilities. They're they're taking people and examining them and creating hybrid childs and
all kinds. I mean, it's just the massive amounts going on in which
the government knew about from the beginning right later. As we sit here right
now and speak, Steve like That's the thing that kind of haunts me a
little bit is as we sit here and speak right now, some agendas being
carried out. There's always an agenda being carried out, Tyler. The question
is whether the agenda is going to do any good or whether it's going to
be just more Uh. That's awful, Okay. And so through all of
that, you've got this big lie in which the entire world, but certainly
American people, are told, don't believe you're right, lying eyes the naked
is that the emperor emperors, not Eggy has got a wonderful set of clothes.
Just keep telling yourself that over and over again, year after year after
year, for seventy plus years. And that lie was incredibly challenging to pull
off, and they had to use every trick in the book short of rounding
people up and killing them, or or killing opposition leaders, or slaughtering any
activist that turned up. No, I couldn't do that. I mean,
that would be a public relations issue. So essentially, just we're going to
just use all our magic. And they pulled it off. And the people
in this country, particularly the politicians and others, I'm sure, watch this
in amazement and said to themselves, if the Defense Department, if our military
intelligence complex, with obviously some cooperation with politicians and maybe even the White House,
but certainly the military, to us as complex, whatever skills they possess,
is able to pull that off. We can lie about anything, and
we will. And the consequence of the systemic institutional mendacity that this type accumulating
decade after decade resulted in the collapse of fundamental trust in our government by the
American people, leading to complete institutional malfunction, chaos, and the situation we're
in today, which is so bad it's comic. So how would you say
grotesque that it's it's it's not you can't even call it evil. It's like
it's a it's a it's a common it's a dark, dark comedy. And
technically it couldn't should never have happened, but it did. Nobody believes anything
from anybody about anything, and nothing good is going to come from that,
Okay, So that is just preparatory to where I'm going next. Now,
through decades of effort by thousands of people who said and committed to themselves in
one way or another, going all the way back to Keio McDonald, Heinek
and so many many other well and on and for but going back that far,
Uh, what they what they committed themselves to was this, you've got
your game, and we're going to have our game. You have the money,
you have the power, you have a lot going for you. We
maybe have the numbers, but we're going to deal with this big lie and
ultimately, however long it takes, we're going to end it. And the
world and American people are going to get the truth. And I don't think
any of them could have known how long. Some were probably more or less
optimistic than others. But I think there were points over the seventy five years
when some pretty sharp people are thinking, I think we're going to do this.
I don't think they could have thought that seventy seven years after Roswell,
the government was still playing this game and getting away with it. I don't
think so anyway. Most of them are dead. But because of all this
effort, is massive effort to write thousands of books, study hundreds of thousands,
if not millions of reports, analysis papers, documentaries, untold thousands of
interviews. We put enough pressure push this thing far enough that ultimately there was
a break in the embargo, a break in the dam as it were not
a huge break, but things opened up a little bit. And then in
twenty seventeen some people came forward and that ultimately initiated what amounts to I feel
and felt that is the end of the truth embargo. I didn't know if
it would take two years, five years, or seven years, but I
felt it was inevitable and getting more inevitable with each passing year. And it
has been it's been seven years since that event. Of twenty seventeen, in
October and December, and we've made study progress. We could have made more
progress. But around the world a lot of awful things are happening. Terrible,
terrible things are happening, with hundreds of thousands of people dying. And
guess what, in every case, if you look at it close enough,
there's lies everywhere everywhere. Okay, and so the line continues, But the
slaughter is overseas right now, not too much here. It's always overseas.
America has that blessing, and so it's dragged things out. Meanwhile, the
political situation since continue to collapse again due to what systemic line, and so
it stragged it out a little bit. And yet progress was being made,
extraordinary progress, and that progress culminated as far as I was concerned, on
July the fourteenth, of this of last year, right July the fourteenth.
And why why do I say that? I say it because on July the
fourteenth, the Senate majority leader, a good man and a Democrat, very
political, but still a very good man, very well respected, Chuck Schomer.
As a response to an even more extraordinary event that took place on June
the fifth, when a true whistle blower, an actual whistle blower, not
just a witness who had worked for a tip. A tip worked for the
UAP, of course, had access to information, was given information, confirmed
information, was was harassed, threatened, bothered, He had a family,
He complained. They knew he was complaining. They acknowledged that this was happening.
They did what they could to minimize it, stop it. But you
can't stop that kind of thing, at least not completely. But ultimately they
made the mistake of thinking, well, we're doing what we can, but
there's no way that he's going to step out on this. They were wrong.
He did. He gives an interview to Ross Coulthart, He gives an
interview to the de brief at All Lands on June the fifth, and all
hell breaks loose because he confirmed on that day we have non human tech and
non human bodies and we do, absolutely we do. And so WHOA.
The process that was underway creating, set, setting up ARROW, getting a
report out of the UT, out of NASA, briefing scores and scores of
congress people, legislation, getting witnesses forward, all of this structure being created
so that we could have disclosure and deal with it properly, which is fine.
The government couldn't say why, which created a lot of confusion. Why
are you doing this? Why are you doing that? Don't you already know?
Well they do, but they really couldn't say that. They're just saying,
look, just be patient. We're getting it all set up for the
party. The party's going to start the day after the President confirms. We're
making it possible for that to happen in in a responsible, in orderly way,
and we were. It was moving forward, but Grush came out ahead
of time. If they had dealt with him differently, he might have been
able to stay out of the public continued to do his work, but he
didn't handle him well, and soon he came forward and made history. But
he created a huge problem, a huge problem for the Department of Defense in
general and for the political class, including the President of the Congress. What
do you do? Here's what we did. Schumer decided to step forward to
make even more history. Over thirty nine days, starting shortly after I'm sure
June the fifth, he and Mike Grounds and some others put together the ultimate
compilation of legislation that was needed, well, surpassing easily the three previous chances
of legislation, and the two NBA bills and the COVID Relief Bill put forward
by Rubio Jillibrandon Warner. This was it the total program. In fact,
they called it the UAP Control Disclosure Plan. They called the Act the UAP
Disclosure Act, and they put everything in it that was needed. Everything would
come forward, every classified item, file, technology, whatever, it was
all going to come forward, provided to the public and archived. Not on
day one, but starting after the Act shortly it would all begin, but
some things would come out sooner. There was an emphasis on anything over twenty
five years. There was Anything that wasn't triggered less than twenty five years ago
would be kind of a foremost. But everything still had to be reviewed and
could be postponed. But clearly a lot would be brought forward and archived and
the public would start learning the truth of this. And it might take two
three four years. They probably thought more than that, but I doubt that
would work out. I think would be two three four years. Eventually we'd
know it all and that was all there, and he put the powers in
that act, he and Rounds to make sure it could happen regardless of whether
there were people inside the United States government and or the military intelligence complex and
or the defense contractors that were basically saying, you're not getting any of this.
You're idiots and fools. We are part of the secret empire and nobody
tells us what to do. The powers were there a UAP review Board appointed
by the President, the highest level classification given to that review board, as
well as certain members of key committees in Congress. Subpoena power given to those
members of Congress as well as the review board, to subpoena the presence of
anybody, no matter how deep underground they operate, no matter how many classifications
they have, how much special access they have, not for criminal reasons,
but rather we want to talk to you. Oh go to hell. Now
you're going to come here, or we're going to go to that underground facility
and we're going to give you an armpit taxi in the court and put you
in jabal. That's power. Okay, that was in the build. And
then he threw in the best results. He added something deliberately that he knew
was going to really shape the treaties. He said, the bill will contain
them in the domain and in the domain the government has if it wishes to
exercise it on specifically et technology. Hekey bodies the ones that Grush was referring
to, and in that instance he confirms Grush was telling the truth. Two,
he confirms that the military intelligence contractors have that tech as well as some
civilians. Right. Three, he basically sends a message to the entire world
because that legislation he was referring to went up on the Senate website July twenty
seven, so anybody in the world could read it. You know, the
Chinese Communist Party putin right, people working under the ground, and you know
on the Western States, anybody who could get to a computer, who could
read it and go, WHOA, looks like the Senate and Senator Schumer serious
about this? WHOA okay? Message set July fourteenth, Only twelve days later
truck Brush. Because the House was starting to get involved, led by Tim
burchet as well as Aunt Polina Luna, Nancy Mason, some others, they
decided we want to end this too, and they were speaking out, particularly
Burchette, saying there's the tea's here, and so they put together a hearing
that Grush was happy to participate in. And that was on July twenty sixth,
and so Grush goes in and tells them under oath everything he told Ross
Colthark dead non human tech, non human bodies. And at one point May
said to him, you told us that, but you happen to know where
they're located, and he said, and I think I don't think he was
supposed to say that. He said, oh, yeah, I know where
the where these crash vehicles are located. And she said, well, can
you tell us? And he said, well, I can only talk about
that in public. I cannot public publicly talk about that. Of course he
wasn't. He was supposed to say. He knew that. He should have
instically said I can't, I can't speak about that. But he let the
cat out of the bag, and that is why afterwards they wanted a skiff
immediately, they wanted to get Grush in a skiff so they could ask him
where the tech is located. And the stepped in his head. Nowise for
you, do you mind if I step in here real quick? Do you
think though I have worked against us in a way where by him letting that
slip, Now, all of a sudden, these private contractors like Lockheed.
Now they can start the shell game. You know. Yeah, No,
no shell game. They're gonna be moving tech around or anything else. What
what what happened? Wasn't Grush that created the problem. I mean he created
the problem in the sense that he set the stage for Schumer, but it
was the UAP Disclosure Act of twenty three that really lit the fire. Twenty
four, twenty four, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. So again, just
twelve days after Schumer makes his move, it's completely reinforced when Grushed then gives
everything now under oath, and so now things are really heating up, and
so and I think Schumer expected this for the very first time since this whole
seventy seven year trade started, those in the that managed the truth embargo made
the decision that they had to step out from behind the curtain and push back
in a what would be an open way. That didn't mean that officers of
these defense contractors were going to be doing it, but rather they got in
touch with their lobbyists and other influential intermediaries and basically said, uh, we're
not putting up with this eminent domain. We have plans for that tech.
We intend to make a lot of money. We've done. We've been we've
been quiet, and we've kept the secrets, and we've been loyal, and
we've done all the work you wanted and we've studied it. You've paid us
well, but we expect to make a lot more. And so that eminent
domain's got to go. And they sent those people up to the Hill to
specifically go after individuals who get millions of dollars in funding from the defense contractors
to base and who have power and tell them fix that bill or you ain't
getting any more donations. And not surprisingly, they went specifically particularly after Mike
Turner House UH, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Mike Rogers,
the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and of course the UH,
the UH UH Senate majority lead, a House majority leader, Mike Mike Johnson,
because he had the ability to prevent the bill from even coming to the
floor. I do not know if he gets a lot of defense contractor donations.
I haven't looked it up. I'll check it out. Yeah, I
know, I know all those two absolutely. And then of course Mitch McConnell,
and they responded, and they put pressure on the people in the conference
that were settling the final language and ultimately did it. And they not only
stripped the eminent domain out, they stripped all the powers. They didn't have
the balls to go all the way and just strip the entire bill out because
you know, you know, it all overreach. You know, I mean,
pigs get you know what do they call it as an old phrase anyway,
pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered? All an all phrase from investment
banking days anyway, So those powers were stripped out. Okay, right after
that, Schumer goes into the Senate and reads into the record that he's disappointed,
he's little irritated the Republicans led that, but he's going to continue to
push, meaning you know, we're going to continue to get this. And
of course what that meant and everybody knew was at any time after disclosure,
possibly totally that would be totally appropriate. Schumer and Rounds and the others could
submit that entire bill again as a standalone not part of the NDAA, and
in different circumstances could pass immediately. And so the threat wasn't over all,
right, And like we talked about on your last episode here, what this
ultimately did. He knew that a lot of it wasn't going to pass right
away. But what it did was it showed us who our enemies were.
Well, we already knew who they were, but it really forced them to
take action. Yes, by doing that, right, it raised it to
raise the game more importantly when when the Defense contourors made that move, and
they had no choice as far as they were concerned, But when they did
that, in addition to Grush, in addition to Schumer and anybody else that's
been talking about this, they they confirmed if there's non human tech and non
human bodies, Because if there is no non human tech and non human bodies,
you don't push back against eminent domain for non human tech and non human
bodies. You don't have to be a genius to figure that out. And
so they essentially confirmed the whole thing in order to cut the bill. And
so Schumer probably anticipated that. He knew he couldn't lose. He's gonna get
a victory either way. And that's where things stood. Now. I'm gonna
go take a ten minute interview in the UK. Yeah, come back after
that, I'll log back in on the stream yard and then I'm gonna tell
you what's gonna happen. Next. Okay, okay, yep, So for
everyone who yep, So everyone who is watching, We're gonna take a quick
five or six minute break if anyone has anything that they want to talk about.
I mean, I'm more than happy. I did want to watch,
uh, some of the The Good Trouble Show and comment on you know what,
Yeah, let's do that. Well, we can watch the Gary Nolan
part of The Good Trouble Show and wait for Steve to come back, because
he's gonna do a five minute interview, five six minute interview with the UK
News, so we'll let him do that. But let me just look up,
look, get this pulled up and we will be right back right after
this. What all the many I occasionally think how quickly our difference is worldwide
would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this work. And
yet I ask you, it's not an alien force already among us. We
must guard against the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether sought or unsolved by the
military industrial contact. The potential or the disastrous rise or misplaced power exists and
will persist. Now I am becoming death or world. My association with Project
Group, they definitely with held information I look on them going against you shall
be twere or from the testimony, or about to give us the truth,
the whole truth, and nothing the truth. So help you goud. Do
you believe that our government is in possession and the agents absolutely? And don't
forget that. Today's episode is brought to you specifically by Biomind, a product
supplied by Edenthia Irbels. I've been taking it for the last month or two
and it has completely changed my life from neuron health and neuron growth. Has
just been changing my daily life like you wouldn't believe. Not only am I
drinking less coffee, but I have a clarity like I've never had in my
life. This is the today's sponsor. So all that the link. You
can get twenty five percent off by using our code in the description below.
All that stuff is there. So let's take a look at the Good Trouble
Show and what Gary Nolan had to say about the report as we wait for
Stephen Bassett to come back from his interview. That is the same kind of
bullshit that happened in the fifties and sixties with the CIA buying off, buying
off reporters in order for them to publish Cia talk sperits. It's wrong,
it's it's an American all right. Enough of that, so I know it's
a lot to dig into. So let's let's move on to Gary Nolan.
Now, guys, there's a lot to unpack. Let's roll an interview we
shot earlier today with the doctor Gary Nolan and see what he had to think
about this dumpster fire of a report from Shawn Kirkpatrick. Here we go.
Our next guest is the Ratchford and Carlotta, a Harris Professor in the Department
of Pathology at Stanford University School of Medicine and the executive director of the Board
for the Soul Foundation, joining us today to give his personal opinion on the
Arrow historical Report. Please welcome doctor Gary Nolan. Doctor Nolan, how are
you, sir? Great, nice to be here again, and actually this
is this will be your fourth time here. You're you're turning into a total
regular here at the Good Trouble Show, so we're super glad to have you
as always, same, excellent, excellent. Okay, So let's dig into
this thing. And of course, right before this I aired sort of a
deep dive into Arrow doctor Shan Kirkpatrick and their methodology. What is what is
your reaction to part one of this historical report. Here's one thing you need
to do before you buy anything online. Don't spend another dime on Amazon until
you watch this. Well, it makes me weren't really worry about what part
two is going to be. I mean, that's sure it's not going to
be a good sequel. That disappoints me obviously, because it's a masterclass in
unscientific bias. You know, the language they use, the conclusions they draw,
it's, you know, obvious that they decided what they wanted to say
before they looked at a lot of the evidence. And that's just not how
science is done. I mean, compare this report to the French COMITA report
from nineteen ninety nine. Now, I mean, that's how you do a
study high ranking official scientif details. I mean, that's a model's academic and
scientific integrity. But this twenty four report doesn't even reference that. I mean,
and that's the case. And to the conclusion is that many of these
cases can be explained as nothing other than non human intelligence. Right, they'd
already thrown out all the cases that had obvious telltale style signs of natural phenomena
or mistakes. So I mean that that bothers me because this twenty twenty four
report feels like a high school hackathon project, right, not a serious scientific
inquiry, and it's really a disservice to the public and to the scientific community
in general, you know. I mean, and here's one of the things.
My sources inside of Aaron tell me that there was a lot of pressure
to rush this report out with preconceived conclusions. I believe that, and that
folks on the inside were unhappy with the narrative being pushed, and the DNI
was also unpleased at this point posted coming out because they won't even get the
chance to vet this in the way that they thought it should have been.
So, you know, when you've got a report that's pushing an agenda that
other than following the evidence, they basically push what it is. They're objective
as you've got where they try to hide, you know, I mean,
this is they don't even compare to the twenty twenty three and twenty twenty two
reports, which were of course reports of things that are different than this is
a historical context, but they don't even give any of the numbers of what
it is that they were covering over the last forty years. Right, So
there's lack of detailed data, no geographic breakdown, no info on shapes and
sizes of the kinds of things. They didn't define the criteria by which they
were going to be coming to their conclusion. So, you know, if
we want to get to the bottom of this, we need transparency, objectivity,
and a willingness to follow the data where it leads. And the twenty
twenty four report fails on every account. Now, when you say sort of
disappoint on the inside, do you mean within Arrow from people within Arrow?
Yeah, I mean I mean that place is not a locked vault, right
right, So, of course, and you know, and you just spoke
about data, you know, so it seems like they're making claims, you
know, without any data, which, of course is what they what Kirkpatrick
and the others, you know, always sort of accuse us of, is
is saying all this stuff without data? Well, where is their data?
And are they going to present the raw data? That's what I want to
know. Yeah, why maybe, why aren't they? It's the oldest trick
in the book. Do as I say, you know, as they do?
Arrow is deeply guilty of the very thing that they're accusing others of,
in fact of what most of the so called debunkers do. And it's a
problem more so because what they're doing is obviously deliberate, right, I mean,
I think there's a lot of people who come forward with whatever they're in
though it might be or their results or their data, but they do so
in the spirit of objectivity. But in this case, what they're doing is
is deliberate. You know, they wanted to take their word for it,
no questions asked. That's not science. That's not how science is done.
Science demands evidence. If they are so sure of their conclusions, why hide
the data, right? I mean, I would like to demand right now
here and now that they release the data on which their conclusions are made.
Don't expect anybody to take your conclusions, trust me, bro, without giving
us the data. Right. So it's just a it's just the wrong way
to go about it. And it's it's problematic because you know, at the
beginning, when they set themselves up, doctor Kirkpatrick literally said, we're going
to do this by the by the numbers, by the book, by the
science. We're going to do it the right way. Okay, well if
you said that, why did you do it this way? I mean,
it's not transparency, it's smoke and mirrors. And you know, for instance,
for me as a scientist in cancer research, you know, making assumptions
and claims without evidence is like claiming I've cured cancer without showing the data,
right, or claiming I cured cancer in mice and then trying to extrapolate that
information to humans. You can't. In science. You have to show your
work, all of it, not just the bits and pieces that support your
claims. So until they release the raw data, their conclusions are simply put
unsupportable. And what bothers me is not so much what they're willing to put
out. What bothers me are the nineteen fifty style stenographers like Julian Barnes of
the New York Times. Yeah, who you know who seem willing to just
write what it is that they say without any uh, without any consideration of
whether or not what they're saying is wrong. It's like, I mean,
I'll go further on the nineteen fifties stenographer. I mean, it's like the
dud should be asking him or saying, hey, doll, why don't you
go get me a cup of coffee. You know, it's the same kind
of dismissive attitude and treating the mainstream media and the New York Times of all
places, as if they are some sort of errand girl. I mean,
come on, you know, and I'm going to call out. You know.
I've had a conversation with Shane Harris at one point, you know,
months ago, where he said, well, you know, look, these
are all nice stories, and I want to believe the stories, but they're
not supporting it with evidence. Well, Shane, you just reported on something
and you didn't ask them for what their evidence is, So why do the
standard? Yeah, no, it's this whole trust me broth thing that Kirkpatrick
was. Yeah, the hypocrisy is insane. And the other thing too,
you know, speaking about the the media, the fact that, for instance,
News Nation was completely frozen out of that whole sort of pre dropping of
all this information. Chris Sharp and Mark von Renning Camp journalists that actually have
been tracking this story. They're educated in the subject and would ask hard questions.
They were left out of that process, completely frozen out, which just
blows me away. Well, I mean it's just unfortunate. I mean,
it's interesting if they actually want to even convince the people who have let's say,
a different expectation than what they put out. If they had brought in
those kinds of individuals, and they had done it in a fair way,
in a right way, they could still put out their report, and the
New York Times and the Washington Posts could still run with their stories the way
that they did, but at least they wouldn't give everybody else the reason to
be up in arms about it with righteous indignation, right And you know,
so they just they just open themselves up to you know, this kind of
problem, you know. And further, I mean, look at it this
way. If you don't think that the Chinese and the Russians are watching this,
then you're making a mistake. Right. So the Chinese have already basically
said that they have a program to at least investigate this. So, you
know, we're living in a pretty unstable world right now. If the Chinese
wanted to really embarrass the United States, all they would need to do is
come out and say something far more positive about this than what the DD has
said, and they could make the d D look like a bunch of fools.
They could put make our government look like fools. So to the extent
that this is a problem worldwide, or the extent that we're dealing with this
is if it were an issue of international relations, the DoD is by its
very actions and arrow, perhaps more specifically, and perhaps this is why D
and I is upset with them, are putting the nation at risk. Hi,
I'm content. Just last year, my mother, sister, and grandmother
had absolutely that's on their shoulders, It's on their head. It totally is.
And at the end of the day, it completely boils down to that
when they are putting something out that and my opinion, is misleading the public,
is an attempt to mislead members of Congress and their staffers that in and
of itself jeopardizes national security. Now, going back to the Preskin, one
of the things that and I'm sure Julian Barnes overlooked it as well, is
in this report they state that thirty two percent, exactly thirty two percent of
the cases studied that they cannot explain. That is literally five times the amount
of cases categorized as unexplained in Project blue Book thirty two percent. Why are
why is the press completely ignoring this? You know, I don't know.
I mean it's a it's a case of you know, not looking at the
evidence and trying to decide ahead of time what it is that you want to
focus on to, you know, to It's like the word the bird with
the broken wing effect, right, the mother bird that pretends that its wing
is broken to draw the predator away from the nest. I mean that's really
what this is an example of, you know that I've said this many times.
Science is advanced by paying attention to the things that don't fit the you
know, don't fit on the line. It's the data off the curve where
the discoveries are made. And so thirty two percent is a huge number.
I mean, and this is kind of strange because even Kirkpatrick pointed out previously,
and Arrow pointed out previously about these metal spheres that are seen moving in
inexplicable ways. I mean, if that's not evidence, what is? And
that kind of comes around to the really the question of what's the threshold for
what evidence is? And when are you going to define what it is that
meets the threshold for something that is not explicable by current standards. You can't
hold everything in limbo forever, until you wait until the data meets what your
expectations should be. Right, So you know, look in science, you
lay out your criteria up front. You don't move the goal posts later.
By not putting their standards in writing, they can, they allows them to
dismiss any evidence that they want anytime they want, right, and it's playing
a game where only one side defines the rules as they go. It's called
cheating. You know, that's very much the definition of cheating. And so
if they're serious about this investigation, they need to define at what point something
is doing has movements, or or is moving in ways that are incapable of
being explained. You can't say I just want more data until the data fits
what your narrative might be, or hope that people forget about what the case
is. The bottom line is, you know, without clear criteria, this
report is more smoke and mirrors than signs. And our own needs to stet
up, step up, put their standards in writing. They need to stop
playing this game with It's not space aliens. It's not et because there's lots
of other hypotheses out there that it might be. Yeah, it's maybe you
can pass a lie detector's test by saying it's not et from Alpha centauri,
but maybe it's something else. And so you need to basically stop playing these
verbal finesse and leisure demand games. Yeah, I think one thing I've pointed
out, for instance, with mcwest, he always says, well, show
me, show me the data, or show me the classified data. Well
he knows he's never going to see the classified data. It's a fool's Errand
I think it's the same thing with, you know, with what these guys
are doing. If they do not lay out what the threshold is, they
can continue to move the goalpost and obviously arrive at the conclusion that they are
trying to put out to the public. It's it's a lot of us had
positive expectations about ARROW, that we were going to be bringing true scientists on
board, uh, that they were putting a physicist like uh Kirkpatrick, uh,
you know, to be to lead it. We were going to have
serious scientists to mean, not not that debunkers like you know, the person
you just mentioned, he's not serious and so we just you know, it's
just that the days are done to even consider the that person, you know.
But what they done though by by not coming forward and using the rules
of science that they claim that we're going to do is they've basically given everybody
the opportunity to point out that in fact, they're they're they're they're worse than
the debunkers because the debunkers at least believe in what they're doing. These people
believe in putting out disinformation and lying right, they are purposefully changing the thing,
and in science that's called fraud. In science, that kind of fraud
is what gets you lose has you lose your job. So you know,
the question for me is at what point are they being allowed to lie?
And at what point are they ever going to be called to the map?
And you know, but but again I want to make sure that people understand
I'm not saying that I know what the conclusion is. What I'm saying is
that they are throwing out a potential answer if they've truly considered the data correctly.
That's the sort of stuff that gets you yelled at in my group meeting.
Understandable, Understandable, it's yeah, it's in my view, it's propaganda.
It is it's truly nothing short of that, and it jeopardizes the national
security of the United States, when you have the Pentagon blatantly, in my
view, lying to the American public and misleading Congress. Well, and look
at the look at the problem that they they couldn't even get Harry Reid's home
state right right, yeah, I mean, I mean, who was double
checking it? You could have at least passed it through Chatchyputine and gotten you
know, gotten that part fixed. You know, they literally, I mean,
this is one of the things from the people on the inside, one
of the people who are upset about it. They literally said, we we
referenced site fan like the Lord of the Rings and appreciate video games with wiki
sites. I mean, that'sous. I mean, it's just I don't know
it just well what that tells you. I think the seriousness that they use
to put the thing together and frankly just pross checking what it was that they
were using the source material for sure. And I think one of the interesting
things as well is also you have Kirk Patrick essentially trying to push a conspiracy
theory about a conspiracy theory. In his view, he spun this whole conspiracy
theory and he's on this this sort of I don't know what you want to
call a press tour or whatever. That is essentially saying that former members of
our national security establishment, people with T S s c I clearance, have
duped Congress into this whole thing. So here he is Kirkpatrick, once again,
without evidence, putting forth a conspiracy theory and and putting it into a
government report. It's it leaves you speechless, It truly does. Well.
It seems like a retribution tour. I mean, the man left in with
a cloud of frankly in my opinion, you know, questions about his roles
there and frankly in prior places that he had been. I mean, it's
sort of like this, all right, guys, you've just returned to the
victual studio to start right down on the transition, and this report is now
three months past him even being there. So why does he why does it
still seem to have his stamp on it? That just I just I don't
understand that you would hope that the people who came in after it would have
had some ability to h to right the ship. Yeah. And the thing
that that blows me away too, And we got into this a little bit,
and my deep dive on this whole thing is how he is still advising
Arrow in an unpaid way. It just is insane. So at the end
of the day, doctor Noland, do you think this will derail Congress in
their effort to get to the truth of this? No, I mean,
I mean, this is the problem. It's it's so this report is so
over the top bad that everybody knows what it is that it was meant to
do. And the very fact that they, you know, had a bunch
of pet news agencies come in ahead of time and do this, I mean
everybody everybody knew about that. They didn't want anybody to know that that got
leaked to Russ Colhart, and so you know, the jig is up.
Congress knows what you're up to. Yeah, Congress actually had as the reports,
the ic IG has the reports, and everybody knows that the people who
know things didn't go to Row because they didn't trust them in the first place.
So you know, I mean, yes, they'll have a blip in
the newspapers for the next week or so, and you know, I'll hear
about it from an occasional colleague here or there. But if anything, it
just strengthens everybody's resolved to get to the truth. And again I don't know
what the truth is. I mean, the truth will come through the application
of appropriate science and the logic, et cetera and doing it. And that's
you know, that's what science has learned how to do over the last few
centuries. And so you know, we'll just be patient and continue to do
the work and you know, chin up, move forward. I couldn't agree
more. That's that's really all we can do, and just keep keep the
pressure on. Well doctor, Yeah, all right, everybody, we are
back from break. My camera is not turned back a lot yet, but
nonetheless, Steve, welcome back, Welcome back. Thank you. Okay you
hear me? Okay, I can hear you. Yeah, okay. Good.
First, Uh, I'm pleased that you ran an interview with doctor Gary
Nolan, one of my absolute most favorite people, one of the bravest signs
in the country. Ah. And he's made enormous contributions and it's and is
going to continue to make contributions as we move to the post disclosure world.
Uh. The only thing I would disagree is mourn are moving for the truth.
We already know the truth. The government knows the truth about the extraterstrial
presence. They've known about it for seventy years. The public, or at
least the researchers and activists in the field, we know a pretty good deal
of the truth because we're limited a little bit because the government, of course,
is withholding massive amounts of information. But we already know the truth.
This is all about getting the truth spoken confirmed, all right. Then after
that there's much more to learn. But as long as the government says there's
no there there, then essentially we're limited and moving forward, and that is
going to end. So love Gary, great interview for him, and everybody.
Check out the Soul Foundation. It's a nonprofit. He would like to
raise several million bucks. If you got a few million bucks, and there's
people all over this country that have got millions of bucks stashed in their basements.
God, use it for something decent, right, use it right,
support something profound, and what's more profound, ending the truth embargo and acknowledging
me at presence. Okay, now, but that also leads me. But
that also leads me to say this one thing, and that is that the
Hollywood Disclosure Alliance just got five oh one C three status, so you can
people can now make donations to our founding because I'm a founding member, you're
a board member, founding member, uh and uh creator, So you know,
if if people want to get involved in that as well, if you
have the money, definitely, I think you know, our organization is also
one of those ones that's up there. Yeah, I'll double back on that.
Uh yeah. So I just uh so, I did an interview in
the UK, and I was listening that Nick Pope was being interviewed part to
me, and I'm listening to that Howard Hughes and the Unexplained and Nick.
Nick was making some pretty good points as usual and being fairly strong. But
Nick is not an activist, so he's couching things within a certain parameter.
So, as I talked before, I am an activist and so consequently I
don't really have too many just trained someone to say exactly what I think needs
to be said. And so as I was as I finished up before the
break, I said that, Okay, the report was put together by the
DoD. Right, this is a do D report, not an ARROW report.
Basically, the DoD basically reviewed what Arrow was done, which is not
much at all, right, saying that it reviewed eighty years of stuff.
That's crap, that's total nonsense. Blue Book had I forget how many thousands
of reports in it, and it was going for seventeen years. I didn't
do any of that. It's so blatant insults the intelligence of everybody in this
country, even people that are you know, I don't care who you are.
Your intelligence has just been insulted by your Department of Defense. And we
can't stand for it because they think that they can do that. God knows
what they have in store for us next. And so here is what is
about to happen. Unlike nineteen sixty nine, right when the Condon Report,
which is still a absolute stain on the record of the University of Colorado,
which they'd never apologized for, a complete bogus sham report concocted as a scientific
study, was used as the basis to close down the Blue Book project,
which was causing a lot of problems because Alan Heinech was starting to do a
good job and was starting to realize a lot of this is true and it
was starting to get legitimate, get a little too legitimate. Had to go.
And then NICAP, which was made of five thousand people, many of
which were high level scientists, because this was the way it was back then,
was becoming a problem. So they had to destroy that. So they
destroyed NCAP, closed down Blue Book, put out the Condon Report, disgracing
the University of Colorado and Condon for all time, and said hey, we're
free. Okay. That was nineteen sixty nine, and they continue the Truth
Embargo onward, decade after decade after decade, so confident that they could do
anything, say anything, because they've got secrecy, they've got tons of money.
We're just a bunch of peons out here just trying to make a living,
get along, okay. And then around the late nineteen nineties, around
the same time that Bill Clinton, President Clinton was trying to get UFO files
because Rockefeller lost. Rockefeller wanted him to make an effort to see if,
basically and the Truth Embargo get the files out, and basically the Pentagon told
to go to hell, and his enemies went after him in every conceivable way,
attacked them and his wife and their dog, and their brothers and their
sisters. There's anything to stop them, and they found some things. Ultimately
they neutered him, but the attacks on him were really profound by some really
evil people right who had done far worse than their lives and Clinton could even
dream to do, and they shut it down. So they got away with
that, but it get lingered on and then ultimately we got where we are.
But in the late nineteen nineties, DARPA kind of maybe by mistake or
whatever, just kind of let the Internet loose, and before you know it,
the Mosaic browser turned up, and then the net State browser turned up,
and people started creating websites all around the world and searching search terms and
things, and in the very late nineties it was it was reported repeatedly that
the number two most searched term on the Internet, after sex, was UFOs
And it just went from there, and then come social media Facebook two thousand
and three, Twitter two thousand and six, Instagram, TikTok, until there
were billions of people on the Internet capable of communicating at will with each other
in multiple ways and platforms, and not just just email right text. But
the beauty of the Internet and Google, God bless it is that you can
communicate reversely anybody on this planet, and if you don't speak their language,
it's no problem because Google will be happening to translate it for you. And
we're almost to the point where you're going to be able to talk to anybody
on the planet in real time and you will be literally translated. And so
now you have the neurosphere that tr Dshavan was talking about back in the nineteen
fifties, a neurosphere, a little global brain in which there's so many connections,
so many communications, that it is almost a living brain in which billions
of people can communicate it will that's not nineteen sixty nine. And the uap
UFO topic and the activism recorded attended to it is entrenched in the Internet.
How powerful is the Internet. I'm gonna give a kind of a funny example,
but there's actual truth to it. If Taylor Swift, who I love
a lot, She's wonderful, Okay, I like her. I haven't been
had a chance to listen to her music, but I keep seeing her on
the NFL games. I like this woman. If Taylor Swift were to post
on her Twitter account that this report by the Department Offense is a totalance ullshit,
Okay, oh my all hell would break close? Why Because Taylor Swift
has ninety five million followers on who will literally do anything worship the grounds he
walks on, And there are plenty of other influencers at that level. Any
one of them could step forward, and I got a feeling that some of
them are. And that's just the influencers. The Internet is going to take
this report. It is going to shred. It is going to put it
into a nice ball of shred, and it's going to stuff it up the
rectum of defined Department of Defense that we spend approximately one trillion dollars a year
funding, and it's going to result ultimately in the resignation of a number of
people associated with that Department of Defense. And I'm very sorry to say that
it needs to start with Lloyd Austin, who I think is a fine man.
But to be the one that allows that report to go out, that's
it. That's career ending. I mean, is it is a travesty.
It's it transcends the lies about a rock and Vietnam and everything else that killed
millions of people. But given the history of this and the issue involved in
what's at stake and everything else, to put that report out is absolutely you
resign Gal should probably resign anybody else attached to it in the authorizing what should
resign. It's unacceptable, it's fraudulent. When they get away with this kind
of crap, it just makes it easier to lie about the next worst stuff.
We make them believe anything. They don't believe anything. We can say
anything. So let's talk about I don't know, some some country has got
laser weapons or something, and let's go blow it up. And so we
go, Oh, of course, And if you're saying that that's true,
you know, the moon is infected with the virus. We need to destroy
the moon. So let's start sending you know, and I mat our weapons
up there people. Oh well, of course, if you're saying it,
it must be true. It is a license for them to literally continue to
lie us to Gomorrah, to destroy our civilization. They have light about nukes,
they have light about war, they have light about any matter research.
They led about biochemical research. They lie about everything, and we pay the
consequences. The vast number of casualties from the wars of the twentieth century were
civilians, not combatants. All right, And I think we've had enough of
this. And the disclosure event and the confirmation of an et presence offers the
promise of moving past that in a post disclosure world, and they're even denying
that. They're saying no, no, no, there can be no post
disclosure world. In a change of worldview. You can't have a wider perspective,
because we want you kissing our ass and going to war every damn time
we tell you to do it, and doing anything else want you to do.
And I ain't going there. And I'm telling people right now, this
is just the beginning. I've been at this for twenty eight years. I
have been reasonable, I have been thoughtful, I have been careful. No
longer. Now. I'm not going to go down to the Pentagon parking lot
and send my set myself on fire. Somebody recently did that, troubled man
trying to make a point. I'm not gonna vary, because once you do
that, you can't do anything else. But I'm inviting everybody out there that
is mad as hell and not gonna take it anymore to start using the Internet
to reiin hell down upon the Department of Defense. Don't rain hell on the
Congress, not yet, go to the Congress and go to New Paradigm Institute
dot org. And they've got a platform there where every person can immediately easily
contact their senator and two members. They're congress person and two senators, and
just let to know you're not going to put up with that crap. And
they are the Congress, okay. And and the Pentagon works for the White
House, and you have oversight over the Pentagon in certain ways, and you
need to exercise that and bring the Pentagon to heal as if it was a
rabid dog. And if it doesn't come to heal, start removing people,
remove every single point D in the Pentagon if you have to, and replace
them with somebody that's gonna lie through their ass. But be nice about it.
In other words, because this is not coming from the Congress. You've
got Burchett and Luna and Mason Gates at others that are just pushing the issue
out of the House saying there's ets here. You've got the entire Intel Committee
behind getting the legislation and moving toward hearings. And Gerchett is a good job,
Burchette is coming back on the show. Good, give him my regards
well in the next month. So he owes me a lunch by the way,
maybe maybe you can pop in for that. So so in other words,
be nice with the Congress, but make it clear that, hey,
in the face of this unbelievable hack to brazenness, you need to step in
kick a little do o d ass. Okay, but as far as the
d O d is concerned, Holy hell, okay. I love the beginning
of the movie Gladiator, Oh so good. One of the greatest opening of
any movies in history. All this battle, showing you at everything and all
the noise in the sound and so forth. And then it cuts to you
know, Maximus, and he's standing there and he's giving some instructions to his
key lieutenant, and he says to him, on my mark, unleash.
Hell. Well, I'm not Maximus Meridius, you know, general of the
Legion Armies, but about it's time to on leash. Hell, That's what
I'm talking about. It all right, My screen is over, Rubbie.
I'm willing to take some questions without getting hyperbolic. You have a little conversation
with you, tolerant. I don't mean to be dominant, but this,
you know, I'm sorry you caught no. I I love when you're dominant
like that. That. You know how many clips that we just got from
that, I don't know a lot, a lot, So ask me some
questions that you think your listeners would like to hear. Answers, Well,
let me turn on let me turn on the the other camera real quick.
So while you were gone, I I switched Yeah, I switched over.
You go all right, very good, there you are. You got your
nice fireplace going must be nice and warm. It's it's just an illusion.
It's not actually I have a he are going over here. There's a lot
of illusion going on right now. Yeah, lots lots of illusion going on.
Yeah. Absolutely, But all right, so listen, we got sons
to talk about. Listener listener question. I did a four hours Twitter space
three weeks ago. I did a six hour Twitter space. Let me tell
you, I'm the king of Q and a baby. I love it and
I really do. What you've been doing is amazing. In the report,
in the Arrow Historical Report, not only did they cite a wiki fandom,
but they also cited other places that when you click click the like the links
that they're non existent. And uh, what do you say to this report
seems to be like a dog ate my homework kin kind of deal, like
they just threw it together last minute, And how can doctor Sean Kirkpatrick go
on a media blitz saying that there is this trust me Bro attitude when he
just submitted a thirty one to thirty three page report of trust me Bro results.
There's no data, there's no data. Remember, this isn't Sean Thedod
did this report about what Errow was done. All right, now, I
have not read everything, but if this thing is being presented, it's just
Sean Kirkpatrick put this together. That's not going to be good for him.
I don't think that's the case. But if it is, then they've set
him up for when the whole thing blows up. They'll say, oh,
he made the whole thing up, in which case God knows he's gonna have
to move. Well. He boasted about it on one of his interviews that
one of his last things was this report, this support, compiling the support.
And then Gary Nolan in that interview says that there was a lot of
you know, with his insiders and Arrow, that there was a lot of
conflict inside Arrow about the narrative that they were basically pushing out. So is
this a Project Blue Book scenario where Kirkpatrick is dead set on squashing the topic
as a whole. Kirkpatrick, please, folks, Sean Kirkpatrick is a tiny,
tiny, tiny part of this. He's a patsy. He was put
in charge of Arrow, probably just to hold the fort while they got their
act together so they could BONDI get the disclosure once the airing the Intel Committee
took place, and then he would be the director of a post disclosure Arrow,
which would have plenty to do and plenty of money. Would be great,
okay, And maybe he knew that, maybe he did, but it
was a Potemkin village. They weren't getting any money. That's what Jilibrand was
irritated about. And maybe Senator of Jillibrand didn't understand they really didn't need much
money because it was being set up for what was coming next. But maybe
he actually thought that it was his mandate to do something. But he is
practically irrelevant. The only reason that he has become an issue is because when
Grush came forward with the truth, Kirkpatrick was sitting there in a potent can
village unable to really deal with it. His position was hopeless, and his
decision was I will fight back and keep the hordes away by attacking Grush,
which may be set a precedent for others. This report is by the Department
of Defense. It is not Sean Kirkpatrick's homework that got eaten by a dog.
It is a ridiculous report and it's absurd and it's trashy. But I'm
telling you it was put out on the Department of Defense website. You had,
you had supported by Ready, and so as far as I'm concerned,
it is a d O D report. And if they try to put this
over on Kirkpatrick meaning oh, we had no idea that God was a psychopathical
liar and the whole thing was focus and we feel so bad, I'm gonna
come back at them, and I'll defend Sean Kirkpatrick, all right, because
they will. They will eat their own Believe me, they wouldn't hesitate to
do it. Sean Kirkpatrick is not the villain here. The villain here is
the Department of Defense and those within it that are determined that the truth embargo
must never end, and the defense contractors are determined that we would like it
to end, and when it does end, we're gonna make billions and billions
of dollars. Right, those people are the problem, not Sean Kirkpatrick.
All right, so get off of him, right. So Kirkpatrick could literally
be a modern day Heinech. He's just he's just the patsy, you know,
the guy that they needed to bring in to make it look more scientific
and to give yeah, a good career. He had. But he wasn't.
He wasn't a They weren't going to bring Richard Dolan a run at Brow.
He's not going to be Alan Heinick was a brilliant scientist that eventually,
simply by understanding and seeing the truth, decided he turned against the bogus program
that the truth and Barbo was Sean Kirkpatrick is not quite in that level.
Now. Well, I mean he could be. You know if John kerk
Patrick would decide to wait a minute, this is not this is not gone
well and wait a minute, I'm being set up. And he came forward
and provided some of what we'll call probably substant of evidence that this thing is
a bogus report. Uh, it would go a long ways to think improving
his place in history. Uh could he do it? I don't know,
but I certainly advised him. Look, I I had some I had I
had an exchange a couple of nasty email exchanges a long time ago with Mike
Shermer. Is it Mike Shermer Michael Shermer, Yeah, yeah, uh And
because he had said some things that really pissed me off, and so you
know, but you know, he said, he said publicly I threatened him.
I didn't really threaten him. I did say that history might havevicerate him,
but that's kind of not really a threat. But any event that,
ultimately I made nice and I sent him a nice email. And we've only
passed each other once. I've never spoken since then. It's been almost I
don't know how many years. In any event, uh, I eve aventually
sent him a conciliatory email and I said, I said, look, he's
a smart guy when it comes to people like Shermer and others. I just
it's hard for me to believe that anybody that's smart is and I'll figured this
out whatever. I said. Look, you're extremely well known, you're respected.
If you would pull if you would do a heinech, I don't know,
maybe read a few more books or whatever, make it a little more
effort to try to see it from the point of view of the seventy years
of research that's been done by the public and not just listen to the Pentagon
and actually came forward and said, look, I've reversed my thinking on this,
and I believe this presence is real. You would be the j Allen
Heineck of the twenty first century and you would be lauded. It would be
people would be extremely appreciative. You would go down in history. But if
you don't do that when the truth embargo finally ends, if I were you,
I didn't say it this way, but I'll say it now, I'd
move to it another country and change my name and just disappear because your whole
life will be shown to be a lie. And so that's what I said
a long time ago. Same so. But even but Kirkpatrick doesn't even have
the kind of gravitas of Shermer. Shermer's been out there on this issue through
years and years and years, all kinds of publications, even just a guy
brought in to run a program that was supposed to be held in place until
we got the hearings in front of the Intel Committee, which Mark Warner could
hold tomorrow, setting the stage for the President to end the Truthenbargo. That's
it. So he got screwed, he got upset they're using him. But
ultimately we will find out who really wrote this report, because there is no
way in hell that just Kirkpatrick just writes this report with nonsense in it,
like we investigated everything back eighty years submitted that to the top people in the
Department of Defense, and they read it and went, oh, okay,
that makes sense, that makes sense, makes sense. Okay, that's really
good, very very good, very good. It's comprehensive. Sean, thank
you so much. So okay, run that puppy. That way in hell,
everything that came out, and that report came out because the DoD reviewed
it and said, yeah, let's go with this. So Sean, don't
take the fall for these assholes. Don't do it. This is not your
fault. You were just working for the government with a good career, smart
man, doing important things, and you got sucked into this. Don't let
them use you like they tried to use Heinech and so many others right the
way they destroyed McDonald until they killed himself. Don't do that. Step aside,
do something, but stay out of it. You're in a game way
too big. You don't want to play this game. Let the activist and
the vast horde of people on the internet into this issue. We got your
back. We'll take care of this. We've got listen. What do you
think about the Cometta report, the French report? And oh it was not
used in the historical historical account that Arrow provided Tyler Tyler, the lizards of
things that that that that it was not in that report would be would be
longer than the last ten thousand receipts you get from CBS. Haveter you buy
some toothpaste? Okay, I can't it was it was Grant Levac Steve,
What are your thoughts on Arrow's admission lack of reference on page twenty six to
France's Cometta and Australia's investig your investigatory efforts IE nineteen seventy one Joint Intelligence Organization.
It's just a piece of crap that was thrown together. Yeah, just
enough to get to get to get some to be able to it was just
like that. Let the Condon report, right, the kind of report was
crap, Right, it wasn't that long, but they used it. Now
Condon was a Colorado professor and so forth, and so I forgot how long
it was. It was probably better written than this, okay. In other
words, they should have gone back and said, you know, how good
was the conterpart. We've got to be five times better than that. Nah.
I would just put a piece you's head out there. No problem.
People believe anything now. And by the way, if you're following our politics,
it's hard not to think that, you know, there are people that
will in fact believe anything. Now they've lost the ability to trust anything.
And once you can't trust anything, you can't believe anything. Or put it
another way, once you can't trust the institutions, you're looking elsewhere for something
to believe, simply because it's comfortable and whatever. Anyway, it's a mess.
So they got away with it. But oh no, no, no,
no, no, no, eighty you do you know how many thousands
of people have worked to study and understand this issue, and the millions of
documents that have been looked at, and the report sightings that have been done,
and all the documentaries, the vast amount of work. If the DoD
wanted to do a study on this, it would take five years and probably
five hundred million dollars to duplicate what the citizens have done since forty seven,
and so once again, if this wasn't so serious in terms of interrupting the
path to the disclosure, which we were well on our way too, it
would just be one really funny thing. It would be a massive joke,
a dark humor. There's going to be a movie about this. I'm sure
there's already been a few dark humor movies about the truth embargo and kind of
one angled or another. It's always makes fun of them, right, all
these people with their secrets, they don't give a shit. I mean,
they're making great money. They've got houses, they've got nice cars, they've
got underground parking, and so they don't care. But the but here's the
other thing that I forgot to mention, and this is another reason why you're
screwed. It's a simple it's a simple dynamic. You ready, Yeah,
you're working in classified programs, you have you have classified status, you have
important work, you have you know your ear and ear and subsidence of what
it could be in colleges, universities, but also certainly working in important corporations.
But certainly if you're a high level scientist or a highly cloudsified member of
the de IA, or anybody else inside our military intellis is complex. You
don't want anything to do with social media. Oh god, No, they
all know social media. They open accounts, they have Twitter accounts, right
if they do, they don't put them under their name. They might have
they might have somehow access to the you know, they look at it,
but they're going to put themselves out there and and and they're busy. They're
a country to run, and so they're not on social media, and they
don't follow social media. They don't know shit about social media. And that's
pretty much the case for the entire military intelligence complex at the highest levels.
And so that lack of understanding of the power of the net is the ultimate
fatal flaw. They don't get it. They go just a bunch of idiots
and fools looking at tiktak, walking around staring at their phones or whatever,
playing you know, computer games and ship and they're all idiots and fools.
But I wish my kids wouldn't do it. But they can't stop the kids.
But whatever. So ultimately they're going, why do we care what we
do? Why do we care if social media doesn't like it? Let me
tell you something. You should sit down some time. Dart's doing some Google
searches and start counting how many people's career was literally obliterated at a week because
something really awful they did made it on the net and went viral. The
list is growing every day, some of it some of it's righteous, some
of it's not. The point is the internet can destroy you like that,
and so how you use it, what you say, what you do is
extremely important. And if you don't give a shit and do whatever you want
or you're not paying attention, ack, guess what, it's going to take
you down. And that's their fatal flaw. I don't think Lloyd Austin spends
a lot of time on TikTok, you know what I'm saying. I don't
think Lloyd Austin even knows who Taylor Swift is. But she's got ninety five
million followers and she calls for his resignation. He should probably just turn it
in right and leave because he's probably toast. Do you think he gets that?
Not a chance. Now. I don't know a pick on him.
He's a good man. He's having a rough time of late, but the
DoD put that report out and he is the Secretary of defense. And let
me just give you another example when they could get away with stuff. All
right, We're gonna go back before, really before the Internet got started,
just at the beginning of the Internet and the massive trend towards social media and
what I call the global mind that t R. D. Shaden predicted back
in the nineteen fifties. It's in nineteen ninety seven, and the government,
the DoD has had enough of Bill Clinton and John Podesta and Steven Schiff and
Philip Corso and all that crap, just bugging that. I'm nipping at their
heels causing problems raising awareness to the fact that there's there's ets here wherever.
And so a couple of things happened finally, and as and just as the
massive fiftieth anniversary of Roswell was coming, where the Time magazine was predicting there
could be one hundred thousand pe people there. In other words, Roswell was
starting to get a lot of attention. Roswell, right, And that's the
same Roswell the course I was talking about. And Schiff was looking for the
records that they magically made disappear, and they're going, you know, this
is getting out of hand. Let's take care of it. Here's what they
did. First. Sheila Widnall, the first secretary of an Armed Forces,
Secretary of Air Force, brilliant woman, good woman, I'm quite sure,
signed off on something like a twelve million dollar study. Does that sound familiar.
And the whole purpose of this twelve million dollar study was to show that
the whole Roswell event was nothing more than what is called a mogulman, which
apparently Roger Raimie didn't know about. He held up a may have held up
by Rodwood Weather blown. It looked like tinfoil from fish in his freezer.
But whatever, And that report was to noot Roswell by saying it's a mogul
balloon. It was much more sophisticated than that wind Weather balloon and twelve million
bucks. She was a secretary of the Air Force. I believe she's still
alive. I have no animus towards chillin doctor Wignall, but let me be
absolutely clear, she utterly disgraced herself and her career and her country and the
Air Force by signing off on that report. Unless she's a complete idiot,
because again, anybody that has significant access and intelligence by nineteen ninety six'
fivenew damn well was an extraterrestrial present. So that happened. And then ha,
and by the way, I'm gonna be pushing this stuff out big time.
I'm just getting warmed up, right. So what happened then is they
said, Okay, Roswell's come in. We gotta do something, we gotta
do something, And so they called a press conference at the Pentagon. But
they made a mistake which they didn't make this time. Yeah, you're talking
about these the Sanford, the sixty one, the Haines press conference nineteen ninety
seven, and so in this last little thing they did, they only brought
in a select group of journalists that were carefully selected based upon I guess they're
feeling that. Ah, no problem from them. Hi, Julian Bond's how
you doing there? Yeah, you know, how's it going? Yeah?
So I was just gonna say yeah. So and then they bring them in,
and so I guess there are all special people. You're getting this report
and they go out and they write it up. Now, of course it's
spreading around. I cannot log in the articles fast enough. It's already been
sixty seventy Every media in the world is covering this much more than they were
recovering the other things. But believe me, they were covering everything. But
this is formal, this is DoD and so everybody's doing an article on it
and there's no pushback yet. But okay, but they did they made a
mistake in ninety seven. They didn't call in a select group of journalists that
they could count on to not really give them a hard time. They opened
the rum and it filled up journalists and out trots. I believe it was
Colonel Haynes. I believe that was Colonel haynescause came out in front of these
journalists. We have the video of it. I'm going to be sharing that
a lot over the coming days. I'm still looking for a complete version of
it. It's out there. I'll get it. And I don't know if
Colonel Haynes is still alive. I mean no animus to you, sir.
You were a victim back then, just like Sean Kirkpatrick is now. And
so he comes out in the stage and surest he starts off going over the
mogul balloon thing. They did come out and Roswell case closed. They cost
twel million fis closed, and he goes over that and then and then he's
feeling good, okay. And then but in the years after that report came
out, the Roswell thing, of course, was still rocking, and the
issue of bodies was in play, the issue of the fact that there were
bodies at that craft. Of course, you know, you've got Schmidt's book,
Terry's book, you got Freeman's book. I mean, there are plenty
of books that that talked about the Roswell case, and of course the bodies
and yeah, so some bodies came with that and this way came. It
was always in the background and mostly it's about the crash, but the bodies
was there. It was always part of the research. They didn't really address
that. There was the Mogul balloon had nothing to do with bodies, and
there was They solved the vehicle problem, but then solved the body problem,
and then the thing to realize, you know, boy, Roswell, one
hundred thousand people. You know, they got a museum, there's got you
know, a crash, you know thing and every thing. We got to
deal with the body and some of these test hummies. They sent Colonel Haynes
out there in front of a full room of press, and as he's wrapping
up, he decides to deal with the bodies, and he very carefully explains
to them that there has been a lot of discussion about body. People claimed
to have seen them et bodies, but we have extensively studied this and we
have confirmed that what happened was that five years after Roswell, we started testing
various equipments and so forth for our pilots and things which required us to drop
crash test dummies from airplanes and see what happens. And it was those crash
test dummies that people were I don't know, stumbling across whatever as they're wandering
through the desert and came across the crash test dummy, and because of time
compression, they confused that as an et that they saw in nineteen forty seven,
and before the press eventually found out what the crash test dummies looked like,
six foot human looking guys in Air Force uniforms with stuff on, they
were laughing their ass off. I mean they're literally laughing at Haynes in the
press this Theodepress briefing room, because it's that ridiculous nineteen ninety seven, and
so this is maybe even well, maybe this way, this is not worse
than that, because this time they got wise and said, if we're gonna
put something this stupid, let's bring in a select group of press. They'll
get the story going. The rest of the people will copy it. That's
what's happening. You got Reuters at Associated Press, and it's turning up in
Japan Times, and it's in China, It's everywhere, and I'm logging it
all on my website, Paradigmresearchgroup dot org. Go to resources print media archive.
I'm up to like fifteen thousand articles, including two thousand just in the
last three years. You can read all about it. And so they got
they going, okay, good, we got it. We got it,
no problem because you see it. Nineteen ninety seven, there really wasn't Internet
of any consequence. There was no social media, and the awareness of the
public in general worldwide too, the particulars of the research done by private citizens
was tiny compared to it is now. And so they just sucked up a
giant LOGI right, really it took they took it, and take too long.
I was like, you know, I think Schumer came out in July
fourteen, then twenty seven, the legislation goes up, and they didn't gut
it until you know, November, and then after that they decide, okay,
we're on the move. So they sucked up this giant logi and they
reared back and they just spit it out in the face of every single American
citizen and frankly every single person on the planet that's paying attention. But just
the Americans is enough. And by that I mean all of the Americans,
the entire members of the how and the Senate and the staff, all of
the witnesses that have come forward, all the pilots that have come forward,
everybody in the military and tell us the complex that noses in et presence but
can't say anything because they have classified They just spit that logi right in their
face, and basically they're saying, how do you like that? Okay exactly,
that's what they just did. And we know that people like Mario Woods,
who is a good friend of mine, We know plenty of people that
gave arrow very very detailed and credible testimony four hours, five hours of things
that you can only come to the conclusion that it was something that can't be
explained. So for them to come to these findings. It's Ellsworth Air Force
Base is mentioned in one paragraph, and it's lump Din with a few other
nuclear facilities, saying that there is a possible connection but probably not. What
do you have to say to the to the nuclear connection, look, no,
no, no, no, look look the nuclear weapons turn all the
look look, look, look. I invite people not to waste any any
more time of their life, those precious days they have left going through pointing
out all of the discrepancies, omissions and everything else about this report. Let's
just all agree that in terms of the report, if you have anything to
say, just say it's an absolute piece of shit. That's it. That's
what I got to say. You don't need to get into details a piece
of shit. You don't want to have to go in and parcel it out
because there's a piece of shit, and consequently it's stinks and it's messy.
Let's just acknowledge that, put up lid over it or something, and then
let's move on to what's going to happen next. And what's going to happen
next, among other things, is this. You see, they have a
problem. They have many problems, but here's one of the problems. They
have. I'm pretty sure they just pissed off Schuck Schumer, Mark Warner,
probably Mark go Rubio as well, though there's a lot of distraction now with
the campaign and all that, Kirsten gillibrand Mike Crowns, they pissed them off.
These people are powerful people, they're senators, and they don't answer to
the d D. Actually supposed to have some oversight over the d D.
And so guess what you know, I don't think Kirkpatrick's report covered any of
the testimony that these members of those that committee and some others. But let's
just talk about the Intel Committee firsthand testimony they've already gotten from witnesses in the
review process that is preparatory to the hearing. Lots of them, scores of
them. And there's enough thing the d D can do to stop Mark Warner
from putting those witnesses in front of the cameras in And I'm gonna put a
picture of this up on my website again. The Senate Intelligence Committee room is
like, primo, okay, nothing against the House Subcommittee hearing that nice little
room. I was in there. I'm actually in the time one hundred,
you know, one of the time one hundred photos. It's a night.
But the Intel Committee room is like it's like it's like, okay, bringing
them in and putting them under both And as that testimony unfolds, if I
have anything to do with that Congressional report that just came out, I would
be already planning either early retirement or shifting into a job that's more lower,
like maybe down in the basement, or just getting a look backing out whatever,
you know, just just like like that the classic universal me on online
where Homer just goes back into the bus bo right, yeah, just right
back in the book, there's a lot of people slipping back into the bush.
And they should actually put a bush, a giant bush somewhere in one
of the main lobbies in the Department of Defense, so that as the testimony
starts coming out in the Intel Committee, everybody that is associated with it can
just head on over there and just slide back into the bush. They can't
stop it. So now it's up to Warner and Schumer. In case Warner
has a little reservation, Schumer could could could buck him up. But certainly
if Warner and Schumer both agreed, it's a done deal. But Warner can
do it on his own. He's a chairman of that committee. It's now
up to them. Are they going to let this stand? Are they going
to do what they were supposed to do that Maybe they were putting off because
of you know, the terrible things in the Middle East, you the political
chaos. As I've said on countless interviews, putting it off is only going
to make it worse. Okay, getting it done makes everything better. Everything
we have to deal with is going to be a little easier to deal with.
Get it done now. Do not wait. This is now a real
clarion call. You cannot wait. You must get this done. More nonsense
like this is going to happen if you don't do it. Bring the witnesses
in, Bring in Bob Sallas and the other twenty Bob sallas Is, bring
in Groosh Crush and the other twenty grushers. Put them in front of the
camera, take their testimony under oath, and end this. End it once
and for all that's right, and then the President will acknowledge the et presence.
We'll be in the post disclosure world, and that will be a hell
of a nice placer to be than where we are right now, because where
we are right now, is well. The only thing that gets me through
is humor. Ipend. I spend all my leisure time watching stand up comics,
getting material that I can use, and just generally trying to laugh.
And if it wasn't for Larry David, I'd be dead by now. Also
Bill, So it's like, uh, you have to laugh through this crap.
But that's not the way we want a country to be. We don't
want the country to be filled with people that are having to turn the stand
up comedy in order to keep from blowing their brains out. No, we
need disclosure. Mark love to talk to you. I'll have you know.
Tim Perchett offered to take me to lunch. I'm trying to get that lunch,
but it's not easy. They're busy people, you know. Mark Warner
has not made that commitment. Mark, I'd love to come down and have
lunch with you, totally calm and polite. I won't be like this,
but I just love to kind of share a few ideas with you, just
in case you have a few moments. Well, I think I think I
have some ideas, but I want to I want to get your your take
on something. Yeah. More questions please, but no more questions off of
the report. Is we already I know, I know, I know.
So if we can get these witnesses in front of the camera, right,
these David Grushes, these these there's going to have to be some sort of
uh way that they can break their NDA in front of the world. No,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no no
no, that's that's not the case. First of all, there is a
ton of testimony that will blow people's minds that is not covered by the NDA.
So that there's that, right, Okay, Well, we want first
hand information, though we want information, right, this is all the first
hand. Second, that's bullshit, Okay, forget it right, So you
know, I mean there is secondhand testimony. This is not a trial,
Okay. We're not trying to determin whether somebody's going to go to jail or
be executed for murder. We're talking about testimony that can collective allows the members
of Congress to make decisions about legislation and so forth. Okay. And so
if somebody with like three PhDs and twenty years working for the Defense Department gets
up there and gives you some important secondhand testimony, you don't just dismiss it.
Ah, But there's plenty of first hand testimony and second ND testimony that
is not covered by NDAs that is pretty powerful. There's also a whole lot
of footage that they could probably commandeer if they wanted to and show it for
hours. Okay, But even the stuff that is somehow not able to be
set in public, all that happens is that the sack base officer, or
the pilot or the DoD manager at DEIA whatever. We'll simply say, Congress,
I mean a senator. I'm unable to talk about that in a public
setting like this, but I'm happy to answer your question in a private setting,
which means a skiff and a twenty witness one week hearing on this subject.
There might be twenty instances where the person can only speak in a skiff.
And so what happens after the hearing is over and the world is on
fire? Right, in addition to everything that's been heard, the senators are
going to go into a skiff to get the stuff that couldn't be told in
the public. Now, the do O D could jump in and say no
skip for you, no skip for you, right, screw you. It
is a senator they've already done this skiff, and they're going to say,
oh, yes you are, and so they will then get that testimony and
so again. And then that testimony which they get in a skiff, can
be shared amongst the Gang of Eight and with the White House without violating classifications.
And so let's don't limit this. I understand the process pretty well.
I'm trying to tell people that once those hearing is underway, it is game
over. Just start counting the hours down to when President Biden. It's going
to be President Biden unless somebody else becomes president in the next month or two.
All Right, He's going to come out in the East room at the
end of Cross Hall, either Friday night, probably a Friday night, and
he's going to say I've watched this testimony. My staff has watched this testimony.
I've talked with the appropriate people. They agree as well. It confirms
without question for me that we are not alone. We have an extraterrustrial presence,
and apparently we have a lot of programs and legacy programs, and well,
I'm going to work to get that information to you. In fact,
he might even say, and certainly under this circumstance, I absolutely support the
Senate Intel Committee and Chuck Schumer's UAP Disclosure Act, and I would invite the
Senate to reintroduce that act. I think that's the perfect platform in which to
do this. Thank you, My wife and I have got a movie to
take in. I'll see you on Monday morning. I know it's going to
be a big day, but try to enjoy your weekend. And it's over.
It's done. After roswell, we finally have confirmation of the presidents.
Okay, and now what a dream scenario that would be. God, I
can only hope that that is something that takes place, trust me, but
is it? Do you see a future where Biden is not the president?
Of course, you have an asthma attack tomorrow, in which case it would
be president. I'm old having a blankout vice president. Forgive me. I'm
sorry, Malais Harris, believe me, totally sucks. It would be president
Kamala Harris. That is the disclosure president. Fine, and honestly, you
know what, that might even better her reputation because let's don't go there.
Yeah, I'm just saying that could be beneficial to her. Look, it's
going to be beneficial who ever does it, it will be one of the
greatest political legacies of all time. But that that that that is what leads
me to to two. This final, well not final, but this aspect
clearly there are companies that have the these materials and they have these materials locked
away. Is there any way that civilian science beats not not beats to the
punch, but is there any way that civilian science and civilian astronomy is what
sets the chain of events in place? Like for instance, I think I
just read report that something came out about the protocols for the astronomer who ends
up finding alien life, right, and how they would have to ease him,
uh and and treat him psychologically, you know. So they're they're they're
they're gearing up for something. It seems. I don't know what that article
is about, but that's ridiculous, and it's absolutely ridiculous. There's a whole
article about the astronomer that finds alien life through the James Web, James Webb,
and how Jimmy Church has been talking about it a lot lately. How
they'd have to treat that person in their family because they had to become instantly
famous, and you know what the transitions they go through. Now, I'll
tell I'll tell you what will happen to this astronomer that actually, somehow because
they have the right, the right means to assess the atmosphere of some planet
or something and and or gets the signal that SETI has been searching for for
all these years, with hundreds of millions of dollars probably and many of the
people, and said, he know there's an at presence, but he's going
to turn away hundreds of millions of dollars, you know, I'll tell you
what will happen. Yeah, he'll come forward and you'll say and he'll he'll
first he'll tell his family that, wow, we have just pretty much confirmed
that a forty seven light years out there there is a civilization. Obviously there's
there's none, there's other intelligent beings, at which point his brother in law
was married to his sister is going to look at him and say, you
ignorant, ass of with extra trust Youal, since I was five, I've
been taking or forty times. Okay, I haven't talked about it because well,
you know the problem there. Okay, But now that you've done this,
I'm gonna let you just say and by the way, your mother is
also a contactee. It'll be like that. And so if they're gonna have
to do any psychology on this guy, it's not gonna because he discovered extra
trust your life. He's gonna find it's already been here and it's been abducting
his family for some time. That might be a problem for him. This
I'm phraising this in such a way. I love that how insane the perspectives
become when a government screws around with reality at this level, right, right,
and and and it's and now now we're in a place where the only
way to do this, in my mind, is to start small and build
your way up. So you know, some thing like, okay, the
James Webb finds whatever, and then they confirm micobrial life on a distant planet.
So you know, it starts small, right, you're suggesting that that's
what we're We have been trying for small. We've been playing the small ball
since well, certainly since SETI was set up in fifty eight. I mean,
we couldn't play ball smaller than this, right, played it so long
you know that that we don't know anything else? No, no, no,
but I think jumping into the abduction thing is is I think you know,
diving into a three foot pool. Wait, wait a minute, jumping
the abduction thing. The abduction thing's been out and about worldwide since the late
eighties, early eighties, the saying all over the place, there are contactees
coming out everywhere. There have been movies about abduction. It is a known
thing worldwide. Jumping into anything, Uh, it's it's a lot tougher to
deal with, no question, And if you're to get the Congress to move
forward, you don't hit them with that. Uh. But do you think
that they haven't been told about abduction? You don't think there are members of
Congress that may be our abductees themselves. But no, that is not the
thing you put out in front. But believe me, adn't mean the direct
contact with extraterrestrials. If we get disclosure on Friday, it'll probably be the
fifth question ask on Monday, the press is back and go after disclosures happen
and go, well, you know, that's a little toughie. Let's don't
go there. Let's just talk about the other stuff. Now they're gonna be
going, I want that story, I want it now. That's yeah,
what's your position on that, mister president, Do you know about the ETS
abduction? Are you an abductee? Whatever? The hell day one, So
anybody thinking small just put that aside. You want to be orderly, which
is what we've been by and large. You want to be responsible, which
is what we've been. Over responsible in a sense. You want to get
the disclosure and the confirmation in a way that's not overly disrupted, which is
exactly what's been happened led by Gary Nolan and Alexander and Melon and others.
Lots of people doing it pretty much the right way, not flawlessly. It's
difficult, trust me. This is in an event of this magnitude what and
unprecedented, But they've done a pretty good job and we're practically there. Okay,
So but once we get disclosure, then it's boomed and nobody is going
to have control over that per se. Though what we can have control over
is how the post revealing process goes, what other countries do, and then
an open contact, If open contact takes place, we're going to have to
deal with that. Hopefully we'll have a year or two to get ready.
Well, that's what I want to talk to you. Lastly, about is
okay post a school. Okay, everything that you say happens the way you
say it happens, right, roughly roughly, let's let's just but but for
the sake of argument, everything happens the way that you're you're you're you're describing.
What does the US government being the de facto world police, and I
know that that that is under a military guys, but what steps does do
these? Does the United States take with NATO and other countries to formulate a
response to whatever is a abducting US or and be in our skies with impunity?
Uh? Well, it's not that simple. But as I envision it,
if the President discloses the et presence within a week, every other head
of state of any of the certainly that quote developed countries will have already confirmed
it themselves. They're not going to sit around on their thumb. Some of
the poorer countries. I don't think it much matters whether the head of state
acknowledges it or not, but they probably will quickly. The United Nations,
it will go into major session and it will be addressed immediately, and so
the confirmation of it will also come through the representatives of the countries to the
United Nations, they will confirm it. All of this will happen very very
fast. And so now the world has pretty much had disclosure worldwide and in
a short amount of time. Now, now now that that's out of the
way, all of the Nations and the United Nation and any other what we'll
call major organization that is dealing with the issues and problems that we face,
well, we'll start to consider how they want to proceed. Uh, it's
it's going to take a lot of a well, actually, AI may come
in handy at that point. I actually really we may need all the AI
we can get, but some some sort of process of how would you say,
not engagement, but some sort of process of information sharing and policy discussions
about not so much. How are we going to deal with the ETS,
because the are going to deal with us anyway they want, right, It's
not like we're going to send them a set of rules and go okay,
here's now no, no, no, How are we going to deal with
each other? What is going to be the setup? What's going to be
a geopolitical arrangements in the post disclosure world. Actually, and I think I'll
be out there saying one of the reasons you want to do this is that
open contact is now deaf on the table. It would be nice to get
things in order before we have that. But again, we're talking about an
unbelievably complex arena. Uh. It'll be fun, it'll be fantastic. I'll
enjoy every second of it, but I cannot predict how it'll go. And
somebody, some nation may do something really stupid. I was gonna say,
because someone asked, will we all be ordered to not engage them for the
time being? You know, they can engage who engage who engage them for
like like, so will countries at least what I'm The first thing that comes
to my mind is will all countries cease kinetically engaging UFOs? Well, assuming
they are engaging? Oh well, I mean all right, Well, if
there's any any country still trying to shoot them down, hopefully that'll stop immediately.
I don't think that's happening, but it's an incredibly stupid thing. Uh.
And there may be a few things that are happening within the secret world
of various nations that might be visible to pause that could happen one of the
along the lines of what you're thinking, which is good you know, I
like the track that you've taken. I mean this this is post disclosure thinking,
folks, and Tyler, you got it, man, you're going to
be You're ready for the post disclosure world. Increase your ad rates. Whatever.
The point is is that one of the questions that will come up very
quickly is, Okay, now that everyone knows there's ETS here, and now
that everybody knows that ETS have a one on one program where they're dealing with
humans on pretty much a one on one basis, one, do we take
efforts to deal with that? In other words, uh, the contact These
had almost no resources, no no options at all during the truth embargo,
which is what made their lives a lot tougher. But hey, what is
government. It's not there to make our lives tougher. And now in a
post disclosure world, the range of things that people could do to make being
taken at two and am in the morning is actually substantial, and it could
be that we could take measures to make that program harder, which they the
ETS could respond, well, okay, if you want to play it that
way, we can, we can, we can be more aggressive. I
don't know, but that will be an issue. Do we try to intervene
in any way with respect to the contact issue on behalf of humans who would,
particularly unless somebody wants contact, in which case, hey have all the
contact you want. That's a big question. But a more significant question,
which I think will be discussed, is would the ETS continue once disclosure is
worldwide? Would the ETS continue their one on one work. I can make
a case that it was in there it would be in the ET's best interest
not to, and I and I make and I and I think that,
and I believe that that's what they'll do, based upon the totality of what
I know about the history of their engagement of the planet, just in the
modern era, I'm thinking they'll stop. So somehow we'll learn that it's not
happening anymore, and some people will be very upset because they're really counting on
that next visit. But uh, they may stop. Okay, great,
that would be That would be probably in terms of diplomacy and and any post
disposure in our engagement or open contact, that would be a smart move.
And maybe after open contact they may say, look, after we've come to
some understandings about a few things I've talked about this open contact, I think
that the matters on the table are pretty easy to figure out, right they
we They may say, look, the work we're doing is pretty important to
us and we need to continue it. But we have suspended it because under
the circumstances it's it's awkward. But if people are willing to volunteer, we
would appreciate that and we can make it worth their while. I know this
sounds silly, but it's actually common sense. We do it all the time.
There's certain kinds of research that we do that you simply you simply can't.
Well, we do it, but it's a big mistake trick people into
it or something, or force them God knows, that's no longer considered cool.
So what we do is we cress volunteers and sometimes it's dangerous. They're
compensated, so there's nothing odd about that. So would the ets do that?
Don't know? But these are These will be one of a good example
of the kind of post disclosure things we'll be talking about. And the nice
thing about that is structural. It's important, it's valid, and it leads
somewhere, and so we won't be spending the rest of our lives running around
in circles while the government stands off to the and laughs his ass off.
So I'm welcoming these kinds of issues. I hope they'll be resolved. I
hope that the post disclosure goes well. But if it doesn't go well,
I'm not gonna I'm not going to be apologizing because the predisclosure world it's not
going well. It's really not going well. And so hey, what do
you want? Right? I think the chances are things get better, not
worse. But if they get worse, they were going to get really bad
anyway. I mean, we're headed towards nuclear war bankly. I mean it
was practically on our doorstep, So I don't apologize taking it. We'reing,
Yeah, we're literally hanging in the balance. We're at the fork in the
road. Okay, in the balance of the fork in the road. You're
mixing your metaphors, but I like it mix it, mixing the metaphors.
We're at the fork in the road where you know, China makes a move
on Taiwan in World War three breaks out, or we get this disclosure out
and maybe the world can come together. Finally, there's so many ways World
War three could break out. I mean, it's like that what was that
movie? H was the war games? Games? Yeah? War games are
pretty cool. Ends up work, you know, play TikTok and nobody wins,
and I'm going, Okay, I get it, I get it.
The cool movie. I liked it. But I'm telling you, unfortunately they've
got supercomputers and now AI because there are so many ways that nuclear war could
break out that they need that AI and super computers to game all this shit,
right. I mean it's like and they're probably doing that, you know,
and they're coming up with, oh my god, there's like four hundred
thousand ways that could happen and three thousand, nine hundred and forty four and
up badly and whatever, and they're just sitting in there all they're like,
it's like, did you ever did you ever see the Marvel Studios Avengers like
movies. So so when doctor Strange is going through all the you know,
billions of possibilities and he comes back and he's like, there's only one we
win, I think I think could it be that there is a mix?
Michael Masters might be right that it's future humans coming back to fix the problems
that are about to happen. Then this fork in the Road. I think
all the possibilities are there, But what if what if the American government,
I mean David Grush talked about a treaty that we potentially signed. I don't
know how much credence you lend that, but what if we gave them our
oceans right and said stay there, it'll protect you. You know, we
haven't charted them, you know, build your bases there, you know whatever.
You can abduct some people, YadA, YadA, YadA, we want
some technology in return. What if they're what if they're inau it? Steve
Hey, Look, all I can say is we only have so many years
on this planet. We got one life. By and large, we need
to stop playing what if you're right? What is all right? You're right,
You're right, You're right. We do we do need to play what
is? And what is is? We need to get this confirmed. That's
the first dominant that needs to fall, no matter what. And and you're
absolutely right. And if there's anybody in the world that is fighting harder,
I'd be hard pressed to say that it that. It's that, it's not
Steven Bassett. There are people that are doing more than I am, but
they have more money than I have now if I can get a bunch of
money together, Oh boy, we'll see I Now let's let's it's promo time
and then we'll wrap it up. By the way, I want the link
to the show. I'm going to promote the hell out of it. This
is this is this is this is primo stuff. So I'm gonna promote it
up and get to another one hundred thousand followers. All right, So here's
the promo first Paradigm Research. Paradigm Research Group has been a sole proprietorship activists
organization for twenty eight years, operating under the First Amendment, meaning there's the
only way they could really get rid of me is to shoot me, and
there for many a day during the last twenty eight years when I wish they
would. But I'm about to file with the Washington DC. Is a nonprofit.
I'll get my five of one three CE pretty quickly, and then I
will for the first time be able to raise funds as a text deductible don't
it is it dot org or dot No, it's just met anything. It's
a solar priorship. It's Stephen Bassett, Okay, so uh now, and
I will convert to a think tank and I'll adjust my website accordingly. It'll
start looking like a think tank website instead of a know whatever it is.
And the more funds that come to Paradigm Research Group, the more think tanky
I can get. I kind of know what to do, all right.
And so and I'm nicely positioned. I'm one block from the White House,
been here for years, and I'm starting to pick up contacts and whatever.
I know. I can do my thing, but you know, you have
to have funds now. So that's that promo. Second promo, Paradigm Research
Paradigm the new Paradigm Institute, which Daniel Shean the one of the great legal
and civil rights activists in history, or so the twenty first, twenty second,
twenty twenty first century. After twenty years, he finally got the funding
to start the new Paradigm Institute think tank dot org. Yeah. Uh.
And they've got an office in Washington which is on the other end down by
the Capitol, one block from the Capitol. I'm one block from the White
House. Can I say, you know? Got him covered? It has
it has a director. He is already building up a substanti He has a
board of directors which is eventually is Romero Institute. He has a substantial group
of advisors coming together and he's raised some money. But that think tank has
no limits. In other words, fifteen twenty thirty million dollars they can run
with that. They could do that. The Center for American Progress, which
was founded by another than John Podesta, who knows about the et presence,
I assure you, was created in two thousand and two. I think he
got twenty to twenty five million dollars to launch it. Do you really want
to kick some butt? You need that kind of money. So any millions
out and millionaires out there or billionaires. We have a thousand by the way
of one thousand billionaires in the United States. I don't know why I can't
meet any. The point is is that, you know, drop twenty thirty
million dollars on Danny Sheen if you'd like the postal world to be fun times.
So there's that. Go to the website and that's where you can also
contact all your members of Congress very easily on this issue. We prefer.
In addition, UH, Contact in the Desert is having its tenth anniversary this
year. Yeah, I know, it's a major conference. It's had huge
attendance got hit hard by the pandemic, coming back under under some new ownership.
May thirty, June three, contactingthedesert dot com. Do I have a
lecture in a workshop and hopefully in intensive and am I running a couple of
panels and on a panel? Yeah? Yeah? And are you going to
do it in person? Podcast with me? I'm doing? Hey, what
do you want? What do you want? I can work it out,
talk to me. Uh so, this is this is I got sixty five
speakers and the schedules about to go up. We have booked the entire Indian
wells Uber resort. I mean I will, I'm gonna be I'm gonna my
main my main goal is to get there, and you know, I think
I think we'll be able to do some really cool stuff. Steve, again,
we're running a tight ship this time. You just can't show up and
start cruising around. So get in touch with the conference. Let them know
your interest in being mediate whatever, Let them know that I am on your
show quite a bit, and that I can shider you're righteous. But yeah,
but in any event, people that want to come, you can buy
your tickets. When you buy your tickets, so they keep getting more expensive
as you get closer. But you've got to get the hotel room. Are
you going to be staying somewhere else over at Motel twelve because there's only four
hundred rooms, So get your hotel room. Then you get your ticket contact
in the desert. It's on its way. Also, the Hollywood Disclosure Alliance
is I think going to become an important thing. It was founded by myself
and Hollywood publicist Dan Harrari, a longtime professional publicist. We cooked it up
at Arts Deli where all the big deals are made. Well Deli's in Los
Angeles. Hollywood Disclosure Alliance dot org. Now it's non trivial. It's modeled
after the entire Environmental Media Association that was set up in eight nineteen eighty nine,
nineteen ninety by none are the Norm Lair and his wife. Then Norm
just passed his wife's still alive, and they started that off with millions of
dollars and major studios signed up on day one. Not surprising. We're talking
normal leer here, right, And what was the purpose to network Hollywood,
the film industry with the entire environmental activist movement which is a really big movement
okay. I mean the disclosure movements is you know, it's nice, but
the environmental activist movement is massive, so that they could help make content and
get the message right right, and so all that, you know, super
wonderful content, creating money, making stuff, could help the environmental telling you
know, who is what, and they just networking together, still going strong
thirty years later, got tons of movie stars in it. It's had five
billion I think, think pr impressions and so forth. Environmental Media Association,
Hollywood Disclosure Alliance is basically modeled after that extraordinary group, and it's the only
other group I think like it in the world, and that is this and
it's kind of it is different in a very important respect. The film industry,
the television industry, the content industry has feasted on the ET issue for
well since nineteen fifty, so we're talking seventy four years. And by that
is they've made six hundred movies plus all the other sci fi movies, but
six hundred sci fi movies with ets in it that eventually make it on television
or television, movie, streaming series, you name it, the whole nine
yards. They have feasted on it and made a fortune I've analyzed it a
little bit. I need to relook at it, but I'm guessing it's up
in the two hundred billion range in modern dollars. And of course, all
those fictional accounts of ets of every type and shape reform have basically educated the
world to the idea of extra Trustrials said he didn't do that. The film
industry did right now. Some of them are pretty scary, but they were
fictional, right Okay. Now, at the same time the movies are doing
all this, the government is maintaining this truth embargo, which I have talked
about incessantly now for a quarter of a century. And the truth embargo was
designed to keep people from getting together and causing trouble, keep the journalists out
of it, keep the universities out of it, keep the film industry out
of it. But what am I being by that? The film industry was
obviously not out of it. The content creating industry, even music was not
out of it. But so they engaged it, but they couldn't challenge it.
And so the single most I think important point behind why the Hollywood Disclosure
Alliance exists now is that in the seventy four years since the first really modern
what I sci fi film came out. Some think it's called the Something.
It was This Island Earth Something was the Data Earth so still. But prior
to that you had Flash Gordon and these little short things. But overall the
first film about nineteen fifty one. In that seventy four years, only one
film, one documentary rather nonfiction film that engaged the ET issue in one way
or another, was a film about Eric Fondanakin's work, right, Ancient Aliens,
what do you call it? And it did very well and it's kind
of a safe play. And that's it. And that was a long time
ago. Not a single other documentary. And when I say engage, what
I'm trying to say is was put on the big screen. I mean,
I think the film industry made some maybe in conjunction with some independence, but
overall they stayed out of it. It was the regular people like you and
I. They were making these docs with almost no money. But the point
is is they never let them on the big screen in two thousand screens,
right, because if you take that subject, you take like one of James
Fox's documentaries, and you put it up on giant screens all over the country.
Two thousand theaters. You're giving it an enormous amount of power and gravitas.
And the film industry sort of agreed one way or another, implicitly explicitly
not to do that. Okay, yeah, no problem, no problem.
So okay, but that's got to change, all right. And so Hollywood
Disclosure Alliance aware that people in Los Angeles and the film industry around the world
are waking up to this issue. They're really getting involved, they're coming forward.
Great the truth and bargoes coming down. We could have disclosure soon.
And so it is a networking nonprofit already five oh one c three can take
donations go to the website Hollywood Disclosure Lines dot org to maximize the ability of
the UAP E t researchers, activist journalists, documentaries, et cetera, et
cetera, witnesses contact these to find the professional content creators and vice versa,
so they can create the content. It's going to educate the world post disclosure
and get them right. Okay. And so you have you have two groups
on that site. You have the Hollywood Founding Members and you got the UAP
Founding Members. And so the Hollywood Founding Members can network with each other.
The UAP founding members can network that they already know each other, and then
the world outside can go to the site and go, oh, that person
knows this, I'm going to go talk to them, or that that studio
is willing to do this, I'll talk to them. And so the whole
thing. It will not be commercial. It will sell nothing, it will
have no subscriptions, not charge for its events. It's absolutely nothing but nonprofit.
The people in it can make deals all day long we want them to,
but the HDA does no deals. Exactly is what the Hollywood Disclosure Alliance
is. And we invite people to go to the site. If you want
to be a member, you have to be referred into by another member and
then it has to be cleared through the executive committee. So we're not just
a wide open membership organization. However, anybody can subscribe to the newsletter no
cost, right, you can go there, do that at the website,
and anyone that puts even a dollar donation to it will go up on the
supporter section and be listed right there in alphabetical order, so everybody can see
if you want to be, if you don't want to be, won't put
job So people see that you don't help it out. That's the Hollywood Disclosure
Alliance. Moving On all right, there's a couple of other things going on.
The move On Symposium this year is coming up September. I believe you
want to go to that. Move On is making tremendous drides. It has
now got a full lobbying firm working for them. They're they're creating massive content
on move On TV as well as docs. Yeah, Ron James is really
the right. UH. They they have done under under the the UH.
I think very aggressive and wise leadership of McDonald. They they have they have
become the move On in the twenty first century we needed, and so they're
there. Their symposium this year is going to be pretty strong. I invite
people to check that out. There's some other conferences coming up. I will
update all of those on my Paradigm Research Group website soon. I've been laxed
there, but I'm going to do that so you'll see that. There's another
think tank that's been created by Gary Nolan. It's called the Soul Foundational.
I'm pretty sure it's a nonprofit. So any billionaires out there, you've got
a couple of hundred million or a million so that you like to put into
the post disclosure world as another opportunity, right, and they're doing They're gonna
be that's the scientific think tank led by a man who is a Nobel Prize
nominee who has survived a lot of health issues and has gone on I think
I think it was Fox News and News Nation and told the world there's an
extra trust your presence here. And it was asked on a scale of one
to one hundred percent, how sure are you? And Gary said one hundred
percent. Yet that's the kind of scientist I like. How many scientists out
there that know that? How many scientists do you think in this country know
one hundred percent there's any t presence? Thousands of them. They just don't
have the courage or the willingness to go public and say that. I'm not
gonna you know, you got af you got family. I'm not I'm not
trying to be too much of a you know, piss on them, but
but you know, it could be helpful if a few more were to come
forward. All right, I agree, you got that Soul Foundation. There's
other organizations forming faster than I can keep track of. There's docs coming out.
Support everything right, support everything, and and get part of this.
The biggest event human history is coming. Get get involved. Even if you
don't have any money, volunteer. You know, you could live ten one
hundred more lifetimes. You're never gonna have a chance like this again. This
is this is this is the big one. This is good. So I
think I think that's my promo, my total promo for today, but I
may have more stuff later. And you did you did great. Thank you,
you did great, Steve. As always, it's so amazing to have
you on the show. You're are such a wealth of knowledge. And what
I love about you is that you're always optimistic and you're always willing to uh
adapt and change to the game. And I think that's why you're so versatile.
And you have the record for appearances on the show as a guest.
So you are someone that I've always looked up to, and I want you
to know that with the utmost respect. You know, I me and Dan
Zetterstrom we are planning to we're planning on me. He's coming to the US
and he co hosts that UFO podcast with Andy and em and I are going
to be making some documentaries based on people in the community. So each person
will have their own documentary, their own little you know, glimpse into their
life. And you are in the top five that we want to do and
hopefully we can get that worked out with you. I think it was Andy
Warhol it said it in the future, everybody will make a fifteen minute documentary.
So yeah, it's good man. I am very properly buttered here.
But look, man, I am a huge fan of the podcasters. I
think they have they're changing the world. I think that's one of the coolest
things ever happened. And there's more coming. So I will do it.
Just you know, you have to be really out there before I won't do
your podcast right. Yeah, and a short notice, so y'all get in
touch with me. I'm I'm on fire. I'm angry right now, so
if you want some you want some energy, call me now. Who knows
two months from now I can be totally chill, but right now on matt
as hell and can't take it anymore. So I love it. I love
so Steve ballastt unhinged, everybody unhinged, Thank everyone, everyone for we had
over two hundred and twenty seven people watching it once tonight, which is such
a such a fantastic thing, and that was spread across a couple of from
platforms, so you know, such a great turnout. Thank you to everyone
who came and for everyone who will watch in the future. Make sure to
like share, subscribe. Not all of our interviews end up on YouTube and
Rumble yet, so you do have to subscribe on Spotify or one of those
podcast platforms to get the one on one interviews. But all the live shows
and all that do come to YouTube, and we're uploading more and more on
YouTube. It's just, uh, we're you know, we're working it.
We're working it. Just like Steve, you know, it's a when you're
one man, when you're a small team, it's it's it's harder to keep
everything on on a tight schedule. So with that being said, make sure
to like share, subscribe, and if you're listening on Apple or Spotify,
leave a rating, leave a review. It really helps getting us to a
wider audience, into an audience that is not just the UFO. Can you
what the goal of this is is to reach the everyday person. They are
the people that we all need to need to be talking to because they need
this information. The UFO community already has it. They're the ones that are
already sold. We need to talk to the everyday Joe Schmoe. We need
to get into his living room, her living room, and that is what
Steve is going to be doing. I have a feeling so thank you everyone.
We'll see you on the other side, sad and say yeah,
Apple Podcasts
Castbox
Castro
Goodpods
Moon FM
Overcast
Pocket Casts
Podbean
Podcast Addict
Podcast Republic
Spotify