Mystery Object Baffles Scientists! COSMIC Contact with 3i/ATLAS? DISCLOSED
THIS IS A BONUS EPISODE- It is meant to be VIEWED on Youtube/RUMBLE for the best Experience as there are many videos/visual assetts (WEEKLY LIVE SHOW ON TDP- "DISCLOSED")
🔴 Don’t miss the conversation. Subscribe & hit the bell to stay informed.
Co Hosted by Spooky (www.x.com/@firesoftruth) #ufotwitter #TotalDisclosure #disclosed
LINK THREAD—https://allmylinks.com/total-disclosure
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube—— www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
Support TY and TDP Studios directly VIA PayPal (No FEES)— https://www.paypal.me/TDPstudios767?locale.x=en_US
YOUTUBE MEMBER—-https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
PATREON MEMBER—https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure?fan_landing=true&view_as=public
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-podcast--5975113/support.
CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —[email protected]
Special Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can’t do this WITHOUT YOU!
-COPYRIGHT-2020-
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
Speaker 1: Cary that keeps playing twice. I don't know why. God.
Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, truth seekers and mystery hunters, Welcome to
Speaker 1: the inaugural episode of Disclosed, your Thursday Night rendezvous with
Speaker 1: the strange, the unexplained, and the downright mind bending. I'm
Speaker 1: Ty Roberts, and I'm going to be joined tonight by
Speaker 1: the brilliant and bold Cari Lindsay. And tonight, guys, better
Speaker 1: buckle up. We've got a lineup that'll make you questioned
Speaker 1: reality itself and whether we're living in the matrix. First up,
Speaker 1: you guys, remember that booga spear. Yeah, the mysterious little
Speaker 1: ball that's been giving scientists migraines for months and months
Speaker 1: and months. I do well. It's finally been carbon dated,
Speaker 1: and let's just say that the results aren't exactly helping
Speaker 1: anyone sleep easier night. Spoiler alert, They might this car,
Speaker 1: this fucking Bouga sphere might predate Mitch McConnell, where I'm
Speaker 1: still waiting for that report. Of course, it doesn't stop there.
Speaker 1: UAPs are shutting down airports around the world when these
Speaker 1: things pop up. Flights stop. Forget whether today weather delays.
Speaker 1: We're now dealing with alien traffic control. Let's see someone
Speaker 1: else delta kind of, you know, try to push that
Speaker 1: as a force masure at God. And then there's three
Speaker 1: eye at lists.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: There are many thoughts on this interstellar object. Some are
Speaker 1: saying it's just a rock, a normal commet tumbling through
Speaker 1: the galaxy, simply passing by, while others say it might
Speaker 1: not be so normal. With the material composition data that's
Speaker 1: coming out. This thing could be the cosmic equivalent of
Speaker 1: your nosy neighbor peeking through the blinds. Who knows October
Speaker 1: is going to be interesting as Atlas makes its closest approach. Guys,
Speaker 1: be vigilant. Uh, this is when you kind of have
Speaker 1: to watch out for people asking you to drink the
Speaker 1: kool aid, if you know what I mean. Oh, and
Speaker 1: Arrow the All Domain and OMID Resolution Office for short
Speaker 1: drop some d uapad videos and finally updated that doss
Speaker 1: based website that they were using breadcrumbs distractions. I don't
Speaker 1: know Carey and I are going to break it all down,
Speaker 1: help you sift through the noise to get to the source.
Speaker 1: And that's what this show is about. Every week on Disclosed,
Speaker 1: we will take you beyond the headlines. Into the strange
Speaker 1: world of the unknown, the otherworldly, the dark, and the mysterious.
Speaker 1: We're not here to hand you the answers on silver bladder.
Speaker 1: We don't have all the answers. We're here to help
Speaker 1: you ask the right questions. With our two unique perspectives,
Speaker 1: we'll dig deep, challenge narratives, and hopefully give you a
Speaker 1: clearer lens into what is truly going on now before
Speaker 1: we dive in, do us a solid If you love
Speaker 1: the idea of cutting through the noise, If you want
Speaker 1: early ad free access to the show, if you want
Speaker 1: to support the mission of bringing these conversations to the
Speaker 1: forefront smashed out subscribe button considered becoming an asset or
Speaker 1: a member of the Total Disclosure community. Trust me, it
Speaker 1: helps us keep the lights on and Kri paid. We
Speaker 1: got to get him some ramen, so pop and the
Speaker 1: questions are sharp. Let's get into it, disclosed. Start snap. Well,
Speaker 1: I just I tripped over my words a bunch, good day,
Speaker 1: good day, what's up? So I thought, before.
Speaker 3: We go any further, I fixed the problem with the
Speaker 3: video playing twice. I had hit a loop button. That
Speaker 3: was my fault. So I was like, why I know.
Speaker 3: I realized I was like, oh, that was me, that
Speaker 3: was me. Hello, everybody, this is disclosed. We were off
Speaker 3: to an awesome start already.
Speaker 1: Hello, Yeah, I did you sow the car been dating joke?
Speaker 1: I thought that was going to hit harder and then
Speaker 1: I forgot it halfway through. But yeah, so so it
Speaker 1: was that, it was so it was well, no, it
Speaker 1: was to actually talking about the Karen dating of buga spear.
Speaker 1: Spoiler alert, it might even be older than Mitch McConnell.
Speaker 1: We're still waiting on that. So but yeah, So Cary
Speaker 1: and I have been talking. He's they've been doing a
Speaker 1: lot of editing for the show, and we thought that
Speaker 1: would be kind of cool to do something more consistently.
Speaker 1: We we're engaging with people, engaging with the audience. Uh,
Speaker 1: and a weekly show has been something that used to
Speaker 1: do with Pop Culture Corner and it's something I really
Speaker 1: really miss kind of just be able to kick back
Speaker 1: the shoes off literally and uh talk about the things
Speaker 1: we love with the people in the community that I
Speaker 1: love and Cary I couldn't the I mean, we have
Speaker 1: very different perspectives. So maybe if you want to reintroduce yourself.
Speaker 3: Hi, that so my name's carried and see. You may
Speaker 3: know me from uh the Dark Places of Uthology known
Speaker 3: as Stephen Cambion's Truth Seekers Show. And I also and
Speaker 3: I also I worked on the docu series with Darcy
Speaker 3: Wick called Dark Alliance The Inside Story of the Cosmic
Speaker 3: con which explored the story of Corey Good the fake
Speaker 3: secret Space program Insider. That's on streaming platforms. You can
Speaker 3: find out on Amazon and Google. Just had to get
Speaker 3: my little plug in there. And I'm here to have
Speaker 3: an engaging dialogue. I feel. I feel like that's something
Speaker 3: that euthology is absolutely lacking, is the ability to look
Speaker 3: at the events that are going on, analyze them, and
Speaker 3: look at the actual facts and then have a conversation.
Speaker 3: And if if me and Tyler disagree, that's okay. We're
Speaker 3: not We're not going to jump down in tevist rights.
Speaker 3: We're not going to dox each other's family is. We're
Speaker 3: just going to have a conversation and that that's that's
Speaker 3: what we're endeavoring to give to you, and we're going
Speaker 3: to present evidence and you guys can make your own decisions,
Speaker 3: but what you believe and let us know in the comments,
Speaker 3: Like it's it's an ongoing dialogue. And if we disagree,
Speaker 3: that's okay, Yeah, without further ado.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And and one last thing, and we'll try not
Speaker 1: to keep talking over each other. Well, well that was
Speaker 1: a given. No, that was my fault. I do that
Speaker 1: a lot. The last thing is the audience. I really
Speaker 1: want to be the third host, you know, So any
Speaker 1: any super chats, any donations, any memberships, obviously, you know,
Speaker 1: we want to make a point of including the guys
Speaker 1: in the discussion. And I truly mean it, like when
Speaker 1: I say that I come here to have conversations with
Speaker 1: the community because you know, you guys are just the
Speaker 1: best and and I've always really appreciated, uh, the UFO world.
Speaker 1: There's some really smart people, but there's also people we
Speaker 1: need to watch out for. So there's okay. One of
Speaker 1: the one of the first story we're starting with, Cari
Speaker 1: is this. I've been hearing reports all this week about
Speaker 1: so that the drones are coming back up and shutting
Speaker 1: down airports and Copenhagen other places around the globe. What's
Speaker 1: going on with these drones or what the UFO community
Speaker 1: just decides our UFOs right.
Speaker 3: Right, So to understand the situation, let's let's go back
Speaker 3: to the beginning. So the other night, around nine point
Speaker 3: thirty at night in I believe Copenhagen. Let me double
Speaker 3: chat YEP with Copenhagen. So there was a unidentified craft
Speaker 3: that flew over the airport and caused a huge ruckus.
Speaker 3: It was a big WTF moment and the shutdown the airport,
Speaker 3: planes had to be rere and all this stuff. Then
Speaker 3: videos started coming out, and the UFO community does what
Speaker 3: it does, and they jumped to the most extreme solution
Speaker 3: instead of relying on some impertal days and making make
Speaker 3: an informed decision about what it was. So I'm going
Speaker 3: to share my screen and we're gonna we're gonna go
Speaker 3: through a couple of things.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is again if you guys will remember
Speaker 1: last what is it? Last November December, and actually even
Speaker 1: the prop the previous November December, the United States, the
Speaker 1: East Coast, New Jersey drones overlaying the Air Force base.
Speaker 1: This has been something that for some reason just keeps
Speaker 1: happening and and the UFO community is taking it and
Speaker 1: they're running with it and and I don't know if
Speaker 1: that's for clicks and try to make the subject relevant,
Speaker 1: but all it's really doing is hurting credibility.
Speaker 3: I agree, I absolutely agree. So here is the one
Speaker 3: of the original videos taken in the app of this
Speaker 3: this kind of wing looking craft flying over the airport.
Speaker 3: So I will say this, if it looks anomalous, right yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the weird green hue I think adds to the
Speaker 1: to the mystery of it. How it's being filmed is
Speaker 1: clearly that. So my problem here is the people on
Speaker 1: the ground. So these you can't just walk onto a
Speaker 1: runway like that unless you're you know, part of working
Speaker 1: at the airport. So a lot of people what they're
Speaker 1: saying is that that video, how is someone who works
Speaker 1: with airplanes misidentifying an airplane? It's like, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean that that's a good question, and I
Speaker 3: mean that's a question for the person that filmed the video,
Speaker 3: right because if we uh, In fact, I think I
Speaker 3: have a higher here. So here's a slightly higher quality version. See,
Speaker 3: I think we're looking at a so we're looking at
Speaker 3: it through I think I think we're looking at it
Speaker 3: through glass, so we're getting slight kind of yep.
Speaker 1: So the only thing I'm not seeing here, admittedly is
Speaker 1: traditional air traffic lights like one on each side blinking.
Speaker 1: So but again you're saying that on flight radar, this
Speaker 1: this craft is transponding.
Speaker 3: Yes, so I'll share that time now and we'll go
Speaker 3: to it. So because at that time, isn't this over
Speaker 3: Because and this is my theory, it caused a flap,
Speaker 3: So the airport gets shut down and there's reports of
Speaker 3: lights and then maybe there were drones at the other airports.
Speaker 3: But this initial event, it was a trackable plane that
Speaker 3: flew over the over the airport slowly twice. And that's
Speaker 3: that's the flight path it took. Oh, it's pretty fit.
Speaker 1: It does go right over the air beside.
Speaker 3: So it's interesting to note. So it flew over eight
Speaker 3: seventeen and eight nineteen and seven minutes later is when
Speaker 3: they closed the airport.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 3: I mean, I feel like that's pretty cut and dry
Speaker 3: as to what the cause of that airport shutdown was. Now,
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that's the same for the Oslo airport.
Speaker 3: I think that could just be people reporting drones, whether
Speaker 3: there were drones or not, because I've heard conflicting reports
Speaker 3: about whether people have actually syndrones or they've shut it down.
Speaker 3: In case they're are drones and they're investigating. But what
Speaker 3: I mean, if if anyone in the chat can comment
Speaker 3: and let us know, that would be great. But from
Speaker 3: what everything I've seen, like the one bona Fide trackable
Speaker 3: event was the first one and that was a plane.
Speaker 1: So okay, yeah, I do want to say this. So
Speaker 1: I don't know if anyone's ever flown drones before, but
Speaker 1: they and the moment you hit restricted airspace the most
Speaker 1: commercially available drone like, so these are if they are drones,
Speaker 1: they're not people like us flying them. It's either some
Speaker 1: sort of nation state like Russia, China actually those two
Speaker 1: maybe even you know the old the old Israel, who knows,
Speaker 1: I won't I don't want to get canceled or anything,
Speaker 1: but commercial drones when they hit that air space of
Speaker 1: a restricted airspace, the drone literally turns in most cases,
Speaker 1: turns around and returns to send her as soon as
Speaker 1: you try crossing that path that threshold. So these aren't
Speaker 1: just DGI drone. These are high capacity, high battery and
Speaker 1: they can like stay in the air long and they're big.
Speaker 1: So at least those are the ones that were being
Speaker 1: seen over the East Coast that caused that flap, most
Speaker 1: recently over the United States. Now, could it be happening
Speaker 1: over in Oslo, in other airports in you know, the
Speaker 1: UK some places I've heard of. Yeah, and then Scandinavia.
Speaker 1: There was the press conference where the woman she literally
Speaker 1: said it. The woman said, you know, I want this
Speaker 1: to be unexplained, honestly, but what I think it is
Speaker 1: is Russia or China and she she she says that
Speaker 1: you know, it's most likely drones. So again, I think
Speaker 1: people are taking this topic of drones and you know,
Speaker 1: the the the discourse between it's kind of like what
Speaker 1: is a whistleblower?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: What is a UFO?
Speaker 3: Right, Let's get into the kind of linguistic semantics. But
Speaker 3: it the definitions are changing. I think of what we
Speaker 3: colloquially as a society think about these things. I just
Speaker 3: a side note on the on the the East Coast flat.
Speaker 3: I've I've got my own kind of pet theory about
Speaker 3: that that it was like there's like drones that can
Speaker 3: they put them out to detect like nuclear material, and
Speaker 3: that I read I heard reports at the time that
Speaker 3: there was there was some kind of nuclear material miss,
Speaker 3: some kind of intelligent snapoo and there was nuclear material missing,
Speaker 3: and that they were searching for it. Now, this could
Speaker 3: just be tinfoil from the internet. I'm going to preface
Speaker 3: me saying all that with that. But it was interesting
Speaker 3: and it certainly seemed more plausible than than aliens. So
Speaker 3: you know, and that would they tell us? Would they
Speaker 3: tell us if there was nuclear material like loose in
Speaker 3: on the East Coast? I don't think they would tell
Speaker 3: us if there was.
Speaker 1: Sorry, no, but I will say this, I got a
Speaker 1: message on signal from someone in Congress that stated just
Speaker 1: exactly what you just said. They said, they said to me,
Speaker 1: and I will show you privately so you know that
Speaker 1: I'm telling the truth.
Speaker 3: I cannot I think I know who you're talking about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but they they they said it to me. They
Speaker 1: said that that's what they think is going on. And
Speaker 1: that's why I because I was going to go to
Speaker 1: New Jersey at the time that this was all happening.
Speaker 1: And then I was like, you know what, not worth it,
Speaker 1: Not not gonna do that, Not gonna take that chance.
Speaker 1: But that's a worst case scenario, is some sort of
Speaker 1: nuclear material, some sort of bad actor. Having said nuclear material,
Speaker 1: and I know that there have been reports of material
Speaker 1: god missing, and that is of grave concern.
Speaker 3: It is, it should be of concerned everybody. I just
Speaker 3: had an interesting thought. So it's this this comment Gene Sticko.
Speaker 3: So my guess is Russian testing such broken session antagonizing
Speaker 3: launching from Kaliningrad enclaves separated by Lithuania on the Baltic Sea.
Speaker 3: It's a nuke based for Russia as well. It got
Speaker 3: me thinking that maybe, so this one's clearly a plane,
Speaker 3: but the other ones, how would you want to capitalize
Speaker 3: on destabilizing NATO and the West and whatnot? During this
Speaker 3: flap you have the first event and then you have
Speaker 3: Russian drones then piggyback on it to test response times. Right,
Speaker 3: that could just be you know, that could just be
Speaker 3: some tinfoil. But what it's about what makes more logical
Speaker 3: sense aliens or some geopolitical stuff considering NATO is doing
Speaker 3: like nuclear drills this week with strategic bombers flying over
Speaker 3: from America. They're they're flying over Europe and stuff. So
Speaker 3: really there's a lot, Yeah, there's a lot more going
Speaker 3: on in the geopolitical context than just these airports shutting down.
Speaker 3: There's stuff going on around that. So I don't think
Speaker 3: do we.
Speaker 1: Know how long the airport was shut down for.
Speaker 3: Suble Look, that's actually something I did not find, so
Speaker 3: let's have a look. Sorry if my typing is very loud.
Speaker 4: I can't spell.
Speaker 3: I should have got this before we went on there. Sorry, audience.
Speaker 3: So nearly four nearly four hours, that is a long time.
Speaker 3: It is a long time, but like it's also not
Speaker 3: that long. Considering what they thought.
Speaker 1: What do you say to the passengers? Do you say
Speaker 1: I wonder what they said to the passengers. Did they say, listen,
Speaker 1: we have an unknown craft.
Speaker 3: An airspace violation, probably some nondescript language where it's yeah,
Speaker 3: we had an air space vile because it makes it
Speaker 3: sound more run of the mill if you say it
Speaker 3: like that, we had an airspace violation and some because
Speaker 3: they then the passengers are then going to think, oh,
Speaker 3: it's probably just a plane messed up on approach or.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: But then when it shuts down for hours and hours.
Speaker 3: I guess there's two stories, Like there's an initial oh,
Speaker 3: there's this, and then there's probably after a few hours
Speaker 3: and the passages are still like, why can we not
Speaker 3: get off this plane? So there's probably another story, But
Speaker 3: i'd want to talk to someone who was on one
Speaker 3: of those planes and find out what they were told.
Speaker 3: But I haven't seen anybody saying there on one of
Speaker 3: these planes, so I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and and and uh, you know this object, this topic,
Speaker 1: I mean, this specific topic of the day. I mean again,
Speaker 1: it doesn't excite me because drones and this whole thing.
Speaker 1: And we're actually gonna get to this later with the
Speaker 1: hell fire missile videos. There is a lot of misidentification.
Speaker 1: And anybody in the UFO community at least that that's
Speaker 1: worth their salt right and knows what they're talking about,
Speaker 1: will tell you that ninety five and I'm being very
Speaker 1: generous with that ninety five ninety five percent of sighting
Speaker 1: can be explained by prosaic or you know, prosaic objects
Speaker 1: or normal conditions misidentifications. That last five percent is where
Speaker 1: the anomalies are, and I'd say it's more like half
Speaker 1: a percent one percent.
Speaker 3: I'm very glad you brought up a normalous sightings because
Speaker 3: that is an excellent segue to our next segment about
Speaker 3: the unresolved hour video. Yeah, so should we do you
Speaker 3: have any final thoughts on the on the strength flap.
Speaker 1: I think we need to be very very careful about
Speaker 1: using the word UFO when it comes to these drunes.
Speaker 1: I mean we know that I listen, don't take whatever
Speaker 1: the government's telling you at face value, do the research,
Speaker 1: do the independent, trust and verify.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: But also it's okay if it's just a drone, right,
Speaker 1: because we have other things to focus on. So part
Speaker 1: of what we're supposed to be doing is sifting through,
Speaker 1: pushing everything that's not worth our time to the side.
Speaker 1: Just because it's the twenty four hour news cycle and
Speaker 1: it's a headline today doesn't mean that it's actually you know,
Speaker 1: once you find the answer, it's it's over at that point,
Speaker 1: like move on, And that's what we're just going to
Speaker 1: do right now. So let's move on to something a
Speaker 1: little bit more fun.
Speaker 3: Let's move on, sir. So let's next. It is next
Speaker 3: up is I don't have to share my tap for that.
Speaker 3: So the next is Erro. As you were saying in
Speaker 3: the intro, they finally updated their doss website. So they
Speaker 3: finally did an update with a bunch of videos, and
Speaker 3: I think there was five five resolved videos as balloons.
Speaker 3: One as a non anomalous phenomenon I guess like some
Speaker 3: like a lightning bug or something, and then there's one
Speaker 3: unresolved video. We actually have a government released unresolved video
Speaker 3: from ERROW, so we're gonna look at it. And I
Speaker 3: had to make an account with the the the I
Speaker 3: have not seen Naval Intelligence Video Service or what the
Speaker 3: dvids to get the high resolution version of this video.
Speaker 3: So we're gonna go over it right now.
Speaker 1: I have not seen these videos, so the.
Speaker 3: All Domin Resolution Office could not identify this. Okay, so
Speaker 3: this was taken over over the skies of Africa.
Speaker 1: It's doing weird Digsact Figure eight.
Speaker 3: So I've been I watched this earlier today and I
Speaker 3: was trying to figure out is this the camera moving
Speaker 3: and like the drone flying because obviously it's it's flying,
Speaker 3: And then is it the camera moving or is it
Speaker 3: the object moving? And the drone is fairly stationary because
Speaker 3: you can see it banking there. See what are some.
Speaker 6: Seizure what's targeting? This looks like a ground based It
Speaker 6: doesn't look like this is flying.
Speaker 3: No, you see the top right where it's jangling, So
Speaker 3: that's the that's the the wing action and the gyro
Speaker 3: stable against.
Speaker 1: Oh oh okay, okay, okay, I see it.
Speaker 3: You can see you can see it, you can Yeah,
Speaker 3: you can see the bottom ground.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I see I see it.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: That's interesting, that's interesting. But there's just not enough.
Speaker 3: Right, there's not enough. I mean, it's a story of
Speaker 3: Error's life, right, never enough detail. But it's interesting that
Speaker 3: they would put put that out. I'm kind of questioning,
Speaker 3: like if if it's you leaving up to the public, Like,
Speaker 3: if it's unresolved, what's the virtue in releasing it? Are
Speaker 3: they throwing a bone? Are they trying to, like you
Speaker 3: said earlier, like breadcrumbs, trying to distract people? Because I
Speaker 3: don't think in releasing something if they don't know what
Speaker 3: it is, well, I.
Speaker 1: Think that that's what the goal of the new guy is. Uh,
Speaker 1: this Kaslowsky guy, you know, his two predecessors, what of
Speaker 1: which I'm in contact with. And it's not doctor Evil,
Speaker 1: I can tell you that. I don't believe you. So
Speaker 1: both of those guys were they're very very, very very
Speaker 1: very just not in the community. I think the community
Speaker 1: looks at them and you know, they're just like the
Speaker 1: enemy at this point, because they're clearly like some sort
Speaker 1: of bias is there. They don't take this subject as serious.
Speaker 1: Maybe and I think the new director is trying to
Speaker 1: at least show people like, hey, listen, we're gonna put
Speaker 1: something out. You know, we'll put out what we'll put
Speaker 1: out one that we we can't figure out, and we'll
Speaker 1: let you know. And I think he's trying to maybe
Speaker 1: bridge a relationship with the UFO community truely.
Speaker 3: Like I'll take that space for it. But it's I
Speaker 3: want to see more. I mean, I guess that's it's
Speaker 3: always a thing in the community like more, I need more.
Speaker 3: But what was the eighth two seconds eighty two seconds
Speaker 3: of video of like a little Light in the sky.
Speaker 3: How much money are they getting a year as a
Speaker 3: funding and that that's what we get? Is that all
Speaker 3: there is? I doubt it?
Speaker 1: No, So of course it's Chris Mellen has said that there.
Speaker 3: Is for I mean, two minds about it. I understand it,
Speaker 3: but I'm also like, I want more. It's not enough
Speaker 3: for me to go, yeah, error is doing a good job.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm glad that they did something, but it's
Speaker 3: not enough for me to say, hey, they're doing a
Speaker 3: great jobs.
Speaker 1: And and you know, like I said before, it's it's
Speaker 1: kind of funny because you know, I talk about guys
Speaker 1: like Chris Miller. Chris Mellin's gone on the record a
Speaker 1: couple of times. Hey, lover, I hate him, But he
Speaker 1: said that, you know, he knows that that that the
Speaker 1: Department Defense has videos that are of you know, ten
Speaker 1: ADP four K quality of anomalous objects. Now has he
Speaker 1: seen them? You know, have other people seen them? And
Speaker 1: and you know, where are they? Why aren't we being
Speaker 1: shown them? What's preventing them from being shown? Because I
Speaker 1: don't think I think it's very clear that the Department
Speaker 1: of Defense has not classified the idea of of alien life. Right,
Speaker 1: there's people well exactly, but I think that they are
Speaker 1: being very selective of what gets out and what doesn't
Speaker 1: get out. And I think, you know, because we saw
Speaker 1: that there was that that that footage of of a
Speaker 1: Russian plane dumping fuel on one of our Reaper drones
Speaker 1: and it was like you could see the pilot on
Speaker 1: the inside of the fucking Russian craft. Like, So don't
Speaker 1: so either either up state.
Speaker 3: We know that is exists and we have the capability. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we know that we have the capability to capture these
Speaker 3: things in high definition. So why getting the low reate
Speaker 3: even that video clip I had to sign up to
Speaker 3: down load ten ap two and a half meg per second.
Speaker 3: I know for a fact that camera sensor records in
Speaker 3: a way high quality. So like again, it's like, are
Speaker 3: they releasing a just low enough quality to say it's unresolved?
Speaker 3: But if you had the full Like I'm just confused,
Speaker 3: why not just release the raw source footage because there's
Speaker 3: no way we're any records in two and a half megasecond.
Speaker 3: There's no way.
Speaker 1: I want to ask you a question. So, all right,
Speaker 1: everybody knows that Weaponized Weaponized podcast. This week they had
Speaker 1: that guy, the Dylan Borland who testified at the latest
Speaker 1: hearing and he told his story there. There's a story
Speaker 1: that he tells at Langley about this this white light
Speaker 1: being seen. Right, And obviously orbs have been really like
Speaker 1: in the news, and and orbs are kind of like
Speaker 1: what everybody's talking about lately.
Speaker 3: I got a question, Sorry, but I've got a question.
Speaker 3: So how do we define an or It's just a light, right,
Speaker 3: So like when people say they saw an ORB, I
Speaker 3: feel like that there's a struggle to delineate between like
Speaker 3: a light. So like so like a light on a
Speaker 3: drone or what we think of is like, as we'll
Speaker 3: get to in this this Helphire video, something that looks
Speaker 3: could at least under that camera setting, looks like not
Speaker 3: an anomalous blob.
Speaker 1: Right, I don't I don't know.
Speaker 3: I mean I say, I feel like orb is a
Speaker 3: capsule term and we need to do as a community,
Speaker 3: we need to do better to differentiate between a light
Speaker 3: and something that actually is morphing and actually looks like
Speaker 3: an right.
Speaker 1: Because when I think of an orb, I think of
Speaker 1: like this gaseous you know, not well, not like morphing,
Speaker 1: but like something peculiar about it.
Speaker 3: It's not just a static, it's not a perfect sphere.
Speaker 3: It's like it's like a globule of liquid.
Speaker 1: Right. And honestly, I will say some of the videos
Speaker 1: that Chris I know people liked to throw shade, some
Speaker 1: of the Chris blood cell videos are pretty like you
Speaker 1: see that like like it's like it looks like it's
Speaker 1: like plasma zapping across around and you know, doing something.
Speaker 1: So I mean, is that an artifact of the camera?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 1: These are the things And and if if the government
Speaker 1: would start releasing videos that that maybe are of more
Speaker 1: high quality, you know, maybe we could start having real
Speaker 1: conversations about what these things could be. You know, is
Speaker 1: it is it something prosaic? Is it are is it?
Speaker 1: Is it a defense Is it a special access program?
Speaker 1: You know sort of thing we know that they can do.
Speaker 1: DARPA is like fifty years ahead of us and in
Speaker 1: uh in defense technology, So you know, is it some
Speaker 1: sort of black program? And you know, are they Are
Speaker 1: they doing what they do because they can do a
Speaker 1: lot with lasers. They can make the they can make
Speaker 1: the I don't know what. I'm not a scientist, so
Speaker 1: I can't explain it too well, but they like charge
Speaker 1: the particles so much, and then it gives the impression
Speaker 1: that something's on radar or something's there, and even to
Speaker 1: the eye it kind of looks like something's there. So
Speaker 1: I mean, these are capabilities that we do already have,
Speaker 1: So I mean, what are we dealing with?
Speaker 3: Well, So one question that just came to mind as
Speaker 3: you were talking about Chris Bloodsawyer is can you or
Speaker 3: anybody in the audience tell me the difference between the
Speaker 3: Chris bloods CE five and the Stephen Grier CE five.
Speaker 3: Is there a difference? Yeah, because they're both capturing like
Speaker 3: similar looking things. I say this with quotation mark similar
Speaker 3: looking things. I'm just curious if, if, what if they're
Speaker 3: using the same technique or you know, what's what's the
Speaker 3: similarities and what's the difference is between them?
Speaker 1: I think they're they're the It's again, it's it's like saying,
Speaker 1: what what the these psionics guys are doing? Isn't CE five?
Speaker 1: I think Greer. I think Greer was the first to
Speaker 1: to to really introduce the idea or or mainstream the idea,
Speaker 1: because I know it was actually around a little bit
Speaker 1: before him too, and he popularized it with these protocols
Speaker 1: I and I think that's what what everyone else is doing.
Speaker 1: They just don't want to label it CE five because
Speaker 1: green is very controversial. So if you're if you're I mean,
Speaker 1: if you're willing to hitch your wagon to his, then
Speaker 1: I think you're you'd be willing to call it CE five,
Speaker 1: whereas Blood CE and like Barber, I don't think they're
Speaker 1: willing to hitch their stuff to.
Speaker 3: I mean, in terms of the actual technique, there's no difference.
Speaker 3: You're meditating and this this brings me to my next thing,
Speaker 3: is is Greer has been caught faking sightings with drones
Speaker 3: and flares from a plane and stuff. It just gives me.
Speaker 3: It gives me a lot of pause to look at
Speaker 3: the Bledsoe story and think it's genuine because I see
Speaker 3: no substantive difference between the techniques that Greer's outfit and
Speaker 3: the c setting and stuff that are doing and what
Speaker 3: the Bloodsows are doing. So if one's faking and another
Speaker 3: group of getting the same results, can you see why
Speaker 3: I have questions?
Speaker 1: Yeah? And I will. So the reason I was bringing
Speaker 1: all this up is do you did you see the
Speaker 1: Ross Coultart video of the psionic asset that that he
Speaker 1: had that green Bereton that was a psionic asset for
Speaker 1: for what's it called Skywatcher? And this guy, so I listen,
Speaker 1: I'll say it now. I'll say it now because now
Speaker 1: he's not answering me, and and and so this guy
Speaker 1: he was trying to get me to get him a
Speaker 1: Stretch Limo drive. Yeah, so he was. He was trying.
Speaker 1: So I was like, listen, I want to have you
Speaker 1: in the in the podcast studio. I want to have
Speaker 1: you here. You're gonna be here, You're gonna be two
Speaker 1: hours away. You know, how can I get you here?
Speaker 1: So he wanted me to rent this stretch limo for
Speaker 1: him and his ladies as he called it, to come
Speaker 1: here for so two hours here, two hours back. And
Speaker 1: obviously the limo would have to stay in the area
Speaker 1: while we do the show because it's not going to
Speaker 1: take off and then drive back here to get them.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make sense. So I would have had to
Speaker 1: pay for like eight hours of limo. So the cost
Speaker 1: was like seventeen eighteen hundred dollars just to get him here.
Speaker 1: And so apparently now after the News Nation video that
Speaker 1: he did that he apparently shows an alien being, he's
Speaker 1: now on Patreon selling a psionic asset logs for five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars. So if you guys, if you guys in
Speaker 1: the chack can't share two dollars with us to keep
Speaker 1: the lights on, and you spend five hundred dollars to
Speaker 1: give a fucking psionic asset who By the way, I
Speaker 1: have not been able to find their DD two fourteen,
Speaker 1: and I do not know if they're actually in the
Speaker 1: military or are in the military. I hope that they
Speaker 1: wouldn't lie about that. I'm not saying they did, but
Speaker 1: I mean, guys, let's let's get our priorities right here right,
Speaker 1: So Ross Ross has gone full Grier, full Grier.
Speaker 3: Imagine my shock.
Speaker 1: Well Ross came into the field. There's this very nuts
Speaker 1: and bolts like journal, you know, hardcore journal from the
Speaker 1: old days. Even though you know no one wants to
Speaker 1: talk about how he got ran out of his old job.
Speaker 3: I was I was very hoping that you were going
Speaker 3: to bring that out so I didn't have to. Yesh,
Speaker 3: he got he got run out of sixty minutes Australia
Speaker 3: for a completely false story alleging a sex ring inside
Speaker 3: the UK House of Lords. He had some source give
Speaker 3: him all of this story that he ran with without
Speaker 3: actually fact checking it. The guy that gave him the
Speaker 3: story ends up going to jail for making it all
Speaker 3: up on wasting police time. And it's insane. It's in
Speaker 3: insane story that it makes me. But then I look
Speaker 3: at like whom News Nation employees like Chris Komo, and
Speaker 3: I'm like, oh, well that explains a lot. So you know,
Speaker 3: it's it's not that big of a shark, but it is. See.
Speaker 1: So yeah, and and and he had told me in
Speaker 1: the chat, in the chat that we had that the
Speaker 1: video that he was going to drop was going to
Speaker 1: change the world. And I'm looking around and I'm wondering,
Speaker 1: did the world change and I missed it?
Speaker 3: I mean, you know what you want? My first gut
Speaker 3: reaction to that video.
Speaker 1: Is there any where we could pull the clip up?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Sure, So I'll explain my my take while I
Speaker 3: grab it. So you know, when you're when it's raining
Speaker 3: on a window, and yes, you put your camera up
Speaker 3: to it, up on the glass and you're filming through
Speaker 3: the water droplets on the glass and you slide the
Speaker 3: camera slide and you get all these different reflections and stuff.
Speaker 3: That's what that video reminds me of. Like first reaction was, Oh,
Speaker 3: that's just that. And I say this because I take
Speaker 3: a lot of like weather photos and weather videos, so
Speaker 3: I've done that a lot, Like I've had to try
Speaker 3: and get my camera to look through a little gap
Speaker 3: in a bit of glass to get past the rain drops.
Speaker 3: So I it was a kind of a unique thing
Speaker 3: that I like, I know, I know that visual interesting.
Speaker 3: What was it? What was his name, Matt Batista, right,
Speaker 3: Michael Batista, Michael Batista.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And while he's bringing that up, guys, so carri
Speaker 1: So I filmed an interview with doctor Greg Rogers, and
Speaker 1: we'll be talking about him in a minute. We have
Speaker 1: a bunch of topics still to go half the show.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sorry, I don't know what I was
Speaker 1: just about to say. We released that episode with doctor
Speaker 1: Greg Rodgers last night on YouTube, so definitely after this
Speaker 1: show check that out. Cary did such a good job
Speaker 1: with the editing and the mixing and fixing some of
Speaker 1: the focus issue that I saw that some of you
Speaker 1: guys noticed, which is embarrassing, but no, we have we
Speaker 1: have much much planned and it was a very I
Speaker 1: shot that at Contact in the desert in the hotel
Speaker 1: room before the day, but the day the day that
Speaker 1: I was doing like twelve other interviews, so there was
Speaker 1: a lot in my mind that day. So we got
Speaker 1: I think we got the video from NewsNation. Here, we
Speaker 1: had the content that Ross is now promoting. This is
Speaker 1: the guy who came into the field and questioned everything
Speaker 1: was very nuts and bolts. You know. People liked him
Speaker 1: because he had the accent, and he did a very
Speaker 1: smart thing by pairing himself up with someone who is
Speaker 1: very likable like Bryce Sable.
Speaker 3: Yes I was actually that was a master streak.
Speaker 1: Faster, So he's smart. I'll give him that. Sorry, let's
Speaker 1: play this, bad.
Speaker 3: Boy, Let's play this. So think of this from the
Speaker 3: context of water on the window.
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, no, no, no, what is Oh my god?
Speaker 1: Oh I see it now, Holy shit. It's just it's
Speaker 1: like a fucking candle on the outside.
Speaker 3: He's saying, it's just it's a street light. There's a
Speaker 3: house or building over there, and then there's a street light.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: He's moving his camera through like, uh, it's just on
Speaker 3: a pane of glass with water.
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 3: Like that was my instinct, gut reaction. I was like,
Speaker 3: I know what that is. Like I could be totally wrong,
Speaker 3: but like, that's what that looks like.
Speaker 1: Guys. Does anyone think that that is an alien? I would, honestly,
Speaker 1: I would believe the Las Vegas alien video before I
Speaker 1: fucking believe this thing. And that's saying a lot. That
Speaker 1: is saying a.
Speaker 7: Lot that looks yeah, what you know, and thinking though,
Speaker 7: now that you say it, it looks like there's so
Speaker 7: what his what his claim was is that he pulled
Speaker 7: out his phone just he asked if he could film them,
Speaker 7: can it?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 1: But they said, they being the aliens, they said only
Speaker 1: if you put your dog away, what dude.
Speaker 3: Liars And this is the same guy that wants a
Speaker 3: limo for him and his.
Speaker 1: Girls, yes six for sixteen to be charged.
Speaker 3: How do they communicate with him?
Speaker 1: Yeah, well through his through through meditation, So again back
Speaker 1: to that C five style. What he's claiming his ability
Speaker 1: is is to be able to connect with them on
Speaker 1: a on a psionic level, on a on a level
Speaker 1: through telepathy and call these things in and he says
Speaker 1: that he's basically he said that they landed for him
Speaker 1: in this video. They said you can record us, but
Speaker 1: only if you put your dog away, which seems like
Speaker 1: a really bizarre fucking detail. The liars put things. A
Speaker 1: good liar someone who knows they're lying and they're making
Speaker 1: a story, they'll include these really obscure, weird details.
Speaker 3: And I think it makes them sound more genuine but nice,
Speaker 3: like you wouldn't if you were telling like a truthful story.
Speaker 3: It's not details that you would like think are important.
Speaker 1: Sorry, that's that's the trick, is they communicate with the girls.
Speaker 1: I shouldn't have been putting the girls down. Uh that's
Speaker 1: the cold maybe down? Yeah, yeah, yeah, I listen. I
Speaker 1: will say this for my total disclosure brethren. I did
Speaker 1: say that I would drive to him, and he said, no,
Speaker 1: that's a security.
Speaker 3: Risk because you're such a dangerous person. Time so dangerous,
Speaker 3: it's so dangerous.
Speaker 1: A So that's that's. That's that. And he's ghosting me now,
Speaker 1: So I don't I don't even care. I don't once
Speaker 1: I saw a video. So he was trying to get
Speaker 1: me to play because someone and this is my problem
Speaker 1: with the UFO community right now, someone's telling him that
Speaker 1: this is okay to do that, this is how it's done.
Speaker 1: So what he was trying to do is get me
Speaker 1: to be so excited as a UFO believer that I
Speaker 1: would jump and spend whenever I needed to to get
Speaker 1: him here. But that's not me, I I I am.
Speaker 1: I am very stingy. There's you know.
Speaker 3: Of like like we we've kind of created like a
Speaker 3: UFO culture that incentivizes this kind of behavior because we
Speaker 3: seem to equate like shows with money as being shows
Speaker 3: of quality.
Speaker 1: Yes, And.
Speaker 3: It creates like a space for people to go, oh, well,
Speaker 3: you you've obviously got money, you get all these guests,
Speaker 3: therefore you can pay me for my story. And it
Speaker 3: creates his echos, this cottage industry, and I say it
Speaker 3: a lot like in the Secret Space program Insider Space,
Speaker 3: where people will come forward with a very similar kind
Speaker 3: of story, like oh, I channeled Aliens and I went
Speaker 3: off and did a twenty year service and came back.
Speaker 3: It's the same stick because there's a profit incentive for
Speaker 3: people who want content. Yeah, so yeah, I know who's
Speaker 3: somewhat of a friend to the show. But Jesse Michaels
Speaker 3: is someone that comes to someone you are Cannon.
Speaker 1: I'm Cannon in American Alchemy. Now.
Speaker 3: I don't know if if he pays people for their time,
Speaker 3: but it strikes me as a show with so much
Speaker 3: money that it attracts people with crazy stories who want
Speaker 3: to sell their crazy story because they know that he
Speaker 3: comes from like the Peter Teele money empire. Now I
Speaker 3: have anything personal against Jesse, and you know, anything I've
Speaker 3: ever tweeted at him is purely on a fact basis,
Speaker 3: not on a personal one. So I just I think
Speaker 3: that we could do better as a community about like
Speaker 3: the culture we're creating where we create space for these
Speaker 3: insane people to come forward with insane stories that these
Speaker 3: aren't the stories we're going to see in Congress, because
Speaker 3: that prove that you know, you hear them once and
Speaker 3: you go, this person is crazy, like any normal person
Speaker 3: would hear. Oh, I've been taken off to Mars for
Speaker 3: twenty years where I was abused by the Grays and
Speaker 3: made to do slave labor and then set back on
Speaker 3: a craft and there was there was only white people
Speaker 3: in my craft, like these are some of the stories
Speaker 3: you hear in the Secret Space program inside the space
Speaker 3: and it's they're completely incentivized by the money machine and
Speaker 3: the content creation machine. And to save myself going too
Speaker 3: far on that run, I'll stop it there.
Speaker 1: But well, there's clearly money to be made. People are
Speaker 1: willing to spend money on their will, their their wont
Speaker 1: to believe. It's it's it's it's dangerous, and some people
Speaker 1: don't realize that they're emptying their wallets for these guys
Speaker 1: like Greer. Just you know, they're spending thirteen fourteen hundred
Speaker 1: dollars for a weekend of meditation and him talking at you,
Speaker 1: not to you, but at you. Right, he's talking at
Speaker 1: you about all the great things and every single thing
Speaker 1: that he's ever done, and how he's involved in every
Speaker 1: single uf big UFO store. He needs to insert himself
Speaker 1: into every single narrative because like like I said, he's
Speaker 1: he's built this whole idea in his fan base or
Speaker 1: his followers that he is the only way to closure happens.
Speaker 1: And I mean it's it really like I said, That's
Speaker 1: why I really loved your film Dark Alliance, because it
Speaker 1: did finally shine a light into a very very dark
Speaker 1: corner of this seemingly like very inclusive topic. And there
Speaker 1: are guys like Uap Gerb that do wonderful work the
Speaker 1: Jesse Michaels, you know what, the video on T Townsend Brown.
Speaker 1: I love that video. I could watch that one hundred
Speaker 1: times and not be bored. No do I think all
Speaker 1: these people are here because they want the answers to
Speaker 1: the existential questions of the universe.
Speaker 3: No, No, I think I think on like a base
Speaker 3: level they do. But I think it gets overridden with
Speaker 3: the profit motive. Right, Oh, I can get a load
Speaker 3: of money along the way, not realizing that the along
Speaker 3: the way has been going on for eighty years, Like
Speaker 3: there is no like, Oh, I'll do this for three years.
Speaker 3: I'll get the truth and I'll get out that that's
Speaker 3: not a thing, Like there's always a joke in the
Speaker 3: uthology like you can check in or you can check out,
Speaker 3: but you can you can never leave once you're once. Yeah,
Speaker 3: once you're in, you're in. And it's very it seems
Speaker 3: it's extremely hard to leave the topic because of this
Speaker 3: never ending Oh we're almost there, guys, discuss it's going
Speaker 3: to be a big year for disclosure, big year for disclosure,
Speaker 3: and it's it's not a big year for disclosure, would
Speaker 3: be an actual mass sighting over a huge city.
Speaker 1: That's what we really need is another Phoenix lights incident
Speaker 1: happening to like tomorrow with smartphones and and listen, I
Speaker 1: did make a joke in the in the intro about
Speaker 1: three eye out lists, and you know this is the
Speaker 1: time where you shouldn't drink the kool aid, right, that's
Speaker 1: just you know, if you if you don't know what
Speaker 1: I mean, wink wink. I don't want to get us
Speaker 1: to monetize or anything. But you know, there there are
Speaker 1: people that like will take, like have taken their lives
Speaker 1: to do these really weird culty things. You know, with
Speaker 1: the hail Bob comment, you know that that's a tragedy.
Speaker 1: What happened those people thought that You know that the
Speaker 1: the what was it, Heaven's Gate, That Heaven's Gate. They
Speaker 1: thought they were being told that they were gonna, you know,
Speaker 1: be brought onto the ship. And maybe they did. Maybe
Speaker 1: it is an alien spacecraft and we're the ones and
Speaker 1: we're the idiots down here laughing at them. But they
Speaker 1: really did go there, who knows. I don't know.
Speaker 3: But did they leave that, buddies, that's you know, it's like, yeah,
Speaker 3: well they died. Well this is what I mean, if
Speaker 3: they died. But like you're saying, what if they did,
Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, they could be a huge cosmic joke
Speaker 3: on us, and maybe maybe they've zupped them out of
Speaker 3: their bodies into some kind of extra dimensional systems.
Speaker 1: But I do want to I do want to throw
Speaker 1: it a quick something really quick here. Again, we're still
Speaker 1: building out the show. We're gonna build in segments and
Speaker 1: we're gonna refine it.
Speaker 3: This is a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is definitely episode one. We have one hundred
Speaker 1: almost two hundred people watching ninety nine percent on x
Speaker 1: SO at like the halfway mark, guys, I do got
Speaker 1: to cut the X Please come over on YouTube and watch, please, sport.
Speaker 1: I want to get the word out about this show,
Speaker 1: We're definitely but listen, there was something about the rapture
Speaker 1: that this past week. So apparently this guy, this priest
Speaker 1: was preaching and he said that the rapture was happening,
Speaker 1: and apparently a bunch of people like started selling their
Speaker 1: cars and quitting their jobs and they were ready for
Speaker 1: the rapture and it was huge on TikTok And uh,
Speaker 1: I mean, did you see that?
Speaker 3: I did. I think that the people that believe that
Speaker 3: the raptor is coming, they start selling their possessions and
Speaker 3: stuff that I feel like that is a symptom of
Speaker 3: a deeper issue going on with them, where they're ready,
Speaker 3: like they're ready to leave, They're ready to die, die, ascend, die,
Speaker 3: what however you want to quantify it. So I I
Speaker 3: do think it's pretty pretty crazy. But I I mean,
Speaker 3: maybe we're maybe the rapture did happen and we're we're
Speaker 3: the roobs that are stuck here.
Speaker 1: You know, no no one does a fucking no, then
Speaker 1: there's no good people on fucking earth because no one
Speaker 1: left first time. Oh anyway, so is there any more?
Speaker 1: Was there any other videos from from Arrow that were
Speaker 1: that were of any interest?
Speaker 3: No, the rest of the rest were just balloons and
Speaker 3: one was like a non a norm anomalist phenomenon. And
Speaker 3: I'm like, I don't even need to look at those.
Speaker 3: You told me what they are in the description, so
Speaker 3: I didn't even I didn't look.
Speaker 5: Well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you guys can go to arrow what is
Speaker 1: it arrow dot gov.
Speaker 3: Something like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, go to the d O d's website and check
Speaker 1: out the videos for yourself. If I cannot link them
Speaker 1: in the description below, post stream because I don't have
Speaker 1: it there right now. But let's move on to something
Speaker 1: really quick. Let's move on. I just want to talk
Speaker 1: about this really quick. I posted it on X the
Speaker 1: other day and I had a conversation with doctor Greg Rogers,
Speaker 1: who was this week's this Week's guest on the show,
Speaker 1: and he brought something up to me. He brought two
Speaker 1: things up to me that that ended up being subjects
Speaker 1: that we're talking about tonight. So he him and I
Speaker 1: were talking on the phone. I don't know do I
Speaker 1: want to share this video? I think I do, But
Speaker 1: we were talking about three eye out lists apparently so
Speaker 1: apparently and I didn't know this. So when you when
Speaker 1: you see when you see Nickel in something, there's always iron.
Speaker 1: So when he was talking about the can you hear that?
Speaker 3: No, yeah, not yet, don't hear that?
Speaker 1: No we can Okay, So what the point he's making
Speaker 1: is that three eye out lists in in in the universe,
Speaker 1: you don't see nickel without iron. They're always together, right,
Speaker 1: unless by some sort of manufacturing process you separate the two,
Speaker 1: like we do here on Earth, when we separate the
Speaker 1: nickel and turn it into alloys and make spacecraft with them,
Speaker 1: and we actually do. Now, iron is very dense, it's heavy,
Speaker 1: and it's coroni, so it's not good material for spacecraft
Speaker 1: or anything that's going to be in the vacuum of
Speaker 1: space so or anywhere else. And the composition that is
Speaker 1: coming back on three iye at lists, so aside from
Speaker 1: its really really weird trajectory and it being an interstellar object,
Speaker 1: it's got a composition that has nickel but no iron. Now,
Speaker 1: what doctor Rogers tells me is that that is very,
Speaker 1: very important, and we could just listen to this real quick.
Speaker 1: I think you are very I think you're talking about
Speaker 1: the health fire. That's a big year. But pause that
Speaker 1: what does that have to do with three eye out lists? Oh?
Speaker 2: No, three eye at lists that's a whole other thing.
Speaker 2: But my viewpoint on that is, you know, I'll be load.
Speaker 2: We can talk about the trajectory, and you know, even
Speaker 2: the carbon diox side, the water ratio is an amazing
Speaker 2: anomal because normally it's three to one water to CO
Speaker 2: two and now the CO two is eight to one
Speaker 2: to the water. So yeah, that's a big thing, but
Speaker 2: it's totally backwards. But the universe does not make nickel
Speaker 2: without making iron. Now, then we have to industrially do
Speaker 2: a bunch of stuff to separate the nickel from the iron.
Speaker 2: And then for our spacecraft where you're going to use
Speaker 2: nickel alloys for the Space Shuttle, for the Voyagers one
Speaker 2: and two, for the New Horizon spacecraft. When we launch satellites,
Speaker 2: we use nickel, but you don't use any iron. Iron
Speaker 2: is heavy and it's corrosive, so it's not used on spacecraft.
Speaker 2: If the voyager eventually strays into another solar system and
Speaker 2: some intelligent civilization watches it, it's going to give a
Speaker 2: nickel signature without iron, and they're gonna, know, what do
Speaker 2: you think we're seeing with three I at lists there's
Speaker 2: no iron. So it's not a natural process because the nature.
Speaker 2: Every time it makes iron, it's also going to make nickel.
Speaker 1: Holy shit, are you saying that this is something weird.
Speaker 2: I'm saying that is exactly weird.
Speaker 1: And then I just I had to quickly stop that
Speaker 1: because I did share something very very private with him
Speaker 1: after that. But so he so this is a man
Speaker 1: that worked with NASA Chief of Aerospace Medicine, chief light surgeon,
Speaker 1: was you know, also has some experience with chemical is
Speaker 1: it chemical engineering? I think so, you know, as as
Speaker 1: someone who does have that kind of wherewithal an expertise.
Speaker 1: When he did say it, I was like, Okay, you're
Speaker 1: you're raising some good points. Do I think it really
Speaker 1: is some sort of probe? I don't know. I really
Speaker 1: don't do. I want it to be. Hell fucking yeah,
Speaker 1: I do. But what's.
Speaker 6: So?
Speaker 3: I do think the the alloy issue is interesting. I've
Speaker 3: been thinking about it ever since you posted it, like
Speaker 3: how how something like that would work? And it reminded
Speaker 3: me of I can't remember if it was like the
Speaker 3: meta materials or there was something where there's a material
Speaker 3: that came from like a meteorite that was clearly made
Speaker 3: in the different kind of gravity. Well, because of the
Speaker 3: alignment of the part of the atoms. It could only
Speaker 3: be made in like a different, different part of space.
Speaker 3: And it's got me thinking like, well, uh, we're talking
Speaker 3: about the separation process between nickel and iron, right right,
Speaker 3: and that's we're understanding that process in terms of like
Speaker 3: Earth and Earth's gravity well, Earth's gravity well and our
Speaker 3: Sun's gravity well in how elements are formed and bonded,
Speaker 3: whereas we don't know that this thing could have come
Speaker 3: from some other part of space where nickel can form
Speaker 3: without ion, Like I feel like we need to have
Speaker 3: space for that because we we don't know that it's not.
Speaker 3: So it's I'm kind of I'm skeptical. I think it's
Speaker 3: probably probably just like part of a comet or part
Speaker 3: of an asteroid that's busted off and it's stumbling. I do.
Speaker 3: I do think it's very interesting that there is no
Speaker 3: no iron, But I'm I'm open to a prosaic explanation
Speaker 3: that has to do with kind of spatial I don't
Speaker 3: know what conditions or dynamics.
Speaker 1: Saying that you know, a different star could be, right,
Speaker 1: we should We shouldn't just look through the human lens like, hey,
Speaker 1: we've never seen it, so it can't be possible.
Speaker 3: Right, That's what I'm getting is so we understand the
Speaker 3: process because we do it here on Earth where elements
Speaker 3: form a certain way, and out in space they could
Speaker 3: form in a different way and we don't know it.
Speaker 3: So like I feel like, is that more plausible than
Speaker 3: it being an alien probe? Wellbe you know, yeah, possibly, yeah.
Speaker 1: And it's going to make its closest approach, I believe October,
Speaker 1: if I'm not mistaken. So we have a lot of
Speaker 1: Thursdays till then, or at least four, So obviously we'll
Speaker 1: be you.
Speaker 3: Know, well as we go week to week, and we'll
Speaker 3: we'll keep the audience up to date and we'll have
Speaker 3: a hopefully good conversation about it because it's very interesting.
Speaker 3: I mean, I think it's closer and we can scan
Speaker 3: it more accurately, we'll get a clearer picture. Maybe there
Speaker 3: is iron there and we're just not scanning it properly.
Speaker 3: We don't.
Speaker 1: Well, you know what's interesting is now I have this
Speaker 1: I have this theory theory. It's very loose. I mean,
Speaker 1: don't take me at, you know, at full face value,
Speaker 1: because I'm still kind of producing it. But I always
Speaker 1: said that it was weird that after twenty seventeen, it
Speaker 1: does seem like they are drip feeding us and kind
Speaker 1: of getting us ready for something. Now have UFOs been
Speaker 1: around since before twenty seventeen?
Speaker 3: Of course, I've just got to point out that was
Speaker 3: very millinarian of you. What does that mean, the belief
Speaker 3: that there is like a coming golden age or there
Speaker 3: is something coming and you know there's an event coming, right,
Speaker 3: So yeah, yeah, it's a millinary in tendency. I see,
Speaker 3: And you followed you all the time of oh this
Speaker 3: is you know, this is going to be a great
Speaker 3: year for disclosure. This is disclosure is coming. You know
Speaker 3: all of this. It's millenary and tenets. I just wanted
Speaker 3: to point that out.
Speaker 1: But could the government be aware? Could the military industrial
Speaker 1: complex or government dark but whoever the deep state is,
Speaker 1: whatever that is, whatever capacity you want to call it,
Speaker 1: the illuminati? Could they have figured out that something was
Speaker 1: eventually going to make its way here and it was
Speaker 1: going to become very apparent, and to avoid some sort
Speaker 1: of chaotic disclosure, they would drip feed us this idea
Speaker 1: that we are not alone and you know, kind of
Speaker 1: mold and get the playing field ready for an inevitable
Speaker 1: kind of forced disclosure, because I don't think it's up
Speaker 1: to us to disclose. I think if there is something here,
Speaker 1: they're the ones in charge of whether they're going to
Speaker 1: come out or not. And I mean it raises a
Speaker 1: good question if the Grays and those nord Eggs or whatever,
Speaker 1: if those things are truly here and they don't intervene,
Speaker 1: and they you know, and they know something also coming,
Speaker 1: could they be here to witness what civilizations meeting, what
Speaker 1: that looks like, because it only happens so few times,
Speaker 1: you know, because age of the universe, the distance between
Speaker 1: planets and dimensionalities, and the technology it would take to
Speaker 1: actually pull these kind of things off. So could they
Speaker 1: want to have always said this? Are they here to
Speaker 1: witness the end of the world? Right? They seem to
Speaker 1: be attracted to our nukes? Are they here to stop something?
Speaker 1: Or are they here to observe something? And I don't
Speaker 1: think it's out of the realm of possible that something
Speaker 1: they know was on its was going to be on
Speaker 1: its way or was on its way, is on its
Speaker 1: way and has been for a long time, and they
Speaker 1: just they got here. They can leave and come and go,
Speaker 1: and you know, our government then figured it out as well,
Speaker 1: and now you know they're priving the field. They kept it,
Speaker 1: you know, locked up as long as they could, but
Speaker 1: now they needed to start that society needed to be
Speaker 1: kind of read into the program, if you will.
Speaker 3: So are you saying that they've known about Triatlis's approach
Speaker 3: for a long time?
Speaker 1: It's what I'm posing, yes, And it's maybe why we
Speaker 1: keep sending up these So we fast tracked James Webb.
Speaker 1: People don't like remember that, but we took a real
Speaker 1: chance getting up as quick as we did, and it
Speaker 1: wasn't a guarantee that when it unfolded that it wasn't
Speaker 1: just going to smash apart. So why did we rush
Speaker 1: web up there?
Speaker 3: Why? Why?
Speaker 1: Why? Why? Is Dobbs are allowing people like David Grosh
Speaker 1: and Luel Azando.
Speaker 3: Or okay, okay, do you know what? Do you know
Speaker 3: what dob is?
Speaker 1: I do? I'm very aware of what the art.
Speaker 3: You are allowed. I know and I know you know,
Speaker 3: but I feel like the audience needs to hear it
Speaker 3: because I'm going to beat him over the head with
Speaker 3: it until they understand it. I love the audience, but
Speaker 3: the audience needs to understand these things. One question is
Speaker 3: my camera frozen.
Speaker 1: Yeah it is. Actually okay, it's not me for once.
Speaker 3: I know it's strange. Let me let me switch it
Speaker 3: out one second, but you.
Speaker 1: Listen, So I'll say this before you get into your
Speaker 1: whole little smash on Dobster. I am not saying that
Speaker 1: Dobbster is the one that is allowing it. I'm just
Speaker 1: saying that it seems weird that if I mean, they're
Speaker 1: what they're talking about now with crash retrieval, I mean,
Speaker 1: the Dobster isn't saying okay, go talk about it. They're
Speaker 1: just saying it's not classified. What you're talking about is
Speaker 1: not inherently classified. So you know, we you know, we
Speaker 1: can't stop you from from talking about that as a
Speaker 1: as a private citizen or as you know, as a
Speaker 1: private citizen talking about it in the capacity of having
Speaker 1: the hindsight of being in the military and and and
Speaker 1: the n r O and Space Force. So I think
Speaker 1: it's very interesting that, you know, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: just the floodgates opened and we have all this video,
Speaker 1: all this all these quote unquote whistle blowers. And I
Speaker 1: don't think if you go through Dobster you are a whistleblower.
Speaker 1: I think you are, whether you believe it or not,
Speaker 1: you are an agent of the d O D. You
Speaker 1: might not be peddling exactly what they want, but there's
Speaker 1: a what they are saying, you're good to go talk
Speaker 1: about this. That's my belief.
Speaker 3: Okay, here's my understanding of Dobson, and I might be
Speaker 3: wrong here, but they're like Remit, their purpose is not
Speaker 3: to say, hey, you're okay to go talk about this.
Speaker 3: Their purpose is to look at what you're going to
Speaker 3: say and verify that there's nothing classified within what you're
Speaker 3: going to say, not whether what you're going to say
Speaker 3: is truthful or not. And I feel like that that
Speaker 3: serves propaganda purposes, it can serve personal financial purposes. So
Speaker 3: I feel like it's something I really really need the
Speaker 3: audience to understand, is that just because dops are clear
Speaker 3: something does not mean that it's factual or truthful. It
Speaker 3: just means that there was nothing classified in that document
Speaker 3: that they had to flag. That's that's their only purpose
Speaker 3: is to flag classified material in the doctor fields.
Speaker 1: Okay, So what you're saying is you don't think David
Speaker 1: Grush saying that we have that the US government is
Speaker 1: in possession of non human biologics and that we absolutely
Speaker 1: have a crash retrieval program. You don't think that that
Speaker 1: is something they would want not to be talked about,
Speaker 1: because well, it's It raises an interesting question because if
Speaker 1: they do say you can't talk about it, then we
Speaker 1: know it's true, right because when asked that question, Hey,
Speaker 1: David Grush, do we have crash retrieval programs? I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I can't talk about that. That's for me whenever that said,
Speaker 1: that's a yes we do, and I think for everyone
Speaker 1: else that that's the case anytime this congressional hearings happened
Speaker 1: and someone says, sorry, I'm about to speak about that
Speaker 1: in a skiff, I.
Speaker 3: Think because if they so like Grush is put in,
Speaker 3: oh I want to talk about this stuff, and they
Speaker 3: clear him, and we're saying, oh, if it was true,
Speaker 3: they wouldn't want it out or they couldn't tell him
Speaker 3: not to because then it reveals the existence of it.
Speaker 3: So this is a sticky area where it's it's kind
Speaker 3: of it's like confirmed any way you look at it,
Speaker 3: even though there's no no proof other than the guy
Speaker 3: saying it. So like if he's made he's making a
Speaker 3: claim that there's there's biologics right now. If that's not true,
Speaker 3: then it is not a classified thing. Therefore they can't
Speaker 3: tell him not to say it.
Speaker 1: Also a good point also, it's well, you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: because I guess you could. Well, that is actually really
Speaker 1: good point. So it is kind of what the Yeah, Donnie,
Speaker 1: I would say that it's a catch twenty two.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it is a catch twenty two or catch twenty Well,
Speaker 3: it's used as a catch twenty two by UFO content
Speaker 3: creators and people in this sphere. They use the trappings
Speaker 3: of DOPSA and the kind of ambiguity and misunderstanding of
Speaker 3: the by the public of this process to say, oh, well,
Speaker 3: dops are approved it, and then people run with it
Speaker 3: and go, oh my god, doptsor approved it. It's all true,
Speaker 3: and it's like, no, it just wasn't classified. That actually
Speaker 3: leads me to believe it's probably not true. If dops
Speaker 3: aren't turning around and going no, that's a classified thing,
Speaker 3: it's probably not true. You're mute, sir.
Speaker 1: I just realized that my door to the studio is
Speaker 1: open and my dog is in here, but I don't
Speaker 1: see them, So what Yeah, my studio door is open,
Speaker 1: and I don't know. I can't see my dog. So
Speaker 1: give me one moment, a different start.
Speaker 3: I'll start prepping the next story. Hell, everybody always an
Speaker 3: adventure here, always adventure here.
Speaker 1: I got them, all right, everybody. Logan is safe. Logan
Speaker 1: is safe. So the door is closed. I was like,
Speaker 1: it looked open from here, and I just had a
Speaker 1: fucking mini panic attack.
Speaker 3: Okay, okay, So to save us, to save us, going
Speaker 3: too too long? So the you wanted to bring up
Speaker 3: the boogosphere carbon dating?
Speaker 1: Yes, do you have the do you have the I
Speaker 1: do you have the report? Yes? All right, guys, literally
Speaker 1: if you know so, probably at an hour and fifteen,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna cut the Twitter feed. If you would come
Speaker 1: over to YouTube, it would really help. And again, any
Speaker 1: uh any donations are really really helpful. We'll be here
Speaker 1: every Thursday for the foreseeable future and it's gonna be really.
Speaker 3: I've tried to do it, all right.
Speaker 1: You might have to make that big.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's not the highest quality copy of it. So
Speaker 3: I ran this through a channel friend Rock Expert, who
Speaker 3: told me a bunch of stuff about this document. It's
Speaker 3: a legitimate document. The people involved in it are legitimate scientists.
Speaker 3: They are accredited. I was actually quite surprised because up
Speaker 3: until now this whole boogles fare thing has seemed booky,
Speaker 3: spooky and bookie. But no, so this report is real.
Speaker 3: It's carbondated to what it is. But it's very important
Speaker 3: to note that this is a carbon dating of let
Speaker 3: me switch tabersecond, it's a carbon dating of this these
Speaker 3: resin dots on the bottom of the sphere, not of
Speaker 3: the metal itself. So I know I'm sharing a doctor
Speaker 3: Stephen Greer tweet. I feel horrible inside on the repent later.
Speaker 3: But it's just important to note that like in can
Speaker 3: exist for thousands of years. Have you sayn Jurassic Park, Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's you know, that's the amber. Amber resin is, you know.
Speaker 1: And if this thing hit the ground, if it if
Speaker 1: it fell, you know, or or and let's say it
Speaker 1: is something anomalous and it was in the air and
Speaker 1: it comes crashing down and then something some like resin
Speaker 1: gets lodged in it. Uh, you know, it could be
Speaker 1: anomalous some sort of anomalous uh technology. But this carbon
Speaker 1: dating doesn't really say anything.
Speaker 3: Right, it's it's it's yeah, it's kind of inconclusive to
Speaker 3: a point where we yeah, we because if you look,
Speaker 3: I mean, if you look closely, you can kind of
Speaker 3: see like, yeah, can we get it's gonna give me
Speaker 3: a second, Let's do this the other way.
Speaker 1: It looks like it looks imperfect.
Speaker 3: Well, it looks like I'll be honest, it looks like
Speaker 3: so it looks like a circuit soldering.
Speaker 1: I mean, that looks exactly like a circuit, right it does.
Speaker 3: And then but then it's got instead of solder, it's
Speaker 3: got resin, which is interesting because then they test the
Speaker 3: resin and they find out it's super duper role. But
Speaker 3: resin can last for a very very very long time
Speaker 3: and be stored for a very long time. So if
Speaker 3: this is man made and they put some I mean,
Speaker 3: what I would want to do is find out where
Speaker 3: this resin came from. What's the composition of this resin?
Speaker 3: Does it match anywhere on Earth or known resin samples
Speaker 3: of Earth? I guess that's the next the next step
Speaker 3: in finding out what this thing is. But it's this,
Speaker 3: this is not conclusive in any way. And you know,
Speaker 3: seeing someone like Stephen Grier sharing and like, oh my god,
Speaker 3: it's confirmed. It's twelve thousand years old. No, it was
Speaker 3: Mitch McConnell. Yeah, man, you're you're you're on a roll
Speaker 3: with Mitch mcconnald today. Where are we there? We go?
Speaker 1: So and and I think a real big so and listen,
Speaker 1: I don't think the fact that that the resin says
Speaker 1: it's this age is you know, I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: think that that discounts that if this this could be
Speaker 1: I mean, could this be an artifact of some sort
Speaker 1: of ancient civilization? Could could this be something that we
Speaker 1: we came across.
Speaker 3: I mean that raises that raises questions about manufacturing processes. Well,
Speaker 3: of course, yeah, of course. I feel like that gets
Speaker 3: us to like the pyramids whatever, How are they building
Speaker 3: these kinds of things meso America?
Speaker 1: Right? And but so, and that's my point is I
Speaker 1: think that we we do owe it. I mean, when
Speaker 1: I talked to Burleson about it, he went down and
Speaker 1: saw this thing and touched held in and you know,
Speaker 1: examined it. He said that it wasn't that it didn't
Speaker 1: impress him. So make of that what you will. It
Speaker 1: didn't impress uh, Congressman Congressman Burlison, you know, And and
Speaker 1: I don't think it's see what doesn't help this case
Speaker 1: is that himI Mussan and the Greer are attached to it.
Speaker 1: Two people who have been caught doing stuff that has
Speaker 1: been either debunked or genuinely like knowingly hoaxed, like the
Speaker 1: Little Alien got the little the Greer with the Little
Speaker 1: Alien and Gary Malin and then himI with the the other. Yeah. There, no,
Speaker 1: there was that that there was an original one of
Speaker 1: this mummy.
Speaker 3: The mummy the Emory Smith turned up to a conference
Speaker 3: and the figurine model.
Speaker 1: That's the Yeah, that's the Greer one. himI if you
Speaker 1: look it up. Himie was peddling this thing and they
Speaker 1: sold tickets and all the shit, and they showed this
Speaker 1: picture of a mummy and it turned out to be
Speaker 1: a picture of a mummy that was in some museum
Speaker 1: and it was of a disfigured like young boy. But
Speaker 1: Dolan was Richard Dolan. This is the one crazy part.
Speaker 1: They got Richard Dolan involved in it, and and that's
Speaker 1: like the one blemish that I know of on his record,
Speaker 1: and that's why I think he stays far away from
Speaker 1: a lot of this. No, it was maybe someone in
Speaker 1: the chat can help us chat, but they were hiding
Speaker 1: and all them. They did this like big auditorium thing
Speaker 1: and they showed this picture and it was a mummy
Speaker 1: inside of like a closed thing. And it turns out
Speaker 1: that it was on some sort of it was it
Speaker 1: was at some sort of natural museum history. It was
Speaker 1: just a photo out of that and they like change
Speaker 1: the colors and stuff.
Speaker 3: So they took they took a photo and photoshopped it
Speaker 3: to look more alien and then.
Speaker 1: Something like that. Yeah, something like that happened. So yeah,
Speaker 1: a child mummy. I think that he remembers it. So
Speaker 1: himI has been he's been known and listen, I don't
Speaker 1: think that himI. I'm not saying he's an evil guy.
Speaker 1: He's not the Egyptologist what's that name, zich. I don't
Speaker 1: think he's like evil like Zachie Halases who. But but
Speaker 1: I do think that that that himI is a TV
Speaker 1: show host, and you know he needs to like ratings, ratings, ratings, right,
Speaker 1: this is I know.
Speaker 3: That Moti and this this ship started with Prometheus Entertainment
Speaker 3: in two thousand and six when they started Ancient Aliens
Speaker 3: and they started humping out bullshit, bullshit alien things to
Speaker 3: millions and millions of people on the History channel.
Speaker 1: Oh that is it. They cropped out the card that
Speaker 1: identified that it was a child mummery mummy, and then
Speaker 1: they blurred it.
Speaker 3: Up a little bit imagine shot.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So and then and and they got dude, they sold
Speaker 1: tickets that like it was this big breaking like you know,
Speaker 1: like disclosure is inevitable kind of event that they were
Speaker 1: gonna reveal proof of an alien species. And then like
Speaker 1: a day later, dude, someone's like bing founded, you guys
Speaker 1: are fucking like it was. It's it's a travesty because
Speaker 1: these things are always happening in the UFO community. And
Speaker 1: it's again, have.
Speaker 3: You noticed how all of these things they always seem
Speaker 3: to come from like older guys or all the older
Speaker 3: people yep, And it's like they they don't understand how
Speaker 3: the inter networks. They think it's like, oh, oh I
Speaker 3: get I can get one over on them. People aren't
Speaker 3: going to notice. And within ten minutes sometimes you have
Speaker 3: like like and you see this UPHO videos, like people
Speaker 3: will pinpoint the flight, will altitude, what direction, everything within
Speaker 3: like five ten minutes because we have the technology to
Speaker 3: do that. Now, well that's like the people, right.
Speaker 1: Like people they tried to pass off those guys are truly,
Speaker 1: truly fraudsters. And again I don't yeah, not even I
Speaker 1: don't think it. I don't think it's a surprise to
Speaker 1: anyone that they hook their belt and their wagon to
Speaker 1: doctor career and make all these prou documentaries with them
Speaker 1: and the Cousin brothers. I mean, the they're they're they
Speaker 1: were so sloppy with their work and it's like these
Speaker 1: people are just what they're doing is they're clicking. They're
Speaker 1: getting the clicks. They're they're they're turning a profit off
Speaker 1: of that ad revenue and the donations for people who
Speaker 1: want to believe, and then that leads way to the
Speaker 1: secret space program stuff and all these other grifts that
Speaker 1: have have have been known. Like there's a reason that
Speaker 1: people laugh at the UFO community. There there's I mean,
Speaker 1: we haven't done a good job of I mean, there
Speaker 1: are great people in the field, Like there are great people,
Speaker 1: but there are so many fraudsters and and and people
Speaker 1: that are are are literally just trying to and and
Speaker 1: you know, get attention and uh tell you there's some
Speaker 1: sort of star seed from Alpha Centauri. It's it's crazy.
Speaker 1: And and then when the real stuff comes along and
Speaker 1: that That's what makes me think, like is it a
Speaker 1: sy op? Because I mean, yeah, it gets debunked or
Speaker 1: it gets lumped in with everything else, and you know,
Speaker 1: people laugh at it and they're like, oh yeah, okay, sure, sure, sure,
Speaker 1: you know, just just crazy Uncle Dave that Thanksgiving talking
Speaker 1: about There's.
Speaker 3: Been an icy effort to kind of manage the community
Speaker 3: ever since Keyho went on that interview and started naming names. Right, yes,
Speaker 3: so we're seven decades into into this. I would call
Speaker 3: the whole thing a sign because there was there was
Speaker 3: a concerted operation to manage the public perception of the
Speaker 3: topic through blue Book and and through that mechanism. What
Speaker 3: just happened. You're muted and you switch cameras. It's always
Speaker 3: a bundle of inventions here and disclosed what was I saying?
Speaker 3: I can't hear so Keyho? Right, So the cover up,
Speaker 3: the psychological cover up, started with Keyho in and making
Speaker 3: you concerned that because if you look at the timing
Speaker 3: of Keyho doing that, right after that is when all
Speaker 3: of these alien contact he started coming forward, like Fantassel
Speaker 3: and the Damski and all, so I almost see that stuff,
Speaker 3: so that there was a bifurcation in the past you
Speaker 3: had just euthology was just the thing. Then you've got
Speaker 3: this new age branch that is way more fantastical and
Speaker 3: attractive because it plays the people's faith like that, you know,
Speaker 3: and it played on White America's faith in the fifties
Speaker 3: and led people into you know, that that that primed people.
Speaker 3: Is that as it moved into like the sixties kind
Speaker 3: of counterculture era where it became cool and hip to
Speaker 3: question the man, and the idea of a government cover
Speaker 3: up was a lot, especially after JFK, was a lot
Speaker 3: easier to believe, even though I mean, even if, even
Speaker 3: though though that point we really had was like Betty
Speaker 3: and Bonnie Hill, you know, and I guess and I guess,
Speaker 3: you know, I guess Malmstroam happened and stuff. But we
Speaker 3: didn't hear about that until ninety five.
Speaker 1: So right, I mean Pathca Goula. I think the seventies
Speaker 1: were probably a really good time for But the seventies
Speaker 1: had a lot of abduction. Like the seventies, there was
Speaker 1: the I mean, there's a giant there. There's a giant
Speaker 1: data set from the seventies from from Isn't.
Speaker 3: It interesting how abduction stories massively increased after the introduction
Speaker 3: of psychedelics to the culture.
Speaker 1: It's that is actually pretty interesting. And I will say,
Speaker 1: as someone who has done psychedelics and I've done d MT,
Speaker 1: with DMT, like I literally shot out of the like
Speaker 1: let's call it the crown chakra, just so you know
Speaker 1: people can understand what I mean. Like, it literally felt
Speaker 1: like I shot out through the crown chakra of my
Speaker 1: of my head. Yeah, like Reed Richard's yeah, my galactus.
Speaker 1: And then all of a sudden, I'm in this this realm,
Speaker 1: and Carrie, I kid you, not this place whenever it
Speaker 1: was And again I am I am hard to like
Speaker 1: I have a very very tight grip on reality. I'm
Speaker 1: very very grounded. And even though I have had a
Speaker 1: UFO sighting and I did have something weird happened to
Speaker 1: me when my mom died, when when I was in
Speaker 1: the room with her, that has raised my bar so
Speaker 1: high because I know what I have seen that when
Speaker 1: I had this experience with d MT, I mean that
Speaker 1: felt the most real out of all of them. I
Speaker 1: went somewhere and and it was I'm color blind. There
Speaker 1: was colors I'd never seen before. Look, there was things
Speaker 1: that it just like fractals, and it felt like the
Speaker 1: universe was bent around me and I was able to
Speaker 1: walk on this like glass and like this glassy material.
Speaker 1: I only say that because I think it's a good representation.
Speaker 1: But it was like walking through you know, when you
Speaker 1: go through like like i'd say, like an aquarium and
Speaker 1: they have those tunnels where like the aquariums all around
Speaker 1: you and the fish are swimming all around you, and
Speaker 1: you walk through the tunnel and the fishes tanks it
Speaker 1: all around you. It felt like that. But picture of
Speaker 1: the universe is outside. I'm walking through the tunnel and
Speaker 1: at the end of the tunnel there's this thing, this being,
Speaker 1: and I know it's a being because it's standing upright
Speaker 1: and it's got this like hood thing on. And I
Speaker 1: get up to it. I look into its eyes. It
Speaker 1: had no eyes. I know, people say machine else I
Speaker 1: did not see that there was it was. It looked
Speaker 1: more like the grim fucking Reaper. It had no face,
Speaker 1: and but I knew in my head that it's it.
Speaker 1: It was thinking you should not be here right now.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't be here, And I got like, actually, like
Speaker 1: I got upset, and I was like, fuck you. I
Speaker 1: didn't I don't think I said fuck you to him,
Speaker 1: but I was like, who are you to tell me?
Speaker 1: Like where I can and can't be? And as soon
Speaker 1: as I took a step past him, boo, like like
Speaker 1: a sling shot, I slung back into my body and
Speaker 1: I for like three weeks, I was I just I
Speaker 1: couldn't stop thinking about it. It was all I could
Speaker 1: think about how real it was.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I got a couple I got a couple
Speaker 3: of thoughts about that. So that's that's a very interesting story,
Speaker 3: similar to the experience I had. So this is the
Speaker 3: feeling of the extra colors and stuff. Is it's like
Speaker 3: realer than real? Right? Yes, it was really So it's
Speaker 3: like it's yeah, it's like being in being in unreality
Speaker 3: where everything is just it's it's hard to put into words,
Speaker 3: but it's like you're getting all the sensory input at
Speaker 3: once and everything is real. Two. Uh, what you described
Speaker 3: is a non Euclidean space where it's wrapping, where it's
Speaker 3: like wrapping around you and your awareness is kind of
Speaker 3: folding through it because it's not do you know the
Speaker 3: difference between Euclidean and Nuclidean space, So god h And
Speaker 3: three that you shouldn't be here and standing as I
Speaker 3: think heimed all in in that like observing but gatekeeping
Speaker 3: the realm.
Speaker 1: So for anyone who doesn't now him, Noel is the
Speaker 1: for like Norse mythology. Uh is in the Marvel universe,
Speaker 1: more famous in the Marvel universe for watching over the
Speaker 1: Nine realms. And yeah, so basically, uh, yeah, it's a
Speaker 1: that's a very very good way to say that's a
Speaker 1: very good way to say it. That's pretty trippy actually, uh,
Speaker 1: because you know what, another question it raised for me
Speaker 1: was was I out of my body? Literally? And was
Speaker 1: it saying to me like, you shouldn't be out of
Speaker 1: your You're not occupying your body, you shouldn't be here,
Speaker 1: Like maybe is possession real? Did I leave my body
Speaker 1: and was my body for a moment susceptible to something
Speaker 1: else and coming in andhabiting it? And then when I
Speaker 1: came back, then I come back and I'm demon possessed, Like,
Speaker 1: you know, could there be a correlation there? I think?
Speaker 3: So, I don't know. I think we're going to have
Speaker 3: to do a few clearing sessions to find out if
Speaker 3: you are possessed or not.
Speaker 7: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's an interesting like, well that I'll
Speaker 7: be honest, that's what I took from it.
Speaker 3: That's like, did you feel your body went in this experience?
Speaker 3: Were you just a floating awareness.
Speaker 1: Or well, my body?
Speaker 3: So you have you have a physical avatar in this space.
Speaker 1: I had a physical avatar in the space that resembled
Speaker 1: I didn't have any mirrors there, but it resembled to
Speaker 1: the most degree my human body. But the feeling of
Speaker 1: snapping back into my body gave me the sense that
Speaker 1: maybe I wasn't. Maybe I my astral If they that
Speaker 1: you know your death experiences, the people that have those
Speaker 1: that talk about it a lot that it's kind of
Speaker 1: like that third person view. You leave your body and
Speaker 1: if we do that, is that our soul? And is
Speaker 1: is is that the power of the soul? And is
Speaker 1: the soul leaving the body? And now you know it
Speaker 1: is open as susceptible to darker forces that that I
Speaker 1: think are very real. If you don't think evil is real,
Speaker 1: then you're you're yeah.
Speaker 3: I mean evil is is a I think it's more
Speaker 3: of an energy signature in people. It's like a certain vibe. Yeah,
Speaker 3: the the the idea of you shouldn't be here. It's
Speaker 3: interesting because it's it raises questions like are they in
Speaker 3: some kind of brain cosmology where they're outside of conventional
Speaker 3: space time so they can kind of like an interstellar
Speaker 3: where they can see everywhere. Is it a case of
Speaker 3: you were you weren't in the right setting, so you
Speaker 3: hadn't you hadn't done it in the right way. Because
Speaker 3: it's got me thinking about I read Alien Information Theory
Speaker 3: by Andrew G. Animal and that talks about how we
Speaker 3: can look at d M T as a like a
Speaker 3: technology in that the by by taking it, it's basically
Speaker 3: creating like a dial up tone in your brain to
Speaker 3: be able to to It's creating like almost like a
Speaker 3: digital in if you look at it on a like
Speaker 3: a informational theory level, it's like allowing a data transfer
Speaker 3: to happen, right.
Speaker 1: Right, And yeah, I mean these substances, you know, I
Speaker 1: think I think they do unlock, you know, because and
Speaker 1: I think anyone can anyone who's done like you know, psilocybin,
Speaker 1: you know, if not synthetic psilocybe, but where you lose
Speaker 1: your mind and you know all that stuff. But you know,
Speaker 1: if you've ever eaten mushrooms are taken acid, so you know,
Speaker 1: I remember the first time I ever ever took psilocybin,
Speaker 1: and then you know when it when it wore off.
Speaker 1: The next day, I was sitting outside, you know, and
Speaker 1: the grass was kind of like swaying and the uh glow, yeah,
Speaker 1: the the the trees, you know, and I and I
Speaker 1: was looking at everything, and it was like I knew
Speaker 1: I had a different appreciation for what like the bee
Speaker 1: jumping from flower to flower everything, you know, all of
Speaker 1: a sudden I could see the the the ecosystem around me,
Speaker 1: for for the beauty that it is right right, and
Speaker 1: and for for for actually the very that what humans
Speaker 1: do is disrupt that natural ecosystem.
Speaker 3: And integra experience where so yeah, you'll know, looking at
Speaker 3: the system, you are part of the system. I had
Speaker 3: a similar thing. I actually had a very similar thing
Speaker 3: on mushrooms, probably about ten years ago, where I had
Speaker 3: to go walk my friend's dog before like we all
Speaker 3: came up proper. But as I'm walking the dog, I
Speaker 3: start to come up and I'm looking at a line
Speaker 3: of ants on the tree and like I just had
Speaker 3: this like it was like my consciousness had opened the door.
Speaker 3: And it wasn't like super trippy, but it was like
Speaker 3: the perceptual, like I think of it, like, you know,
Speaker 3: in the first episode of Futurama, Bender has been living
Speaker 3: in a little cupboard and him he's like, oh, you
Speaker 3: can stay here, you can have that corner, and then
Speaker 3: they lean on the button to the door and they've
Speaker 3: got a whole apartment behind it. That's what I feel
Speaker 3: psychedelics has done.
Speaker 1: That's a good that's a good visual.
Speaker 3: So it's definitely it was definitely some a moment where
Speaker 3: I just went ah into connectedness with everything, you know,
Speaker 3: and I carried that energy into the into the rest
Speaker 3: of the night. And actually, what's funny is that was
Speaker 3: the same place where I've spoken about this before. So
Speaker 3: I took acid and then I found Guya dot com.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, so that was it was at
Speaker 3: the same same house. It was like a year later
Speaker 3: across so well, it was more I'm more thinking of
Speaker 3: set and settings, so like it was, it was somewhere
Speaker 3: where I was already consciously comfortable tripping and I was
Speaker 3: around people I was comfortable tripping with, So to have
Speaker 3: that kind of come up and interconnected moment, it felt
Speaker 3: very natural because I was in a very comfortable space
Speaker 3: and I wonder if this gatekeeping of you shouldn't be
Speaker 3: here is because you you didn't and I don't. I mean,
Speaker 3: I don't know what the circumstances of your trip was,
Speaker 3: but whether it was did you do it in like
Speaker 3: a spiritual way or did you do it in a
Speaker 3: I'm getting fucked up with.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it does matter. It does because there, I've I've
Speaker 1: done d MT on multiple occasions, and yeah, you're onto
Speaker 1: something there because and there. I mean, there's a reason
Speaker 1: why when you take them Mark, Hey, I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you one last funny story before you move on.
Speaker 1: I I I when I first moved out of my
Speaker 1: my my parents house, I didn't go too far. I
Speaker 1: moved down the street into my friend's actually my best
Speaker 1: my brother's best friend his house. And they had a
Speaker 1: fucking pig. And I'm not talking about a teacup pig.
Speaker 1: They thought it was. And this thing was up. It
Speaker 1: became a fucking hog. I was. I. I was home
Speaker 1: alone one night and I was like, oh, dude, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna watch Supernatural. I'm gonna eat this tablet of acid
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna have a fucking great night. I was
Speaker 1: so pumped. I get home and it's I'm the only
Speaker 1: one there. It's just me and Piggy Smalls, And I
Speaker 1: took the tab of ass. Yeah that was the pig's name.
Speaker 1: Piggy Smalls shout out Keenan Parlan, you know it. So
Speaker 1: I take that. Yeah, but I take the acid. I
Speaker 1: start tripping, and you know how they say like like
Speaker 1: animals will know when you're high or something. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: I can unquestionably say that. I believe that wholeheartedly because
Speaker 1: as soon as I started tripping, this pig started charging me.
Speaker 1: When I'm like, charging it at me dead on, like
Speaker 1: I I was jumping to the top of the couch
Speaker 1: like this, and I'm like, what the fuck is going on?
Speaker 1: It turned into a demon and the thing just every
Speaker 1: time I tried to get to you know, get to
Speaker 1: the refrigerator, this thing would just.
Speaker 3: And what at me chatting?
Speaker 1: And I ended up. Dude, I was so freaked out,
Speaker 1: and I'll sit I came downstairs because I was like,
Speaker 1: fuck this, I'm going upstairs, and I remember you were
Speaker 1: we weren't supposed to smoke in the house, but I
Speaker 1: was smoking out the window because I didn't want to
Speaker 1: go down to see that fucking that hell pig and
Speaker 1: uh when I did go down, dude, this thing was
Speaker 1: eating a case of CDs. It was like chewing on glass,
Speaker 1: and I'm just like, what the fuck is going on?
Speaker 1: Like was the worst trip I've ever had in my life.
Speaker 1: So if you would do not do not take acid
Speaker 1: in a home with a pig, they'll do it. It's
Speaker 1: not fun.
Speaker 3: See, I thought I'd had a bad trip, but that's
Speaker 3: a pretty bad trip. Yeah, dude, it was so fake,
Speaker 3: the worst trip I ever had. It was like twenty
Speaker 3: twenty one for my birthday and me and some friends
Speaker 3: with some acid and we watched Tenant and it was like, yeah,
Speaker 3: this movie still doesn't make any sense. And now I'm
Speaker 3: just now I'm hot.
Speaker 1: No, I don't like I can't hear anyone's wrong.
Speaker 3: We turned it off like halfway through because we were
Speaker 3: just like, this is not a good time, man, this
Speaker 3: doesn't make any sense. Like the music's really loud and
Speaker 3: I just want to play. So we end up turning.
Speaker 3: We end up like going for going for a walk
Speaker 3: around like the nature Reserve to like get out of
Speaker 3: your tenant.
Speaker 1: Isn't it crazy? Though? How like you're with someone like
Speaker 1: when you're on mushrooms. Mushrooms more specific than acid mushrooms,
Speaker 1: Like you can feel other people's auras and you'll know
Speaker 1: if someone's like angry or upset, you'll tap into it
Speaker 1: and and like it will affect you. So that's why
Speaker 1: if you do take these kind of things, first off,
Speaker 1: you should you should have a very firm grasp on reality.
Speaker 1: You should be very comfortable in your own skin. You
Speaker 1: shouldn't if I mean, if you're borderline personality disorder, you
Speaker 1: probably shouldn't take acid, mushrooms, d empty or anything that
Speaker 1: will do something like that to you. It's a real
Speaker 1: problem and we've seen it. So that's my my PSA
Speaker 1: for the night. Guys. Yeah, so I.
Speaker 3: Want to say we have we have one story, but
Speaker 3: I know.
Speaker 1: We have we have one final story. But I also
Speaker 1: have a little banter that I think we could do
Speaker 1: at the end of the show. Let's jump into that
Speaker 1: last topic because I got a lot of shit to
Speaker 1: say about this.
Speaker 3: All right, So this final story is good. So we're
Speaker 3: gonna play the video. Now you've probably heard ourself. Yeah,
Speaker 3: so you've probably all heard about it. This the video
Speaker 3: that was played at the recent congressional hearing of a
Speaker 3: hell fire missile hitting an quote orb unquote, and the
Speaker 3: the orb apparently then splits into multiple orbs and then continues.
Speaker 3: So there's a lot of questions surrounding it. I think
Speaker 3: we should we should open it up and play the
Speaker 3: clip from Dr Rogers talking about it, because then I
Speaker 3: can get into the stuff that I found while looking
Speaker 3: into it. Because last night, so just to explain to
Speaker 3: the audience last night, when we were were kind of
Speaker 3: soft locking what we were gonna we're gonna cover today,
Speaker 3: Tyler brought up a very interesting point to me that
Speaker 3: heal fire missile is primarily an air to ground missile.
Speaker 3: It's not it's not an air to wear missile. And
Speaker 3: this got got a huge problem. This is because it's
Speaker 3: a problem, and they've got my brain going going, well,
Speaker 3: how what is that? Is that like a thing? Can
Speaker 3: they be used in air to it?
Speaker 6: Like?
Speaker 3: Are they misidentifying what kind of missile it was? So
Speaker 3: I went looking and we'll get to what I found
Speaker 3: after we play the clip from Dr Rogers. If you
Speaker 3: have that prepparized prepparized, that's not a word prepared.
Speaker 1: I think I can play it. I didn't clip that part, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: but I can look at it and I literally have
Speaker 1: it ready. You can. I record all my phone calls
Speaker 1: with him, and I want to see if it did
Speaker 1: you hear that?
Speaker 3: Yep, agreed, they wanted to test it.
Speaker 4: Gland missile, you don't fire and a moving object.
Speaker 5: Now, then if they have upgraded it and they wanted
Speaker 5: to test it, they would have a video, they would
Speaker 5: have a drone line and they would.
Speaker 4: Check to see if it would hit it. But so
Speaker 4: you can see everything. Well, you don't put an explosive
Speaker 4: in the war head and when it.
Speaker 5: Hits, it doesn't explode, It just bounces off. It bounces
Speaker 5: off and so you can see the help our missile
Speaker 5: going out of view to the lower right, and then
Speaker 5: it knocks the UAV you a the unmanned aerial vehicle.
Speaker 5: It knocks knocks it off its track. But then if
Speaker 5: it regains and they continue to follow it, to me,
Speaker 5: that is completely a test of a new weapon system.
Speaker 4: It is not defense of a maybe vessel.
Speaker 5: If the if the Navy vessel is really wanting to
Speaker 5: defend itself, air air missile.
Speaker 1: Can canna use one that it knows is going to
Speaker 1: do the job, not something.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you're not going to use an air to ground missile,
Speaker 5: uh to do this. It was experimental, so m yeah,
Speaker 5: if they were going to take out a take. Now,
Speaker 5: remember it was released in an unauthorized fashion so they
Speaker 5: could make it look like it was an actual attack
Speaker 5: that was being warned off. The Navy doesn't even have
Speaker 5: to deny it because it wasn't officially released, right, I.
Speaker 1: Don't even have to acknowledge it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, so they don't have to say, oh, that was
Speaker 5: test footage. They don't have to say anything because they
Speaker 5: didn't atalize it to be released, and so it was
Speaker 5: leaked by someone just just just to make.
Speaker 4: It look good. You know that hearing was a dog
Speaker 4: and pony show, as we've been come ed in the military.
Speaker 1: All Right, all right, all right.
Speaker 3: All right, all right right.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to let you see what I said
Speaker 1: after that. That's part is private. But essentially what he
Speaker 1: is saying, and he raises a very very good point,
Speaker 1: and I think I missed it that part of it.
Speaker 1: But what he says in the beginning is because I
Speaker 1: asked him, I go, all right, hey, remember when we
Speaker 1: had those shootdowns like of the Chinese by balloon and
Speaker 1: like the UN that all those things. I was like,
Speaker 1: what missiles did they use because those were air to air,
Speaker 1: and he goes, yes, they use sidewinder missiles, and we
Speaker 1: have a clip of them shooting. They actually missed the
Speaker 1: first time, and then they hit the Chinese Spie balloon
Speaker 1: the second time with a sidewinder. And if this was
Speaker 1: a real scenario and a real defense of their craft,
Speaker 1: they would not have been using a hellfire missile, which
Speaker 1: is an air to ground. So you know that that's
Speaker 1: meant for like, you know, if you want to take
Speaker 1: out a bridge, you know, and if you're at warring
Speaker 1: and you need to take out a bridge or a
Speaker 1: complex or a target, a target that isn't really moving right,
Speaker 1: It's that's not what that missile is designed for. It's
Speaker 1: it's designed more or less for air to ground, where
Speaker 1: the sidewinder is air to air. So again, if this
Speaker 1: was a real scenario of defensive measures, then they would
Speaker 1: not be taking a chance by using a hellfire missile.
Speaker 1: And you see it bounce right off.
Speaker 3: So I'm gonna push back on that notion that that
Speaker 3: is not a thing. So when you brought this up
Speaker 3: to me last night, I sat there and thought, that's
Speaker 3: actually a very good point. Why are they using an
Speaker 3: air to ground missile to strike something in the air.
Speaker 3: Is this something that has happened before? And the answer
Speaker 3: is yes, it's happened three times in twenty six years.
Speaker 3: Two times was Israel. And we're going to take a look.
Speaker 3: So where is it? Which So here is an article
Speaker 3: from May of two thousand and one, So Israel shut
Speaker 3: down a Lebanese civilian plane, a Cessna one fifty two,
Speaker 3: for flying towards Israel. Bear in mind this was this
Speaker 3: is pre nine eleven, so that's that's an interesting thing
Speaker 3: to note. This is pre nine eleven. Israel shot down
Speaker 3: a plane for entering into restricted airspace. They used a
Speaker 3: health fire missile to do this, which is is is
Speaker 3: It's interesting and it could just be a you know,
Speaker 3: that's what they had on on what you know, on
Speaker 3: the on the jet or the helicopter. I think it's
Speaker 3: a helicopter. But it proves that you can you can
Speaker 3: laser designate this a stense of being an underground missile,
Speaker 3: and you can laser designate and hit something in the air.
Speaker 3: So I continued looking and I found one other instance
Speaker 3: of it happening and that we actually we have the video.
Speaker 3: We have the video of it. I actually have. We
Speaker 3: have we have video of a health fire missile being
Speaker 3: fired at a drug so moving. You need to unmute yourself.
Speaker 1: Oh I wasn't talking.
Speaker 3: Oh it cut you off midsense.
Speaker 1: Speaking. Wow, detonates. Sorry, but you see how how on
Speaker 1: impact it detonates immediately.
Speaker 3: Well, this is what I'm going to get to you.
Speaker 3: So that's striking something hot. Whereas I I from what
Speaker 3: I what I think the so what I think.
Speaker 1: That that was just what we just watched that last
Speaker 1: scenario that was air to ground.
Speaker 3: With this it keeps muting every time I play the video.
Speaker 1: The last thing that it showed looked like it was.
Speaker 1: So this right here is very much air to air.
Speaker 1: These these these these are very much so you have
Speaker 1: permission to gauge the target. Look at that fucking explosion.
Speaker 3: So and then you see it. You see all the
Speaker 3: debris falling down, You see the draining banking away.
Speaker 1: So another air air to air. This is air to
Speaker 1: ground though.
Speaker 3: Right here, I'm guessing that I mean that was that.
Speaker 1: It's a good visual to see what.
Speaker 3: Again, what an antaground strike looks like russoks like, yes,
Speaker 3: And I found that very interesting that, like, it is
Speaker 3: interesting that they used a health fire missile to destroy
Speaker 3: or attempt to destroy whatever this thing is in the
Speaker 3: video from Congress.
Speaker 1: And I want to preface all of this. Everyone knows
Speaker 1: that Burleson is a good friend of mine. I am
Speaker 1: not here to say that he's trying to show us
Speaker 1: things that aren't true. I'm saying that I think that
Speaker 1: that these videos are being brought to.
Speaker 3: Them and political purpose.
Speaker 1: Yes, so I am a huge fan of Burleson and
Speaker 1: what he's doing. I really am. He's a great guy.
Speaker 1: Do I think that dog do I think the hearing
Speaker 1: was a dog and pony show like Greg does. No.
Speaker 1: I think Greg's a little salty. If I'm being honest,
Speaker 1: I think he's salty that he didn't get called to testify.
Speaker 1: But I mean that's not neither here nor there. And
Speaker 1: like I said, I'm I will say these kind of
Speaker 1: things about and Greg's like a family to me and
Speaker 1: I and.
Speaker 3: That's what I Then it's like, what are we doing right?
Speaker 3: You have to play the politic game or I don't
Speaker 3: want to offend this person in this person.
Speaker 1: But he does say this, He does say this about
Speaker 1: this on this video that we're about to watch the
Speaker 1: congressional video. He said that again. And even if so if,
Speaker 1: even if it is a hellfire missile and it's being
Speaker 1: shot air to air, it doesn't impact. I mean it doesn't.
Speaker 1: There's no kinetic engagement with like there's no explosion, and
Speaker 1: that is not indicative of a hellfire missile and what
Speaker 1: it does. So this is needing him to believe that
Speaker 1: this was a test of some sort that they did
Speaker 1: not actually put a charge inside of it, because on
Speaker 1: impact it should have detonated if it was a hell
Speaker 1: fire what.
Speaker 3: It depends what it's hitting. So this is this is
Speaker 3: where it gets into how does a hellfire missile does
Speaker 3: a NAT's target and know what it's aiming for and
Speaker 3: it's primarily a laser target. Now I'm going to pose
Speaker 3: this question all the people that think that this missile
Speaker 3: was fired at some kind of UAP ORB anomalous thing,
Speaker 3: tell me how an orb How you can get a
Speaker 3: laser designation off of something that is not reflecting in
Speaker 3: a way that's normal, That doesn't you know, it's not
Speaker 3: a reflective surface. It generally this and this gets into
Speaker 3: what I was saying earlier about like what we think
Speaker 3: of as an orb and what's a light? Now you're muted, So.
Speaker 1: I said, oh, that's why you brought that up. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what is an orb?
Speaker 3: Yeah, because it's.
Speaker 1: So that that does raise a good question.
Speaker 3: So how if they are able to laser designate a
Speaker 3: hell fire missile onto this object, then it is definitely
Speaker 3: man made because you need a reflective surface to be
Speaker 3: and something that's actually in a way that isn't bending.
Speaker 3: You know, it's not like a torsion field. It's not
Speaker 3: like some kind of em drive that's going to bend
Speaker 3: the laser designate.
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm gonna yeah, but I'm gonna disagree with you
Speaker 1: because let's say that these crafts can become physical.
Speaker 3: That that but not reflected in the visual that we
Speaker 3: have instead of it just looking like an amorphous block like,
Speaker 3: because the way it looks is it is it. It
Speaker 3: changes shape upon impact and kind of rolls away. Now,
Speaker 3: if that's some kind of anomalous em bubble or something,
Speaker 3: you can't get a laser designate of that. So my question,
Speaker 3: my personal theory is that it was a balloon, a
Speaker 3: ray kind of like the Chinese Yukon balloon. Probably a
Speaker 3: different kind of setup. But the reason it doesn't detonate
Speaker 3: is because it's literally it's ripping through a canvas. It's
Speaker 3: going so fast that it doesn't even it doesn't even
Speaker 3: like know it's impacted something because it's like can thin
Speaker 3: canvas traveler is traveling so fast, and then you've got
Speaker 3: the parallax, so that here's the other thing. The reason
Speaker 3: it looks like it's moving is parallax from the drone.
Speaker 3: So like as the drone is flying and it's moving,
Speaker 3: it's banking around this object that's now falling. The parallax
Speaker 3: between the camera and the falling motion of whatever this
Speaker 3: thing that just got hit the missile makes it look
Speaker 3: like it's translating forward, but it's not. It's just it
Speaker 3: might be forward, but I think it's it's more of
Speaker 3: a parallax issue and that the missile just went straight
Speaker 3: through the balloon, because you even see the missile kind
Speaker 3: of changes directory directions slightly after coming out of the
Speaker 3: other side of the balloon, like it's kind of off
Speaker 3: to the side, And I'm thinking, oh, is that just
Speaker 3: is that just an effect of like impacting this canvas
Speaker 3: where the warhead's not having enough pressure on the air
Speaker 3: like it's hit a hard surface to detonate, Like is
Speaker 3: this missile program to detonate upon reaching like a zero
Speaker 3: point on the laser designate or on is it like
Speaker 3: something that's impact based on the actual cone of the missile.
Speaker 3: So it hit something physical to explode.
Speaker 1: Okay, well, actually I think we.
Speaker 3: Have enough information about that to know. Like and like
Speaker 3: doctor Rogers said, it could have been a non explosive
Speaker 3: warhead and that could be why it didn't explode, but
Speaker 3: it definitely hit a balloon in my opinion.
Speaker 1: Donni raises a good point here. So he Corbell in
Speaker 1: a Weaponized episode made the comment that he has seen it.
Speaker 1: And again, you know if this is you know, if
Speaker 1: you are believe, if you believe what Corbell is saying.
Speaker 1: And now I think Map said he also saw it.
Speaker 1: That there's five more minutes of this orb or whatever
Speaker 1: what this target, let's just call it. This target continues
Speaker 1: flying for like five more minutes and does not go
Speaker 1: into the ocean like we're being told by some of
Speaker 1: the debunkers like Mick West and you know, even Greg
Speaker 1: for that matter. And so what do you say to that?
Speaker 1: Do you just say that speculation?
Speaker 3: Show it, show it to me, like I am not
Speaker 3: going to blindly trust these people primarily because of the
Speaker 3: because of the support of bobblers up. If if I'm
Speaker 3: going to be brutally honest, it's because of the propping
Speaker 3: up of Bobblazar in terms of making that the Bobblazar
Speaker 3: documentary that Corbell made it willfully ignored a lot of
Speaker 3: problems in Bob's story and only propped up the proof,
Speaker 3: but then ignored all of the actual other stuff that
Speaker 3: makes it questionable, like Stanton Friedman that the was the pimp,
Speaker 3: the pimping execution and stuff. So it by ignoring those things, Uh,
Speaker 3: it's created a massive area of doubt for me with
Speaker 3: these people. And you know, I've met I've met them,
Speaker 3: I've met Jeremy, I've met George, not like deeply. I
Speaker 3: met them at Contact in the desert. It was very fleeting.
Speaker 3: But yeah, they strike They strike me as people who
Speaker 3: this is their career. They've decided to build somewhat of
Speaker 3: a mythology around the stories that they're covering to create
Speaker 3: prestige for themselves, and that's how they get into Congress
Speaker 3: to testify and all this stuff, because they've created a
Speaker 3: prestige for themselves.
Speaker 1: But oh, God, there's so much I want to say
Speaker 1: that I don't.
Speaker 3: I know, the feeling like I could go on a
Speaker 3: I could go on a spicy rant. I'm not going to.
Speaker 3: It's okay, but I think we can agree that wilfully
Speaker 3: ignoring negative aspects of Bobb Lazar's story has harmed Corbelle
Speaker 3: in the long run.
Speaker 1: All right, well, what do you think about the fact
Speaker 1: that bizarre Okay, I'm I and I'm genuinely asking this bizarre.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's not He hasn't written a book. He
Speaker 1: hasn't done that things like other people in UFO world
Speaker 1: that they always do, there's always a book. I mean,
Speaker 1: he hasn't even really, I.
Speaker 3: Mean, isn't like there was a there was ant a
Speaker 3: biography that came out that he was like heavily involved
Speaker 3: in that came from the publishing company.
Speaker 1: Right, he has not made money, apparently according to him
Speaker 1: and according to a lot of people. Now, well, I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 3: Very mind is this is a guy that in nineteen
Speaker 3: ninety six was supposed to interview with Nippon TV and
Speaker 3: he absolutely was so weird to them and then ghosted them.
Speaker 3: So like he has a pattern for a long time
Speaker 3: of having he is a weird guy, and that is
Speaker 3: the fact that he's a weird guy. I don't think
Speaker 3: we should be holding him to the standard of like,
Speaker 3: oh like of like a normal person in this situation
Speaker 3: because he is demonstratably very weird and he also put
Speaker 3: he is a very smart dude.
Speaker 1: But he can also put jets on a car, and
Speaker 1: he can also do these things.
Speaker 3: A car is not a UFO witness make you.
Speaker 1: Know, okay, but this is you don't now hear me
Speaker 1: out on this again. This is I like wherever I listen.
Speaker 1: I like that we disagree, me too.
Speaker 3: I mean I frequal dialogue, and I like that the
Speaker 3: people get to see us have this kind of dialogue.
Speaker 1: Do I believe one hundred percent that Boblezar is and
Speaker 1: did everything he said he does or had did has done. No.
Speaker 1: I do not. However, you don't think that there is
Speaker 1: any or or you don't think that you don't This
Speaker 1: is the perfect guy. This is a guy if if
Speaker 1: you need it to discredit him, right, and you needed
Speaker 1: him to to to you needed someone who thought outside
Speaker 1: of the normal box, right, and you also needed him
Speaker 1: to be kind of like all right, just in case
Speaker 1: we need to be able to throw this guy under
Speaker 1: the bus, because he's only gonna be here temporarily. We
Speaker 1: just need him to do this one thing, to crack
Speaker 1: this one little piece, and then you know, we'll go
Speaker 1: on like we don't know the whole story. And I
Speaker 1: think it's very plausible that after his article in after
Speaker 1: the article in that Sandy Nash or or whatever, that
Speaker 1: that story is. I can't quote it verbatim, but he's
Speaker 1: on the front page, you know, and he and he
Speaker 1: builds a jet car and also yeah, yeah, those alamos
Speaker 1: and that he was in fact, Now he might not.
Speaker 1: Maybe he did embellish his his school history. Maybe he did, right,
Speaker 1: but I don't think that that is also indicted. But yeah,
Speaker 1: I could go on.
Speaker 3: To give balance to the other side. The one thing
Speaker 3: with bobb Leazar's story this always kept me, giving me
Speaker 3: like one percent space in my brain that he knew
Speaker 3: something is the fact he was able to take ye,
Speaker 3: take gene Haaf from people out into the desert and
Speaker 3: know when these test flights are going to take place
Speaker 3: and then and film them. That is interesting, like it is,
Speaker 3: but it's not impossible that someone could have told him.
Speaker 3: It's not impossible that this information could have come from
Speaker 3: somewhere else, and he's, oh, guys, yeah, I mean it
Speaker 3: could have come from John let It could mean he
Speaker 3: could have found out like what the flight times for
Speaker 3: Gianet Airlines work, and then extrapolated out that, oh there's
Speaker 3: a gap in the flights. Maybe they're doing test flights
Speaker 3: at that time, and then he goes out sees it
Speaker 3: and then goes hey, Bob, and then Bob tears, Oh,
Speaker 3: you know, I'll take people out there. There is there's
Speaker 3: a lot that we don't know.
Speaker 1: There is. There is a guy that does say that
Speaker 1: he saw Bob on the Janet air Airline flights. In however,
Speaker 1: I think it could be that there's a lot of
Speaker 1: room and and and there. I mean, memory is fallible,
Speaker 1: it's it's definitely not perfect. So you know, could he
Speaker 1: could it have been look because Bob does kind of
Speaker 1: look like not not classic science, but you know the
Speaker 1: big glasses. They could that looked like him. Maybe, But
Speaker 1: there are I mean there there or it could be
Speaker 1: someone like the Cordy Good situation where they're they're trying
Speaker 1: to get in on the lie too right in situation.
Speaker 3: Was actually on Janet flights or is this someone just
Speaker 3: saying this.
Speaker 1: Was confirmed.
Speaker 3: This was a bona fide employee of the d O
Speaker 3: D or a gen G like who did they work for?
Speaker 1: Yeah, something, It was one of the two that was
Speaker 1: he was a contractor, former military you know, uh, and
Speaker 1: and was verified to some degree. You know, we'll put
Speaker 1: a pin in this one.
Speaker 3: Put this one. It's one of those timeless stories that
Speaker 3: you can always come back to and have a discussion
Speaker 3: about because there's a lot of facets that are just fascinating.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, No, And I find there's a movie coming
Speaker 1: out called S four The Bobbles Our Story, And I
Speaker 1: got to meet the director at Contact and like they
Speaker 1: were putting us they they they recreated like the hangar
Speaker 1: and stuff, and I mean it's pretty remarkable. So I
Speaker 1: have a feeling that Bob's are that story is we'll
Speaker 1: be talking about it will.
Speaker 3: Be coming back. He's a little side side note. I
Speaker 3: know we're over two hours now, so we need to
Speaker 3: wrap up soon. But there's a side note that there
Speaker 3: was a famous director at that recent Congress hearing called
Speaker 3: Colin Trevoro. You may know him from doing that, you
Speaker 3: know Colin so so yeah, if you actually look, he's
Speaker 3: actually he's sat behind them. He is working on a
Speaker 3: Bobble's art movie right now, and he.
Speaker 1: Was, Oh, that's right, Oh my god, that's right.
Speaker 3: Pretty cool. Interesting, interesting, Bob is our story is not
Speaker 3: going away. I think that I'm hoping now, you know,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna put this out into the universe. I'm hoping
Speaker 3: that Colin Trevoro represents the story honestly. In Bob's relationships
Speaker 3: with his ex wife wife being the murder case and
Speaker 3: the pimp charge, there is a very weird all. All
Speaker 3: of these things need to be told truthfully in a
Speaker 3: story about his life. If you ignore them, then you
Speaker 3: are doing the same disservice to yourself that Jeremy Corbell
Speaker 3: did to his career by ignoring this stuff. And I
Speaker 3: know Jeremy Corbell is gonna sit there and go, well,
Speaker 3: I don't care. I've got this this real estate stuff,
Speaker 3: and I got all the documentary money and the next
Speaker 3: time money. Well, in in terms of credibility, it's kind
Speaker 3: of shocked because he won't engage on these issues.
Speaker 1: So WHOA, all right, optics here, let's let's spin this
Speaker 1: Corbell That movie gets him on Rogan's radar. Not to
Speaker 1: mention that he did the MMA and like him and
Speaker 1: his wife had this. So I've looked into Corbell hard
Speaker 1: and I've had my issues with Corbell.
Speaker 3: The quantum jiu jitsu, quantum.
Speaker 1: Jiu jitsu that he was doing and all that, and
Speaker 1: it's almost like the Coltart story where he kind of
Speaker 1: finds himself without a job and without a direction and
Speaker 1: it seems like, you know that the UFO all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, Then Corbell picked up a camera and spent
Speaker 1: a month with John Lear, of all people, and then
Speaker 1: was introduced to Bob Bazaar and then made the movie
Speaker 1: with Bob Bazaar. So he actually got his introduction to
Speaker 1: the topic was because he got a camera and then
Speaker 1: went to John Lear, whose dad created the Lear Jet,
Speaker 1: and you know John flew for the CIA, and you know,
Speaker 1: was very very smart.
Speaker 3: He used his own tagline. He he but now he's
Speaker 3: also his career and said, I'm going to take my
Speaker 3: curiosity and I'm going to weaponize it.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's for being And.
Speaker 3: That's literally, like he tells you at the beginning of every.
Speaker 1: Movie, what's that's why his show is weaponized? Yes, that's
Speaker 1: literally that's like there, that's like there is.
Speaker 3: How he literally got started was he was curious about
Speaker 3: this stuff, so we picked up a camera came I
Speaker 3: have no problem with that because like, that's that's how
Speaker 3: it works for a lot of people. That's why I
Speaker 3: started doing video editing, because I wanted to weaponize It's
Speaker 3: kind of like weaponized autism in a way, like you're
Speaker 3: weaponizing this special Maybe do you not get that reference? No? No,
Speaker 3: I get I get it. I mean next week I
Speaker 3: might turn up and I might be drooling everywhere because
Speaker 3: I'm gonna take a little more.
Speaker 1: But my girlfriend was like, uh, when she says something
Speaker 1: actually pretty hilarious, She's like, hey, so, uh, you know
Speaker 1: I think tyan PM, So does that mean I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna be autistic at night? And I kissed myself dude,
Speaker 1: it was so bunny.
Speaker 3: So who do you think having a weird a week?
Speaker 3: Jimmy Kimmel or the CEO of Tayler.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I will say this just because it's not the
Speaker 1: topic list this week. So we are not going to
Speaker 1: pigeonholed ourselves and put it ourselves into a quarter with
Speaker 1: this show and only talk about UFOs and the paranormal.
Speaker 1: So expect you to have a range of topics.
Speaker 3: Yes, we are going to branch we thought for the
Speaker 3: first episode because it's it's primarily a UFO based show,
Speaker 3: we would start with a UFO episode, but we will
Speaker 3: be branching out. There's plenty of things to talk about.
Speaker 3: I can talk about my weather work, I can talk
Speaker 3: about secret space people, we can talk about science, and
Speaker 3: can talk about politics. Is a whole universe up there
Speaker 3: for us to talk about and disagree on.
Speaker 1: So yeah, absolutely, I want to.
Speaker 3: I want to take this moment to thank everybody for watching.
Speaker 3: I know we've gone. We've gone way longer than we
Speaker 3: and we plan to. So let's wrap this up cohesively.
Speaker 3: Where can people mine?
Speaker 6: Is you?
Speaker 3: Tyler?
Speaker 1: Wait, we're gonna watch that hellfire missile we did?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: Can you show it to me one more time?
Speaker 3: I'll show you one more time.
Speaker 1: All right, let's see it.
Speaker 3: Muted you again because I started playing a video.
Speaker 1: The congressional one.
Speaker 3: Oh, the congressional one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we never actually all right, So here it is, guys.
Speaker 1: So this is the.
Speaker 3: I played it. I played it while Dr Rogers was talking.
Speaker 1: Oh that's why I didn't see it. Well, So what
Speaker 1: I want you to pause it at a moment.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure if there is a pause thing on
Speaker 3: an uploaded video, Yeah there is, boom.
Speaker 1: What are those three things, those three things tailing behind
Speaker 1: it that I don't know if you saw Marion Vaughan,
Speaker 1: Renning Camps.
Speaker 3: Mark Marek Vaughn.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sorry, I always mess his name up. Apologize.
Speaker 1: He's actually coming on the show soon as a podcast guest,
Speaker 1: and so he when you do a close up the
Speaker 1: three things that broke off of it, they they are
Speaker 1: the exact same shape as the object, just smaller, and
Speaker 1: each one you could essentially overlay on each other and
Speaker 1: they're the same size, same dimension. So I will say
Speaker 1: that is a little weird. But you know, again, is
Speaker 1: it is it out of the realm of possibilities that
Speaker 1: it's totally prosaic? I don't. I would say again.
Speaker 3: I think it's part of the bracket. So you've got
Speaker 3: the balloon and you've got the cables coming down to
Speaker 3: whatever the array is, like the sensor array or whatever,
Speaker 3: and then at the end of the wires you've got
Speaker 3: a bunch of brackets and stuff that connect it. I mean,
Speaker 3: I'm I'm assuming here, but like this is what feels
Speaker 3: logical to me is that you the missile impacts the loon,
Speaker 3: balloon starts falling, cables are trailing behind it with parts
Speaker 3: of the array flapping behind it. Fair enough, fair enough,
Speaker 3: because I think the kinetic energy of that missile hitting
Speaker 3: the balloon, I think would probably share the cables off
Speaker 3: of whatever the sensor arrays. So that's that's just my
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm open to being wrong. I'm open to
Speaker 3: being proved wrong on that, but that's logically what makes
Speaker 3: sense in my head.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So I also want to I want to say
Speaker 1: this if if you have a topic that you'd like
Speaker 1: us to cover next Thursday or Thursday after that, or
Speaker 1: or in any show, email me uh at my email
Speaker 1: is in the description if you want to share your email,
Speaker 1: but if you want to eventually want to work it out. So,
Speaker 1: if you guys want to submit a topic you think
Speaker 1: that would be.
Speaker 3: Fun to submit in the comments were submitted.
Speaker 1: In the comments, but give us a give us a
Speaker 1: heads up somehow, whether it's through Twitter or email my
Speaker 1: emails in the description below. We'll definitely obviously consider the
Speaker 1: topic if it fits. You know what we're doing, and
Speaker 1: you know if if if it is from a member
Speaker 1: or something, we will highly consider it. So if you
Speaker 1: want to get early access, gain clearance, get read in
Speaker 1: to the program by becoming a member. Only help support
Speaker 1: the show by you know, sending super chats, donations all that.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: Tonight was our inaugural episode. I it went really well.
Speaker 1: I had a fun time. I can't wait to keep
Speaker 1: doing this again. I did. I did stream on X tonight.
Speaker 1: I don't think we're gonna be doing that regularly. It'll
Speaker 1: be YouTube and rumble, but I do want to, you know,
Speaker 1: introduce people to the show. So we'll be here every
Speaker 1: single Thursday, every single Thursday, heads forth. Yeah, I'm here, baby,
Speaker 1: I'm here. I bought the studio for a reason. Man,
Speaker 1: we got to start, you know, I gotta start doing
Speaker 1: something with it. So, I mean we do. We're doing
Speaker 1: great stuff. Other other stuff too with the podcast.
Speaker 3: Exciting interviews coming up if you're watching, we do just
Speaker 3: we released yesterday and edit with Dr Greg Rogers, next
Speaker 3: NASA Chief of Medical.
Speaker 1: Chief of Aerospace Medicine, and he was a chief sturgeon
Speaker 1: for the US Air Force.
Speaker 3: So I highly advise you go check that out. I did. Uh.
Speaker 3: I did some pretty cool editing. Uh so that you
Speaker 3: remember the pictures of Roswell. Yeah, now it's a video
Speaker 3: what oh oh yeah that was that was.
Speaker 1: The Immersive Scouts. When you first showed that to me,
Speaker 1: I was like, whoa, you can't you here? So for
Speaker 1: anyone who hasn't seen it, go watch that video. There's
Speaker 1: a cutaway that you that Carrie put in there where
Speaker 1: he kind of brings the the what's his name by
Speaker 1: my blanking mac No, no, no, not Mac Brazil uh
Speaker 1: uh yeah, Major Jesse Marcel, who is part of the
Speaker 1: five and ninth uh atomic only the only atomic squadron
Speaker 1: in the world at the time happens to be in
Speaker 1: the place where it's supposed to do a foe crash
Speaker 1: or allegedly crashed. I do again. I'm a big proponent
Speaker 1: of that nuclear that nuclear connection.
Speaker 5: Baby.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That picture when that guy I kind of brought
Speaker 1: to life. I mean technology is truly crazy. Uh you
Speaker 1: can find me Yeah, you could find me hiding in
Speaker 1: the corner pretty soon at some of these videos because
Speaker 1: you know what really scary and and maybe we should
Speaker 1: bring a we should talk about AI sometime soon because
Speaker 1: I mean lockeyed, right, they just unveiled their their their
Speaker 1: newest thing. It's unmanned and they're I mean, dude, pilots
Speaker 1: are going to get phased out soon.
Speaker 3: Right, just like just like the driver that was That
Speaker 3: was the story that got cut from this week, and
Speaker 3: it did get cut this week. It's number one on
Speaker 3: the sheet the next week. I want to dig in
Speaker 3: a little deeper and find out about this. It is
Speaker 3: called the vectus vectis drone. Yes, yeah, so I want
Speaker 3: to dig in a little deeper onto like the what
Speaker 3: information is available about the development of it, And there's
Speaker 3: probably not a lot because it skunk works.
Speaker 1: But here's the here's the thing.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 1: Again, don't Borland actually said it in the Weaponized Interview,
Speaker 1: like the drone program had the most suicides because it's
Speaker 1: like you're you're with a controller, right, and like you're
Speaker 1: flying these and the reaper drones and you're just you know,
Speaker 1: you get the authorization to engage kinetically, and you know,
Speaker 1: you know that you told them that there are civilians there,
Speaker 1: and there is such thing as an acceptable civilian casualty rate.
Speaker 1: As fucking terrible as that sounds, that is the way
Speaker 1: our military industrial complex and operates for quote unquote national security.
Speaker 1: You know, there is a casualty rate that they are
Speaker 1: willing to accept in order to subdue the bad guy.
Speaker 1: And when you pull that trigger as a drone operator,
Speaker 1: like I mean, it's it's different than like your in
Speaker 1: combat and that guy shooting at you and you're at
Speaker 1: him and it's either you or him, right in this case, Yes,
Speaker 1: And there is a large problem with AI and what
Speaker 1: it's going to do to us. It is going to
Speaker 1: dehumanize these kinds of things. And you know, now this
Speaker 1: ties into the Jimmy Kimmel thing and the Charlie Kirk
Speaker 1: thing and every goddamn shooting that continues to riddle the
Speaker 1: United States. It is beyond me that we have become
Speaker 1: so normalized to people walking into schools, churches, and other gatherings.
Speaker 1: I will not go. I will never ever go to
Speaker 1: another New Year's ball drop event. I will never go
Speaker 1: to another open field like celebration. I just do not
Speaker 1: feel comfortable in crowds these days. We are becoming so
Speaker 1: so divided by the media, and it is sickening what
Speaker 1: is happening When Jimmy Kimmel becomes the picture of free speech.
Speaker 1: We have a fucking problem. We have a fucking problem.
Speaker 3: For Tiler twenty eight, Yeah, well, I think you know,
Speaker 3: I am going to be able to voice some of
Speaker 3: my concerns here and I am going to like this.
Speaker 1: Charlie kirk on everything. Absolutely not, but we'll get We'll
Speaker 1: get this. You can find me disclosure.
Speaker 3: That'll be cool.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I would like to do that. Disclosure pod on Twitter, YouTube,
Speaker 1: total disclosure on all post guts, all podcast platforms. Like
Speaker 1: I said, make sure live share, subscribe if you can
Speaker 1: help support the channel monetarily. I'm also covering the Moufon
Speaker 1: Symposium on October fifth. I will also be speaking at
Speaker 1: the Moufon Symposium from Massachusetts. Jean stickos in the comments
Speaker 1: right now, it's it's a it's an event that he's
Speaker 1: helping put On and Jim. Our other friend is the
Speaker 1: Mouffon guy from Moufon. I mean, I'm Massachusetts, so as
Speaker 1: a as a favorite of them. I'm going to be
Speaker 1: covering that that October fifth, which is a Sunday. So
Speaker 1: fun stuff coming up. We just dropped down episode doctor
Speaker 1: Greg Rogers, the NASA Chief of Airspace Medicine, who was
Speaker 1: shown a UFO in a hangar somewhere keep at least
Speaker 1: in the vicinity of Cape Canaveral or whatever in ninety
Speaker 1: ninety two, a year before I was born, actually, which
Speaker 1: is weird. And that's also the year Sallas came out. Anyway, No,
Speaker 1: it's ninety two.
Speaker 3: Agree to disagree?
Speaker 1: Would you be disagree? Fat? Okay? Yeah, my name's ty Robberts.
Speaker 1: Baby's Carrie. Where can they find you?
Speaker 3: But you can find me on the internet. You can
Speaker 3: find me at Twitter on Twitter Pires of Truth. You
Speaker 3: can find me in various discords. I'm in the truth
Speaker 3: Seekers Discord and the Hidden Plane Sight.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, go check out True Seekers.
Speaker 3: And yeah, go check out Why So it's the The
Speaker 3: other show I work on is called truth Seekers. I've
Speaker 3: been a graphic artist and video editor for that show,
Speaker 3: and I guess the producer, like on and off, I
Speaker 3: don't produce all everything he does. I just want to
Speaker 3: make that abundantly clear to the internet. I don't control
Speaker 3: what Darcy says, does dunne, I don't control what Steven
Speaker 3: does anyway.
Speaker 1: Okay, So anyway, Gods.
Speaker 3: Thank you for watching. I'm gonna leave now, I'm just
Speaker 3: gonna leave.
Speaker 1: Put your head in the fucking bye. But pretend everyone
Speaker 1: didn't just hear that. No, I'm just kidding. He didn't
Speaker 1: mean it. He works with Darcy.
Speaker 3: On the brain.
Speaker 8: Yeah, like an idiot, just fools a pot half hours.
Speaker 8: My brain is fried, so.
Speaker 1: I know it's all. He's in the UK too, so
Speaker 1: it's like eleven thirty am two am. Oh god, he's
Speaker 1: doing me a very big fat yes. Thank you everyone.
Speaker 1: That was truly, truly, truly fun Again. We're gonna be
Speaker 1: building out the show again and we'll fine tune it
Speaker 1: and you know, get more graphics and we're gonna have
Speaker 1: fun with this. So all right, you will catch you
Speaker 1: next time. Love you. Thet ever entertaining entity undergasting people.
Speaker 8: That's actual
Podbean