Joe Rogan Interviews Dr Steven Greer (REMOVED FROM JRE) SPECIAL PRESENTATION: THE LOST TAPE
We dont usually Play full episodes of ANYONES show, But This Episode is a Great trip back in time, not just for UFOlogy, And Dr Greer, But the JRE as well. Rogan, After signing wityh spotify had to remove over 70 Episodes. This was one of those episodes.
TRY BIO MIND BY EDENTIA HERBALS, 25% OFF EXCLUSIVELY FOR TDP LISTENERS-PERFORMANCE MUSHROOM SUPPLEMENT MADE WITH ONLY THE FINEST INGREDIENTS, PEER REVIEWED, AND BACKED UP BY SCIENCE, I USE IT EVERY SINGLE DAY, AND IT HAS CHANGED MY LIFE— WWW.EDENTIAHERBALS.COM & DON’T FORGET TO USE CODE TOTAL DISCLOSURE AT CHECKOUT FOR 25%OFF
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
Support TDP directly: https://www.paypal.me/TDPstudios767?locale.x=en_US
Be A Member On The Audio Feed (Limited Perks: Early Access/Ad Free Content) https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-ufos-coverups-conspiracy--5975113/support
YOUTUBE MEMBER;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
PATREON MEMBER;
https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure?fan_landing=true&view_as=public
GET YOUR TOTAL DISCLOSURE: UFO/ALIEN INSPIRED MERCH, OR A GIFT FOR YOUR FAMILY MEMBER, FRIEND, OR TREAT YOURSELF! : https://pop-culture-corner-store.creator-spring.com/?
FOLLOW TDP ON RUMBLE, A growing Platform that Rivals Youtube, and Allows for More Free Speech: Sign Up And tell them TDP sent you, by using our link;
https://rumble.com/register/TotalDisclosure93/
Follow Us On Twitter: Www.Twitter.com/DisclosurePod
Follow Us On Instagram: www.Instagram.com/Total.Disclosure
USE OUR CODE AND SIGN UP FOR TUBE-BUDDY TO START UTILIZING THEIR AMAZING TOOLS, LET TUBE BUDDY DO THE WORK FOR YOU: https://www.tubebuddy.com/POP
Sign Up for VIDIQ and Get Tons of Creator Content Tools, SEO Boosts, Keyword Scores, Title Suggestions, & So much MORE! VIDIQ can be integrated seamlessly into your Browser and Youtube Channel, Start utilizing this tool now, Sign up with TDP’s Link-www.VIDIQ.com/TotalDisclosure
CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —[email protected]
Special Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can’t do this WITHOUT YOU!
-COPYRIGHT-2020-
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
Speaker 1: Welcome to a very special weekend edition, a late night
Speaker 1: weekend edition. If you're on the East Coast, it's eleven thirty.
Speaker 1: If you're in Hawaii right now, you're not impressed. It's
Speaker 1: only five twenty four, So eleven twenty four on the
Speaker 1: East Coast. The Joe Rogan Experience podcast. This episode is
Speaker 1: brought to you by.
Speaker 2: On it dot com.
Speaker 1: If you go to n n it T use the
Speaker 1: code named Rogan, you will save ten percent off any
Speaker 1: and all supplements.
Speaker 2: We're going to keep it simple.
Speaker 3: Kiss Kisserson.
Speaker 1: Oh that guy we met him this weekend, the dude
Speaker 1: who is in the on it power commercial, the powerlifter,
Speaker 1: very very cool dude with his also very cool girlfriend,
Speaker 1: And it was hilarious because they were so happy that
Speaker 1: we shit all over the part of the commercial where he.
Speaker 2: Hangs out with the girls. She was so mad about
Speaker 2: that because at the.
Speaker 1: End of the commercial, this is a commercial for a
Speaker 1: testosterone supplement called T plus, and what T plus does
Speaker 1: is actually stimulates your body to produce more testosterone than
Speaker 1: This's a commercial with this powerlifter dude. Well, in the
Speaker 1: beginning of it, it's just him lifting weights. All of
Speaker 1: it makes sense, you know, but then the end of it,
Speaker 1: it was him with two girls at a bar and
Speaker 1: he was like, being mister sexy face, we need to.
Speaker 3: Get a copy of it because I need to see it.
Speaker 2: He took that shit off the internet so fast.
Speaker 3: And you know what he said.
Speaker 4: I guess I said in one of the podcasts, I
Speaker 4: said like, I don't want to be like this guy,
Speaker 4: or like look like this guy.
Speaker 3: So he comes up to me goes, I don't want
Speaker 3: to look like you.
Speaker 1: Man.
Speaker 3: I'm wait, who are you? And I'm like, oh, you're
Speaker 3: kissing mother.
Speaker 1: You're not telling the truth at all, you fuck you
Speaker 1: distort reality. He came up to you and told you
Speaker 1: the whole thing. You didn't you knew who he was exactly.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but he said out and he tweeted it to you.
Speaker 1: I don't want to be like you. Yeah.
Speaker 4: I had no idea who that was. I just thought
Speaker 4: it was a hater. I probably blocked him. I was like, what,
Speaker 4: I don't want to be like you either, What the
Speaker 4: fuck that means?
Speaker 1: Whatever?
Speaker 4: But he was super nice and I accidentally put a
Speaker 4: sticker in his girlfriend's hair.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Brian was.
Speaker 1: He thought he was being cute by putting Deus Squad
Speaker 1: stickers on the pack of people's.
Speaker 3: Back when I was taking photos.
Speaker 1: Yeah, douche bag, silly pitch anyway on a dot com
Speaker 1: o n it code named Rogan, save yourself some money
Speaker 1: ten percent off any and all supplements.
Speaker 2: When when is your shows? You got a show in
Speaker 2: San Diego coming up?
Speaker 3: Yeah, we have one San Diego March fourteenth.
Speaker 4: We have Billy Bonot, Tony Hinchcliff Chas and Teabo and
Speaker 4: another person that we're working on that's pretty big and
Speaker 4: tickets are on sale right now. And also I'm going
Speaker 4: to Toronto in July, but I won't even bother.
Speaker 1: Well that's in July.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's it's too.
Speaker 1: Far away, Yeah, too far away. All right, Doctor Stephen
Speaker 1: Greer is here. We are going to get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of a lot of crazy shit, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: This is one of the most requested guests ever on
Speaker 1: the podcast Cuosing Cue the music, Brian, Let's get this
Speaker 1: thing started officially Joe Roman Podcast.
Speaker 5: Check it out The Joe Brogan Experience.
Speaker 4: Join by day Joe Rogan Podcast, by night, all day,
Speaker 4: our guest today.
Speaker 1: For the folks who are tuning into this ironically on
Speaker 1: serious satellite radio, they don't hear the commercial part of it,
Speaker 1: doctor Stephen Greer. If you don't know who doctor Greer is,
Speaker 1: there's a thing that a lot of people are aware
Speaker 1: of that came out. This was twenty twenty eleven, the
Speaker 1: Disclosure Project?
Speaker 2: Was it in two thousand and one?
Speaker 1: Did I say eleven?
Speaker 2: I met?
Speaker 1: One? I met right around September eleventh. That's where the
Speaker 1: eleven came from my head. Two thousand and one. It
Speaker 1: was huge in the Internet, huge point of controversy and
Speaker 1: a topic of conversation. It was you on stage introducing
Speaker 1: this Disclosure Project, explaining how much information you had access
Speaker 1: to about alien spacecraft's visiting Earth, and how many distinguished,
Speaker 1: high ranking military people, and that was where it got shocking.
Speaker 2: Agreed with you.
Speaker 1: That was where it got shocking, because that was the
Speaker 1: first time we'd ever seen like high ranking military officers,
Speaker 1: one after another, testify that they had personal encounters with
Speaker 1: things that are not of this world. People who would
Speaker 1: know the difference between black ops technology, the current military
Speaker 1: defense projects that might be secret, and people that would
Speaker 1: know also who to talk to about these things if
Speaker 1: they did think it was a black ops but they knew,
Speaker 1: and it was in my opinion that video is probably
Speaker 1: one of the most important videos ever when it comes
Speaker 1: to extraterrestrial life or the idea of extraterrestrial life visiting Earth,
Speaker 1: because the conversations that I've ever had that I've always
Speaker 1: had with rational people, especially rational people who are not
Speaker 1: obsessed by aliens like I've been my whole life, but
Speaker 1: rational people who just you know, Oh, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's real or not. But you know,
Speaker 1: where's the evidence. I'm sure there's alien.
Speaker 2: Life out there? Has it visited us? Oh?
Speaker 1: I don't, probably not right. When you see that video
Speaker 1: and you see those high ranking military guys one after
Speaker 1: another give these very not just believable, but they're kind
Speaker 1: of they're spooky. There's are spooky stories because the way
Speaker 1: they're talking about them, you could see in their face,
Speaker 1: the emotions as they're recounting the just the shear, to
Speaker 1: use a word, alienness of their experience. We had never
Speaker 1: really seen anything like that before. It had always been well,
Speaker 1: I guess they probably could be out there, but who knows.
Speaker 1: When I watched that video, it was a real it
Speaker 1: was a real shift because it was one of the
Speaker 1: first things that ever saw that made me really stop
Speaker 1: and think. There's a part of everybody that doesn't want
Speaker 1: to get duped. And when it comes to a subject,
Speaker 1: especially an important subject like UFOs, there's a part of
Speaker 1: everybody that goes you want to call bullshit right away,
Speaker 1: because you don't want to be the last guy to
Speaker 1: call bullshit.
Speaker 2: You don't want to be the guy.
Speaker 1: Who believes, believes, believes and it turns its bullshit. Ah,
Speaker 1: you dummy, you believed it. You were the first guy
Speaker 1: believe in it. Man, you want to be the first
Speaker 1: guy to call bullshit. It's always a way cooler position.
Speaker 1: And if there was alien life, if there was alien
Speaker 1: life that had visited the earth, excuse me, what evidence
Speaker 1: would they leave behind? What would you know in your
Speaker 1: day to day existence? How much of it would you know?
Speaker 1: Almost nothing?
Speaker 5: Yeah, particularly when it's getting hovered up by a very
Speaker 5: well organized and well funded intelligence program.
Speaker 1: Including the Project Blue Book, which was run by doctor
Speaker 1: j Allen Heinek.
Speaker 5: Now that was a cover story. The Project blue Book
Speaker 5: was really a little office where they were putting things
Speaker 5: in there and making it sound like they were really investigating. Meanwhile,
Speaker 5: there was an unacknowledged project, what we call a black project,
Speaker 5: but the proper name is an unacknowledged special access project
Speaker 5: or use app, and the US apps running this have
Speaker 5: been around since the forties, very well funded, working on
Speaker 5: these issues, working on the technology, studying how these things
Speaker 5: are going from one star system to another. And that's
Speaker 5: the sort of thing that that we've been drilling down
Speaker 5: on for about twenty two years.
Speaker 1: So the Project blue Book that was run by doctor
Speaker 1: Heinick is that was his name.
Speaker 5: Yeah, doctor j Allen Heineck, Right, he was an Air
Speaker 5: Force guy astronomer that the Air Force engaged to do that.
Speaker 5: Later he came out and admitted that that was all
Speaker 5: just sort of a dog and pony show.
Speaker 1: And he also became a huge UFO believer, which is
Speaker 1: really fascinating because most of the stories that they investigated
Speaker 1: in Project blue Book he sort of debunked correct. In fact,
Speaker 1: instead of being open about the possibilities, they always steered
Speaker 1: towards debunking first, right.
Speaker 5: And actually the big problem became when he put his
Speaker 5: foot in his mouth when in Gerald Ford's home district
Speaker 5: in Michigan, there were a whole dozens of people who
Speaker 5: saw an extraterrestrial vehicle that was maneuvering at close range,
Speaker 5: and he went up and investigated and made some reference
Speaker 5: to it being swamp gas and gerald Ford went ballistic
Speaker 5: because his constituents went ballistic, and gerald Ford actually had
Speaker 5: an in quarry into it while he was a member
Speaker 5: of the House of Representatives. Of course, later as president
Speaker 5: he never dealt with this issue because basically presidential intelligence
Speaker 5: doesn't have access to those projects.
Speaker 1: When you say that he said it was swampcass, that
Speaker 1: jay On Heineg said it was swampcasts, So you're saying
Speaker 1: that Ford objected because he knew it was an extraterrestrial vehicle.
Speaker 5: He knew that some of his constituents, who are very credible,
Speaker 5: knew it was something real.
Speaker 1: What was his position then, what was he.
Speaker 5: He was actually believed it was real, as the.
Speaker 1: I mean in government is pre pet president.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he was in the House of Representatives in the Congress,
Speaker 5: he was a congressman before he was vice president and
Speaker 5: then president.
Speaker 1: And so he was upset that they were saying that
Speaker 1: it wasn't a real vehicle. So he clamped down on it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and actually held a hearing where a lot of
Speaker 5: people came and gave evidence and information, but it didn't
Speaker 5: go anywhere because it's Washington. Nothing ever goes anywhere in Washington.
Speaker 5: And so you know, I started as founder of Disclosure
Speaker 5: part dot org and now serious disclosure dot com. We
Speaker 5: began investigating this in nineteen ninety and you know, I'm
Speaker 5: a trauma doctor, emergency doctor who was running a very
Speaker 5: busy er and raising for kids. And I got involved
Speaker 5: with this because I knew about it since childhood. And
Speaker 5: you know, my I have family. My mom's brother uncle
Speaker 5: was an engineer that worked on the lunar module and
Speaker 5: I had an interest in this since I was a
Speaker 5: little child. So the thing that put Neil Armstrong on
Speaker 5: the on the moon, my family had a hand in that.
Speaker 5: So I think that what most people don't realize is
Speaker 5: that inside the intelligence community, the airspace community, there are
Speaker 5: a lot of people who are very knowledgeable about this,
Speaker 5: but they're not allowed to talk about it. It's a
Speaker 5: career ender for most of them. And that was what
Speaker 5: we did for Disclosure Project was to put all those
Speaker 5: folks together identify them. So I spent about ten years
Speaker 5: identifying who these people were. And first I had maybe
Speaker 5: half a dozen of them. Now we have over five hundred,
Speaker 5: five hundred and fifty.
Speaker 2: Who was the most credible people?
Speaker 1: Just folks listening to this that haven't watched that video,
Speaker 1: who are the most credible people?
Speaker 5: Well, we're gonna have some of them in the film. Serious,
Speaker 5: you know, that's like s I R I U S.
Speaker 5: Sirius is going to have a lot of this information
Speaker 5: in it, and some stuff is going to blow your mind,
Speaker 5: including the possibility of an actual body, a humanoid body
Speaker 5: that we're investigating. And we'll get into this in a
Speaker 5: moment and when you see it, you're going to go, really,
Speaker 5: my god. But you know, these witnesses that we have
Speaker 5: who are military, go from the head of investigations for
Speaker 5: the FAA, John Callahan to a people like Gordon Cooper,
Speaker 5: who was one of the early Mercury astronauts who his
Speaker 5: crew actually filmed one of these extra trestole vehicles landing
Speaker 5: on a dry lake bid out here near Edwards and
Speaker 5: he looked at the film and sent it on a
Speaker 5: Pentagon plane. Now the backstory to this, now this is
Speaker 5: giving an idea of how labyrinthing screwed up Washington's become
Speaker 5: and what Eisenhower said, And he said, but where are
Speaker 5: the military industry complex? Because it's going to get out
Speaker 5: of control and be a threat to our democracy. Gordon Cooper,
Speaker 5: you know, a very heroic early astronaut, had detailed information,
Speaker 5: what we call actionable intelligence on that event, this landing
Speaker 5: of a vehicle in broad daylight near Edwards Air Force
Speaker 5: Base in nineteen fifty six. Now, when Clinton was president,
Speaker 5: Gordon Cooper asked, was asked by the Secretary of Defense,
Speaker 5: William Cohen about this issue, and he says, yes, I
Speaker 5: absolutely will verify this, and I'll give you the information
Speaker 5: when and where and how it happened. So the Secretary
Speaker 5: of Defense of the United States of America had this information,
Speaker 5: made an inquiry through channels and came up with a
Speaker 5: dry hole. Basically, this stuff has all been put into
Speaker 5: a parallel universe that the senior people in our government
Speaker 5: have for the most part, no access to. Now, I
Speaker 5: would not have believed that if I hadn't been the
Speaker 5: guy who was brought to Washington during the Clinton years
Speaker 5: to do the briefing for the CIA director. And I
Speaker 5: was asked to go up there as a service, and
Speaker 5: I did it. Left my er and I put together
Speaker 5: a whole lot of these early witnesses, testimony, photographs, some
Speaker 5: really amazing government documents that we acquired through channels I
Speaker 5: don't want to talk about. And I put this briefing together,
Speaker 5: and so I go up there and here's the city
Speaker 5: CIA director, our James Woolsey, and his wife was there,
Speaker 5: who was at the time the chief operating officer of
Speaker 5: the National Academy of Sciences. And when I was first
Speaker 5: invited to go up there and brief the CI director,
Speaker 5: I was told they want you to come up here
Speaker 5: because President Clinton and he have inquired about this subject
Speaker 5: and are being denied access. And I have a letter
Speaker 5: proving this.
Speaker 1: President Clinton has been denied access. So they want you,
Speaker 1: a doctor who.
Speaker 5: Had a family connection to these programs and also to information.
Speaker 2: How did they know about you?
Speaker 5: Well, let me finish this Southern threat and I'll get
Speaker 5: to that, because that's a little blowing in mind even more.
Speaker 5: But what happened is that I really thought this was crap.
Speaker 5: I mean because his handler, the CI Director's handler who
Speaker 5: contacted me, he said, look, they need you to come
Speaker 5: up here because they can't find out anything, but they
Speaker 5: know stuff's going on. I thought they just wanted to
Speaker 5: pick my brain a sort of spooks, you know how spooks. Well,
Speaker 5: the spies will try to just get information. I went
Speaker 5: up there and the CI director was honestly, completely in
Speaker 5: the dark, and I was mortified. And towards the end
Speaker 5: of this almost three hour briefing that I did for
Speaker 5: the CI director, my wife was with me, and I
Speaker 5: gave him this white paper, this position paper that a
Speaker 5: summary of action that the president needed to take and
Speaker 5: he needed to take, and he My hands were shaking
Speaker 5: because I'm like this thirty five year old guy. Briefing
Speaker 5: the sitting CI director was very intimidating, frankly, and you know,
Speaker 5: at the end of it, I said, you know, we
Speaker 5: really need you to help disclose this information because the
Speaker 5: people need to know. But also the technologies that we've
Speaker 5: studied and have mastered for fifty years could get us
Speaker 5: off oil, we could fix this environment, we could fix
Speaker 5: the world's poverty problems and the geopolitical problems in the
Speaker 5: Middle East. And he looked at me, he says, how
Speaker 5: do we disclose that which we have no access to?
Speaker 5: And I just thought I thought I'd pass out. I said,
Speaker 5: what do you mean? You have to act? And this
Speaker 5: was from his mouth to my ears, And so I
Speaker 5: learned the hard way, the very very hard way that
Speaker 5: when you're dealing with things that are some people say
Speaker 5: above top secret, but the proper name is an unacknowledged
Speaker 5: special access project. And we have about one hundred to
Speaker 5: two hundred billion dollars a year in our treasury going
Speaker 5: into these rogue operations, and it's it's a criminal, it's
Speaker 5: our ageous that you know, just because you're the CI director,
Speaker 5: just because you're Secretary of Defense or on the Senate
Speaker 5: Intelligence Committee means nothing. And even the president. So the
Speaker 5: reason he those folks invited me to come up there
Speaker 5: is that the year before I had taken a team
Speaker 5: of people out on a beach using some experimental protocols
Speaker 5: to contact these vehicles and the occupants, and four of
Speaker 5: these UFOs popped into the sky, just boom boom, boom boom,
Speaker 5: which we have on videotape, a great videotapecause we didn't
Speaker 5: have good cameras back then, and there were a couple
Speaker 5: Air Force officers and pilots there, and this went up
Speaker 5: through the chain of command. A few months later, the
Speaker 5: former head of Army Intelligence invites me to a meeting,
Speaker 5: and then some National Security Agency people do and one
Speaker 5: thing leads to another, and I'm being invited to brief
Speaker 5: the sitting CIA director so that you know that.
Speaker 1: You contacted these spaceships.
Speaker 5: Well, this gets into a discussion. You know, that's complex,
Speaker 5: but yes.
Speaker 2: And you can do that at any time.
Speaker 5: Well not at any time, but I think that under
Speaker 5: the right that there are protocols, and we developed something
Speaker 5: called the close Encounters of the fifth kind of initiative,
Speaker 5: which is when you use this set of very very
Speaker 5: controversial protocols that deal with non locality, the fact that
Speaker 5: the universe has various dimensions that you can move through
Speaker 5: to go from one star system to another. But those
Speaker 5: dimensions that are at higher resonant fields than say linear
Speaker 5: space time or electromagnetism also interface with what I call
Speaker 5: coherent thought. So the Moody Blues were right when they
Speaker 5: said thinking is the best way to travel. And there's
Speaker 5: a component to where you're I'm probably going to lose
Speaker 5: half your listeners right now. No, I've got all right, Well,
Speaker 5: hey all you freaks, listen up, and listen up hard.
Speaker 5: You can develop technologies and we have these in classified
Speaker 5: projects now where you can have a what's called a
Speaker 5: switch that will interface with very intent thought. So it's
Speaker 5: beyond forget your iPhone. Now, if you're traveling from one
Speaker 5: star system to another, that's what you're going to be using.
Speaker 5: You're going to be using technologies that are phasing a
Speaker 5: multiples of the speed of light. And those dimensions also
Speaker 5: intersect at a certain point with coherent thought. Just like
Speaker 5: light is coherent, a laser is coherent light. And so
Speaker 5: this gets into the whole question of how over the
Speaker 5: history of humanity have there been so many reports of
Speaker 5: contact and there are I mean going all the way
Speaker 5: back to the Vimanas and the Vedas, to accounts that
Speaker 5: you know, there's a wonderful painting and the Middle Ages
Speaker 5: of this exactly. It looks like a modern UFO over
Speaker 5: the shoulder of Mary holding Jesus in a picture that's
Speaker 5: been from the fourteen hundreds. I've actually seen the original
Speaker 5: of this. So I think the question becomes, you know,
Speaker 5: we probably have always had extraterrestrial civilizations observing our little planet.
Speaker 5: The question is what happened in the last fifty to
Speaker 5: one hundred years that really got their attention, And I'm
Speaker 5: quite convinced it was when we started detonating thermo nuclear weapons.
Speaker 5: But one of the projects we're involved with is Disclosure
Speaker 5: project and another one is sort of a citizen's diplomacy effort, saying, look,
Speaker 5: since our government is dead in the water on this
Speaker 5: in terms of the Secretary of State and folks like that.
Speaker 5: And I know I went up to the UN and
Speaker 5: met with back when but butrus Gali was U and
Speaker 5: Secretary General and brief these guys and her Leagali, the
Speaker 5: wife of the Secretary General, and I talked about this
Speaker 5: in depth, and she said, they're not going to let
Speaker 5: us deal with something like this. So I started a
Speaker 5: citizens diplomacy effort back in nineteen ninety. But this is
Speaker 5: actually and this is the part that I get ridiculed
Speaker 5: the most for. But it's the reason why the intelligence
Speaker 5: community took it most seriously is that they knew that
Speaker 5: we had discovered the Ressetta Stone of contact and they
Speaker 5: were very concerned, now concern from the covert end, from
Speaker 5: the end of a lot of these Washington operatives. They
Speaker 5: were just fascinated. They didn't understand it because it was
Speaker 5: sort of past their scientific understanding, but they were very interested.
Speaker 1: And this is something I hate and interrupt you no, no, please,
Speaker 1: It is something that we can't really just gloss over
Speaker 1: the idea that coherent thought, as you say, intersects with
Speaker 1: these other levels, these other dimensions that we can't normally access.
Speaker 5: Correct.
Speaker 2: How did you.
Speaker 1: Find out about this and how did you develop the
Speaker 1: ability in.
Speaker 5: The hot seat early man.
Speaker 2: Well, I need to mean you have to.
Speaker 1: When you say that you can do that, I mean
Speaker 1: somehow or another, you have to without getting anybody killed.
Speaker 1: You have to explain how did you figure that out?
Speaker 5: I figured it out when I was a teenager, and
Speaker 5: through a series of experiences I had, and you know,
Speaker 5: I was I was talking to Thomas Jane, who's an
Speaker 5: actor here in town, about this, and I had a
Speaker 5: near death experience when I was seventeen. I was very sick,
Speaker 5: and I had an experience that took me into some
Speaker 5: awareness about the nature of consciousness and the non locality
Speaker 5: of mind and the fact that the mind is actually
Speaker 5: a singularity, that there's a only one mind and it's
Speaker 5: just shining through various individuals, appearing as many. And this experience,
Speaker 5: although it sounds very spiritual and religious, was very palpable.
Speaker 5: And I was raised a very devout atheist, so we
Speaker 5: didn't believe in anything, and so when I realized that
Speaker 5: this was real, I began to study meditation, and through
Speaker 5: that began to have some experiences where I realized this
Speaker 5: could happen. And I had a contact experience. I was eighteen.
Speaker 5: It was a few months later in the fall of
Speaker 5: nineteen seventy three, and I was doing this. I was meditating,
Speaker 5: and then I was doing what I was now called
Speaker 5: SRV scientific remote viewing, where you use consciousness to see
Speaker 5: remote places. And of course Army Intelligence and the CI
Speaker 5: of experimented with this for years, which you may or
Speaker 5: may not know about. We can get into that. But
Speaker 5: I know all those guys. I know all the SRV people.
Speaker 5: But I was as a kid, you know, and I
Speaker 5: just turned eighteen. I was doing this, and suddenly I
Speaker 5: had this experience where I thought, well, what if I
Speaker 5: try to go into that state of one mind that
Speaker 5: I experienced when I was a kid six six months earlier,
Speaker 5: when I had this near death experience. So I did,
Speaker 5: and then I had an experience where I remote viewed
Speaker 5: in salty space and I could see that there was
Speaker 5: an ET spacecraft out there, and I made contact and
Speaker 5: it appeared and it literally materialized right near the mountain
Speaker 5: where I.
Speaker 2: Was how you to do this?
Speaker 5: Eighteen No drugs? No, No, I've never done any drugs.
Speaker 2: He's never done any drugs, no psychedelics, nothing, never.
Speaker 5: Wow.
Speaker 2: Are you aware aware of dimethyl trip to being? Do
Speaker 2: you know what?
Speaker 5: I do?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 1: It's a supposedly your brain produces it when you're in
Speaker 1: periods of extreme stress or near death experiences. And it's
Speaker 1: also the same chemical that's in ayahuasca, which has been
Speaker 1: used by indigenous tribes.
Speaker 5: To Now, this was just this was a very natural
Speaker 5: sort of thing that happened.
Speaker 1: But what I'm saying is that these people that are
Speaker 1: having these experiences, that are having a lot of people
Speaker 1: that are having alien contact experiences, they are all having
Speaker 1: them in the middle of the night, like most of
Speaker 1: them are having them at night. And I'm not discounting
Speaker 1: this in any way, in fact, maybe possibly enhancing the
Speaker 1: possibility of people understanding this or the vehicle the mind
Speaker 1: produces this dimethyl trip to me during rem sleep, and
Speaker 1: it's believed. It's still a very sketchy thing. We know
Speaker 1: that the body produces it. We know they believe the
Speaker 1: pineal glam which is literally your third eye and reptiles
Speaker 1: it as a retina of corny and also they believe
Speaker 1: that's what the evidence on it apparently is like really
Speaker 1: kind of it's hard to figure out exactly, but they
Speaker 1: know the body has it.
Speaker 2: They know it's.
Speaker 1: Produced by the liver and the lungs for sure. And
Speaker 1: this chemical, when you get it and you give it
Speaker 1: to people that have had UFO abduction experiences, it gives
Speaker 1: them the exact same experience. It brings them into contact
Speaker 1: with other beings. The idea that this is just a
Speaker 1: hallucination because your your body has some endogenous chemical in
Speaker 1: it and it's spikes and stimulates the visual cortex and
Speaker 1: what have you, and you have this That is what
Speaker 1: everyone has always assumed whenever you talk about anything hallucinatory
Speaker 1: or psychedelic, right, But what they're not, what a lot
Speaker 1: of people haven't taken into consideration, is that you're basically
Speaker 1: a conglomeration of chemicals. Your neurotransmitters, dopamine, serotonin, There's a
Speaker 1: million different chemicals which as their levels vary up and down,
Speaker 1: it drastically changes your reality, your happiness level, your appreciation love, oxytocin.
Speaker 1: All these things proven one hundred percent change your reality,
Speaker 1: change the physical meat vehicle reality that you have. And
Speaker 1: I think, for whatever reason, when we think of something
Speaker 1: in the mind, when we think of the mind, like
Speaker 1: you're you're saying that coherent thought can contact other entities
Speaker 1: from other people are like, what the fuck are you
Speaker 1: talking about? You know, that's like the initial immediate reaction.
Speaker 5: Because we've all been misunder miseducated about the nature of real.
Speaker 2: Well of consciousness.
Speaker 1: I've always tried to get people to try to understand
Speaker 1: how bizarre just just imagination is. And I don't mean
Speaker 1: imagination by your imagining things that aren't there. That's not real.
Speaker 1: You're playing a game with your mind. What I mean
Speaker 1: by imagination is everything, including the language that we're speaking
Speaker 1: with right now, the vehicle in which this language is
Speaker 1: getting delivered through the Internet. All of this came from
Speaker 1: the imagination. Everything, this table came from the imagination. Everything
Speaker 1: is the arm that holds this microphone. Someone thought this
Speaker 1: shit up and then all of a sudden it manifested
Speaker 1: itself in a physical form when they actively created it.
Speaker 1: That seems so normal to us, It seems so normal.
Speaker 1: But we're the only fucking animal in the world we
Speaker 1: know that can.
Speaker 5: Do this well. And it goes beyond that, because you know,
Speaker 5: doctor John at Princeton University had the Princeton Engineering Anomalies
Speaker 5: Search Lab, and I knew doctor John, and they had
Speaker 5: proven that you could set up a random number generator
Speaker 5: machine and put your thought towards it and begin to move,
Speaker 5: whether it's fitting out zeros or ones, and that there
Speaker 5: is in fact been proven scientifically that the mind is
Speaker 5: actually operating non locally, meaning that it's not limited to
Speaker 5: space and time in a linear way. And these studies
Speaker 5: that have been done by Dean Rayden and doctor John
Speaker 5: and many other scientists with very good credentials. I mean,
Speaker 5: doctor John was an engineer and at Princeton what they
Speaker 5: found is that in fact, the mind itself is what
Speaker 5: Urban Schrodinger said. And Urban Schrodinger, of course was the
Speaker 5: father of particle wave theory and quantum mechanics, and I
Speaker 5: think it was in nineteen ten or so he said,
Speaker 5: the total number of minds in the universe is one.
Speaker 5: That is, it's a singularity. And so that understanding is
Speaker 5: I mean, I know it sounds sort of out there,
Speaker 5: but no, I mean it actually sounds very vedic in
Speaker 5: the sense of a Buddhist, of a Danta. But well, yeah,
Speaker 5: I mean I guess maybe Sarah Palin, But did I
Speaker 5: say that. I'm sorry, I apologize. But the reality is
Speaker 5: the world isn't flat, and there's a whole area of
Speaker 5: physics and science that has been drilled down on for
Speaker 5: years that establish all these things is true. It isn't
Speaker 5: talked about because the high priests of religion and the
Speaker 5: high priests of science are all opposed to this information
Speaker 5: coming out the idea. So part of the secrecy around
Speaker 5: this whole UFO issue isn't just the physical energy and
Speaker 5: propulsion systems. It's the paradigm because if you if you
Speaker 5: asked the question in fact, going back to this dinner
Speaker 5: with the CIA director and his wife, very smart lady,
Speaker 5: and she turns in we're sitting across the table having dinner.
Speaker 5: I mean, that was the cover story was it was
Speaker 5: a dinner and she says, how are they community across
Speaker 5: the vastness of space? And of course I had the
Speaker 5: you know, I didn't know whether to tell her something
Speaker 5: that sounded scientific so I maintained my credibility, or to
Speaker 5: tell her the truth and risk losing all my credibility.
Speaker 5: But I decided then in the early days of this
Speaker 5: project that if someone's smart enough to ask the question,
Speaker 5: I'm going to answer it honestly, even though it's going
Speaker 5: to blow their mind. And so I looked at her
Speaker 5: and her husband, the CI director sitting next to her.
Speaker 5: I didn't really understand where she was going. I said, look,
Speaker 5: take her milky way one hundred thousand light years across,
Speaker 5: all right, So that in one hundred thousand light years
Speaker 5: is a distance. That's how far you would go at
Speaker 5: one hundred and eighty six thousand miles a second. For
Speaker 5: one hundred thousand years going at that speed, that's just
Speaker 5: our own galaxy. Now you take one percent of that,
Speaker 5: say a thousand light years at the speed of your
Speaker 5: cell phone or radio wave or TV wave or this
Speaker 5: system we're using right here, for someone from a star
Speaker 5: system one percent of the way through our galaxy for
Speaker 5: them to say hello, how are you? And for a
Speaker 5: spacecraft that's at another star system a thousand light years
Speaker 5: away say here Earth to say, fine, how are you doing?
Speaker 5: That just took how long years? Two thousand years, one
Speaker 5: thousand one way and one thousand another. So the time
Speaker 5: since the birth of cry so the speed of light
Speaker 5: is too damn slow, and so when you begin to
Speaker 5: go through what I call the crossing point of light,
Speaker 5: it's like the sound barrier was a big deal. The
Speaker 5: biggest deal is the light barrier. And when you go
Speaker 5: past the light barrier, you're going to cross into these
Speaker 5: kind of multi phasic resonant dimensions, part of which hook
Speaker 5: into the singularity of mind and thought. And actually, this
Speaker 5: film that we're working on, which is the largest crowdfunded
Speaker 5: documentary in history to my knowledge, serious and you can
Speaker 5: find out about it serious disclosure dot com. It's been
Speaker 5: crowdfunded by the public. It's all been funded by people
Speaker 5: out there, thousands of people. We're going to do a Oh,
Speaker 5: we're going to do a premiere here in La on
Speaker 5: April twenty second, if you want to come, but I
Speaker 5: would love to. Okay, come.
Speaker 1: Well, we can't send things to the speed of light, right,
Speaker 1: I mean even that even saying.
Speaker 5: That beyond the speed of light, but they can't do that.
Speaker 1: Right, I mean, you can't send information in the form
Speaker 1: of light yet, can you not?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 5: No, but I'm well, fiber optics and things of this sort,
Speaker 5: but does that move with the speed of light pretty much? Yeah,
Speaker 5: But what I'm saying is that if you go beyond
Speaker 5: the speed of light, it's a whole new physics, of course. Okay,
Speaker 5: so that's what If these craft are here, and now
Speaker 5: we have I have over four thousand cases where they've landed,
Speaker 5: and we have evidence. I have three thousand, five hundred
Speaker 5: pilot cases. We have over five hundred whistleblowers top secret military,
Speaker 5: corporate people, and I have one hundred and ten of
Speaker 5: them on digital videotape, although nobody wants to see it,
Speaker 5: but I have it. So the question is, if they're here,
Speaker 5: how the hell they get here. Well, they're not using
Speaker 5: an exceon jet a fuel, and they're not using a
Speaker 5: solid rocket booster, and they're not using an ion drive
Speaker 5: or anything linear. So you have to begin to have
Speaker 5: this question. So when the CI director's wife asked me this,
Speaker 5: I told her about that they had technologies that interface
Speaker 5: with thought and consciousness, and that sounded It may sound
Speaker 5: as bizarre to people now, but if you took your
Speaker 5: cell phone and showed Thomas Jefferson your smartphone, they would
Speaker 5: think it was magic. If you went to Salem, Massachusetts
Speaker 5: a couple hundred years ago, you'd be burned at the
Speaker 5: stake as a witch. So the point is is that
Speaker 5: people have to have some humility about the fact that
Speaker 5: humans are one half of one step out of the
Speaker 5: jungle technologically, and we're only one hundred or so years
Speaker 5: into anything resumming real technology. So when we're dealing with
Speaker 5: civilizations that are ten to the six to ten to
Speaker 5: the seventh, one hundred thousand to million years ahead of us,
Speaker 5: we have to have some humility about what that might
Speaker 5: look like. And so when I explained this to the wife,
Speaker 5: the SI director, she just looked at me and said,
Speaker 5: I thought it had to be something like that. I mean,
Speaker 5: people are ready to actually understand this. Not everyone has
Speaker 5: to be retarded on this. And I tell folks that
Speaker 5: it's what's a shame in mind mind is that our
Speaker 5: civilization has been exploring these sort of what they call
Speaker 5: border land sciences for one hundred years and it's all
Speaker 5: been kept very secret or debunked or ridiculed, and it's
Speaker 5: actually holding us back, not only socially and spiritually, but
Speaker 5: environmentally and in every other way. Because this nexus of
Speaker 5: where you have these advanced transdimensional physics come together, that's
Speaker 5: how you're propelling through one point in space to another
Speaker 5: across galaxies. It's also how we're going to be able
Speaker 5: to run this planet's energy grid without a grid, where
Speaker 5: every home, business, and car can pull energy out of
Speaker 5: the fabrica space time through this kind of physics. And
Speaker 5: so there's this nexus where electromagnetism and transdimensional physics comes together,
Speaker 5: and then you cross it a little deeper, and that's
Speaker 5: where you get into the science of consciousness. And this
Speaker 5: becomes a very very complex issue for most people because
Speaker 5: it's new to them, but once you understand the fundamental
Speaker 5: science behind it, it's really very simple.
Speaker 1: Need to understand is that no one two hundred years
Speaker 1: ago even thought of a camera. Right two hundred years ago,
Speaker 1: when you want to picture something, you had to draw it,
Speaker 1: and there was you know, the idea of a camera
Speaker 1: was so the idea of a movie, the idea of
Speaker 1: sending a video on your phone to your friend. You
Speaker 1: could take a video of you here right now and
Speaker 1: send it to a friend and they would get it
Speaker 1: almost instantly. That's just a tiny blip in human history,
Speaker 1: a two hundred year blip in human history, from riding
Speaker 1: horses to sending video through the internet.
Speaker 5: One hundred years yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, and the people that existed back then would
Speaker 1: have never seen it coming. And if technology, and we
Speaker 1: know it does, accelerates exponentially, what we're dealing with a
Speaker 1: thousand years from now, ten thousand years from now is
Speaker 1: completely unrecognizable. We live in an area where our solar
Speaker 1: system is kind of scary. There's a lot of rocks
Speaker 1: out there, and they fly around and occasionally slam in
Speaker 1: the shit, and they can they can ruin civilization for
Speaker 1: a little bit. But there might be solar systems out
Speaker 1: there that doesn't take place. There could be a civilization
Speaker 1: that developed two three billion years ago. I mean, we
Speaker 1: really don't know. We have no idea.
Speaker 5: Well, the Earth has had life for seven hundred million
Speaker 5: years and all scientists recognize that, except people who think
Speaker 5: that the world was made six thousand years ago. And
Speaker 5: I have nothing to say that those folks except to
Speaker 5: say get over it. But I know, I think you're
Speaker 5: I'm an outrageous person, at a little bit outrageous. You
Speaker 5: haven't heard anything yet.
Speaker 6: Stayed, Yeah, I'm ready all right, trapped in so but
Speaker 6: but if you really look at our technological development, you know,
Speaker 6: my grandmother was born in post reconstruction South in the
Speaker 6: late eighteen hundreds.
Speaker 5: Her Son worked on the lunar module put the first
Speaker 5: man on the moon. But by the time we landed
Speaker 5: on the moon in nineteen sixty nine, we were fifteen
Speaker 5: years into having classified anti gravity propulsion devices.
Speaker 1: The biggest mind fuck that I always trying to drop
Speaker 1: on people with time is between the invention of the airplane,
Speaker 1: it was less than fifty years that someone you use
Speaker 1: that airplane to drop a nuclear weapon, right.
Speaker 5: And see this is this is pretty crazy. This gets
Speaker 5: into the whole question. You know, I've had a lot
Speaker 5: of people ask me we have And if you go
Speaker 5: to our side Serious Disclosure dot com, there's a section
Speaker 5: that has all these top secret military guys on it,
Speaker 5: and part of it is that there's a whole grouping
Speaker 5: of them. I have a dozen of them, so who
Speaker 5: are at strategic air command facilities and nuclear weapons storage
Speaker 5: areas and processing areas and all this stuff. And every
Speaker 5: one of them were overflown by et spacecraft back in
Speaker 5: the forties, fifties, sixties because they were very concerned about
Speaker 5: what we were doing, because we were going from having
Speaker 5: these technologies to weaponizing them, and our technological development had
Speaker 5: gotten ahead of our social and spiritual development. Way ahead,
Speaker 5: and this is an existential threat. But you know, as
Speaker 5: an emergency doctor, I used to have, you know, crazy
Speaker 5: people come into the er and I'd have to commit them,
Speaker 5: and you know, it's dangerous to yourself for others. And
Speaker 5: what I found is that if you take a step
Speaker 5: back and look humanity through the eyes of extraterrestrial civilizations,
Speaker 5: we've become dangerous to ourselves, but we're also dangerous to others.
Speaker 5: And moreover, we become an existential threat to the biosphere
Speaker 5: of the Earth, where we're killing the oceans, the atmosphere
Speaker 5: and everything else. All this is unnecessary. So the question
Speaker 5: is the misanthropic sociopaths that are running the planet into
Speaker 5: the ground are going to have to be stood down
Speaker 5: by the people getting behind disclosure, getting behind the technologies
Speaker 5: and basically saying we're fed up and we're not going
Speaker 5: to put up with this anymore. It's like the moving
Speaker 5: Network and we're mad as hell, and I think people
Speaker 5: and it isn't about doing anything violent. It's about saying
Speaker 5: we need to just move forward because Washington isn't going
Speaker 5: to do it. My uncle's company, North Grummin isn't Lockheed
Speaker 5: Martin isn't going to do it. It's you and me
Speaker 5: and the other people out there who get the situation
Speaker 5: we're in and want to fix it.
Speaker 1: One of the things that might have also got their
Speaker 1: attention was Operations Starfish Prime. You aware of that from
Speaker 1: nineteen sixty two where they launched a nuclear bomb in
Speaker 1: a space He blew up a nuclear bomb in space.
Speaker 5: Well, I actually one of our witnesses, Colonel Diedrichson, was
Speaker 5: with the Atomic Energy Commission, which became the DOE, and
Speaker 5: he was an Air Force colonel and his responsibility was
Speaker 5: over all the nuclear facilities. But he knew of a
Speaker 5: program where we were going to lob a thermonuclear weapon
Speaker 5: and detonated on the Moon and when that okay, and
Speaker 5: they actually worked on this, and when it went exo atmospheric,
Speaker 5: when it left our atmosphere and it was intercepted by
Speaker 5: an extra trestful vehicle and basically de materialized was taken out.
Speaker 5: And he knew had personal knowledge.
Speaker 1: Of this, so they had actually tried to do.
Speaker 5: This, they actually launched it and it was on its
Speaker 5: way to the Moon. So you know, there have been
Speaker 5: a lot of really create It's like doctor Strange Love
Speaker 5: on steroids with some of these guys. And you know,
Speaker 5: I still work with a lot of folks who are
Speaker 5: with the Agency and aerospace industry. And there's a term
Speaker 5: at the Naval Research Labs and CIA for this whole
Speaker 5: area of science, and it's called w FM. It stands
Speaker 5: for it's not a radio station, by the way, it
Speaker 5: stands for weird science and freaking magic. And that's what
Speaker 5: they call it.
Speaker 2: And grown, man, you should never use the word freaking.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't. This is what they call it.
Speaker 1: They need to be stopped if they have that access
Speaker 1: to technology and they use the word freaking.
Speaker 2: Yes, you can't be trusting them, Oh you can't. They're
Speaker 2: held back.
Speaker 5: Actually, I'll tell you that a lot of them are
Speaker 5: really good people who want to see the secrecy end, but.
Speaker 1: There's not much they can do as an individual when
Speaker 1: you're in a compartmentalized sort of a system like well, I.
Speaker 5: Got a lot of them come forward. You know, almost
Speaker 5: all of our top secret guys had signed security oos.
Speaker 5: But here here's something I want everyone to listen carefully.
Speaker 5: Daniel Sheehan, who is as constitutional attorney who did Pentagon
Speaker 5: papers and Silquid case and all this and I ran
Speaker 5: this by him. I said, look, I've done briefings for
Speaker 5: here's a short list. The Director of Central Intelligence, the
Speaker 5: head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, members of the Senate
Speaker 5: Intelligence Committee, senior people who are on the House, various
Speaker 5: House committees, Government Oversight Committee, Presidential staff. The head of
Speaker 5: intelligence for the Joint Jesus Staff was called J two. Personally.
Speaker 5: I took astronautger Mitchell to one of those briefings for
Speaker 5: the admiral Admiral Tom Wilson. And every one of these
Speaker 5: people had been inquiring about this issue and had been
Speaker 5: denied access. One of them, who I will not name,
Speaker 5: I learned before my briefing with him, I had given
Speaker 5: a document that's going to be in this film serious,
Speaker 5: And the document is it's on the front of the thing,
Speaker 5: the briefing I put together for President Obama. And if
Speaker 5: you go down the list.
Speaker 1: One you put together a briefing for President Obama.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he asked you to someone senior involved with his
Speaker 5: team did And so.
Speaker 1: Jesus Christ, how weird must that be? To be the
Speaker 1: president and then to get in there and go, Okay,
Speaker 1: what the fuck is.
Speaker 5: Going on with the Emperor? Has no clue?
Speaker 1: Hey call that that doctor. What's that guy's name, Virginia,
Speaker 1: Go get that guy.
Speaker 5: Yeah. So no, But what happened is that when when
Speaker 5: when this admiral looked at this document and it's gonna
Speaker 5: blow people's mind when they see this. Uh, it's a
Speaker 5: National Reconnaissance Office document. NRO does all the top secret
Speaker 5: bicatellites and over their headquarters it says we own the
Speaker 5: night and the oh yeah, that's their motto, we own
Speaker 5: the Night. It's pretty yeah, it's pretty spooky. Yeah, but so,
Speaker 5: you know, these are kind of dudes I work with
Speaker 5: all the time. What happened is that the one of
Speaker 5: these compartments, it has a whole distribution list cosmic ops,
Speaker 5: magic ops, da da da da da da da, you know,
Speaker 5: all kinds of It's about twenty of them. And this
Speaker 5: is a document that was not declassified. It was given
Speaker 5: to me by a source that I want to talk about.
Speaker 5: And this admiral recognized one of those compartments, so he
Speaker 5: contacted them and on the other end of the phone
Speaker 5: they said, he said look that I'm so and so,
Speaker 5: and they said, yes, sir, we know who you are.
Speaker 5: And he says, well, I want to be read into
Speaker 5: which is military speak for brief on this project. And
Speaker 5: they said, sir, we cannot discuss this project with you. You
Speaker 5: don't have a need to know. He says, what do
Speaker 5: you mean. I'm the head of intelligence for the Joint
Speaker 5: Chiefs of Staff. How can I not have a need
Speaker 5: to know? And they said, sir, we will not discuss
Speaker 5: this with you. Clip blocking.
Speaker 1: So who the fuck knows? Who's like?
Speaker 2: How many people are there? Have you determined that.
Speaker 5: The Yeah, I have, I know some of the members
Speaker 5: of the of there's a committee and it's transnational. It
Speaker 5: started out much smaller and less opaque back in the
Speaker 5: forties when Truman was around.
Speaker 2: Does it have a name?
Speaker 5: It did have the name Majestic, and that is not
Speaker 5: a myth, and so.
Speaker 2: He's Majestic twelve, right? Is that what it was?
Speaker 5: Yes? But the document is of the nineties that I
Speaker 5: got it still had Magic m Ajic on it. And
Speaker 5: so a lot of these programs, you know, they've gone
Speaker 5: through multiple generations of evolution. And now I understand it's
Speaker 5: a committee of two or three hundred folks who are
Speaker 5: you know, corporate, very deep kind of shadow government operations.
Speaker 5: The mistake the public makes is that they think that
Speaker 5: just because you're the president or the CIA director or
Speaker 5: member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, you're going to have
Speaker 5: access to those. And that's because they do not understand
Speaker 5: what Rumsfeldt said is true on the day before nine
Speaker 5: to eleven. And this is going to be in the
Speaker 5: film where he said there's two point three trillion dollars
Speaker 5: basically missing that we can account for out of the
Speaker 5: Department of Defense budget over the last few years. Two
Speaker 5: point three trillion, not billion. Now we found out, and
Speaker 5: I discovered this in the early nineties, that there's somewhere
Speaker 5: between one hundred and two hundred billion a year basically
Speaker 5: just being stolen going into these illegal projects. And so
Speaker 5: when she Han and I looked at this this attorney,
Speaker 5: I said, look, if all these people who have a
Speaker 5: need to know in the constitutional chain of command are
Speaker 5: being to deceived and what have you, I'm going to
Speaker 5: declare all those projects rogue a priori illegal. Therefore, anyone
Speaker 5: who signed a security oath for them, I'm going to
Speaker 5: unilaterally announce that they're released from them. So all of
Speaker 5: you listening, if you've been in any of these projects
Speaker 5: with Lockheed, Northrop, SAIC, the CIA, you do not have
Speaker 5: to go by the secrecy because if they are denying
Speaker 5: access to the people who are in the constitutional chain
Speaker 5: of command, which I can prove they have in a
Speaker 5: court of law, those projects are rogue and therefore those
Speaker 5: security oaths have no enforceability. Now whether or not you
Speaker 5: have the courage to come forward is another question. But
Speaker 5: what I was very glad to be able to do
Speaker 5: between the early nineties and two thousand and one with
Speaker 5: the Disclosure Project is to pull together the people who
Speaker 5: did have a courage and they're still coming forward, and
Speaker 5: when we have people contact me all the time who
Speaker 5: are in these projects, who give us information, intelligence, and
Speaker 5: it's really a citizen's effort. I mean, I've never been
Speaker 5: in the government in my entire life, but I think
Speaker 5: this is what you have an idea, and if the
Speaker 5: idea picks up steam and people see the reason for it.
Speaker 5: But the other thing is to do it in a
Speaker 5: way where people feel supported. And that's why we did
Speaker 5: this in a way where there were dozens that came
Speaker 5: out at once. I mean I think in the initial
Speaker 5: batch of people came forward, it was about seventy.
Speaker 1: One of the things I always want to get into
Speaker 1: people's heads when they start talking about the government or
Speaker 1: the people in charge or you know, those in the know.
Speaker 1: The idea that they're exchanging information has been proven false
Speaker 1: time and time again. Right.
Speaker 2: Not only that, what's really.
Speaker 1: Blown me away lately is finding out that, especially in
Speaker 1: this supposed patriotic time of war, we have government factions
Speaker 1: that don't like other government factions.
Speaker 5: It's always been that way.
Speaker 1: I was blown away when portray us was outed by
Speaker 1: the FBI.
Speaker 2: I'd be like, are you fucking crazy? Like that is?
Speaker 1: You're talking about the head of the CIA, and there's
Speaker 1: the FBI is spying on him over an affair, and
Speaker 1: you're going to bring down this beloved national hero. Stupid,
Speaker 1: unbelievably stupid, but also unbelievably revealing about how partitioned our
Speaker 1: government truly is and how difficult it would be to
Speaker 1: get accessed to some critical information if this information is
Speaker 1: in any way deemed too sensitive or too controversial, or
Speaker 1: to whatever, too paradigm shifting for average eyes.
Speaker 5: Well, let's make this very simple. If you acknowledge that
Speaker 5: the UFOs are there and they're real, and anyone with
Speaker 5: an IQ over mud it's going to ask the question,
Speaker 5: then how did they get here? If you ask that question,
Speaker 5: we have the answers for it. And if the public
Speaker 5: knows that, then they know we don't need excellon mobile,
Speaker 5: we don't need oil, gas, coal, nuclear power, or centralized
Speaker 5: utility grew.
Speaker 1: That's assuming, though, that most people believe that the UFOs
Speaker 1: are real, because.
Speaker 5: I am about fifty to sixty percent do now.
Speaker 2: I think they say that. I think they say.
Speaker 1: But I think they most of the time will look
Speaker 1: for terrestrial explanations most rational people.
Speaker 5: Well, no, actually, what I'm no. There was just a
Speaker 5: poll that came out a month ago and there's actually
Speaker 5: forty three percent of the public believe that extraterrestrial life
Speaker 5: has been on the planet here now.
Speaker 1: Fifty one percent believe that the Earth is less than
Speaker 1: ten thousand years old. You know that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, wellther well, I don't know if it's that high.
Speaker 5: I heard it was about a quarter of the population.
Speaker 1: So gallop pole, I think twenty ten, twenty ten, they
Speaker 1: got fifty one percent.
Speaker 5: The Flatter Society still has a lot of members, I guess.
Speaker 5: But you know, here's the here's the bigger issue is
Speaker 5: that if you bring this information out and let's let's
Speaker 5: say that one of the objectives of what I'm working
Speaker 5: on now.
Speaker 2: I mean, let me just clear that up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, forty six percent okay, creationist view of human origins
Speaker 1: forty forty.
Speaker 5: Six per well, but of the creationist view, not all
Speaker 5: those people think the world is ten thousand years old.
Speaker 5: I think that number is only about ten thousand.
Speaker 2: Years, though they're saying ten thousand years.
Speaker 1: This is what in this study, the Galop study, the
Speaker 1: very specifically, forty six percent of Americans believe the creation's
Speaker 1: view that God created humans in their present form at
Speaker 1: a time within the last ten thousand years.
Speaker 5: Oh God, you're going to make me move to norwayad.
Speaker 1: Has a good choice to Canada's right there, and they're badass,
Speaker 1: I know, you know. But just to throw some salt
Speaker 1: on your idea, that makes all you want. Well, look,
Speaker 1: I told you I'm a huge fan of the UFO experience.
Speaker 1: I mean, I really want it to be real. But
Speaker 1: just because forty seven percent of what have the fuck think?
Speaker 1: Forty six percent think that the earth right?
Speaker 5: No, no, you're right here? Yeah, and but the evidence
Speaker 5: speaks for herself. And I told someone wants.
Speaker 1: But what does it what percentage? Okay, let's let's just
Speaker 1: be honest or rather, let's open this. What percentage of
Speaker 1: UFO sightings are real? How what percentage are totally made up?
Speaker 1: And what percentage are a confusion?
Speaker 5: But that's not the metric we're using. We're going by
Speaker 5: government release documents. We're going by people who are insiders,
Speaker 5: who have actually handled extra trust yours.
Speaker 1: So when you're talking about extraconferences, you're talking about experiences
Speaker 1: from people who are one hundred percent credible bulletproof.
Speaker 5: War and only that. But if you have the former
Speaker 5: Minister of Defense of Canada say that he checked out
Speaker 5: with a US Air Force general that in fact, there
Speaker 5: was an accident that happened in New Mexico in nineteen
Speaker 5: forty seven, which people call Roswell, and that what Philip Corso,
Speaker 5: Colonel Corso wrote in his book the day after Roswell
Speaker 5: was substantially correct. And this is the Honorable Paul Hellier,
Speaker 5: and he and I did a press conference in Toronto
Speaker 5: a couple of years ago, and he has completely verified this.
Speaker 5: So the question is, and the same thing happened with
Speaker 5: five Star Admiral Lord Hill Norton. I mean here he
Speaker 5: was the Minister of Defense and he found out after
Speaker 5: the fact that in fact, an extra trustal vehicle had
Speaker 5: landed at the event waters U Royal Air Force Base
Speaker 5: at Rendal from Forest in England, and we have multiple
Speaker 5: Disclosure Project witnesses who were there. And it came out
Speaker 5: recently that the Ministry of Defense in Great Britain released
Speaker 5: the documents on that where they had physical evidence that
Speaker 5: this thing actually did land and left physical traces, et cetera,
Speaker 5: and so on. So I tell people, you know, usually
Speaker 5: the New York Times say, well, we need two or
Speaker 5: three corroborating witnesses to something, particularly three if it's a
Speaker 5: very controversial story. I said, yes, But the Disclosure Project
Speaker 5: has hundreds of these sort of people, thousands of cases
Speaker 5: like this, and we're not talking about just people.
Speaker 2: Per event. They don't mean like.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but we have we have an we have event.
Speaker 5: We have multiple ones for this landing at Rendils from
Speaker 5: far we have multiple ones from the minor North Dakota.
Speaker 5: It happens where there will be some of them, you know,
Speaker 5: four or five, six at one event. They are very
Speaker 5: incredible military people. And so why isn't you know, why
Speaker 5: isn't the lamestream news, the mainstream news reporting this. If
Speaker 5: you put together this amount of information, and then the
Speaker 5: question becomes how free is our media and how free
Speaker 5: is our market and how free is our country? Because
Speaker 5: I think there's more corruption than people can imagine. And
Speaker 5: I'm not a conspiracy theory person. I do.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, yes you are.
Speaker 5: No, I'm not.
Speaker 1: How dare you? No, I'm not, But just be honest.
Speaker 1: You're okay, okay, but about UFO conspiracy, like it was.
Speaker 5: The mafia conspiracy of a criminal enterprise. Yes, but it's
Speaker 5: not a theory, it's a fact. There's a big difference between.
Speaker 1: The Obviously you're talking about a UFO conspiracy and energy conspiracy.
Speaker 1: You're talking about the suppressing information.
Speaker 5: People conspire in their own interests. And if you're you gotta,
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I know you don't like conspiracy theorists, but okay, well,
Speaker 1: I just.
Speaker 5: I think it's misused and I think that you know,
Speaker 5: just weight it's a loaded thing, and it's like, you know,
Speaker 5: it's like when Larry King asked me, do you believe?
Speaker 5: I said, well, you know, I believe in a lot
Speaker 5: of things that you can't see and prove. But if
Speaker 5: I have four thousand cases where these things have landed,
Speaker 5: if I have hundreds of photographs and videotapes. If I
Speaker 5: have dozens of top secret guys who can corroborate this,
Speaker 5: why is that a belief? I mean, you believe in
Speaker 5: God and some other things, but I mean this is
Speaker 5: not a matter of belief.
Speaker 2: Most people believe.
Speaker 1: And I'll quote Neil de grass Tyson who says that
Speaker 1: eyewitness testimony is the least reliable of all pieces of evidence.
Speaker 5: That's right.
Speaker 1: But what physical evidence do you have that goes along
Speaker 1: with eyewitness sessimony that you believe is the most compelling?
Speaker 5: Well, I think the most compelling that I've ever seen.
Speaker 5: It's something we're working on right now, and it remains
Speaker 5: to be seen if it's going to be what we
Speaker 5: think it is, and we're going to know fairly soon.
Speaker 5: And I don't want to get ahead of myself, but
Speaker 5: I was introduced to an institute that acquired a small
Speaker 5: humanoid being about six inches in length.
Speaker 1: This is in the trailer for Serious. I've seen this,
Speaker 1: this little skeleton that's X rayed.
Speaker 5: And CAT scanned, and we're now doing the genetic work
Speaker 5: up at the top university in the world that's doing this.
Speaker 1: Pull that up, Brian, because it's very freaky people on
Speaker 1: U stream and Vimeo can see this. We'll just well,
Speaker 1: you know what, let's just play the entire trailer for
Speaker 1: you and get people excited about this movie. Now, who
Speaker 1: found this this alien being? And where did they acquire
Speaker 1: this thing?
Speaker 5: It was? I'm not at liberty. I'm still waiting to
Speaker 5: see if this person was but.
Speaker 2: Because it might be horseshit right, it's a possibility, you.
Speaker 5: Know, you know, no, I know. All I'm saying is
Speaker 5: that it is an organic being. It is an organic
Speaker 5: It is with the cats can shows lungs on the inside.
Speaker 5: It has ten ribs, not twelve. We have now proven
Speaker 5: from bone density that it's at least several years old
Speaker 5: and it's only six inches long.
Speaker 2: So the t do you prove that from bone density?
Speaker 5: We look at the epiphacial plates and the calvinch calcium.
Speaker 1: In other words, isn't it why you're dealing with a
Speaker 1: completely alien species?
Speaker 5: No? No, no, I'm saying, if you were to go back,
Speaker 5: if you're going to assume that it's not et then
Speaker 5: you look at it. What would this be if it
Speaker 5: were human? Okay, so you have to go through an algorithm,
Speaker 5: and it's a diagnosis of exclusion we could say in medicine,
Speaker 5: because if it's not a miscarried or a boarded fetus,
Speaker 5: which is the size of what this would be about
Speaker 5: twenty two weeks. If it's not any known primate, it's
Speaker 5: not a fossil because it has organic material and DNA material.
Speaker 5: We've already extracted. We clipped one of the ribs, two
Speaker 5: of the ribs, and have gotten the DNA material out
Speaker 5: of the rib of internal mirrow. And so this is
Speaker 5: being processed right now as we speak.
Speaker 1: Literally, So if it was a human, it would be
Speaker 1: several years old. So that proves that it's not a human.
Speaker 5: There is no there's no form of Dwarfism or any
Speaker 5: other genetic anomaly known in the literature according to the
Speaker 5: world's expert in this area that would explain something of
Speaker 5: this age that is this and also that has these abnormalities.
Speaker 5: If you look at the skull, if you look at
Speaker 5: the the fact that has ten ribs, there are no
Speaker 5: genetic syndromes where you have ten ribs.
Speaker 2: Have you seen this thing in person?
Speaker 5: I was the third person to hold it, handle it,
Speaker 5: and I did the I didn't say autopsy on it,
Speaker 5: but I did the tests on it and.
Speaker 2: How long had it been dead for? We have no idea,
Speaker 2: no idea.
Speaker 5: That that we didn't get enough material from. We didn't
Speaker 5: want to damage this little thing too much, so the
Speaker 5: carbon dating on it will be the next step. We
Speaker 5: wanted to be sure we had enough genetic material and
Speaker 5: if we had to go back, and we didn't want
Speaker 5: to destroy anyway. So we're working a scientific algorithm on this.
Speaker 5: This is actually the people, the public who is supporting
Speaker 5: the film serious or the reason why we were able
Speaker 5: to do all these studies.
Speaker 2: How is this?
Speaker 1: How is this thing preserved?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 5: But it was found in a very very dry desert
Speaker 5: area and it's just very desiccated. It's very dried out,
Speaker 5: and it was not in any sort of preservative and
Speaker 5: now it died a traumatic death. We know it behind
Speaker 5: the right mass storied air cell behind your ear. Here
Speaker 5: the skull is crashed in and it's a little asymmetric
Speaker 5: on the jaw, and that the right humorous is fractured
Speaker 5: through and through. But and it happened at mortem or
Speaker 5: shortly post mortem. We think it was the fatal blow
Speaker 5: to this particular being. Now what is this being? When
Speaker 5: you look at it? Almost every scientist that has seen
Speaker 5: it goes looks like an et but we don't know.
Speaker 5: All I'm going to say is that we're not gonna
Speaker 5: be able to say because you know, even the genetics,
Speaker 5: there's no database to compare it to. Now we have
Speaker 5: the whole human genome to compare too, which is what
Speaker 5: we're doing right now, and we have all the literature
Speaker 5: that the world's expert in skeletal abnormalities, I mean, the
Speaker 5: expert in the world looked at this thing is that
Speaker 5: this is nothing that I know of and that has
Speaker 5: ever been seen on this planet. And so the question
Speaker 5: then becomes what is it? Now? It turns out it
Speaker 5: was found in an area of the Atacama Desert in
Speaker 5: Chile that native peoples have reports of these objects, iluminous
Speaker 5: objects going in and out of the foothills of the.
Speaker 1: Andes famous famous for very.
Speaker 5: Famous, very famous, and also in these remote native villages
Speaker 5: or reports of these very small beings upright, humanoid type beings.
Speaker 1: Isn't that also the area where they constructed the VLT
Speaker 1: telescopic array, one of the very large telescope I believe.
Speaker 5: I think there, yeah, because it's a very dark area
Speaker 5: and there have been a lot of astronomy. And we
Speaker 5: also know one of our witnesses who was manning a
Speaker 5: facility on the Peruvian Bolivian border that's not too far
Speaker 5: from this area, was there in the early nineties when
Speaker 5: we were using a SDI star Wars system to track
Speaker 5: et craft and hit them with electromagnetic pulse weapons. And
Speaker 5: one was downed and crashed on the Peruvian Bolivian border.
Speaker 2: We hit it with electromagnetic pulse weapons. Yeah, this is
Speaker 2: so who did this? The Air Force to the army like,
Speaker 2: do we know?
Speaker 5: Yeah, we know, but I mean it's this group majestic.
Speaker 5: But I mean, you know, if you were to talk
Speaker 5: to the general I briefed, who's head of the Defense
Speaker 5: Intelligence Agency, which is almost as beca as the CIA
Speaker 5: that's in the Pentagon, you didn't know anything about this.
Speaker 5: So you when you say who's doing it, it's not
Speaker 5: it's kind of almost not The correct even way of
Speaker 5: framing it is to say, you know, when Senator Annually
Speaker 5: he just passed away wonderful centator from you know, he said,
Speaker 5: there exists a secret government with its own air force,
Speaker 5: its own funding mechanism, its own navy. I'm quoting almost
Speaker 5: exactly and actually this is a great speech by this senator,
Speaker 5: and it's because he had run across that this was
Speaker 5: going on. So the question is who's running this. Well,
Speaker 5: they've gone off the reservation. There's certainly no congressional oversight
Speaker 5: or a presidential oversight over these rogue elements. And I
Speaker 5: think that is a threat to our democracy. But it's
Speaker 5: also a threat to our security in the world. If
Speaker 5: what we've learned is true from multiple military insiders, that
Speaker 5: we have been attempting to target these extraterrestrial vehicles and
Speaker 5: down them. How stupid is that? And you're dealing with
Speaker 5: civilizations that could turn the Earth into a pink mist
Speaker 5: floating through space in a nanosecond, and we're there firing
Speaker 5: at them. Why you know?
Speaker 2: I mean this is but you're convinced that this happened.
Speaker 5: Absolutely, I absolutely know it is because I have too
Speaker 5: many insiders who have been present when we've done this
Speaker 5: sort of the weaponization of electromagnetic signals.
Speaker 1: What about disinformation?
Speaker 5: Do you do most of the information out there is disinformation?
Speaker 2: I would say, any of it's ever hit you like
Speaker 2: any of this might be.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, no, no, not what I'm telling you. But
Speaker 5: have I ever been called flat footed. Yeah, almost, and
Speaker 5: but you know, we're very careful. And I have to say,
Speaker 5: you know, as a doctor who got into this sort
Speaker 5: of accidentally. And then I was tutored and mentored by
Speaker 5: some really good people in the military, in an the
Speaker 5: intelligence community who wanted me to do this. And one
Speaker 5: of them is still the CIA PhD guy, and he says,
Speaker 5: you know, someone needs to do this because the politicians
Speaker 5: are never going to deal with in these big corporations
Speaker 5: are absolutely not going to let it out. And this
Speaker 5: was back in the nineties. And I said, well, what
Speaker 5: am I supposed to do? And you know, one of
Speaker 5: the interesting things after we put this briefing together for
Speaker 5: Clinton and you know, Lawrence Rockefeller, I put the concept together,
Speaker 5: the best available evidence and all these cases. And then
Speaker 5: Lawrence Rockefeller hosts Bill and Hillary Clinton at the Rockefeller
Speaker 5: Ranch and it had me out there shortly before that.
Speaker 5: And mister Rockefeller was the white hat in the family
Speaker 5: who wanted to end the secrecy, unlike some of his family.
Speaker 5: And so he said to me one night, I was
Speaker 5: out on his porch on a deck in the granteetans
Speaker 5: at the Jy Ranch, and he said, we really need
Speaker 5: you to hurry up and do this. And I said, oh, Lawrence,
Speaker 5: I'm just a doctor in North Carolina. I'm working in
Speaker 5: an er, you know. He says, no, you have to
Speaker 5: do it. I said, no, Lawrence, you have to get
Speaker 5: these guys to do He says, they will never do it.
Speaker 5: And I said, Lawrence, for God's sake, you're old, you're rich,
Speaker 5: and you're a Rockefeller. He says no. He says, the
Speaker 5: implications of this are so vast and so profound that
Speaker 5: no aspect of life will be unchanged when it comes out.
Speaker 5: I said, yes, Lawrence, that's white secret. And then he
Speaker 5: said to me, well, that means those folks aren't going
Speaker 5: to do it. And then, you know, before that, shortly
Speaker 5: after that, and I had this meeting with the CI director,
Speaker 5: and one of the President's friends came to my house,
Speaker 5: and this was a very disturbing story. I'm sitting at
Speaker 5: the table with my four kids, four daughters, and this
Speaker 5: man who's very close friends with the President Mclinton says
Speaker 5: to me, well, you know, they're very supportive of what
Speaker 5: you've recommended in this white paper. I said, great, he says,
Speaker 5: but they're not going to do it. I said, why not?
Speaker 5: He says, they're convinced that if the president steps into
Speaker 5: this too hard, he'll end up like Jack Kennedy. And
Speaker 5: I started laughing, thinking what a load of nonsense, and
Speaker 5: he stopped me. He says, no, they're serious. I said, well,
Speaker 5: don't say this in front of the kids. So we
Speaker 5: went to the library in my house after dinner and
Speaker 5: I said, what are you talking about, Kevin, And he said,
Speaker 5: they really think this is too dangerous. I said, well,
Speaker 5: one am I supposed to do one of my chop
Speaker 5: liver And he looked at me and he says, yeah,
Speaker 5: you're expendable. So I've always viewed myself as the kind
Speaker 5: of the throwaway guy, and all of this sense that
Speaker 5: these guys, you know, the folks who have enormous political
Speaker 5: power and corporate power, even the ones who support this
Speaker 5: very avidly, and there's a lot of them, they don't
Speaker 5: want to stick their necks out.
Speaker 1: But I'm confused. Okay, why would they kill Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: if Bill Clinton came out and said that we may
Speaker 1: have evidence that there might be some intelligent life out
Speaker 1: there in the world.
Speaker 5: Universe, Because you know, it's like the ram song, it's
Speaker 5: the end of the world as we know it because
Speaker 5: if that happens, when that happens, people would panic. No, no, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 5: The public isn't going to panic over this unless it's
Speaker 5: couch in a stupid way.
Speaker 1: Well, the public definitely will panic. If the president comes
Speaker 1: out and says there's UFOs and then he gets whacked,
Speaker 1: that would lead to panic.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but there's a bigger problem if the president doesn't
Speaker 5: have control access over these projects. He didn't want to
Speaker 5: talk about it because then it shows the fact that
Speaker 5: our democracy has been sidelined, as Eisenhower warned us. I
Speaker 5: mean the reason eisen Look, I mean, Eisenhower was not
Speaker 5: anti military. It was a five star general.
Speaker 1: For folks who don't know this story, just fill people
Speaker 1: in on the speech that he made as an active
Speaker 1: sitting president leaving.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the last day of his presidency, he basically said,
Speaker 5: beware the military industrial complex and this is the dangers
Speaker 5: and he said, the dangers of this and enormous power
Speaker 5: will be a threat to our democracy in our way
Speaker 5: of life. Now. The reason he said that is that
Speaker 5: between nineteen fifty four and nineteen sixty sixty one, when
Speaker 5: he was leaving office, it was on his watch that
Speaker 5: the military Industrial Complex reorganized under the Rockefeller Commission of
Speaker 5: nineteen fifty six, and Eisenhower lost complete control over these projects.
Speaker 5: I have a lieutenant colonel who was on the plane
Speaker 5: with Jack Kennedy flying to Berlin when he gave the
Speaker 5: Eye Am a Berliner speech and Jack Kenny was talking
Speaker 5: about this UFO issue. But he turned to this guy
Speaker 5: who was kind of the chief steward for Air Force
Speaker 5: one who I know, and he said, I know about this,
Speaker 5: but the whole matter is the president. Kennedy saying this,
Speaker 5: The whole matter is out of my hands, and I
Speaker 5: don't know why. And this guy was stunned. In fact,
Speaker 5: I'll tell you there's a kind of a gruff colonel
Speaker 5: Air Force guy who was crying as he told his
Speaker 5: story because it hit him that there had been sort
Speaker 5: of a silent, silent coup de eta on this issue.
Speaker 5: And one of the problems in Washington when I meet
Speaker 5: with people who are part of powerful committees and politicians
Speaker 5: is that they're kind of viewed as placeholders that come
Speaker 5: and go. The mainstream media is really bred and circus,
Speaker 5: where they just keep wanting people to be entertained with
Speaker 5: shock and dribble. The question becomes how are you going
Speaker 5: to get this story out? And that's why. I mean
Speaker 5: a few years ago I left medicine, which was a
Speaker 5: hard thing for me to do because I mean I
Speaker 5: really loved taking care of you know, real emergencies, and Trump,
Speaker 5: how long did you do that for? I was in
Speaker 5: that er ten years and I was chairman of Emergency Medicine,
Speaker 5: and you know, the problem became for me, the world's
Speaker 5: in an emergency. So I said, I'm an emergency doctor
Speaker 5: and I know an emergency when I see one, and
Speaker 5: we're in deep trouble, and so someone has to do this.
Speaker 5: But before I did that, what you have to understand
Speaker 5: is I went to everyone I could. I mean, I
Speaker 5: went to these powerful people. I went to the UN,
Speaker 5: I went to the British government, the Ministry of Defense,
Speaker 5: and basically none of them doubted this was all true. Frankly,
Speaker 5: this is what people need to understand. There was no
Speaker 5: laughter in the room. They took it very seriously, but
Speaker 5: they didn't want to stick their necks out. And a
Speaker 5: friend of mine who's a big business guy, he said, well,
Speaker 5: you know the way the world works now, everyone wants
Speaker 5: to be first, to be second when it's something tough.
Speaker 1: And I've always felt that something along the lines of
Speaker 1: alien contact. If they did have information, there's no reason
Speaker 1: to let people know unless it's unavoidable. I always felt
Speaker 1: like unless they were just going to try to do
Speaker 1: some damage control and re define what's happening, I didn't
Speaker 1: I wouldn't think that they would ever come out about it. It
Speaker 1: just doesn't seem like it would be something that would
Speaker 1: be advantageous to just start telling people about UFOs. The
Speaker 1: idea is always that the government is our daddy, and
Speaker 1: then our government's looking out for us. But the evidence
Speaker 1: points time and time again to that that's horseshit and
Speaker 1: that's not really what's going on.
Speaker 5: But you know, my military advisor made the point years
Speaker 5: ago that because so many people, I mean between five
Speaker 5: and ten percent of the public have seen one of
Speaker 5: these objects, many of them very close range.
Speaker 1: Let's get back to that, because this is what we
Speaker 1: had talked about before when we got onto this. People
Speaker 1: who think the Earth is ten thousand years old. I
Speaker 1: think most of what people see is bullshit. I think
Speaker 1: most yeah, you have no question about that.
Speaker 2: Most sightings.
Speaker 1: I did a show once for CBS called Game Show
Speaker 1: in my Head and it was a a hidden camera
Speaker 1: game show where we'd put it an earpiece in people's
Speaker 1: head and we were send them out on the street
Speaker 1: and they didn't know what they had to do until
Speaker 1: they got there. And one of them we said, Okay,
Speaker 1: see that camera over there, that's where that works for you.
Speaker 2: There's a big news camera. You're a news reporter.
Speaker 1: And there was just a UFO sighting right above Hollywood Boulevard.
Speaker 1: The problem is the witness took off. So you need
Speaker 1: to grab someone who wasn't there and have them become
Speaker 1: a witness, tell them exactly what you need to tell
Speaker 1: them to get them to do this, get them to
Speaker 1: lie on camera. Then you need to get them to
Speaker 1: tell you that they were abducted and probed.
Speaker 2: And we got people to do it like that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, no, I have no doubt, but yeah you can't.
Speaker 5: You can always do that. But I'm talking about high
Speaker 5: level and the residual. I mean, for example, we have
Speaker 5: multiple pilots for commercial airlines and the air Force. And
Speaker 5: this is one of the really great cases we have,
Speaker 5: by the way, the Japan Airlines case over Alaska in
Speaker 5: the eighties and the guy who was in charge of
Speaker 5: investigations for the FAA. He was third from the top
Speaker 5: during the Rake era. He actually left that agency and
Speaker 5: brought the originals with him and gave them to us
Speaker 5: of the radar tracings of this thing that was the
Speaker 5: size of like ten seven forty sevens moving in a
Speaker 5: nonlinear way over the skies. It was on civilian radar,
Speaker 5: which was on military radar. They scrambled F sixteen jets
Speaker 5: it was on their radar, and the japan Airlines seven
Speaker 5: forty seven pilot has testified to it, and we have
Speaker 5: all of that. In this case, I've heard of this, okay,
Speaker 5: all right. So when we brought all that forward and
Speaker 5: this guy came forward, he says, I'm one of these
Speaker 5: high level government officials who actually has seen all this
Speaker 5: and has handled it, but no one's asking the right questions.
Speaker 5: So when you pull all that together, and then of
Speaker 5: course there will be events like this thing that happened
Speaker 5: in Phoenix, where you know, eventually the governor of Arizona
Speaker 5: five Simonton, came out later and at the time he
Speaker 5: ridiculed it, but he had actually seen it. Came out
Speaker 5: later ten years later in two thousand and seven, said yeah,
Speaker 5: that was an ET craft almost certainly. And I saw it,
Speaker 5: and tens of thousands of people in the Phoenix area
Speaker 5: saw it, and it was photographed, and it was on radar,
Speaker 5: and there were very trained people. So you know, you
Speaker 5: have to ask the question, how many things like that
Speaker 5: have to happen? And you know, on the other hand,
Speaker 5: you know, the things that we have in physics that
Speaker 5: are inferred through indirect measurements, like black holes, are articles
Speaker 5: of belief in faith or even the Big Bang theory.
Speaker 5: But when you have all of this and this is
Speaker 5: not just someone on Hollywood Boulevard who's making stuff up.
Speaker 5: We have dozens thousands of people. You have radar cases,
Speaker 5: you have all this, and so a lot of this
Speaker 5: is what's going to be in the film. Serious And
Speaker 5: because what I've said to people is that the fact
Speaker 5: that people haven't seen this evidence doesn't mean that it
Speaker 5: doesn't exist. It doesn't exist. But I agree with you.
Speaker 5: There are a lot of people who will see things
Speaker 5: and it'll be a planet rising, or it'll be a meteor,
Speaker 5: or it'll.
Speaker 2: Be military aircraft, a satellite, yeah.
Speaker 5: Or it'll be a Now this is the other part
Speaker 5: of this. There are a lot of things that are
Speaker 5: UFO sightings that are very legit, and that's why I
Speaker 5: don't like the word UFO. There are two categories of
Speaker 5: UFOs that once you eliminate all the nonsense you're talking about,
Speaker 5: and they're the ones that are etvs, which is what
Speaker 5: they're called the NSA extratrestical vehicles. And then they're the
Speaker 5: ones that are the electromagnetic devices. We've been building since
Speaker 5: the fifties. And if people think that propulsion and energy
Speaker 5: systems stopped in the forties, they need to think about this.
Speaker 5: Let's step back for a minute. Your car is running
Speaker 5: on an internal combustion engine circa.
Speaker 1: Mine is because I'm a man, okay, and I don't
Speaker 1: drive a fucking sissy hybrid.
Speaker 5: Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 1: I'm not driving a Prius. It makes no noise.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you should have a thousand worse electric one and
Speaker 5: then you'd really have some power.
Speaker 1: It's too futuristic. Man, I need led Zeppelin on the radio.
Speaker 1: I need a little yeah, seventies of my life.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well nobody I mean this, you know, and the
Speaker 5: jet engine people think that was We're fine around jets.
Speaker 5: So I came out here from DC. That's nineteen thirties
Speaker 5: rockets nineteen forties, Berner von Brown, do people really think
Speaker 5: there have been no breakthroughs in energy physics?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm sure people absolutely know that we've been working
Speaker 1: on things like that. But to bring up what you
Speaker 1: brought up earlier about the governor of Phoenix, just to
Speaker 1: point out that the governor of Arizona, rather the governor
Speaker 1: of Alaska, Sarah Palin, is one of those people that
Speaker 1: believe the Earth is less than ten thousand years old.
Speaker 1: So just because you're a governor something doesn't mean you're
Speaker 1: on the ball.
Speaker 2: And second of all, I had friends.
Speaker 1: That were in Phoenix, and one of them, very credible guy,
Speaker 1: told me he saw some giant black triangle flying motionless
Speaker 1: over the sky. He said it was bigger than several
Speaker 1: football fields. He said it made no noise, and it
Speaker 1: blocked out the stars and flew over and he said
Speaker 1: everyone in his neighborhood was shitting their pants. It was
Speaker 1: enough to me that I would go, wow, there's something.
Speaker 1: There's too many people that saw something. You could attribute
Speaker 1: certain things to mass hysteria, but that was one of
Speaker 1: them that I found to be very strange. But I'd
Speaker 1: never heard any photographs. You say, photographs, Oh.
Speaker 5: We have amazing photograph, some video. They're going to be
Speaker 5: in the film.
Speaker 1: Serious, you don't have them anywhere else. So anybody you
Speaker 1: see online you're.
Speaker 2: Holding on back?
Speaker 5: No no, no, no, no, no, they're out there. Doctor Lyn Katai,
Speaker 5: who's a medical doctor, also took some of them.
Speaker 2: There's other video photos of the Phoenix crafts.
Speaker 5: Yes, the actual one.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 2: So what should we if.
Speaker 1: We want to look for one right now to put
Speaker 1: in this show? Right now we're online? Who does he
Speaker 1: look for?
Speaker 5: I guess you'd go to doctor Lynn katais side. I
Speaker 5: don't have him memory name K I.
Speaker 2: T A I K A K K I T A I. Yeah,
Speaker 2: pull that up, Brian, See what image.
Speaker 5: She has in there?
Speaker 2: I've never heard there's been photographs. What is the photo? Show?
Speaker 5: It shows exactly what people described, a formation of lights
Speaker 5: that were moving together in a massive sort of the formation.
Speaker 2: Right, And the government said that those were flares.
Speaker 5: Right because a couple hours later, when they couldn't contain
Speaker 5: the news story on this. I was there when this happened.
Speaker 2: By the way, you were in Phoenix.
Speaker 5: I was there.
Speaker 1: Did you see it? Yeah?
Speaker 2: What did you see?
Speaker 5: What you what you just described? No?
Speaker 1: You?
Speaker 5: Why was I there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, did you get your spider call to Batman?
Speaker 1: Whatever fucking the thing, a UFO just appears over your
Speaker 1: house like the bat sign.
Speaker 2: Remember when he's in trouble, we need to send Batman.
Speaker 5: So right, No, they don't. I was actually there at
Speaker 5: a digital lab that was being loaned to us to
Speaker 5: put together.
Speaker 1: Coincidentally, well not coincidentally.
Speaker 5: To put together the best photos and videos to give
Speaker 5: to Congress that I was briefing in April of ninety seven.
Speaker 5: So in March of ninety seven, I had gone there
Speaker 5: and there was a guy who had a digital laboratory
Speaker 5: who said, look, we'll let you use our equipment and
Speaker 5: assemble this and will help you. And he'd worked a
Speaker 5: lot with the military, and so I had collected photos
Speaker 5: and videos from all over the world and governments from
Speaker 5: all over the world, which we call the best available evidence.
Speaker 5: And I was putting it together because in April we
Speaker 5: were holding a closed briefing for members of Congress who
Speaker 5: wanted to know. And that's when people like Congressman Dan Burton,
Speaker 5: who was chairman of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee,
Speaker 5: came and a whole lot of other people from the
Speaker 5: Pentagon Vice President's office and whatnot. And so I was
Speaker 5: there when that happened, and someone came running into the
Speaker 5: lab saying, my god, while we're here trying there's all
Speaker 5: there's this going on. And it turned out it was
Speaker 5: on the news that night in Phoenix. Now, interestingly, the
Speaker 5: national news didn't pick up on it till June. This
Speaker 5: happened in March, which is very interesting. Why did that
Speaker 5: get held back? But you know, and so there are
Speaker 5: so many people who saw it, and this was huge.
Speaker 5: Whatever this object was, it was not the size of
Speaker 5: like a seven forty seven. A seven forty seven, you know,
Speaker 5: you probably could put dozens of them inside the volume
Speaker 5: of this thing. It was huge.
Speaker 1: I found it interesting that the stories were very similar.
Speaker 1: It's one of the things that I found most interesting.
Speaker 1: I watched some stuff online and then when I spoke
Speaker 1: to my friend and loves in Phoenix and he told
Speaker 1: me what he saw, I was like, Wow, you're talking
Speaker 1: about like at least six or seven people are telling
Speaker 1: the exact same story of seeing this exact same sort
Speaker 1: of thing. Now, these are the images that you're talking about.
Speaker 1: These are the just the whatever the red lights that
Speaker 1: are in the sky. I think the video is probably
Speaker 1: more impressive, being that the video shows these things essentially
Speaker 1: hover for a long period of time, and much longer
Speaker 1: than really should be attributable to parachutes and flares. It
Speaker 1: doesn't really make any sense because parachutes and flares, they
Speaker 1: don't really move that slow. When you you know, you
Speaker 1: watch a guy jump out of a plane with a parachute.
Speaker 1: The parachutes, you know, they drive, they slow your fall down,
Speaker 1: but they don't make you spend.
Speaker 5: Graph of it. No, and we know how how those
Speaker 5: kind of flares imperman but the people who were directly
Speaker 5: under it, and it moved not just over this part
Speaker 5: of Phoenix, it moved all the way from outside Flagstaff
Speaker 5: through the valley and then down towards Tempe.
Speaker 1: Now, how did you know about it? You were there working?
Speaker 1: Did you hear about it?
Speaker 5: But there was a guy that ran into the lab
Speaker 5: and who had actually been in the military, so you
Speaker 5: would't believe what's going on. So so yeah, I was
Speaker 5: there that night and nineteen ninety seven, March of ninety seven. Now,
Speaker 5: what's equally interesting if you look at this now, the
Speaker 5: Belgian Air Force cooperated with me very very nicely back
Speaker 5: in the early nineties and late eighties. You may have
Speaker 5: remembered there was this wave of things that happened in
Speaker 5: eastern Belgium where there were these massive triangles that were
Speaker 5: about eight hundred feet on each side that were photographed,
Speaker 5: radar traced, chased by F sixteen's on it, and we
Speaker 5: have all this, and the head of the Belgian Air
Speaker 5: Force actually showed the radar of one of these objects
Speaker 5: going from hover to several thousand miles per hour straight
Speaker 5: up into space, way outside the envelope of any normal
Speaker 5: conventional propulsions. See they have a video of this radardar,
Speaker 5: radar of it, and we have this, so you know,
Speaker 5: the question becomes, how many of these cases do you
Speaker 5: need to have before you say there's something out there?
Speaker 5: And I think this is what the problem is that
Speaker 5: on this subject, the ridicule around it, and that the
Speaker 5: disinformation and the crazy stories that are out there is
Speaker 5: what dominates the serious pun intended. Perhaps the serious stuff
Speaker 5: really gets left on the cutting room floor by most
Speaker 5: movie directors and media and even on the Internet. It's
Speaker 5: very hard, and I think to pick your way through
Speaker 5: it's very difficult what I've tried to do, and it's
Speaker 5: not that I've done a perfect job of it. I've
Speaker 5: done the best I can with a lot of help.
Speaker 5: But remember we've never been funded. We're all volunteer effort,
Speaker 5: and so what we've tried to do is get people
Speaker 5: who have the really good stuff from governments come forward
Speaker 5: and share it. And this is why, you know, when
Speaker 5: the Space Agency of France released a lot of their
Speaker 5: documents after I was having some meetings in France, and
Speaker 5: with some of the scenes.
Speaker 1: You can't say it both was.
Speaker 5: It was France when I was there and when it's
Speaker 5: here at France. And you know that there's an admiral
Speaker 5: that were with us in France who's a wonderful guy,
Speaker 5: and he's an MD and a PhD in an Amerald,
Speaker 5: and you know he knows all this is very real.
Speaker 5: And so eventually the French government really I believe it
Speaker 5: was about one hundred thousand pages of documents on all
Speaker 5: of this. And now since the Disclosure Project launched ten
Speaker 5: or twelve years ago, there are fourteen countries who've opened
Speaker 5: up their files. Now, christ the United States isn't because
Speaker 5: the United States has managed differently on this issue. It's
Speaker 5: a compartment. It unacknowledged the.
Speaker 1: Former Soviet Union has actually been pretty open more recently
Speaker 1: and more recent times about.
Speaker 5: Them when it first fell apart. Not so much now,
Speaker 5: but when it first fell apart, we have a great
Speaker 5: dossi of KGB cases and files and also military and
Speaker 5: in fact, some of the cosmonauts that had had encounters
Speaker 5: with these I pulled together in nineteen ninety five for
Speaker 5: a meeting with some of our astronauts like Agri Mitchell,
Speaker 5: to have a meeting out here in California. So you know,
Speaker 5: there are some really solid cases out of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: Does Edgar Mitchell claim to have had a personal experience.
Speaker 5: No, No, he's just investigated it and has concluded that
Speaker 5: this is all very real, and he did come with me.
Speaker 5: I invited him to the briefing we set up for
Speaker 5: the head of intelligence for the Joint chiefs of Staff
Speaker 5: at the Pentagon, and I think it was very interesting
Speaker 5: for him to have learned that people at that level
Speaker 5: were shaken to their foundations because they concluded this was
Speaker 5: all real, but when they made inquiries, they were being
Speaker 5: lied to and denied access. And so this brings up
Speaker 5: this question who's running this show and who's over who
Speaker 5: the Foxes are guarding the hen House. And this exactly
Speaker 5: goes back to Eisenhower's warning. But you know, we're fifty
Speaker 5: years into that era now, and so half a century later.
Speaker 5: As big of a screw up as it was in
Speaker 5: nineteen sixty one when Eisenhower warned us about it, it's
Speaker 5: ten times worse than that now, and so much so
Speaker 5: that I have concluded that the way we change the
Speaker 5: dynamic on this is that the people will lead, the
Speaker 5: leaders will have to follow. We do the disclosure, we
Speaker 5: bring out these technologies, we set up teams to make contact,
Speaker 5: and we just bypassed.
Speaker 1: The government the evidence that you have this or possible
Speaker 1: evidence of this alien life.
Speaker 2: Before that, this is a more recent thing.
Speaker 1: This is fairly recent. Right before that, what was the
Speaker 1: most compelling piece of physical evidence that you've ever encountered?
Speaker 5: I would have to say that it's these really well documented,
Speaker 5: complex cases that involve documents, radar cases with photographs and
Speaker 5: multiple corroborating in credible witnesses.
Speaker 1: Such as what about landing sites?
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, I mean we do. I actually have been
Speaker 5: given materials from where the sites of land into very anomalous.
Speaker 5: A great case that's in the French files that they
Speaker 5: released in the Japan was it called Japan This the
Speaker 5: Space Agency like NASA release was the Provence case of
Speaker 5: nineteen eighty one leave when one of these objects landed
Speaker 5: in a lavender field of all places, where just smelled awesome. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well it was a.
Speaker 5: Commercial lavender farm and so cool, and it was wee
Speaker 5: hours of the morning and this thing lands. The farmer
Speaker 5: comes out and it's this disc shaped craft. I think
Speaker 5: it was in the fifty foot diameter range and there
Speaker 5: were these little beans outside picking lavender. Now this sounds crazy,
Speaker 5: like amount of science.
Speaker 2: Fiction, like you a little guy.
Speaker 5: No, No, from what I remember, like four feet five
Speaker 5: feet in that range. And then but it left this
Speaker 5: spot where it had landed and there were anomalies electromagnetic
Speaker 5: sort of radiation into the soil. And this was actually
Speaker 5: studied by the French government concluded to be an absolutely
Speaker 5: real case, just like the bent Waters Royal Air Force
Speaker 5: Base case in England was determined to be an authentic
Speaker 5: case of a landing. So these sort of landing casees
Speaker 5: that have also Now at the time there weren't many
Speaker 5: people coming forward. Now we have all these military people
Speaker 5: coming forward corroborating they were there they saw this, and
Speaker 5: now the documents are getting released from the UK and France,
Speaker 5: but in the United States it's still a black hole.
Speaker 1: Now we're going to play your trailer for the urcoming
Speaker 1: film Serious. You got to pull up, Brian. Is it
Speaker 1: huged all the way through?
Speaker 5: Here we sit twenty twelve with the world still burning
Speaker 5: oil and gas and coal, when we have had all
Speaker 5: the information we need to have had a completely new civilization.
Speaker 2: Doctor Stephen Greer is absolutely a hero.
Speaker 5: In the councils of government, we misguard again the acquisition
Speaker 5: of unwarranted influence, whether it's sought or unsought by the
Speaker 5: military industrial companies.
Speaker 1: You know, hundreds of billions of dollars burning. The public
Speaker 1: would be a little annoyed, all right, sit down and
Speaker 1: shut up.
Speaker 3: I was told to pray, not to meditate. I was
Speaker 3: told to talk, not to listen.
Speaker 1: I'm learning to listen.
Speaker 5: The primary purpose is to train people to understand these
Speaker 5: other civilizations and their cultures. I don't get what goddamn
Speaker 5: what anybody else says about it. I saw that, But
Speaker 5: who do you tell without them look at it?
Speaker 1: You like you ain't graph two type.
Speaker 4: And I was a part of the United States air
Speaker 4: Force cover up for eighteen years.
Speaker 1: What we are attempting to achieve as a device which
Speaker 1: defuits the perpendicular force of gravity.
Speaker 5: When we look at our data, we lost seven percent
Speaker 5: of weight.
Speaker 2: We now have the technology to take et home.
Speaker 1: Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing to us
Speaker 1: and the most mysterious.
Speaker 5: It doesn't take much effort. You could just clear your mind.
Speaker 5: People are afraid of looking at technology.
Speaker 1: Paul Brown, stuff got basically suppressed for many years.
Speaker 5: If you got murdered, the problem is not proving that
Speaker 5: you appose exists. Is when you begin to expose the
Speaker 5: energy and propulsion system behind how they're getting here. M hm,
Speaker 5: you should push said.
Speaker 2: That little thing freaked me out.
Speaker 5: Really yeah, well, you know, I don't mean to sound callous,
Speaker 5: but being a you know, doctor, I've seen so many
Speaker 5: worse things. But it's actually fascinating, fascinating.
Speaker 1: I mean, it freaked me out, not that it's a
Speaker 1: dead body of dead things. It freaked me out that
Speaker 1: that might be a life form. By the way, well,
Speaker 1: it was.
Speaker 5: A life form. We know for a fact it was
Speaker 5: a life form. What it was what we're investigating, and
Speaker 5: I think that you know, you know, one of our
Speaker 5: witnesses who was on a retrieval team of retrieving extraterrestrial
Speaker 5: bodies from craft that we had targeted. You know, I's
Speaker 5: talked about the fact that there are many different species
Speaker 5: that have been cataloged over the years, and at one point,
Speaker 5: I think it was in the late sixties, there were
Speaker 5: like sixty eight or sixty nine or something in that range.
Speaker 5: You know, if you look at space and look at
Speaker 5: the stars, probably every stable star system has planets around
Speaker 5: it they're discovering, and there's the likelihood that there's an
Speaker 5: enormous diversity of life out there, is a statistical certainty.
Speaker 5: Even the conventional astronomers and the Drake formula will support that.
Speaker 5: The question is, you know, have they gotten here? Well,
Speaker 5: you most probably wouldn't be able to, just like we
Speaker 5: weren't for thousands and thousands of years. But there's such
Speaker 5: hubris to think that, you know, we're at the pinnacle
Speaker 5: of the technology on Earth in twenty thirteen.
Speaker 1: We're not.
Speaker 5: And I think that, and I think that, you know,
Speaker 5: when you begin to look at the progression of technology,
Speaker 5: once you reach a breakout point, as we have in
Speaker 5: the last century here. In fact, most of the big
Speaker 5: breakthroughs and technologies no one knows about. They exist, but
Speaker 5: they're in a classified project. And that's I think as
Speaker 5: big or a bigger story than the et story is
Speaker 5: the fact that there is a cabal of, as I said, sociopathic,
Speaker 5: misanthropic folks who have decided their macroeconomic grip on power
Speaker 5: needs to be maintained through this sort of ruthless secrecy,
Speaker 5: and where they keep from the public this information. Not
Speaker 5: because they think people are going to hurl themselves off
Speaker 5: the Brooklyn Bridge, because we're not alone in the universe,
Speaker 5: but because when this comes out, and this information comes out,
Speaker 5: it means that the sciences already exist so that we
Speaker 5: can get off oil and gas and coal. And you
Speaker 5: know what, a Goldman Sachs guy said, that's a six
Speaker 5: hundred trillion dollar nut. You're cracking right there. Trillion. And
Speaker 5: because if you look at all the oil in the ground,
Speaker 5: the coal in the ground, the commodities trading, the Petra
Speaker 5: dollar system, the utilities, the internal combustion engines, all of
Speaker 5: that is defunct, extinct stuff, or should be. And so
Speaker 5: here we are cannibalizing this planet for no good reason
Speaker 5: except that there's a handful of folks, and you look
Speaker 5: at the sort of centralization of wealth and power there
Speaker 5: is in the world. Now, it's the most extreme it's
Speaker 5: ever been in human history. Right now, right this minute,
Speaker 5: this instant. So you know there's two hundred to three
Speaker 5: hundred individuals and corporations that have over half the network
Speaker 5: of the world.
Speaker 1: You know the guy in the beginning of your video
Speaker 1: that says that your genius David Wilcock. Do you know
Speaker 1: who that guy is? Oh?
Speaker 5: Yes, I know who he is.
Speaker 1: Do you know that he also thinks that he's Edgar
Speaker 1: Casey reincarnated and shows you pictures.
Speaker 5: I have no idea that's news to me.
Speaker 1: Edgar Casey's friends and how his friends look like Edgar
Speaker 1: Casey's friends. Really, do you ever watched any of that
Speaker 1: guy's lectures?
Speaker 5: No, I haven't. Yeah, I mean some of the team
Speaker 5: interviewed him, but I don't.
Speaker 2: I want to do a little editing. You might want
Speaker 2: to do a little editing with that one.
Speaker 1: Not saying that anything else in your documentary is bullshit,
Speaker 1: but that guy makes my radar detect to go off.
Speaker 1: The evidence that this this technology has been suppressed? Is
Speaker 1: there evidence that like this free energy technology has been.
Speaker 5: There's a huge amount of evidence.
Speaker 2: Do you reveal this in this documentary.
Speaker 5: There's a whole document trail. And one of the things
Speaker 5: we got some years ago was a demand from the
Speaker 5: Department of Defense to the FBI that they turned over
Speaker 5: the secret papers of Nikola Tesla that were stolen. And
Speaker 5: we have this document, and you know what happened to
Speaker 5: them and what were they trying to hide. The Federation
Speaker 5: of American Scientists, a very big mainstream organization in Washington
Speaker 5: that has a national security research project associated with the
Speaker 5: Federation American Scientists, came out about two years ago with
Speaker 5: a report that there were five thousand, one hundred and
Speaker 5: thirty five patents that had been seized under the National
Speaker 5: Security Act and that some of these things were energy related.
Speaker 5: One of them, in nineteen seventy one was only a
Speaker 5: solar photo generator. You know, we're from sunlight to electricity
Speaker 5: photobotic that was more than twenty percent efficient now you
Speaker 5: can't even get that now, but meaning that it was
Speaker 5: probably like forty fifty percent turning sunlight directly into electricity,
Speaker 5: and it had a national security order slapped on it.
Speaker 5: And this mainstream scientific group says, how could that be
Speaker 5: a threat to national security. It would have been a
Speaker 5: threat to the domination of oil and coal and the
Speaker 5: petro dollar system. So you know, this is not a
Speaker 5: conspiracy theory. There are entities that have conspired and you
Speaker 5: look at the wealth and power behind these entities. I mean,
Speaker 5: people have been killed for a lot less than this.
Speaker 2: It really is.
Speaker 1: That is such a loaded word, that conspiracy. It's unfortunate
Speaker 1: that it's necessary to use because it's been so co opted.
Speaker 5: Well, I think it's really more about special interest in
Speaker 5: cartels always acting in their interest and if you've got
Speaker 5: the power, you're going to use it. And you know
Speaker 5: what here and here's the problem if the people allow
Speaker 5: it to happen. And obviously reading an article in the
Speaker 5: New Republic about this that if you whether you're you know,
Speaker 5: letting Saddam Hussein or the Libyan dictator Moumarktafi or whatever
Speaker 5: it is, or you have to give them that power.
Speaker 5: We give the power to the government ultimately by our passivity.
Speaker 5: And so ultimately, you know, I'm not one of these
Speaker 5: people who runs around saying, oh, well, you know, they're
Speaker 5: these boogeymen that are doing everything and we're just hapless creatures.
Speaker 5: If we're allowing it, if we're not part of the solution,
Speaker 5: we're part of the problem. If we're if we're allowing
Speaker 5: it by our inaction and passivity because we want to
Speaker 5: be bread and circus people sitting around eating, you know,
Speaker 5: cheetos and watching Jay Leno, which is fine. But if
Speaker 5: that's all we're doing and we're not trying to fix
Speaker 5: this problem, then you know, obviously the passivity of the
Speaker 5: public and our politicians who don't want to risk their
Speaker 5: career or danger in that power vacuum, you're going to
Speaker 5: have these sort of people step And I think there's
Speaker 5: a power vacuum that existed for a little while after
Speaker 5: World War Two that gave an entry to these folks.
Speaker 5: I think that it will continue for as long as
Speaker 5: we let them do it.
Speaker 1: I think it's pretty obvious when you look at the
Speaker 1: fact that this is the age of information, where information
Speaker 1: is being distributed more freely and more easily than ever before.
Speaker 1: Yet this is also the age where the government is
Speaker 1: continuing to attack the Bill of Rights, continuing to slowly
Speaker 1: but surely restrict our rights and civil liberties and make
Speaker 1: it so that if they deem you a threat to
Speaker 1: the nation, in any way, shape or form. They can
Speaker 1: essentially detain you. They don't have to do anything legal,
Speaker 1: they don't have to contact your family. This is all
Speaker 1: stuff that's being past now, and that seems to me
Speaker 1: to point to the fact that they're looking at this
Speaker 1: what is the what's where, where's it going? What's if
Speaker 1: you look at it on a graph, if you look
Speaker 1: at it, if you project the future, well it's going
Speaker 1: towards some ultimate free information space. And if it gets
Speaker 1: to that, then it's going to be revealed exactly how
Speaker 1: much fucker he's been going on for all these decades,
Speaker 1: and how much craziness has been going on behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: And it's going to come to a point in time
Speaker 1: where the government is going to have to be accountable
Speaker 1: for where all the money goes every year in tax dollars,
Speaker 1: and right now they're not. You give them your tax dollars,
Speaker 1: you don't get a receipt, You don't know what the
Speaker 1: fuck happens. There's a congressional budget meetings and the Senate,
Speaker 1: you know, gets together, and the President puts out his
Speaker 1: plan and the financial people get involved. But how much
Speaker 1: access do we actually have as to where your doctor,
Speaker 1: Stephen Grier's financial records or your tax dollars go almost nothing.
Speaker 5: Oh, we don't know. And you know, even the folks
Speaker 5: who I know an auditor for the federal government who
Speaker 5: audits north or Grumman, and he said, one of the
Speaker 5: problems is that once you get to a compartmental, compartmented
Speaker 5: project that's eyes only and it's unacknowledged, they're not going
Speaker 5: to tell you anything. They won't even acknowledge it exists.
Speaker 5: So how is there any check and balance on that?
Speaker 2: It's essentially a dictatorship.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when it gets to that, really you're you're you're
Speaker 1: essentially dealing with the dictatorship. It's just dressed up as
Speaker 1: a democracy. But their ability to act is completely They
Speaker 1: have total community.
Speaker 2: They can do whatever the fuck they want. They don't
Speaker 2: they don't they don't have to work if.
Speaker 5: We let them. And here's the other problem with that,
Speaker 5: you know, is that the macroeconomic system, you know, we're
Speaker 5: supposed to be a free market economy. Well, how free
Speaker 5: can the market be if there have been decades of
Speaker 5: confiscation and suppression of these advanced transdimensional energy devices and
Speaker 5: these so called over unity free energy devices, and that
Speaker 5: if that's going on. It can completely lays to waste
Speaker 5: the whole concept of a free market. So, yeah, it's
Speaker 5: a free market if you want to tinker around the
Speaker 5: edges and come out with an iPhone and five instead
Speaker 5: of an iPhone four or you know whatever version of
Speaker 5: this and that. Right, But let's not forget that your
Speaker 5: computer that you think is so cool, you're charging it
Speaker 5: off a grid that's an eighteen hundreds coal fired power
Speaker 5: grid for the most part. And so you know, we
Speaker 5: really have to wake up to the fact that our
Speaker 5: society has been held back, retarded really seriously by this
Speaker 5: kind of secrecy. And so the secrecy is actually becoming
Speaker 5: a threat to our continue not just our liberty, but
Speaker 5: it's an existential threat to the planet. And moreover, it
Speaker 5: keeps forcing all these unintended consequences where we stay encamped
Speaker 5: in the Middle East and you know the buzzword in
Speaker 5: Washington because of our vital national security interests, well, that's
Speaker 5: code for oil. Just forget the BS. That means oil,
Speaker 5: because you say, well, what about Israel. Israel has two
Speaker 5: or three hundred nuclear weapons and they may I live
Speaker 5: there for three years. Believe me when I tell you,
Speaker 5: they can take care of this. I mean, you know,
Speaker 5: if there's an existential threat to Israel, you know they
Speaker 5: can handle it. They don't need big brother of America there.
Speaker 1: But don't they mean, isn't it. Don't they get a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of funding from US and weapons.
Speaker 5: Or they get funding. But I'm just saying we don't.
Speaker 5: That's not the reason we're in all those vast areas
Speaker 5: of the Middle East. It's because of the oil interest,
Speaker 5: of course. And you know, and this becomes a question
Speaker 5: of why, Well, because if you have a device that
Speaker 5: would fit on the table here that run your house,
Speaker 5: you don't be on the grid or your car, put
Speaker 5: in the boot of your car, and you have enormous.
Speaker 1: Amount of power electric how would that work?
Speaker 5: Those are called zero point or quantum vacuum electromagnetic generators,
Speaker 5: and basically, through very high voltage systems, you create a
Speaker 5: vector into this baseline energy field that it really holds
Speaker 5: the universe together. And you know, they start talking about
Speaker 5: the Higgs field and the negative energy of the matter
Speaker 5: of the universe. But for years it's been proven that
Speaker 5: this zero point energy field exists through what's called the
Speaker 5: Casimir effect. And I'll get into the Arcana of the
Speaker 5: physics of it. But this is published in mainstream journals.
Speaker 5: The question is how do you tap it and can
Speaker 5: you The answer is yes, and it have been, but
Speaker 5: they keep suppressing scientists and inventors who come up with it.
Speaker 5: There's a man that I know who worked at Lawrence
Speaker 5: Berkeley Labs, and he was using a coiled array around
Speaker 5: a barium tight K eight crystal and using very high
Speaker 5: voltages with certain hurts, certain pulses. He was able to
Speaker 5: get ten times more energy out than was going in
Speaker 5: because the crystaline structure was tapping into this zero point
Speaker 5: energy field that is in the fabric of space and time.
Speaker 5: So there's an enormous amount of power. It's been estimated
Speaker 5: that every cubic centimeter or space not out of space
Speaker 5: space in this room has enough energy to run the
Speaker 5: Earth for a day if you could tap it. So
Speaker 5: the question becomes, if you can do that, you're not
Speaker 5: going to need to have your car filled up at
Speaker 5: a gas station or utility to con it or whoever
Speaker 5: it is, and those sort of interests of Trump, the
Speaker 5: technical ones, the technological issues, I believe it can be fixed.
Speaker 5: It's a strategic issue that's the problem.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stop you because I need to know about
Speaker 1: this experiment. Where was this taking place?
Speaker 2: Is this peer reviewed?
Speaker 1: Is this something that has been it was confiscated.
Speaker 5: The man that had this happen, it's a physicist and
Speaker 5: some goons broke into his lab, broke it up at
Speaker 5: the experiment, and the basic took him and put him
Speaker 5: in a mental hospital for a while.
Speaker 2: Where did this happen?
Speaker 5: Lawrence Berkeley Labs in the eighties.
Speaker 1: Okay, so seventies or eighties. Do we know exactly what
Speaker 1: he did? And is it reproducible?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I think so. Why has no one reproduced this? It
Speaker 2: doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 5: Because you have to have a whole lot of specialized
Speaker 5: equipment to do it right, and people have tried what
Speaker 5: here's getting. Really, the reason we're doing this film is
Speaker 5: that one hundred percent of the proceeds from it are
Speaker 5: going to go in to build a new energy lab,
Speaker 5: so all this stuff that we've collected can be done.
Speaker 5: I think with the intelligence we've gathered in between one
Speaker 5: and two years, we will come out with at least
Speaker 5: a generation one point zero of these energy systems. Because
Speaker 5: I have thousands of pages of documents on this and
Speaker 5: many many physicists who worked in these programs. But you've
Speaker 5: got to have a properly equipped lab, you've got to
Speaker 5: have security, you've got to have the whole world watching.
Speaker 5: And this would not be a secret project like the
Speaker 5: skunk Works at Lockheed. This would be I would am I,
Speaker 5: it would be like this to be streamed, so all
Speaker 5: the work going on in that lab, the whole world watching. Okay, sorry,
Speaker 5: because I don't think you can do this secretibly.
Speaker 1: How come you know about this story? How come you
Speaker 1: know about this experiment tapping into zero point energy? But
Speaker 1: this is not common knowledge amongst nuclear physicists. This is
Speaker 1: not something that's discussed in the mainstream news. This is
Speaker 1: not something that you can find information online in any
Speaker 1: credible source.
Speaker 2: No one is real.
Speaker 1: It seems to me that if there was an experiment
Speaker 1: that tapped into such an unbelievably unlimited supply of energy
Speaker 1: like that, it would be impossible to keep this under wraps,
Speaker 1: that you would be able to keep the conversation under wraps.
Speaker 5: No, it's not true. And in fact, if you go
Speaker 5: to the website series disclosure dot com, there's a portal
Speaker 5: there to the energy research and there are thousands of
Speaker 5: documents and pages of stuff, things that were reported in
Speaker 5: the media, and then they got confiscated and shut down.
Speaker 5: But you're asking this question as if academia and the
Speaker 5: media are operating freely, not under the suppressive behaviors.
Speaker 1: And I think I'm asking the question actually because just
Speaker 1: the nature of human curiosity and incredibly brilliant intelligent men
Speaker 1: that are out there that study energy, I would think
Speaker 1: that someone would look into this and examine it.
Speaker 5: Okay, well there is And in fact, one of the
Speaker 5: people that we were funding for a while before he
Speaker 5: got threatened by a former CIA director who went down
Speaker 5: to his skiff a secure communication intelligence facility, was an
Speaker 5: understudy of Will ms Bender at the University of Washington.
Speaker 2: He got threatened in what they said.
Speaker 5: In nineteen seventy four, I think it was seventy four.
Speaker 5: He formed a company, and he's a brilliant and one
Speaker 5: of the most brilliant people I've ever met who and
Speaker 5: he had developed these trans dimensional systems using electromagnetic energy,
Speaker 5: and some guys came in with a national security order
Speaker 5: told him that they were confiscating his equipment, his device,
Speaker 5: his notes, They were all going into the vault and
Speaker 5: this man who I knew very well, who stayed at
Speaker 5: my home and still works for under contract with CIA
Speaker 5: in various groups. He said that basically the intelligence community
Speaker 5: owns his soul and that it can only do only
Speaker 5: so much to provide information and bring this out. And
Speaker 5: you know, people who think that doesn't happen are living
Speaker 5: in a very naive world.
Speaker 2: This is forty years ago though you're talking about.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and it would happen. That was forty years ago
Speaker 5: when the thing he started. Then when he after I
Speaker 5: developed a relationship with him, he checked with his intelligence
Speaker 5: what they called the shepherds and his handlers and the
Speaker 5: intelligence community. They said, yes, you can work with doctor Greer,
Speaker 5: not on the propulsion stuff that flies around like a UFO,
Speaker 5: but just on the energy generation part of this. And
Speaker 5: so we provided a grant to him through my project,
Speaker 5: the Orion Project.
Speaker 1: So the government limits his ability to do research on
Speaker 1: specific topics.
Speaker 5: Well, he actually is on the payroll the government now
Speaker 5: because he was basically told it's this, so you have
Speaker 5: no career at all. And if he had disclosed what
Speaker 5: he had been invented in nineteen seventy four under the National
Speaker 5: Security Order, he was hit with he would have been imprisoned.
Speaker 5: And these exist. You can look it up as section
Speaker 5: one eighty one eighty one of the Patent law in
Speaker 5: the National Security Act. These national security orders happen all
Speaker 5: the time. So but who's author right, You think President
Speaker 5: Obama or the or the Senate Intelligence Committee knows that
Speaker 5: these goons are out there doing this stuff. No, And
Speaker 5: so here's this brilliant guy. But I mean he's not
Speaker 5: like he's Rambo. I mean he's an engineer and a physicist.
Speaker 5: So he develops this stuff. A bunch of guys come
Speaker 5: in who are badass folks, okay, and he's terrified. And
Speaker 5: so then all these years later it circles back around.
Speaker 5: We get hold of him and we say, look, okay,
Speaker 5: here's you know, some funds do this for us on
Speaker 5: a you know, generation one point zero version of this something,
Speaker 5: and check with your intelligence folks. And they cleared him.
Speaker 5: About the time he was beginning to put this thing together,
Speaker 5: a FORMERCYI directed with a bunch of goons came down
Speaker 5: in twenty ten is two years three years ago, threatened him,
Speaker 5: threatened his family and so that you are not going
Speaker 5: to do this any further, and made it very clear.
Speaker 5: One of the guys at the naval research labs I've
Speaker 5: worked with for years who had some of this information,
Speaker 5: he was told, we will kill you, your wife, your children,
Speaker 5: and your grandchildren if you step out of line on this.
Speaker 5: So I don't think that you know, in terms of
Speaker 5: dealing with this, that you're going to be able to
Speaker 5: do it under any kind of where someone's trying to
Speaker 5: do it quietly secretively. It's going to have to be
Speaker 5: in plain sight.
Speaker 1: So what you're saying is that several people have tried
Speaker 1: to do this in the past one hundred every time,
Speaker 1: and every time they do it, they're threatened and stop
Speaker 1: from doing it. What specialized pieces of equipment would be
Speaker 1: necessary to produce this zero point energy field thing?
Speaker 5: Well, first of all, you know your your computer in
Speaker 5: lights who are running on one ten or two twenty
Speaker 5: all right, voltage. The voltage is involved in these transdimensional
Speaker 5: physics is in the thousands to millions of volts, but
Speaker 5: it very low current, and so you have to have
Speaker 5: special analyzers and generators for that. So, I mean, there
Speaker 5: is a science to this, and we understand it very
Speaker 5: very well. Actually, But building up that lab, I mean
Speaker 5: we looked into the equipment just as like half a
Speaker 5: million dollars just to do that. And so what you
Speaker 5: have to do is.
Speaker 1: It seems like nothing if you're talking about half a
Speaker 1: million dollars, that can.
Speaker 5: No, no, that's just the equipment. No no, no, there's
Speaker 5: no no building, no personnel, no staff, no nothing, just
Speaker 5: you know, the machine. So but so we estimate we
Speaker 5: have a budget for about a two year program around
Speaker 5: six million dollars to put a lab together, put these
Speaker 5: really brilliant people in it, get the right equipment, and
Speaker 5: build up these experiments and do real science. But the
Speaker 5: problem is you have people off on their own doing
Speaker 5: this that stumble across this phenomenon and they get shut
Speaker 5: down or threatened or bought out. Then you know, you
Speaker 5: have the folks who will be instead of threatened, they'll
Speaker 5: just be offered money. You know, So a lot of people.
Speaker 5: Doctor beard and tells the story of a man that
Speaker 5: had one of these generators and he was tested it
Speaker 5: was a legitimate over unity system, and then the guy disappeared,
Speaker 5: and the next time he saw the guy, he had
Speaker 5: a Ferrari and an Armani suit. And the guy never
Speaker 5: had a pot pan as it were, And and you know,
Speaker 5: What we found with this is that a lot of
Speaker 5: times folks will just say, look, you know, we're going
Speaker 5: to buy this, and a lot of people don't believe
Speaker 5: that happens, and they think that's a conspiracy theory. It
Speaker 5: isn't a conspiracy theory. And this is why the Federation
Speaker 5: of American Scientists when they said, look, they're fivey one
Speaker 5: hundred and thirty five or something like that patents that
Speaker 5: have been seized. Most people don't know that those national
Speaker 5: security orders can happen outside of the patent process. So
Speaker 5: even if you're not going the patent route, they can
Speaker 5: go in there and just seize the damn thing. And
Speaker 5: what are you gonna do?
Speaker 1: They just seize it based on the idea that it's
Speaker 1: somehow another threat.
Speaker 5: Well you, I mean, it's kind of like the flag
Speaker 5: in the Bible and that you be wrap yourself in
Speaker 5: these things to do all kinds of outrageous behaviors. Yes,
Speaker 5: but I mean, you can say it's national security. But
Speaker 5: as this one document from the Federal American Scientist says,
Speaker 5: how could a solar volt system be a threat to
Speaker 5: the national security? It would be a threat to the
Speaker 5: special interests that are calling the shots. So the question becomes,
Speaker 5: who's really calling the shots on these sort of decisions.
Speaker 5: Is it in the interests of we the people? No,
Speaker 5: it's in the interest of folks who want to protect
Speaker 5: their cartels.
Speaker 1: What is your take on guys who have come clean before,
Speaker 1: Guys like doctor Robert Lazar.
Speaker 2: Is that guy full of shit?
Speaker 1: He's the guy from Area fifty one that came back
Speaker 1: and said that he was back engineering some alien craft
Speaker 1: and very compelling to listen to, very interesting guy. But
Speaker 1: before I understand, doctor Stanton Friedman questioned him and in
Speaker 1: fact called him a fraud and said that some of
Speaker 1: his educational background was kind of made up.
Speaker 5: And here's the problem with any case where you hang
Speaker 5: it on one person like that is very risky. And
Speaker 5: that's why I've tried to resist that. When we started
Speaker 5: putting together the people who knew about the nuclear facilities
Speaker 5: with their UFOs coming over, I didn't want one or two.
Speaker 5: I wanted half a dozen or a dozen. That's what
Speaker 5: we have. The more spectacular the cases if it hangs
Speaker 5: on one person and the other question is where's the corroboration?
Speaker 5: So I think that that's why we try to focus
Speaker 5: on that. Now, I will say that the areas out
Speaker 5: in the Knells range, and nobody, by the way, cause
Speaker 5: it area fifty one. But will let's say that because
Speaker 5: they pahot MESA S four, S three, S twelve, and
Speaker 5: actually this National Reconnaissance Office document from the nineteen nineties
Speaker 5: lists those facilities there properly.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 5: Well, that's after Blackjack control.
Speaker 1: They had to apply for additional land. Before that, they
Speaker 1: denied it entirely. They had to apply for additional land
Speaker 1: because people were getting so close so they could film
Speaker 1: footage of some of these crafts that they were experimenting on.
Speaker 2: And that's not.
Speaker 1: Bullshit if you've ever seen. No one knows, ye knows
Speaker 1: what those things were, but the way they were moving
Speaker 1: was extraordinary. They moved unlike any craft that we know.
Speaker 1: I would assume that if you look at what we're
Speaker 1: doing today in all different parts of the world with drones,
Speaker 1: especially these drones that have hell fire missiles that can
Speaker 1: be fairly accurate, when you're considering that they're being operated
Speaker 1: by someone halfway across the world, that this probably has
Speaker 1: something to do with what they were working on back
Speaker 1: then when they're making these things fly around and do
Speaker 1: all these crazy turns and twists in the sky.
Speaker 5: No, because the drones that are being reported are conventional
Speaker 5: propulsion systems, either air jets or what we're talking about
Speaker 5: are things that are moving in a way that is
Speaker 5: outside the envelope of normal aerodynamic behavior. In other words,
Speaker 5: you cannot take something with a normal propeller or jet
Speaker 5: engine and accelerated it twenty thousand miles per hour and
Speaker 5: make a right hand turn. And we have photos and
Speaker 5: images of these things doing this. So when you're doing that,
Speaker 5: that's going to your brains, are going to come out
Speaker 5: of your nose if you're a pilot, and even a
Speaker 5: conventional object is going to be blown to smithereens by
Speaker 5: the inertial forces of that kind of turn and decceleration.
Speaker 2: I think we will be talking about two different things though.
Speaker 5: No, I'm not talking about.
Speaker 2: But you're talking about things that have been seen in space.
Speaker 5: No, I'm talking about things that had area fifty one
Speaker 5: at Area fifty one and also all over the world
Speaker 5: that have been documented moving in this way. Those are
Speaker 5: moving and I'm quoting actually General Debrauer of the Belgian
Speaker 5: Air Force Chief who said, this is outside the envelope
Speaker 5: of any conventional aerodynamic system.
Speaker 2: I'm not questioning that.
Speaker 1: But what I am saying is that the things that
Speaker 1: I've seen as far as videos from Area fifty one
Speaker 1: with these unidentified objects, whatever they were moving across the sky,
Speaker 1: they weren't moving that fast.
Speaker 2: Well, they were moving conventional speech.
Speaker 5: Oh, that's conventional, so that could be. But I'm talking
Speaker 5: about the things that I know that have been imaged
Speaker 5: out there, including a daytime object. We have a great video.
Speaker 2: What is this video that you're showing us, Brian?
Speaker 1: What was uh?
Speaker 4: This is uh lower your forty nine quad copters in
Speaker 4: an outdoor formation flight?
Speaker 2: That okay, let me see that.
Speaker 3: It's a pretty pretty bad ass the video.
Speaker 1: This is uh, these are these are conventional? Uh you
Speaker 1: could actually buy these right? Not these I'm not sure
Speaker 1: are they DARPA? Is this darker shit?
Speaker 3: This is ours electronic?
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, but actually you can buy a little military so.
Speaker 1: We could see. Yeah, if you've never seen this, what
Speaker 1: they can do now is really extraordinary. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is all these drones moving or what do you call them?
Speaker 3: What are these are just like little toys?
Speaker 5: Almost?
Speaker 1: Yeah they are.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but I'm sure a lot of people saw this
Speaker 3: in the sky. I was like, oh my god, what
Speaker 3: the fuck's that? And called it? You know UFOs.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Look how they move. I mean, this is really
Speaker 1: amazing stuff. They move in a geometric pattern in the
Speaker 1: sky right that mimics galaxies?
Speaker 5: All right, cool?
Speaker 1: So we know that there's some things that I mean,
Speaker 1: these are obviously terrestrial crafts. This is something.
Speaker 2: Look look what they're doing. I mean, that's amazing. This
Speaker 2: is not UFOs, of course, is identified flying.
Speaker 5: I mean not everything that people see that they don't
Speaker 5: know what it is as a UFO. I mean it's unignowlged. Well,
Speaker 5: it's unidentified to them, and it may be flying. But
Speaker 5: you know, I'm talking about things that are really quite amazing,
Speaker 5: like this one photograph we have of this triangle that's
Speaker 5: going like this and it makes a right hand turning
Speaker 5: and it's going in the photograph.
Speaker 2: Or video photo. Can we see this somewhere?
Speaker 5: Uh, it's I don't know where it's going to be
Speaker 5: in the film.
Speaker 1: But it's going to be in the film. But it's
Speaker 1: it's available online, isn't it. I mean it must. I
Speaker 1: don't know how long has it's been around for. I'll
Speaker 1: have to look it up.
Speaker 2: I don't have to.
Speaker 5: I don't have to cut the film in here, but
Speaker 5: I you know this is one. You know, there are
Speaker 5: a number of these.
Speaker 2: But this is a very compelling piece of evidence.
Speaker 5: Yeah, amazing.
Speaker 2: Why wouldn't you put.
Speaker 1: That online immediately and say, hey, you got to look
Speaker 1: at this. This is a compelling piece of.
Speaker 5: I think it is online somewhere, but I mean, I
Speaker 5: just can't tell you where. You know, we we have
Speaker 5: thousands of pages on our website. You can go if
Speaker 5: you go to a serious disclosure dot com you can
Speaker 5: click through and there's a whole photo gallery and all
Speaker 5: kinds of stuff.
Speaker 2: Okay, good.
Speaker 5: I don't know if this particular one is in that
Speaker 5: photo gallery. But for example, you look at the Vancouver
Speaker 5: Island photograph of a few years ago. I mean I
Speaker 5: think it was in the eighties, daytime disc with a dome.
Speaker 5: It is not a photoshopped. I was studied at NASA ames.
Speaker 5: It's probably the clearest photograph ever taking broad daylight. And
Speaker 5: you know what is that? Well, you know, it's just
Speaker 5: like these ones from Belgium where you have these photographs
Speaker 5: of these big triangular objects and their photo and video
Speaker 5: of those matching up with radar cases and jet pilots
Speaker 5: chasing them. I'm talking about those kind of things. There's
Speaker 5: actually more than people can imagine that's out there.
Speaker 1: Okay, so there's enough of these things where if you
Speaker 1: look at I believe Michokaku said five percent of all
Speaker 1: UFO sightings are completely unexplainable to find laws of physics
Speaker 1: and may possibly be, in his opinion, something that we
Speaker 1: don't understand or could be possibly.
Speaker 5: So that's what I'm talking about. The other stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what do you think they're doing here?
Speaker 5: That's a sixty four trillion dollar question. I think I
Speaker 5: think there are a number of things. Number one, I
Speaker 5: don't think there it's new at all. I don't think
Speaker 5: there's a new phenomenon. There's enough material out there from
Speaker 5: ancient times that would indicate that these objects have been
Speaker 5: around since recorded history. I mentioned this earlier in the show.
Speaker 5: But secondly, I think this stage of our evolution, these
Speaker 5: civilizations are rather concerned about our potential to destroy this
Speaker 5: planet and ourselves, but also the fact we're going into space.
Speaker 5: We have not become peaceful, and in they're classified projects,
Speaker 5: we have things way beyond the International Space Station, so
Speaker 5: that we could become an existential threat to other planets potentially,
Speaker 5: So I think that there is a concern about that,
Speaker 5: and I think that you know, there are all these movies,
Speaker 5: you know, Battle Los Angeles and Independence Day and.
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah Avatar the other way.
Speaker 5: You know, it's yeah, and it's such me. It's like, okay, yeah,
Speaker 5: It's like when I went to write Petterson Air Force
Speaker 5: Base where they hit the Blue room that that very
Speaker 5: Goldwater tried sender to Goldwater tried to get in and you.
Speaker 2: Know thee yeah, yeah.
Speaker 5: It wasn't that. But but the thing is is.
Speaker 1: That hangary team right Patterson Air Force p Yeah, but
Speaker 1: this is a different thing in right Patterson Air Force per.
Speaker 5: Right, it's called the Blue Room.
Speaker 2: Is that where supposedly the Roswell wreckage was.
Speaker 5: The air Material Command. And then when I was there.
Speaker 1: That, by the way, very compelling piece of evidence that
Speaker 1: there might have been something serious going on other than
Speaker 1: a weather balloon. The fact that two separate planes were
Speaker 1: used to send this wreckage, because in case one of
Speaker 1: them went down, it was so historically significant. I have
Speaker 1: that that newspaper, the Roswell Daily Record. I have that
Speaker 1: page on my wall in my house and I look
Speaker 1: at it all the time. It's a fascinating I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's essentially a press release by the military saying
Speaker 1: we recovered a crash.
Speaker 5: Disc before they pulled it back. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's amazing because that's that's a big statement, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, look at all the things that could have
Speaker 1: been they could have been wrong about, like, oh, it
Speaker 1: could have been something else. But the fact that they
Speaker 1: came out and said it's a crash disc that had
Speaker 1: never been done before that that really was one of
Speaker 1: the first.
Speaker 5: I think some heads rolled over that press release. But
Speaker 5: because they had to pull it back.
Speaker 1: Well then they did that ridiculous dog and Pony show
Speaker 1: where they brought out this shitty.
Speaker 2: Looking aluminum Yeah, it kind of looks like a thing.
Speaker 2: It's hilarious that that's quite hilarious.
Speaker 1: And the government I've always i mean, if you just
Speaker 1: look at the history deception that the government has in
Speaker 1: dealing with the American public from the get go, and
Speaker 1: whether it's with the Gulf of Tonkin incident or whether
Speaker 1: it's what happened with the Contras and the Sandinistas using
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, taxpayer dollars and black ops from
Speaker 1: selling cocaine in the ghettos of Los Angeles to fun
Speaker 1: rebel armies. If you just look, you got to know
Speaker 1: they're not telling the truth. Why would they tell the
Speaker 1: truth if it was just a weather balloon? Would they
Speaker 1: really put on this fucking dog and pony show where
Speaker 1: they'd have a general sit there and was a colonel
Speaker 1: whoever it was, on his knees pointing out all the
Speaker 1: rest who look at this?
Speaker 5: He is just wrecked right, Well, that's what Colonel Corso
Speaker 5: said that you know, there's no question that this was
Speaker 5: something very legitimate. And in fact, you know when Barry Goldwater,
Speaker 5: Senator Goldwater, who had McCain seat before John McCain took
Speaker 5: it in Arizona, I was at his home some years
Speaker 5: ago and he had left the Senate and he told me,
Speaker 5: he said, look, he says it was a goddamn mistake.
Speaker 5: Then he said, goddamn mistake now that this was ever
Speaker 5: kept secret. But he was an Air Force reserved general,
Speaker 5: and he told me. Senator Goldwater said, look, I asked
Speaker 5: Curtis LeMay, General LeMay to get me into the blue
Speaker 5: room at right Patterson because I wanted to see this stuff.
Speaker 5: Because he had heard reports from other pilots about UFO encounters,
Speaker 5: and Senator Goldwater told me that Curtis May said, look, Barry,
Speaker 5: I can't even get into that area anymore. And if
Speaker 5: you ever asked me about this again, I will personally
Speaker 5: see that you are a court martialed out of the
Speaker 5: Air Force Reserves. This to a sitting senator and a
Speaker 5: guy who'd run for president, of course in nineteen sixty five,
Speaker 5: that actually happened. Yeah, no, that's amazing, amazing. Well, I
Speaker 5: was sitting there with the senator, and I have a
Speaker 5: guy who was there with me, and you know what
Speaker 5: when I asked him was was Was Curtis May serious?
Speaker 5: He said, yeah, like a heart attack, he says. I
Speaker 5: never brought it up again. And so the question becomes,
Speaker 5: you know, when you have someone like Curtis le May
Speaker 5: who admits and if you google who he was, who
Speaker 5: admits to the fact that at a certain point even
Speaker 5: he was being kind of sidelined in terms of access
Speaker 5: of this information, and then threatens and says something like
Speaker 5: that to a sitting powerful US senator. Did they were
Speaker 5: good friends? I mean, they were buddies. You know, there's
Speaker 5: there's something going on here. And I've heard too many
Speaker 5: accounts like that from these sorts of people. And I
Speaker 5: think it's a it's a time for people to understand that,
Speaker 5: you know, ruthless people are out there and they do
Speaker 5: this sort of stuff. So you know, when when what
Speaker 5: happened for the last sixty years continues to go on
Speaker 5: and on and on, the people who try to move
Speaker 5: into this who are politicians, end up hitting the same boat.
Speaker 5: Saw that Senator Goldwater did.
Speaker 1: These incredibly powerful, technologically advanced beings that come here from
Speaker 1: another planet and are concerned with the fact that we've
Speaker 1: developed the power to blow ourselves up, but yet lack
Speaker 1: the understanding, the intellect, or the spiritual capacity to recognize
Speaker 1: what the dangers and the repercussions of those actions would be.
Speaker 1: What are they are they? Does anybody communicating with them?
Speaker 1: Does anybody have a message from them? Is there anything
Speaker 1: that they say will be done if we keep fucking around?
Speaker 2: I mean, is there is there.
Speaker 1: Like any any any doctrine that they're trying to push
Speaker 1: on us? Oh?
Speaker 5: I don't know if there's any doctrine. I think they're
Speaker 5: waiting for us to reach you know, uh, you know
Speaker 5: you mentioned this, physicist, but you have you know, a
Speaker 5: level one civilization or a level two where we begin
Speaker 5: to behave in a halfway civilized way, so that we
Speaker 5: could be quite open in our contact. But I think,
Speaker 5: you know, I think everyone always says, well, why don't
Speaker 5: they just land on the White House long or something?
Speaker 5: I said, yeah, right, who's white House?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 5: Humans are America?
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah?
Speaker 5: Yeah, so maybe the White House in Bogota, Columbia. I
Speaker 5: think the question is, uh, it turns it the whole
Speaker 5: issue upside down. What do we have to do as
Speaker 5: a people in a civilization to uh be able to
Speaker 5: go into space and have open contact with these civilizations
Speaker 5: quite in an overt way as opposed to episodic way.
Speaker 5: And I think that requires us to begin begin to
Speaker 5: behave peacefully. It certainly requires that we not begin to
Speaker 5: weaponize space, and that we stop doing things that are
Speaker 5: incredibly self destructive. But you know, the idea that they're
Speaker 5: going to land here and and for it's like us
Speaker 5: going to Afghanistan. Think we're going to impose Jeffersonian democracy
Speaker 5: on a medieval feudal society. Really that never has worked.
Speaker 5: So I think these civilizations are smart enough to know
Speaker 5: that that isn't the way this is going to happen
Speaker 5: that humans have. But the problem is that I kind
Speaker 5: of think we're running out of time to get some
Speaker 5: things right, things that should have been fixed one hundred
Speaker 5: years ago, like living together peacefully, bringing out these technologies
Speaker 5: that we don't destroy the biosphere, eliminating poverty in the world.
Speaker 5: You know, forty eight percent of the public doesn't have
Speaker 5: a pot the pen literally, they don't have indoor plumbing
Speaker 5: on this planet. Forty eight percent of the seven billion people.
Speaker 5: A lot of people don't know that. So, you know,
Speaker 5: I think that until we begin to fix some of
Speaker 5: these larger problems. And the good news about all this
Speaker 5: is that it's fixable, and the means that technologies to
Speaker 5: do that are already in existence. So if they're already
Speaker 5: in existence, and the science is and studied and suppressed
Speaker 5: and studied in suppressed for decades, it means that we
Speaker 5: as a people have to come together and say, all right,
Speaker 5: we're going to do this. And I think this is
Speaker 5: why the sort of hate to use the word activists
Speaker 5: or advocacy part of what we're doing is that people
Speaker 5: are always expecting someone else to do this, you know,
Speaker 5: and I think people have to say no, each of
Speaker 5: us have to be responsible for the planet and for
Speaker 5: our future and kind of creating a good future. You
Speaker 5: can't look to big Brother to do it, and I
Speaker 5: don't think you should look through the ets to do it,
Speaker 5: and not that they're not going to help us if
Speaker 5: we at some point we reached a point of being
Speaker 5: functional as opposed to dysfunctional. But I think the prime
Speaker 5: movers have to be the people. We the people and
Speaker 5: my mom's family were some of the original people in
Speaker 5: the American Revolution. We fact terrible to say we were
Speaker 5: the first prisoner of war with the British, But I
Speaker 5: think about the fact that you know, here you had
Speaker 5: this ragtag bunch of people in the American rev illusion
Speaker 5: taken on the most powerful navy and most powerful empire
Speaker 5: in the world the time, the British Empire. I think
Speaker 5: people have to see that within the human spirit, we
Speaker 5: have the means to do this, and a lot of
Speaker 5: people give too much power to where I don't think
Speaker 5: it should be provided to these covert groups and these
Speaker 5: sort of cartels. I think again, I'm getting back to
Speaker 5: this idea of empowerment where we have exactly the power
Speaker 5: we're willing to manifest and know more. But if we're
Speaker 5: going to sit on our hands and expect someone else
Speaker 5: to do it. We're in trouble and there's been too
Speaker 5: much of that and there needs to be I guess
Speaker 5: some moral courage here. And I you know, this is
Speaker 5: what sick in me about, you know, the politics of
Speaker 5: the media and then all these scandals like you were
Speaker 5: talking about with betray us and you know during the
Speaker 5: Clinton earor the Monica Lewinsky thing I called the blow
Speaker 5: job heard around the world, that it's just so much nonsense,
Speaker 5: whereas these big issues are the moral issues as I
Speaker 5: see it.
Speaker 1: You know, well, I think if you look at us
Speaker 1: as a being, as an entity, and our progress on
Speaker 1: this planet, it's so staggering over such a short period
Speaker 1: of time that I think our minds, our ability to
Speaker 1: pass down information, all of these things lagged behind. We're
Speaker 1: essentially waking up in the middle of history. As a
Speaker 1: race of beings humans, We're waking up in the middle
Speaker 1: of a massive amount of momentum. As you're born, you
Speaker 1: were born into a race that is moving in an
Speaker 1: incredibly powerful direction that it's very hard to stop.
Speaker 2: And it's also the.
Speaker 1: Same animal that just twenty thousand and thirty thousand, go
Speaker 1: back as far as you want, where we were essentially
Speaker 1: tribal monkey people. I mean, that's all of those instincts
Speaker 1: that allowed us to get to twenty thirteen are all
Speaker 1: encoded in our genome. All of those instincts, all of
Speaker 1: those reward systems are all encoded, and all of those
Speaker 1: reward systems that whether you look back to Napoleon or
Speaker 1: Genghis Khan, or look at any war figure, any dominator
Speaker 1: throughout human history, the people in power have always tried
Speaker 1: to keep in power and suppress others.
Speaker 2: I think they do.
Speaker 1: But I think also if you look at the power
Speaker 1: of technology to overwhelm everything, including the head spook of
Speaker 1: the CIA. I mean, he was essentially overwhelmed by email.
Speaker 1: That's what took him over, you know. I mean it
Speaker 1: was it was the FBI looking any things, but essentially
Speaker 1: it was all done through electronic means.
Speaker 2: It was all done through He.
Speaker 1: Was revealed by the very powers that the CIA uses.
Speaker 2: In the first place, they're spies.
Speaker 1: The top spy was spied on. It's in my opinion,
Speaker 1: when I look at human history and I look at
Speaker 1: where they just tried to extrapolate. When I tried to
Speaker 1: extrapolate where we're going. It seems to me that it's
Speaker 1: all symbiotically connected to technology, and that seems unavoidable. That's
Speaker 1: why I have such a hard time with the idea
Speaker 1: of someone creating some zero point energy thing that people
Speaker 1: aren't looking into. Enough people know about what Tesla was
Speaker 1: working on. Enough people are fascinated by the ideas of wormholes,
Speaker 1: and I just would think that more people would be
Speaker 1: involved in this, and that the government, with all its shady,
Speaker 1: nefarious arms, wouldn't be able to put out all of
Speaker 1: those fires.
Speaker 5: But a lot of it's self censoring. For example, I'll
Speaker 5: give you a really good example. There was an academic
Speaker 5: guy that I was talking to recently and he was
Speaker 5: wanting to push into this issue, and basically he was told, no,
Speaker 5: you're not going to do it this university because this
Speaker 5: is violating the second law of thermodynamics, and blah blah blah.
Speaker 5: You know, in a rational world, which is what you're
Speaker 5: talking about, I would agree with you, But we don't
Speaker 5: live in a rational world. We live in a world
Speaker 5: where there are a lot of emotions and power, hierarchies
Speaker 5: and all kinds of dysfunctions, and so you have to
Speaker 5: factor that into the equation. And I don't think you
Speaker 5: can underestimate the reach of the national security state, not
Speaker 5: just here but around the world to put out these fires,
Speaker 5: no matter how many times they try to surface, unless
Speaker 5: it's done in a very large way. And I didn't
Speaker 5: believe that, and I've learned the hard way trying to
Speaker 5: do it in a smaller fashion from this, like the
Speaker 5: story I told you about this the scientist who works
Speaker 5: in a skiff down near the Huntsville Space Flight Center
Speaker 5: Marshall's Space Flight Center in Huntsville. And I think what
Speaker 5: we are going to have to do is organize an
Speaker 5: effort that is very much outside of government and mainstream
Speaker 5: corporations and even academia, because academia, if you have never
Speaker 5: been in it, is so political. I mean, you know,
Speaker 5: you know, you touch these sort of issues and it's
Speaker 5: the end of your career. I'll give you a great story.
Speaker 5: In terms of other institutions, you know, the National Science
Speaker 5: Foundation is a very big player in global warming studies
Speaker 5: and all this kind of stuff. And the deputy director
Speaker 5: of that and doctor Bob Corrill, and I had a
Speaker 5: long meeting with another person who was one of the
Speaker 5: five directors of NASA back some years ago, and you know,
Speaker 5: he was very interesting exactly what you're talking about these
Speaker 5: sciences and studies, And I said, look, we need some
Speaker 5: people at the National Science Foundation to really take this
Speaker 5: on as an area of research, development, funding, etc. He says,
Speaker 5: it'd be the end of my career if I did this.
Speaker 5: I said, well, you know, here, it's the future of
Speaker 5: the Earth or your career. What are you going to choose.
Speaker 5: Let's choose the Earth and our future. But the truth
Speaker 5: is everyone puts their pants on one leg at a time,
Speaker 5: and a lot of folks are not going to jeopardize
Speaker 5: their careers and their income. A very famous astronomer who
Speaker 5: worked with Carl Sagan was at our meetings in nineteen
Speaker 5: ninety seven that we did for Congress, and after he
Speaker 5: did that with us, he was told if he ever
Speaker 5: wanted to be published again, right again, or have a
Speaker 5: career in astronomy, he'd have to leave the issue alone.
Speaker 5: So he was directly threatened, and he begged me to
Speaker 5: keep going forward, but that he couldn't be part of it.
Speaker 5: And so I think that you know, most people don't
Speaker 5: realize that this happens every day and it's kind of
Speaker 5: a miracle that this many military, in corporate and intelligence
Speaker 5: people came together this far. But I won't even begin
Speaker 5: to tell you what we've gone through trying to get
Speaker 5: this far. It's been very difficult. And so for every
Speaker 5: person you hear about and that you see in this
Speaker 5: film series or in the Disclosure Project, there are a
Speaker 5: hundred they wouldn't that have given me the information and
Speaker 5: even documents and intelligence, but they don't want to come
Speaker 5: out and be identified. So there's a lot of fear
Speaker 5: of either reprisals, but also just the ridicule factor.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 5: I have a document from nineteen fifty three from the
Speaker 5: CIA that talked about engaging Disney Studios to make cartoonish
Speaker 5: movies about this issue so that it would be the
Speaker 5: butt of jokes. And this document talks about the psychological
Speaker 5: war fair value of the subject. So you know, people
Speaker 5: are sort of like you know in middle school, where
Speaker 5: you're worried about what are people going to think about
Speaker 5: me if I say I think this is real? Are
Speaker 5: you going to lose credibility if you're a doctor or
Speaker 5: a physicist or an engineer.
Speaker 2: Is all part of Project Blue Book.
Speaker 5: Wasn't that this predated this. This, this actually predated that
Speaker 5: when they were first coming together with how do we
Speaker 5: manage this? Because it's hidden in plain sight, people are
Speaker 5: going to see these objects. There's no way to really
Speaker 5: sanitize it. You know. People think you can really get
Speaker 5: rid of this. Well, you can. If there's a certain
Speaker 5: number of people seeing this all the time, you are
Speaker 5: highly credible. So but if you created a media an
Speaker 5: environment where it's ridiculous and you're considered a kook or
Speaker 5: this or that, if you're identified with it, or you'll
Speaker 5: be you know, Governor Moonbeam or Senator space Cadet or something.
Speaker 5: And this is one of the real problems is that
Speaker 5: the subject has been so ridiculed, and there's so much
Speaker 5: ridiculous stuff out there on the subject that's provably nonsensical
Speaker 5: that credible people really have to swallow hard. I have
Speaker 5: to tell you the scientists that are at this major
Speaker 5: Ivy League university doing the work on this little body,
Speaker 5: this humanoid type body, you know, it's a big, big
Speaker 5: thing for them to be working on this, and it's
Speaker 5: even a bigger thing that they're going to go on
Speaker 5: the record about their findings. When are they going to
Speaker 5: do this and the next well you'll see on April
Speaker 5: twenty second, comes to the premiere.
Speaker 2: I'll come to the premiere.
Speaker 1: But on April twenty second, what if no one has
Speaker 1: made some sort of a public statement. No IVY League scientists, No,
Speaker 1: we're going to so, yes, you're promising. Between now in
Speaker 1: April twenty second, there'll be some sort of.
Speaker 5: A reveal, press releases.
Speaker 1: Major institution scientists of credible history will step forward and say, hey,
Speaker 1: this is this is something.
Speaker 5: We don't know what they're going to say. They're still
Speaker 5: doing the run on the genome.
Speaker 2: Well, it's extraordinary, if it's real, if it's it's if.
Speaker 5: It's okay, let me put that the rest right now.
Speaker 5: You touch it, Yeah, I've touched it. We have the
Speaker 5: cat scans, we have the reports from these top scientists.
Speaker 5: The only thing left that we're doing is running the genome,
Speaker 5: which is the whole genome.
Speaker 1: So that scientists have said that it's absolutely of biological origin.
Speaker 1: That's not it's not like my werewolf.
Speaker 5: No, it's this. We know this, we absolutely know, and
Speaker 5: put that to rest.
Speaker 1: Has this damaged your credibility in life? I mean, have
Speaker 1: you have you suffered because of this? In any ways
Speaker 1: of course, in what way?
Speaker 5: Every way? Yeah, Yeah, it's been the hardest thing. You know,
Speaker 5: I tell people the worst days in the er or
Speaker 5: you know, I held a three year old that died
Speaker 5: in my arms. This has been harder, so you know.
Speaker 2: It's harder than the death of a little baby. Really.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: The stuff we've had to deal with, like way horrible
Speaker 5: stuff I don't really want to go into. I mean,
Speaker 5: we probably don't have time. But every nasty thing that
Speaker 5: can be done has been done or attempted to be
Speaker 5: done to many of us, and particularly to us my
Speaker 5: family and not my family so much is you know,
Speaker 5: targeting me with the nastiness just unbelievable ridicules and threats,
Speaker 5: threats and yeah.
Speaker 2: People threaten you to what stop talking about UFOs.
Speaker 5: You know, problems that we've had with a lot of
Speaker 5: security problems. I mean, there's an FBI fill over I'll
Speaker 5: open on this because of the death threats and this
Speaker 5: stuff we've had.
Speaker 1: Really and so you think these death threats are from
Speaker 1: these people that you're exposing that are in the cabal
Speaker 1: of this.
Speaker 5: Well, who knows where they're coming from. You could just
Speaker 5: say it was some nut job, like the people who
Speaker 5: shot up the Sikh temple where our director's family as
Speaker 5: you know, yes, his father was murdered horribly at this thing.
Speaker 5: And but you know, I'm just saying that it's a
Speaker 5: lot easier being an emergency doctor than dealing with this
Speaker 5: issue when you know it's real and you're dealing with
Speaker 5: this level of intelligence.
Speaker 2: And has this affected your career, Yeah.
Speaker 5: I've left medicine because I had to. No, I mean,
Speaker 5: but because I had to choose. How I put this,
Speaker 5: you only have twenty four hours in a day, and
Speaker 5: you know, at a certain point, I had to decide
Speaker 5: I'm either going to continue as a physician or I'm
Speaker 5: going to go full steam on this now. Of course,
Speaker 5: it was a big sacrifice for my family, and I
Speaker 5: was giving up hundreds of thousands of dollars a year
Speaker 5: as a doctor to do this for nothing. All right,
Speaker 5: So it's been difficult. So that's what I'm saying. It's
Speaker 5: been difficult in every way. But that's not important. I'm
Speaker 5: not important. It is.
Speaker 1: It is important, and you're that's a it's a tremendous sacrifice,
Speaker 1: especially because it's something that you would truly believe in.
Speaker 1: How do you support yourself now?
Speaker 5: Well, I have enough resourcefulness. Before I left medicine, I
Speaker 5: bought my home, and I'd saved enough and invested enough
Speaker 5: that I'm okay. And then I have a little bit
Speaker 5: of income from some of the books and things. But
Speaker 5: I mean it's very modest compared to you know, what
Speaker 5: I would have been making. You know, I'd probably in
Speaker 5: the aggregate of giving up around somewhere in the neighborhood
Speaker 5: of five to six million dollars in income doing this,
Speaker 5: which I actually don't regret at all, because I don't
Speaker 5: care about the money.
Speaker 1: I care about when people say that I hate when
Speaker 1: people say that.
Speaker 5: No, I really don't. I mean, this is why you
Speaker 5: know now this you will probably strain credulity here. But
Speaker 5: former head of Army Intelligence approached me in nineteen ninety
Speaker 5: two and offered me the kind of control over a
Speaker 5: two billion dollar fund if I would shut up and
Speaker 5: close down the disclosure project and see SETI.
Speaker 1: Control over a two billion dollar fund. What what did
Speaker 1: he want you to do?
Speaker 5: He just basically want I could do anything with it
Speaker 5: so long as I would shut.
Speaker 2: You could just go big pimpin giant yacht Ferrari. Who
Speaker 2: knows no no more.
Speaker 5: Doctor greer, and then you know what, I said, No,
Speaker 5: I'm not going to do that because I really believe
Speaker 5: that this issue needs to be dealt with. Probably probably
Speaker 5: the guy went to my wife and tried to convince
Speaker 5: her to convince me. And this, you know, this is
Speaker 5: a kind of not.
Speaker 2: Did he want you to work for him or he
Speaker 2: just wanted you to show up.
Speaker 5: He wanted me to merge what we were doing with
Speaker 5: some operation he had which would have basically subsumed it
Speaker 5: and co opted it. And I said no. And then
Speaker 5: he made another run and I said no. And then
Speaker 5: about a month after that, all over the internet it
Speaker 5: came out that I wasn't even a doctor. Here I
Speaker 5: am in this emergency department, and there's a bunch of
Speaker 5: goons went out there that I'm not even an actual MD.
Speaker 5: And I'm there, you know, up to my eyeballs and
Speaker 5: blood and guts in the er and this thing breaks. So,
Speaker 5: you know, they do all kinds of disinformation and psychological
Speaker 5: warfare stuff on people. But I don't really mind that
Speaker 5: that's happened. What I'm more concerned about is the people
Speaker 5: who have the knowledge and responsibility who don't do the
Speaker 5: right thing. Because there's no way that I can do
Speaker 5: this by myself. And what I was really gratified to see,
Speaker 5: and I'm still gratified to see, is you or all
Speaker 5: these people military men and women and others who come
Speaker 5: forward very courageously, academics like the ones doing the work
Speaker 5: on this potential little humanoid creature, which is a real creature.
Speaker 5: Whether it's what it is, we don't know, but they
Speaker 5: it's really a courageous thing for these people to be
Speaker 5: doing that. The people who led the charge in France
Speaker 5: to release all those documents I know the backstory to
Speaker 5: that that the public doesn't know, and there were it
Speaker 5: was very controversial. So I mean, this is the kind
Speaker 5: of courage we need to get the truth out and
Speaker 5: to go forward as a civilization. And so, you know,
Speaker 5: you can't buy it, You got to have it, You
Speaker 5: got to manifest it from inside.
Speaker 1: Are you getting income from this? No, you don't get
Speaker 1: any income from this.
Speaker 5: Now, this is you know, and you know what's beautiful
Speaker 5: about Serious the movie is that it was all crowdfunded.
Speaker 5: No one on my team has taken any funds from
Speaker 5: It's all gone into the production of the movie.
Speaker 2: You don't even take a salary.
Speaker 5: No, oh, no, No, it's all gone into.
Speaker 1: But you list expenses, like don't you list like several hundred,
Speaker 1: two hundred and seventy thousand dollars or something and expenses
Speaker 1: that you charge to create this film.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, but that's the production company, you know, because
Speaker 5: I'm not a filmmaker and I don't ask me to
Speaker 5: turn on can we.
Speaker 2: Have to this production company?
Speaker 5: And then of course we're going to uh, you know,
Speaker 5: we have to organize the premiere. And of course, being crowdfunded,
Speaker 5: you have to fulfill all the incentives for the crowdfunding.
Speaker 5: I don't know if you know crowdfunding. Yeah, but I
Speaker 5: want to thank everyone who's listening, by the way.
Speaker 1: To.
Speaker 5: Kickstarter and then our own private program and you know,
Speaker 5: we have like four thousand people who have contributed funds
Speaker 5: to this, which is really a huge number of folks.
Speaker 5: And and by the way, all of you folks who've
Speaker 5: done that, I just want to can I say this?
Speaker 5: The premiere is going to be here in Los Angeles
Speaker 5: on Earth Day, April twenty second at the La Live,
Speaker 5: the Regal LA Live Cinemas downtown, the Premiere Theater. And
Speaker 5: so that's April twenty second. If you want to come.
Speaker 5: You can kind of sign up and get tickets at
Speaker 5: serious disclosure dot com.
Speaker 1: I'm writing that in my calendar right now. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: try to make that. That sounds really fascinating.
Speaker 5: He tweet it for us, and you're invited to come,
Speaker 5: and you'll come as my guest.
Speaker 1: I'll tweet I'd love to have you.
Speaker 5: As my guests if you want, I would love to go.
Speaker 5: We're gonna have a red carpet and we're gonna invite
Speaker 5: some other you know, people here in Hollywood and in
Speaker 5: the business, and it's gonna be an exciting event. I mean,
Speaker 5: the theater only holds eight hundred and nine people, of
Speaker 5: which about half of those seats already spoken for. But
Speaker 5: but you know, those of you want to come, you know,
Speaker 5: just hop online and you know the system is set
Speaker 5: up so you can do it all digitally. You know,
Speaker 5: it's not gonna meet tickets at the door. Though.
Speaker 1: Okay, what is this thing that you're doing where you
Speaker 1: lead people out into the desert and you have them
Speaker 1: make contact with something ethereal crafts and beings and what what?
Speaker 2: What is that?
Speaker 5: Well, that's the whole CE five concept. I was talking
Speaker 5: about close encounters of the fifth kind that we're using
Speaker 5: these different protocols. And by the way, there's a there's
Speaker 5: a smartphone and an iPhone app for this that you
Speaker 5: can get at serious disclosure dot com. So it has
Speaker 5: all the it'll actually turn your phone into a magnetometer.
Speaker 5: It has the tones that were recorded in this crop
Speaker 5: circle of this weird energy that came into the crops
Speaker 5: Or can.
Speaker 2: Get this on my phone right now?
Speaker 5: Yes, you can. It's called the Contact app. It's and
Speaker 5: it's at it's at you can go to the serious
Speaker 5: disclosure dot com and there's an icon there and you
Speaker 5: can link and it goes to either the iTunes store
Speaker 5: or the Android store.
Speaker 1: Okay, and tell me what happens when you take these?
Speaker 1: You'll take anyone out there? Do they have to go
Speaker 1: through a screening process?
Speaker 5: Yeah, there's Apple. I mean, it's of course, it's a
Speaker 5: We do about a week training of people and remote
Speaker 5: viewing and the protocols of contact and uh, there's sort
Speaker 5: of the whole concept of it, but also how to
Speaker 5: look at the night sky. You go out with satellite charts,
Speaker 5: we have fourth generation night scopes, we have really good
Speaker 5: cameras and you know, in fact, we're going to be
Speaker 5: doing one in Colorado in June in the high desert.
Speaker 5: I have some land up there.
Speaker 1: What is the actual name of this app? Because there's
Speaker 1: a couple of contact apps.
Speaker 5: Well, again, you have to go to serious disclosure dot
Speaker 5: com and there's a link there for it. You know
Speaker 5: the name of them, of your own app?
Speaker 1: You know what, I have so.
Speaker 5: Many irons in the fire. I think it's called et
Speaker 5: contact app.
Speaker 1: Oh, but t contact. Let me try that contact app.
Speaker 1: So and explain to me what what happens here? You
Speaker 1: have a course and in this course, what do these
Speaker 1: people do?
Speaker 5: The idea is that we want to teach them.
Speaker 1: That's your your signal, Yeah, that is that is so
Speaker 1: I just bought your app powerful, Okay, So explain to
Speaker 1: me where would someone sign up for something like this?
Speaker 5: Yeah, And we do these expeditions a few times a year.
Speaker 5: I used to there are only about twenty people who
Speaker 5: are who are allowed to.
Speaker 2: Come now twenty at a time because.
Speaker 5: I can't handle more than that for a week out
Speaker 5: in the desert or out in the mountains. But and
Speaker 5: I just don't have time to do it more often
Speaker 5: than the four or five times a.
Speaker 1: Year that we do.
Speaker 2: So you especially do it quarterly.
Speaker 5: Well yeah, this seasonally, but the schedule is up at
Speaker 5: serious disclosure dot com.
Speaker 2: Where's the place where do you bring these people?
Speaker 5: It just depends. I mean, like we're the next one's
Speaker 5: going to be in the high desert of Colorado at
Speaker 5: about eight thousand feet. It's a remote here into the
Speaker 5: Great Sand Dunes that's had a lot of reports of
Speaker 5: UFOs and contact. In fact, the film director and his
Speaker 5: crew were out there last June a few months ago
Speaker 5: in twenty twelve, when we had this disc fly over
Speaker 5: and then a jet came in to intercept it, and
Speaker 5: just that's going to be in the film. It's really cool.
Speaker 1: You have a video of that or a photo of
Speaker 1: that both really so you have a video of this
Speaker 1: disc in the sky and then a jet approaching the
Speaker 1: disc out.
Speaker 5: Probably coming out of Colorado Spring so as it's coming
Speaker 5: out of that direction. But yeah, it was. It's really
Speaker 5: pretty cool. And of course I think when when the
Speaker 5: director saw this, he went wow.
Speaker 2: And who put this video together? Who made it, who
Speaker 2: filmed it?
Speaker 5: The film crew, the forst serious.
Speaker 2: So you wow, so you know they have.
Speaker 1: This, you like, we don't want to make sure that
Speaker 1: it was real clear of this. You have thousands of
Speaker 1: these videos.
Speaker 5: Well there's one. Yeah, if you go again to this website,
Speaker 5: you'll see that there's a section for the the Contact
Speaker 5: Expeditions and the C five Expeditions. And a couple of
Speaker 5: years ago we were up on there's a mountain north
Speaker 5: of here called Mount Shasta near the Oregon border in
Speaker 5: the Cascade Range, and it's a volcanic mountain and we've
Speaker 5: gone up there a number of years and we've had
Speaker 5: these objects that have appeared and one of them was
Speaker 5: actually in the field. We had their night vision camera
Speaker 5: running and it lifted up and does this and then
Speaker 5: there's like this quirkscrew and de materialize in the sky.
Speaker 5: We have this own videotape and it was during one
Speaker 5: of these expeditions, and it's a really amazing bit of video.
Speaker 2: Is ball lightning a real phenomenon?
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, sure sure? And that's not that this is
Speaker 5: clear skies, no whether but coming up from the grounde.
Speaker 1: But don't they But doesn't ball lightning have something to
Speaker 1: do with there's there's certain types of visual phenomenon that
Speaker 1: have to do with tectonic plates and pressure and stress.
Speaker 5: Piece of electric Yeah, what is now? Well, that's very different. Also,
Speaker 5: that'll be just sort of a discharge, like an electrical discharge,
Speaker 5: see it, And that's from the rocks. And usually it's
Speaker 5: when there's quartz, the pressure of it and electromagnetic energy
Speaker 5: will build up and it'll burst out. But you know,
Speaker 5: this is an object and you can see it quite clearly,
Speaker 5: and it's a it's right at the edge of the
Speaker 5: speed of light because it's kind of coming in and
Speaker 5: out of this dimension. It's a really great video and
Speaker 5: there were like thirty forty people who saw this happen.
Speaker 5: So we do this. I've been doing this for twenty
Speaker 5: two years. And what people, what are you showing up there? Brian?
Speaker 1: What is that?
Speaker 5: It was one of these objects that came over. I
Speaker 5: think that was at Melchester. I'm not sure. It's my
Speaker 5: laser and it's this object that came right over. And
Speaker 5: you know, we also train people that always go out
Speaker 5: with satellite charts, know what you know, so you know
Speaker 5: when the satellite this.
Speaker 1: Is your footage of this thing flying in the sky. Yep, whoa,
Speaker 1: And that's your laser.
Speaker 5: That's why I have a big you know, it's one
Speaker 5: of these.
Speaker 1: I got one of those.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it'll go, it'll go one hundred two hundred miles
Speaker 5: in the space.
Speaker 1: Now, when you were filming this, are you trying to
Speaker 1: contact them? Like?
Speaker 2: What are you trying?
Speaker 5: We had so we do the protocols where you do
Speaker 5: the remote viewing, set up the vector to show them
Speaker 5: where you are. We play these electronic tones in the
Speaker 5: space and then have electronic field detectors out there. So
Speaker 5: we'll have magnetic field detectors, various laser detectors, other electromagnetic
Speaker 5: spectrum and those will begin to go off, and then
Speaker 5: we'll have an object fly over like this object here
Speaker 5: that was right neuros. It comes right outside. So what
Speaker 5: people have to understand is that if you have an
Speaker 5: object that is coming in and out of dimensions, it's
Speaker 5: not going to necessarily look like a seven forty seven
Speaker 5: or even a flying saucer. It's going to be in
Speaker 5: various energy forms. And this is the weird sort of effect.
Speaker 5: Most people don't understand that ninety nine percent of the time,
Speaker 5: an interstellar civilization doesn't have to be in linear space
Speaker 5: time if they have that kind of physics. So what
Speaker 5: happens when you go beyond the speed of light? All right,
Speaker 5: You're going to not have anything visible. But if you
Speaker 5: begin to have an energy discharge into an area of
Speaker 5: space and it's very close to this dimension, it'll start
Speaker 5: to give off an energy field our corona. And so
Speaker 5: one of the witnesses we have was at a nuclear
Speaker 5: hot base out in Oklahoma back years ago, I think
Speaker 5: it was in the seventies, and there was this object
Speaker 5: that was in the shape of UFO, but it wasn't solid,
Speaker 5: and it flew over the what they call the hot
Speaker 5: you know, where the jets were hot loaded with nuclear weapons,
Speaker 5: and the alarms went off. He says, this thing was
Speaker 5: not solid like this is like aeric rock, salt. It
Speaker 5: was you could have walked right through it, but it
Speaker 5: was in the shape of a craft, but it was
Speaker 5: shifted so that the matter was all energy, and of
Speaker 5: course matter is energy. So the physics behind this gets
Speaker 5: into some really arcane stuff, probably beyond the scope of
Speaker 5: the show, but it's what I this is part of
Speaker 5: what we're teaching people when we take them out, is
Speaker 5: how do these objects appear? What might you see? And
Speaker 5: I was talking to an actor here in town who
Speaker 5: had one of these happened near his home, and it
Speaker 5: was very palpable, very real but it wasn't well, no,
Speaker 5: there are no but he you know, these are there
Speaker 5: are a lot of people who've had these sort of experiences.
Speaker 5: They don't want to talk about it because they're afraid
Speaker 5: of you know, being rodokuled. And and but you know,
Speaker 5: when it was described to me, I said, oh, yeah,
Speaker 5: that's classic. Really, I said yeah, because if it's if
Speaker 5: it's not a Lucky Martin, you know, anti gravity, and
Speaker 5: it's really is et. The weirder it is, the more
Speaker 5: likely it is to be ET. And this gets into
Speaker 5: the whole question what are you looking for? So we
Speaker 5: trained people to know kind of what to look for
Speaker 5: versus you know, if experimental aircraft, normal aircraft, you know,
Speaker 5: space objects and junk satellites, and then the stuff that's
Speaker 5: the weird end of it. So the weird end of it, Yeah,
Speaker 5: really cool stuff.
Speaker 2: Really cool stuff.
Speaker 1: You take these people, you bring them out to the
Speaker 1: high desert, you tune them into whatever frequency through whatever
Speaker 1: methods of meditation or what have you. And these ships
Speaker 1: are they just waiting for someone to like email them,
Speaker 1: to send them a signal?
Speaker 5: You know what? I think I think that they've actually
Speaker 5: been waiting a long time for people to do something
Speaker 5: besides just passively look at them?
Speaker 1: Do they have to be what I'm saying is, do
Speaker 1: they have to like load up the ship? Hey, we
Speaker 1: got some fucking people in the desert. Everybody get on board,
Speaker 1: let's go.
Speaker 2: Let's go.
Speaker 1: Then how are you getting them to manifest?
Speaker 5: I'm not getting them too, But how is.
Speaker 1: Anybody getting how? How how is this signal being recognized
Speaker 1: by them?
Speaker 5: Because I'm quite convinced they have electronics that pick up
Speaker 5: on this what we were talking about earlier, this conscious
Speaker 5: field of coherent thought. And this is again the most
Speaker 5: controversial end of what I'm doing. To me, it's the
Speaker 5: most interesting. Also, you know, before I was a doctor,
Speaker 5: I was a meditation teacher.
Speaker 2: Know that, but I didn't know that was what type
Speaker 2: meditation mantra invadic.
Speaker 5: So I was Vedanta Inveda meditation, and you know, I
Speaker 5: learned Sanskrit and learned to teach people meditation. So that
Speaker 5: was my first sort of career. I even call it
Speaker 5: a career. It was an advocation as much as more
Speaker 5: in a vocation. But and I really and it was
Speaker 5: cause as a result of this near death experience, and
Speaker 5: and I began to realize that really the thing that
Speaker 5: is most intriguing about all this is that free energy
Speaker 5: is like late eighteen hundreds to mid nineteen hundreds, anti
Speaker 5: gravity mid forties to mid fifties. The science of consciousness
Speaker 5: and the interface between mind and matter, mind and body,
Speaker 5: mind and thought and electromagnetic systems. That's the really cool stuff.
Speaker 5: And that's you know, to me, most people know me
Speaker 5: for the Disclosure Project and these other things, But to me,
Speaker 5: that's the most exciting part of this because that is
Speaker 5: the frontier. The final frontier is not space, it's consciousness.
Speaker 1: So you take these people out, there's twenty of them,
Speaker 1: and you spend how many days out there, it's.
Speaker 5: Usually six days and nights, and so we go out
Speaker 5: during the day. It's more a teaching module and teaching
Speaker 5: them remote viewing concepts and science of consciousness other information
Speaker 5: they need to have. Then we go out at n
Speaker 5: usually from around sunset to one or so in the morning,
Speaker 5: sometimes two, and we're out in the stars making observation,
Speaker 5: doing the remote viewing practice, and then people go home
Speaker 5: and do it. There's now something like eleven or twelve
Speaker 5: hundred teams all over the world doing this that are
Speaker 5: picked up on this idea. It's really a phenomenal thing,
Speaker 5: and people are having amazing sightings and experiences all over
Speaker 5: the world. There's a global CE five initiative going on, and.
Speaker 2: You keep saying five fifth kind, which is visual?
Speaker 5: No, what is?
Speaker 1: What is?
Speaker 5: Okay? Let me explain that. I'm sorry. You know we're back.
Speaker 2: I know the movie the third kind.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the Steven Spielberg's movie.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's how I know. Most people are probably like me.
Speaker 2: They okay.
Speaker 5: And the fourth kind is when when someone feels they've
Speaker 5: had contact and been on board. The fifth kind is
Speaker 5: a term that I launched in the concept of in
Speaker 5: nineteen ninety, which is when humans instead of passively having
Speaker 5: so all those others. Close encounters of the first, second, third,
Speaker 5: and fourth kind are passive because you're sort of either
Speaker 5: seeing it or it's a landing thing or what have you.
Speaker 5: A closing encounter of the fifth kind is when a
Speaker 5: human does something interactive, so it's like, you know, it's
Speaker 5: like the Internet versus something passive, or where you're you're
Speaker 5: actually making contact and inviting these civilizations to appear and
Speaker 5: make contact for a diplomatic purpose or where they interact
Speaker 5: and doctor Haynes at NASA aims put together a great
Speaker 5: book based on my initial research on this, called Close
Speaker 5: Encounters of the Fifth Kind CE five, where he collected cases.
Speaker 5: We both collected cases. But he published this book some
Speaker 5: years ago about all these people who had done this,
Speaker 5: and some of them were quite incidental. For example, a
Speaker 5: craft is there and the person sees it and instead
Speaker 5: of just gaping, they actually signal to it with say
Speaker 5: a light, and it signals back and comes over. The
Speaker 5: more interesting ones are the ones I discovered that which
Speaker 5: is what happened to me when I was eighteen, where
Speaker 5: you see a craft and you just think, moved to
Speaker 5: the left, and moves to the left, moved to the right,
Speaker 5: moved to the right, and they're showing you that there's
Speaker 5: a link up between intent and thought and their electronics.
Speaker 5: And that's the really cool stuff.
Speaker 1: Have you ever read any young Carl Young?
Speaker 5: Yes?
Speaker 2: What do you think on Carl?
Speaker 1: He wrote a whole book on the physical manifestation of
Speaker 1: UFOs through the conscious thought.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, I mean the world is as you are
Speaker 5: and depends on the level of consciousness of the person
Speaker 5: reading what he wrote. I think that a lot of
Speaker 5: people say, well, that means that you're everything is being
Speaker 5: manifested by your mind. Well, but in a sense, all
Speaker 5: of reality is one conscious thought, if you want to
Speaker 5: get back into the whole all this is that concept
Speaker 5: of the Vedic. But I think these are things when
Speaker 5: you have thirty or forty people see it and it's interactive,
Speaker 5: you know, that's a close encounter of the fifth kind.
Speaker 5: So it's not your imagination doing that particular when you
Speaker 5: didn't get video.
Speaker 1: And I don't even think he was necessarily saying it's
Speaker 1: your imagination, no, no, but he was.
Speaker 5: You know, a lot of people don't understand what he
Speaker 5: was saying, and I think that he was really talking
Speaker 5: about some of a deeper aspect of what is mind?
Speaker 1: Right, what is mind's mind? What effect does consciousness have
Speaker 1: on physical matter?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: That's huge, yeah, and huge, And in a sense he
Speaker 1: could have almost been validating it without totally understanding the
Speaker 1: possibilities of contacting something and making the right thing.
Speaker 2: I agree, I agree you.
Speaker 1: You seem to be convinced of and in fact teach
Speaker 1: people to do it. I think that if you've got
Speaker 1: something like that, how is this not like on twenty
Speaker 1: twenty or whatever those stupid news shows are, How are
Speaker 1: you not going out there.
Speaker 2: Would you be willing to do that with a film crew?
Speaker 5: Oh, we did with CBS with them Dan Rather had
Speaker 5: a show back years ago, what was it called? We
Speaker 5: went down to Mexico and Popo and we did this
Speaker 5: and a craft came up by the volcano Flu and
Speaker 5: they were filming this with professional stuff, and they ended
Speaker 5: up completely debunking it. And even though the camera guy
Speaker 5: and the reporter who was there with me said, anyone
Speaker 5: who sees this will know this is real, and CBS
Speaker 5: sanitized it. And when I then said, look, you agreed
Speaker 5: in writing that any footage you get you would share
Speaker 5: with us if we did this expedition, because we did
Speaker 5: it on our own expense, the person in charge there said,
Speaker 5: we're CBS and we're part of a corporation as Billions,
Speaker 5: and we'll fight you forever. You'll never get this one.
Speaker 1: Why would you need CBS though it seems like you'd
Speaker 1: be able to film something like that yourself and really
Speaker 1: high quality.
Speaker 2: You don't need their footage?
Speaker 5: Well, we do, I mean we have a certain amount.
Speaker 5: I don't operate cameras, but we've had volunteers, but we've
Speaker 5: never had professional crews with us. And I mean at
Speaker 5: some point, it'd be nice if we could do this
Speaker 5: and professional.
Speaker 1: I have a crew. I have a new show. It's
Speaker 1: coming out on the Sci Fi Network. It's called Question Everything.
Speaker 1: One of the things, yeah, and one of the things
Speaker 1: we're going to do is we're going to explore things
Speaker 1: like UFOs, bigfoot. I'm going to go to the Pacific
Speaker 1: Northwest and look for bigfoot. But I want to.
Speaker 5: I would let's go, Let's go to that at Comma
Speaker 5: Desert and see if we can find.
Speaker 2: Where to go.
Speaker 1: Let's go, I would, I would would be more than
Speaker 1: happy to go and bring a professional crew and see
Speaker 1: if something like this can happen.
Speaker 2: What kind of success rate do you have in doing this?
Speaker 5: Uh, well, you know, we've never actually gone out where
Speaker 5: there hasn't been some kind of a sighting or event
Speaker 5: happened that have been seen by everyone.
Speaker 2: Really never, so it's one hundred percent.
Speaker 5: Not every night, not all the time, but yet something five.
Speaker 2: Or six day period and these people camping there.
Speaker 5: No, no, no, we don't stay at well, I mean,
Speaker 5: I guess if someone wanted to. We usually stay in
Speaker 5: condos or houses or something in the area. We usually
Speaker 5: go to fairly you know, remote areas, that are quiet.
Speaker 5: It's very hard to find locations where we're not going
Speaker 5: to be intruded upon. And usually when we do this,
Speaker 5: we do have people who intrude and so we try
Speaker 5: to keep it, you know, so that the group can
Speaker 5: be coherent, because the whole concept of this is coherent
Speaker 5: thought and coherent mind, and that's you know, very difficult
Speaker 5: to do when you're being disrupted by a lot of folks.
Speaker 1: Now, what if you pick twenty people to go, and
Speaker 1: how do you know that someone's not alone?
Speaker 2: You take some crack poducts.
Speaker 5: Oh, well, there have been you know. No, Usually the people,
Speaker 5: you know, we have an application process and I you know,
Speaker 5: i'd say ninety nine percent of the time, they're just
Speaker 5: wonderful people and you know, they're very sincerely interested in
Speaker 5: learning about this. And I think the science a consciousness
Speaker 5: component of the whole what you called the high strangeness
Speaker 5: part of UFO encounters. It becomes very compelling for people
Speaker 5: who've had contact and understand that when you go beyond
Speaker 5: the speed of light between star systems, you're dealing with
Speaker 5: something that's way beyond your cell phone and a Ford
Speaker 5: explorer and people who get that, who get out of
Speaker 5: the linear box and begin to look at that and
Speaker 5: then begin to experiment with a lot of the people
Speaker 5: who come on these or people who have gotten the
Speaker 5: app or learned about it, and they try it, try
Speaker 5: this at home, and they have an amazing sighting and
Speaker 5: encounter with a small group of people or a family,
Speaker 5: and then they want to come and try and do
Speaker 5: it more. So it's an excite to me. That's the
Speaker 5: next phase of all this is disclosure, bring out the
Speaker 5: energy and technologies. But then it's about the public understanding
Speaker 5: that why doesn't everyone just go out under the star
Speaker 5: instead of sitting and looking at television and try some experiments,
Speaker 5: experiment with fought and mind and light and tone.
Speaker 1: And besides kinds of it floating in space? Haven't you
Speaker 1: encountered things that are in closer proximity.
Speaker 2: To the ground?
Speaker 5: Oh yeah? And some very odd photographs of what you
Speaker 5: might call transdimensional images that looked like almost like a
Speaker 5: hologram of a being that floated right outside of our
Speaker 5: circle at Joshua Tree National Park too far from here,
Speaker 5: back a few years above.
Speaker 2: The photos of this thing yep, yep, where can someone
Speaker 2: see that?
Speaker 5: As on the website serious disclosure dot Com, if you
Speaker 5: link to the CE five part of it, there's a
Speaker 5: whole section of this strange luminous thing, and you know
Speaker 5: the photograph of that. It was a three or four
Speaker 5: second exposure. And what was seen right before this happened,
Speaker 5: which is really important for people to understand, was something
Speaker 5: about half the size of the about the size of
Speaker 5: my fist.
Speaker 1: Are a little bigger.
Speaker 5: It was like a sphere that floated over the desert
Speaker 5: and November of nine and several people saw it, and
Speaker 5: then we heard what sounded like a group of people talking.
Speaker 5: But with our nights, goot, there's nothing there. And then
Speaker 5: so a woman on my team took her camera and
Speaker 5: just had a three or four second exposure, took a photograph,
Speaker 5: and in that area where this had happened, there was
Speaker 5: this beam that.
Speaker 2: Was and did you see this with your eyes? Or
Speaker 2: is just no?
Speaker 5: Because this would have been in a flash, but it's
Speaker 5: in the digital.
Speaker 2: Is it possible that it's just an artifact.
Speaker 5: No, it's not an artifact. Absolutely not.
Speaker 1: Why is it not possible? I mean, flashes always produce
Speaker 1: artifacts that.
Speaker 5: Produced No, no, no, no, she did not use a flash.
Speaker 5: Oh it was visible. The flash was so in other words,
Speaker 5: this was no flashball. No, we don't allow flash photography
Speaker 5: when we're out. You got to have good night scotes.
Speaker 5: You have to have good cameras. You can adjust the ISO,
Speaker 5: the and the aperture and all that. Campfires, no, we
Speaker 5: never have campfires. There's a complete darkness. The most you're
Speaker 5: gonna see we're out there is maybe an LED on
Speaker 5: a camera.
Speaker 1: So, whatever this thing was, we know what it was.
Speaker 1: You think it was very confident about what it was.
Speaker 1: Have you ever been aboard a spaceship.
Speaker 5: Well, you know, I've had some really amazing contact experiences
Speaker 5: that are classic and they you know, I had one
Speaker 5: when I was having this eight when I was eighteen
Speaker 5: years old, up on this mountain, up and and it
Speaker 5: was it wasn't at all what you hear about in
Speaker 5: the literature, because it was more in this transdimensional element area.
Speaker 5: And that becomes the whole question is what part of
Speaker 5: what people are reporting is real and what part is
Speaker 5: memory X And this is something we haven't talked about yet,
Speaker 5: but what is the capacity for the intelligence community to
Speaker 5: hoax contact?
Speaker 1: And it's substantial, really, you think a lot of people
Speaker 1: they're hoaxing content.
Speaker 5: Yeah, for scaring the hell out of people like in
Speaker 5: what how do they do that? One of the things
Speaker 5: we learned about a number of years ago is actually
Speaker 5: not something I discovered. It was a man here who
Speaker 5: was looking into what are called military related abductions that
Speaker 5: are made to look ETEP it aren't. And you get
Speaker 5: into this whole question of what are they able to
Speaker 5: stage craft too for its psychological warfare value. And I
Speaker 5: have a document that's actually going to be in the film,
Speaker 5: and it's from the Strategic Studies Institute talking about the
Speaker 5: staging of abductions and other scary things to create fear
Speaker 5: around the UFO issues.
Speaker 1: So they create an artificial spacecraft and abduct people use.
Speaker 5: They may use what's called an ARB, an alien reproduction
Speaker 5: vehicle that's man made. They may use robotic things that
Speaker 5: are called plfs, program life forms that are man made
Speaker 5: but look.
Speaker 2: Very programmed life forms plfs they have.
Speaker 1: They have life forms that that are like robots essentially
Speaker 1: that move around like people.
Speaker 5: Uh. There are reports of that, and in fact reports
Speaker 5: of that, and I think there is if you believe that. Though,
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, I think stan Romanek, if you look at
Speaker 5: the photograph he had of this thing, I think he
Speaker 5: was on Larry King or in some other shows, and
Speaker 5: this thing boo that goes up and down. He's had
Speaker 5: a photo and then there's a video that he hasn't released,
Speaker 5: but I've seen it, you know, other people have seen it,
Speaker 5: and it's this very robotic looking it looks like a
Speaker 5: quote alien, but we know it isn't. I mean, so
Speaker 5: you know, the question is why would they want to
Speaker 5: do something like that. I think, if you can put
Speaker 5: enough information out there to scare scare people, why not
Speaker 5: scare Well.
Speaker 1: It seems to me though, that look that the highest
Speaker 1: level robotics experts in the world today are pretty open
Speaker 1: about their work because they're they're they're showing I mean,
Speaker 1: they're they're they're they're showing periodic improvements in the general public.
Speaker 1: Like the DARPA robots what they're doing in Japan. No
Speaker 1: no one has come any work close to doing something
Speaker 1: along those lines. Not only that they all have an
Speaker 1: external power source.
Speaker 5: Well, but you're assuming that the things that you know
Speaker 5: about are all that they're in existence. But it's like
Speaker 5: saying that because you haven't flown on one of the
Speaker 5: Lockheat's or Northrop's anti gravity devices. They don't have those either.
Speaker 5: I think that they have those. Yes, they one hundred
Speaker 5: percent yes, and been rich all but said so you
Speaker 5: know who's the head of the Lockey Skunkworks. So these
Speaker 5: are a lot of the things that people will see
Speaker 5: out near the Knells Range or so called Area fifty one,
Speaker 5: that are moving in these ways we were talking about earlier.
Speaker 5: Those are man made. There's r et and if you
Speaker 5: go all the way back to the forties in Germany
Speaker 5: during World War two and after, they were doing a
Speaker 5: lot of experiments with things that do electromagnetic lifter effect,
Speaker 5: and going back a little further you look at Tee
Speaker 5: Townsend Brown in nineteen late nineteen twenties, and then also
Speaker 5: the Klosky frost experiment where they actually were able to
Speaker 5: create this effect of levitation and movement. So you know,
Speaker 5: again there's a whole science here. And in the open
Speaker 5: aerospace literature in the late forties and early fifties they
Speaker 5: were saying the next big thing is gravity control and
Speaker 5: anti gravity stuff, and dah, da da da dah, and
Speaker 5: then it went all went black. You can't find it.
Speaker 5: And one of the guys that I've worked with at
Speaker 5: the Naval Research Labs, which is the largest Department Defense
Speaker 5: Lab told me that it was October fifty four when
Speaker 5: we really mastered gravity control and all those projects went black.
Speaker 5: They just disappeared. But up until then you can go
Speaker 5: back and find and there were in the literature. Now,
Speaker 5: the fact that your average person at MIT don't know
Speaker 5: about this doesn't mean it didn't exist. And I think
Speaker 5: that there's a whole history of aerospace and technology that's hidden. Similarly,
Speaker 5: there's a whole history of robotics, genetics, biological studies, and
Speaker 5: what have you, and that had also been very classified.
Speaker 1: You are either one really nutty dude or you are
Speaker 1: a guy who has tapped into one of the craziest
Speaker 1: pieces of information that's being suppressed from the American public.
Speaker 2: And there's no room for a middle ground.
Speaker 5: You know that's well, I know that all every word
Speaker 5: I'm telling you is true.
Speaker 1: I believe I believe that you believe that every word
Speaker 1: out of your mouth is true. I do believe you.
Speaker 2: But this whole thing is so it's so strains credibility.
Speaker 5: All that does, all of it does. And you know
Speaker 5: what I was told years ago that if you really
Speaker 5: told the whole truth about this, that it'll hide itself
Speaker 5: because no one can believe it. So, you know, it
Speaker 5: is kind of through the looking glass and down the
Speaker 5: rabbit hole on this subject. And it's a real problem
Speaker 5: because how far do you go in terms of telling
Speaker 5: what you know and have discovered.
Speaker 1: Well, it seems to me that you are tapped into
Speaker 1: like a way to show people.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, I mean, but who's looking. I mean it's
Speaker 5: like the FAA guy John Callahan, who said, I've got
Speaker 5: the radar tapes, I got the pilot reports. But who's
Speaker 5: looking and who's asking? Well, not twenty twenty, you know,
Speaker 5: I mean you asked about twenty twenty. The guy who's
Speaker 5: executive producer of that came out to my house. I
Speaker 5: gave him thirty five hours a digital stuff of all
Speaker 5: these top secret guys, all the documents, all this stuff.
Speaker 5: He said, this is the biggest story. It's either all
Speaker 5: a hoax or it's the biggest story in history. I said, yeah,
Speaker 5: well I think it's the latter. And he says, I
Speaker 5: want to do this story. I said, I don't think
Speaker 5: they'll let you. And so we went back to corporate
Speaker 5: ABC and yeah, a couple weeks later, he said, doctor career,
Speaker 5: they won't let me do this.
Speaker 1: Story.
Speaker 5: I said, who are they? Ira, And he said, well,
Speaker 5: you know who they are.
Speaker 2: And I've had producers they're like this crazy motherfucker.
Speaker 5: This was the executive producer in charge of the show
Speaker 5: both primetime Live in twenty twenty and he's now with
Speaker 5: sixty minutes. But I think that what.
Speaker 2: I'd love to talk to him. What's his name? Yeah, Ira,
Speaker 2: I'd love to talk to him on the question everything
Speaker 2: show that'd being fascinating.
Speaker 5: Well, you know, I think that that this is the
Speaker 5: other big myth is that when you start dealing with
Speaker 5: the big media that it's a free media. It's free
Speaker 5: to a point. I mean, it's no problem if you
Speaker 5: want to drill down on someone's sex scandal, But if
Speaker 5: you really want to deal with this issue, there's going
Speaker 5: to be a phone call. And you're one of the
Speaker 5: documents that's up on our website. I wrote an article
Speaker 5: called media Play and then it is a document I
Speaker 5: got from the nineteen nineties from the CIA that talks
Speaker 5: about how the CIA had embedded in all the major
Speaker 5: media people to change, alter, or stop stories. And this
Speaker 5: is an official document. So you know, if the public
Speaker 5: listening out there think we really have a free market,
Speaker 5: a free media. You know, you know, wake up. This
Speaker 5: is simply not the case. So I think that one
Speaker 5: of the challenges we've had is that the it's kind
Speaker 5: of a an article of faith that if all this
Speaker 5: were true, would in the media just really want to
Speaker 5: cover this? And I say, yeah, there are some really
Speaker 5: good people in the media who wanted to, but they're
Speaker 5: not allowed to, And so then that's good way who
Speaker 5: controls the big media. But I'm not talking about your show.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I mean, how many shows are out there
Speaker 1: dedicated to looking for UFOs? There seems like this quite
Speaker 1: a bit, and those shows are owned by you know,
Speaker 1: big media companies and networks that promote these shows. You
Speaker 1: think it's just bullshit, and what they're doing is paying
Speaker 1: lip service to it and not really looking and they're
Speaker 1: just covering the controversial aspects of it to get viewers.
Speaker 5: Yes, I think a lot of it's shock and dribble
Speaker 5: and bread and circus. And I think that when you
Speaker 5: then asked the question of you know, years ago when
Speaker 5: I was on Larry King and afterwards I got this
Speaker 5: note from insproduci this is one of the most popular
Speaker 5: shows we've ever had, and so if it was just
Speaker 5: about ratings and just about whether there was anything legitimate
Speaker 5: there to cover. This would be in the news all
Speaker 5: the time. So there's something weird going on here, because
Speaker 5: they'll how over all kinds of sensationalistic nonsense. But you know,
Speaker 5: you have dozens of top secret witnesses, you have legitimate
Speaker 5: government documents, you have photographs, video, or you have teams
Speaker 5: like ours going out having these sort of experiences that
Speaker 5: isn't covered. You have to ask the question why. And
Speaker 5: I think the wonderful thing about twenty thirteen that didn't
Speaker 5: exist five or ten years ago. Twitter, Facebook, video on demand.
Speaker 5: You know, you don't have to go to a big distributor.
Speaker 5: We're and actually, by the way, we're planning to distribute
Speaker 5: this film at the night of the premiere. Maybe we'll
Speaker 5: live stream and if we can figure out how to
Speaker 5: do it, maybe you can help us. I'll we need
Speaker 5: help with it actually because we're actually out of funds well.
Speaker 2: Construction, Brad, and you stream livestream the shit.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And so what we want to do with the
Speaker 5: premiere is live stream and then have the thing and
Speaker 5: then it'll be VOD video on demand, so that you know,
Speaker 5: there's no choke holds in the big media, and then
Speaker 5: you know, you couldn't have done that five or ten
Speaker 5: years ago with any kind of value. Now you can
Speaker 5: do high definition, you can do really good, good video
Speaker 5: and demand, and we're going to do this so that
Speaker 5: everyone can sign up to be an affiliate distributor, so
Speaker 5: that basically, if you want to distribute the show, you
Speaker 5: can distribute it and the people who see it, you know,
Speaker 5: there'll be a small fee to see it, and then
Speaker 5: you'll have part of that and you just build that
Speaker 5: out because what we want to do is make this
Speaker 5: thing go viral so that we don't get into the
Speaker 5: choke holds of the big media, because you know, my
Speaker 5: experience with it is that I'm very, very skeptical of
Speaker 5: the big media doing anything with this until they have to,
Speaker 5: and then it becomes where there's too much noise out there.
Speaker 5: We have to give it a little bit of lip
Speaker 5: service and then we'll take it off again. So that's why,
Speaker 5: by the way, that's why we did this crowdfunding for this.
Speaker 5: It was that we really wanted the people to have
Speaker 5: a stake in it and to move move the film
Speaker 5: serious forward, because if you went to a studio or
Speaker 5: a group of investors. You don't know what they're going
Speaker 5: to do with it. If they control it this way,
Speaker 5: the people own it.
Speaker 1: Well, listen, man, this is a fascinating subject. Like I said,
Speaker 1: it's one of my personal interests and has been since
Speaker 1: I was a small child, and to talk to you
Speaker 1: was a real treat. I really appreciate it.
Speaker 5: I really appreciate you.
Speaker 2: Put your neck out there.
Speaker 1: Man. You say a lot of nutty shit, and it
Speaker 1: takes a lot of courage to do that, or you're crazy.
Speaker 2: I'm willing to believe you.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm willing to be completely open to the
Speaker 1: point of I'll go out to the desert with you.
Speaker 1: I'll do whatever it is. I'm I'm you know, I'm
Speaker 1: fascinated by all this stuff. And if what you're saying
Speaker 1: is true, it is, you know, one of the most
Speaker 1: mind blowing things our society has ever had access to,
Speaker 1: it has ever been able to encounter.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's pretty crazy shit.
Speaker 1: Man.
Speaker 5: Welcome to the new millennium, because now it's time here
Speaker 5: we go.
Speaker 2: I hope you're right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I hope this isn't just crazy talk. April
Speaker 1: twenty second is the day it's in Los Angeles at
Speaker 1: La Live.
Speaker 2: Which is where it's the Regal La the Regal La Live.
Speaker 1: And how can people either find out about this or
Speaker 1: get to this orp want.
Speaker 5: To go Serious Disclosure dot com and you can go
Speaker 5: there and you can you know, get the tickets and
Speaker 5: everything and sign up right there. Everything can be done online.
Speaker 2: And is the film done?
Speaker 5: It's it's going into final completion the next three weeks
Speaker 5: or so.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so April twenty second is when it's all
Speaker 1: going down, and that is hopefully you will already have
Speaker 1: the information from this Ivy League Institute about this alien
Speaker 1: being by then correct or.
Speaker 5: This humanoid being human We don't know what it is, yeah,
Speaker 5: whatever it is or yeah, and we will we already
Speaker 5: have a lot of it, but we're waiting for the
Speaker 5: final genetic sequencing.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: And if people want to follow you on Twitter, it's
Speaker 1: doctor Stephen Greer, Steve v T st e v E.
Speaker 1: And not one of those weirdos that says Steven, but
Speaker 1: it's with a pH who does that some weirdos?
Speaker 3: No, pH?
Speaker 1: He yeah, a lot of weirdos Stephen, pH. That's Stefan right, okay,
Speaker 1: doctor Stephen, you're st e v E and Greer and
Speaker 1: one more time.
Speaker 5: The website is serious Disclosure dot com. S I R
Speaker 5: I U S disclosure dot com.
Speaker 2: This has been a fascinating conversation. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: It's been really interesting and uh, you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm really looking forward to seeing where this goes.
Speaker 5: We'll see you at the premiere.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Will you do this again? Will you come by?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I love to around the time of the premiere with.
Speaker 5: All the new findings.
Speaker 1: Yes, please, all right, we're gonna have some fun. Listen, folks,
Speaker 1: thanks for tuning in. We have a crazy week this week.
Speaker 1: We have Tom Segura is going to be on on Tuesday,
Speaker 1: David Lee Roth is going to be on on yeah, right,
Speaker 1: David Lee Ross here on Wednesday, and on Friday, doctor
Speaker 1: Ahmit Goswami, theoretical physicist. So we have some some crazy science.
Speaker 1: We've got a rock star, and we've got one of
Speaker 1: the funniest people on the planet, and we have doctor
Speaker 1: Stephen Greer. Thank you very much for your time. I
Speaker 1: really appreciate it. You wanted to talk to you, and
Speaker 1: I really appreciate you all you're doing.
Speaker 2: It's awesome stuff. I love it.
Speaker 1: I'm fascinated and I can't wait to talk to you
Speaker 1: again in April, and I can't wait to see your film.
Speaker 2: All right, folks, that's the Dearly yo yo.
Speaker 1: If you want information on that show that Brian's got
Speaker 1: going on in San Diego, go to desk Squad dot tv.
Speaker 1: Is March what Brian fourteen fourteenth at the American Comedy Company,
Speaker 1: which is an amazing club in San Diego, really really
Speaker 1: cool place.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Also to on it dot com. If you go to
Speaker 1: n n it t use a code named Rogan. You'll
Speaker 1: save ten percent off any and all supplements. All Right,
Speaker 1: we love you and we'll see you tomorrow or Tuesday
Speaker 1: or whenever.
Speaker 5: I don't know what Tuesday.
Speaker 2: I'm not telling you what to do.
Podbean