Pt. 1: 29 Palms Military Base MASS UFO. "A Debate" feat. Ret. Veteran Grider & Arthur Preston
- **NOTE** This EPISODE IS BEST WATCHED: AS VIDEO EVIDENCE IS SUBMITED, As well as Documents, and research. Its been Split Into 2 Parts, As it was a 4 Hour Debate.
(GUEST/Debater Socials)
Arthur Preston: https://x.com/XExcalibur333 (ARGUING GENUINE UFO/UAP)
GRIDER: https://x.com/HighEarthOrbit_ (ARGUING FLARES)
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube: / @totaldisclosure
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-podcast--5975113/support.
CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —[email protected]
Special Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can’t do this WITHOUT YOU!
-COPYRIGHT-2020-
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
Speaker 1: All right, guys, welcome back to Total Disclosure. We have
Speaker 1: a special presentation for you tonight. Tonight. I've been seeing
Speaker 1: that has been in the works for some time and
Speaker 1: I just got involved very recently. It has to do
Speaker 1: with the twenty nine Palms mass sighting case where over
Speaker 1: fifty Marines allegedly saw lights in the sky unprompted, unknowingly
Speaker 1: and reported as a UFO corbel George Knapp and the
Speaker 1: platform weaponized where the first ones to break said story,
Speaker 1: and since then a lot of back and forth has
Speaker 1: been going down throughout not just a community, but we're
Speaker 1: talking Department of Defense spokes spokesperson Susan Go getting an
Speaker 1: answer within twenty four hours from the base saying that
Speaker 1: it was that simply an exercise and that there was
Speaker 1: no UAP in the vicinity. So much more, We're gonna
Speaker 1: break it all down. I don't want to waste too
Speaker 1: much time. We're gonna do this in a structure debate style,
Speaker 1: very very gentleman esque. Yeah, there'll be a little drama,
Speaker 1: tensions will flare, but we'll keep it to a minimum.
Speaker 1: With that being said, like share, subscribe, and if you
Speaker 1: want to help support the show, become a member. This
Speaker 1: is not the time for that. I'm gonna bring these
Speaker 1: guys in so arguing and on the side of anomaly
Speaker 1: and a UFO is Arthur President, who is just on
Speaker 1: our live show revamped Arthur. You are continuing the research
Speaker 1: into this case, bringing it up to speed, up to date,
Speaker 1: while you know it's kind of been in the lull.
Speaker 1: Jeremy really hasn't come out and given any more evidence,
Speaker 1: but you've been continuing to work on the case.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you, Ty, and thanks for having me on.
Speaker 2: I definitely think it's UFOs. I think the community is
Speaker 2: mostly wrong. I think they got it wrong on this one.
Speaker 2: So I want to thank you Ty for shining some
Speaker 2: light on this case again and getting the dialogue going
Speaker 2: and some more debate going, because I think it's really
Speaker 2: an important case.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm not really sure what just happened. It's said
Speaker 1: go live, it said that we weren't live. Are we
Speaker 1: live right now?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I saw we're live.
Speaker 1: If anyone's listening around right now, I just want to
Speaker 1: before I bring Grider, Okay, we are, because there was
Speaker 1: there was like a disconnect between my computer and what
Speaker 1: was actually happening. Sorry about that, guys, grider. You you'll
Speaker 1: have military experience with flares. You are opposing the view
Speaker 1: that this was some sort of anomaly, that this was
Speaker 1: just another routine training exercise held at a base in
Speaker 1: California that is known for doing training and exercises.
Speaker 4: Yeah, guys, hey, thank you so much for having me.
Speaker 4: Ty Arthur, it's good to see you again. I'm here to,
Speaker 4: you know, rebunk the debunk on the original. I mean,
Speaker 4: you're a reality debunker, Arthur. You're just you're trying to
Speaker 4: make up, you know, something that's not there.
Speaker 3: I'm here to set the I mean, I'm here to
Speaker 3: set the record straight and put this case in straight
Speaker 3: into bed all right forever, because we're sick of this.
Speaker 3: I mean, we're tired of all this nonsense. Right, it
Speaker 3: was Flairs. I've got the documents, all right, I've got
Speaker 3: the proof, the facts. You're done. All right, You're done tonight.
Speaker 3: It ends tonight.
Speaker 1: Already. I like I said, I love it. I love
Speaker 1: it so again. We are going to allow for everyone
Speaker 1: to get their moment in the sun. Their their their
Speaker 1: main caveat, they're getting their best foot forward. Now, I
Speaker 1: do want to go over a couple things. Now, I
Speaker 1: think what would be best is an introduction of each
Speaker 1: person from each person, lasting five anywhere five seven minutes,
Speaker 1: to briefly introduce your reference frame and your opposing viewpoints,
Speaker 1: the flares versusu AP anomaly, and we'll kind of go
Speaker 1: from go from there, introducing evidence, calling it out by number,
Speaker 1: and half are back and forth.
Speaker 3: So can I go on in a start?
Speaker 1: I guess yes, you may.
Speaker 3: All right.
Speaker 4: So, basically my experience that lends me some credibility in
Speaker 4: this is that I was a former foot artilleryman in
Speaker 4: the United States Army. I was a thirteen Bravo, which
Speaker 4: is a canning crew member basically, which went and I
Speaker 4: fired artillery. That was what I did all deployment. And
Speaker 4: I probably fired over ten thousand rounds in my life,
Speaker 4: with probably twenty five hundred being illumination rounds, which are
Speaker 4: basically parachute flares, not the same as aircraft parachute flaares,
Speaker 4: you know, which is what we see in.
Speaker 3: This video, but same type of you know, same type
Speaker 3: of device. And so basically excuse me. It's basically what.
Speaker 4: Arthur's going to do is he's gonna come out and
Speaker 4: he's going to talk about the credibility of the witnesses
Speaker 4: and the you know, he's gonna say that, uh, you
Speaker 4: know that there were fifty marines that saw it and
Speaker 4: that they said that it wasn't Flair's and that they
Speaker 4: know because of their experience and YadA, YadA, YadA. And
Speaker 4: then he's going to, uh talk about how Susan go
Speaker 4: you know, quickly dismissed the case, you know, with then
Speaker 4: you know she was able to come out with when
Speaker 4: a couple.
Speaker 3: Of hours I think, you know, I think by lunch, Yeah,
Speaker 3: like by lunch that day, so like it was submitted
Speaker 3: in like one am, and then by noon, you know,
Speaker 3: she had she had a statement out.
Speaker 4: Well, I mean that okay, you know I can kind
Speaker 4: of give Arthur that. And then he's going to talk about,
Speaker 4: you know, maybe the comparison to like the Phoenix Light incidents,
Speaker 4: you know, talk about how it's it's comparable though there's
Speaker 4: something to be drawn there, you know, and he's going to, uh,
Speaker 4: you know, he's going to say a lot of things
Speaker 4: that are not true, and I'm going to tack all
Speaker 4: that because I've got the evidence. I've got the exact
Speaker 4: evidence showing that there were a lumination rounds. I are
Speaker 4: illumination rounds being used in the massive air exercise that
Speaker 4: was taking place at that exact time that they had
Speaker 4: the sighting. I have the documents thanks to John Greenwald.
Speaker 4: Thank you, sir. If you're out there listening, you're probably not.
Speaker 1: But he's a friend of the show.
Speaker 4: Oh he is out there listening. Thank you, Thank you John.
Speaker 4: You yeah, man, you really helped. You know, you're great
Speaker 4: with Foya Black Vault, best side ever.
Speaker 3: But yeah, I have the exact the exact type of
Speaker 3: aircraft that fired those rounds, the exact planned FTX schedule,
Speaker 3: which is a field training exercise. I know the exact
Speaker 3: you know pathway that it took across the twenty nine
Speaker 3: Palms range. I can prove with maps, you know that
Speaker 3: the exact location that the flares were dropped over is
Speaker 3: the only place within twenty nine Palms that is cleared
Speaker 3: for that type of ordinance to be used. We're gonna
Speaker 3: look at pictures where I'm gonna, you know, show you
Speaker 3: which I think is the Mick West debunk that has
Speaker 3: already been kind kind of you know, beating like a
Speaker 3: dead horse, but uh, you know it's He's also.
Speaker 1: He's also a friend of the show. And and and
Speaker 1: unlike others in the community, I don't think. I don't
Speaker 1: dismiss him. I think he keeps us grounded in a
Speaker 1: way that you know, there are some cases that are
Speaker 1: pretty cut and dry mis identifications.
Speaker 3: Absolutely.
Speaker 4: I mean, I'm a fan of Micwest personally, but yeah,
Speaker 4: he does great work. But I haven't even looked at
Speaker 4: any of his work, I promise Scouts honor. Like all
Speaker 4: the research that I've done is from my own brain,
Speaker 4: so it may not be up to the level of
Speaker 4: Mick West.
Speaker 3: But.
Speaker 4: I think I'm pretty confident, you know, and being able
Speaker 4: to make this case, and I just want to, you know,
Speaker 4: kind of make it a point, you know, that people
Speaker 4: need to that people could look at this case. There's
Speaker 4: something to be learned from as far as paxes and
Speaker 4: the way that hoaxes develop and they perpetuate across like,
Speaker 4: you know, years, decades, even about how group think and
Speaker 4: about how I mean, I have a well, there's an
Speaker 4: entire segment that I have where I've got bullet points
Speaker 4: listening how a hoax develops and going back to like
Speaker 4: the Philadelphia experiment and Bob Blazar and talking about how
Speaker 4: those perpetuated and comparing those to this case. And yeah,
Speaker 4: so I mean we'll get into that later, but that's
Speaker 4: my introduction.
Speaker 3: And thanks.
Speaker 1: Okay, So just to be clear about your experience, you
Speaker 1: don't have experience with the the flair and I'm and
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm not I'm not belittling you. I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm not discrediting your experience with flaares overall. I'm just
Speaker 1: simply trying to clarify the illumin arounds that you say
Speaker 1: are in the air you didn't ever actually deploy.
Speaker 4: No, I was never in the Air Force. Yeah, are
Speaker 4: in the Marines. I was never a crew member on
Speaker 4: an aircraft. But it's the exact same thing. It's the
Speaker 4: exact same type of chemicals, the exact same like, the
Speaker 4: exact same mechanism of deployment.
Speaker 3: Uh, It's it's identical almost.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, all right, So thank you, Griider. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: pull it over to Arthur, let him get his moment
Speaker 1: to kind of like let us know where he's coming from,
Speaker 1: where he's gonna start his you know where he's going
Speaker 1: to start his evidence trail. Uh, and uh, you know,
Speaker 1: give us his brief five minutes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you, I thank you Grid and Ty. Yeah.
Speaker 2: So my my position is that this was a genuine
Speaker 2: UAP event. It wasn't misidentified flares. There's quite a few
Speaker 2: points I want to make, but I think writer is
Speaker 2: gonna undermine the credibility of the witnesses. I think he
Speaker 2: might start throwing out, you know, fantasies or you know
Speaker 2: ideas that these guys are throwing a practical joke and
Speaker 2: making this up. And I just want to make it
Speaker 2: very clear. I think all the witnesses are telling the truth.
Speaker 2: I think they're very sincere. I don't think they're misremembering.
Speaker 2: And that's probably some of our strongest evidence is the witnesses,
Speaker 2: and most all of the skeptics want to ignore all
Speaker 2: of the witnesses and their testimony. And these are military witnesses,
Speaker 2: and we have five of them that actually adds a
Speaker 2: lot of credibility in this case, has a lot of
Speaker 2: information associated with it. We have like seven videos, we
Speaker 2: have like five low light photos of the event, and
Speaker 2: we have metadata associated with a lot of this. And
Speaker 2: then we have a whole tranch of Foya documents and
Speaker 2: Foya photos and Foya videos also with metadata. And that's
Speaker 2: where I've done most of My analysis is comparing the
Speaker 2: FOYA documents to the original documents, and in that analysis,
Speaker 2: I think I found very strong evidence of fraud, meaning
Speaker 2: that this was some sort of pre bunking operation by
Speaker 2: arrow Susan Go the Department of Defense, and that this
Speaker 2: was a major event, a mass sighting witness not by
Speaker 2: only fifty that was the bare minimum of fifty. According
Speaker 2: to witnesses, Probably in the hundreds, if not up to
Speaker 2: one thousand people witnessed this. In one photo alone, we
Speaker 2: see like six people with their phone their smartphones out
Speaker 2: recording it. So there's probably a bunch more video out there.
Speaker 2: And I want to bring some more light to this
Speaker 2: case and maybe we can get some more evidence, some
Speaker 2: more witnesses, some more video or photos of the event,
Speaker 2: and this could become the next Phoenix Lights. This could
Speaker 2: be as big as the Phoenix Lights because this is
Speaker 2: a mass sighting at a military base. We have on
Speaker 2: duty witnesses, military witnesses and video so this and I
Speaker 2: think it was a big mistake that the community glanced
Speaker 2: over this having some technical issues.
Speaker 1: No no, no, you're goals.
Speaker 2: I think it was a major mistake that the community
Speaker 2: moved on from this case. So quickly. I think a
Speaker 2: lot of the community is operating on kind of a
Speaker 2: low information basis on this case. They they got the
Speaker 2: debunk from Mick West and John Greenwald, you know, within
Speaker 2: twenty four hours. It was very compelling at first glance.
Speaker 2: So at first glance their debunks seemed like conclusive, and
Speaker 2: most people just kind of accepted it and moved on,
Speaker 2: never really dug into this case ever.
Speaker 1: And I will say that I am one of those
Speaker 1: people who did really see this case and just kind
Speaker 1: of let it go in it and want to hear
Speaker 1: out the other So I want to hold it on something.
Speaker 1: What you have no military experience.
Speaker 2: Right, correct?
Speaker 1: Do you have any background in flair and illumination?
Speaker 2: No, no firsthand experience with Flair's I guess the only
Speaker 2: thing that might add its first credentials wise is I
Speaker 2: do have a degree in biology which had physics training,
Speaker 2: so I have taken you know, the basic physics courses,
Speaker 2: and then I also have a master's screen public alpaation
Speaker 2: isn't really applicable at all to this, but I have
Speaker 2: scientific training, so I'm applying my research skills to this case.
Speaker 1: So and that's where I was trying to get to
Speaker 1: so I think what we should do is we should
Speaker 1: start with very simple, very very very simple. There's an
Speaker 1: argument that you both make, and it has to do
Speaker 1: with the witnesses and the credibility of the witnesses. So
Speaker 1: I kind of want to start there, maybe with some
Speaker 1: of the videos and kind of watching them, going through
Speaker 1: them together, uh and then having you each uh point
Speaker 1: out your side. If that makes sense, let me a
Speaker 1: mute grinder.
Speaker 2: That sounds good. I think we should. You should go
Speaker 2: over the videos, the evidence, kind of educate the audience,
Speaker 2: the the you know, the the core of this case.
Speaker 1: Yes, so good.
Speaker 4: So what I'm asserting is that there is no way
Speaker 4: that the Marines did not know what was going on.
Speaker 4: I'm not calling them liars. I'm calling them perceptive. And
Speaker 4: that's a really, that's a really. I mean like that's like,
Speaker 4: I'm the type of person where as a veteran like
Speaker 4: I would give anything if I came across a veteran
Speaker 4: on the street that needed help or whatever. It's like,
Speaker 4: those are my brothers. But they're pulling everybody's chain and
Speaker 4: they know it, and they they absolutely know it. And
Speaker 4: I'm going to prove by the end of this that
Speaker 4: it's undeniable that they know it.
Speaker 1: See I was going to mention that earlier that did
Speaker 1: bring It sparked something in me that you are essentially
Speaker 1: not not like you said, you're not dishonoring the military,
Speaker 1: but you're saying that these group of individuals are perpetuating
Speaker 1: some sort of hoax and with knowledge of it being
Speaker 1: some sort of test and something that they could have
Speaker 1: timed and shown to the world as a UFO.
Speaker 4: That's not what I'm no, like, I want to go
Speaker 4: that far. What I am saying is that there's no
Speaker 4: way that they did not know that those are flares.
Speaker 4: There's no way. And by by the end of this,
Speaker 4: it'll be really really clear why I say that. Am
Speaker 4: I calling the liars?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: But well I have to. I think we have to
Speaker 1: make a distinction. I well, one second, I think we
Speaker 1: need to make a distinction before we hear them, because
Speaker 1: they either they are there a are liars and they're lying.
Speaker 1: Now after the event happened, and maybe I wasn't right,
Speaker 1: maybe I didn't phrase that correctly, but a time, place,
Speaker 1: and situation arose. They got video of it and reported
Speaker 1: it to Jerry meet Carbell. So somewhere along the lines,
Speaker 1: you would have to be saying that they are lying.
Speaker 4: All right there, my brothers, but and I respect them,
Speaker 4: and but somebody's lying about this. I don't know somebody
Speaker 4: absolutely is lying, like yeah.
Speaker 1: And I can agree with you there, I absolutely kind
Speaker 1: of think Arthur could even.
Speaker 2: I just want a little clarity on that where they
Speaker 2: because we have the witnesses reacting in live time on
Speaker 2: the video, and we also have interviews with the witnesses
Speaker 2: at a later point of time. Are you suggesting that
Speaker 2: they were lying in both of those k both in
Speaker 2: live time and then later down as they are interviewed
Speaker 2: at a later point in time.
Speaker 3: Definitely not.
Speaker 4: I'm not saying anybody is specifically lying because I do
Speaker 4: not know for a fact what that person is actually
Speaker 4: was actually thinking and is actually thinking even nowadays, Like
Speaker 4: I have no idea what they're thinking inside their head.
Speaker 4: If they really believe that there's some the thing is
Speaker 4: like seeing IR flares, that's a rarity.
Speaker 3: So most of those soldiers, you know, you think, oh, yeah,
Speaker 3: well they were Marines, but I guarantee that most of
Speaker 3: them were fresh out of you know, basic they were probably.
Speaker 2: You actually don't know that writer, You don't know what
Speaker 2: any of their ranks were.
Speaker 3: They were definitely like lower enlisted apps. You can just
Speaker 3: tell the by the way that they talk.
Speaker 2: You're guessing that. I tend to agree that they sound young,
Speaker 2: but that is just a guess on our behalf.
Speaker 3: At the end of the day, most of the people
Speaker 3: that are in the military are young. You know that, right.
Speaker 2: They're trained Marines.
Speaker 3: They were in training, you know at that time.
Speaker 2: And it's not boot camp. They're out of boot I mean.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but Camp Wilson, if if I'm not mistaken, Camp
Speaker 1: Wilson is a staging area for the most part. It's
Speaker 1: not just a staging area, but it it's you are
Speaker 1: sent there right before you head out to the range.
Speaker 1: If I'm not mistaken, that's the intel I've gathered. So
Speaker 1: it seems like they would be on the younger side
Speaker 1: if I had to say, But I don't think that
Speaker 1: necessarily discounts anything.
Speaker 2: Well, these guys are making life decisions. I mean, they're trusting.
Speaker 2: You know, these guys are firing heavy weapons, and they're
Speaker 2: not children. They're not idiots, even though they might be new.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're right, you didn't. You did not say that.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying that to the audience.
Speaker 3: So I guess, like, okay, so there's a point where
Speaker 3: I don't know if it's in the interview.
Speaker 4: I think it is. Actually no, I think it's in
Speaker 4: when they're actually having the sighting and one of them says, oh, well,
Speaker 4: you don't fire flares in a in a five gun
Speaker 4: you know, battery. Yeah, yeah, no, five guns in a battery.
Speaker 4: But you know, if you've been down range, then you
Speaker 4: know that are then you do know the aircraft, you know,
Speaker 4: drop in fives, They drop in sets of five.
Speaker 3: That's very, very common.
Speaker 4: So the fact that he said that and like he
Speaker 4: couldn't identify the difference between an indirect fired you know
Speaker 4: round that is a parachute flair like that would be
Speaker 4: in that's probably I don't know, that could be either
Speaker 4: or really but yeah, I mean that's uh.
Speaker 1: I'm just showing some examples of what flairs that's.
Speaker 4: That's yeah, see, that's probably artillery. And then this yeah
Speaker 4: five see, and I mean just look how this okay, well,
Speaker 4: I mean, you know, we'll get into it, but yeah,
Speaker 4: I mean, just the fact that and there's a couple
Speaker 4: of other points, you know, the where like the Marines
Speaker 4: kind of contradict themselves, and they kind of show that
Speaker 4: they don't really have a lot of experience. I mean,
Speaker 4: I'm not discounting, you know, these people as soldiers as individuals,
Speaker 4: like they're better than ninety percent of the people that
Speaker 4: are out there, the ninety percent of civilians. Like they've
Speaker 4: already made the sacrifice, they've already shown that they have character,
Speaker 4: that they have integrity, that they are, that they're men.
Speaker 4: That's not what I'm saying. I'm just saying that somebody
Speaker 4: is lying, and that's that's just how it is.
Speaker 1: Fair enough, fair enough, let's leave it there. Fly a
Speaker 1: little bit high on that one, all right. So I'm
Speaker 1: gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna give it Arthur first. Arthur,
Speaker 1: what do you want me to pull out?
Speaker 2: Why don't we go through the Why don't you go
Speaker 2: through the videos? So why don't you bring up video
Speaker 2: one and we'll just go through the videos of the event,
Speaker 2: all right?
Speaker 1: Right, So what I want, yes, what I was gonna
Speaker 1: say is what I want to do, if we're gonna
Speaker 1: do the videos, is we're gonna give you both a
Speaker 1: chance to respond to the videos. Okay, okay, all right.
Speaker 1: I just want to make sure that in the media thread,
Speaker 1: it doesn't look like it.
Speaker 2: Should say event event video one.
Speaker 1: Oh I got it.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Hey, so all the videos, like all the official videos,
Speaker 3: you're gonna be.
Speaker 1: Yep, I got it here. I'm sorry, guys, this is
Speaker 1: gonna be This is gonna be a learning curve. Someone's
Speaker 1: got some.
Speaker 2: And just to put some context into this video that
Speaker 2: he's about to play, h he's using a cell phone
Speaker 2: to video the night sky. So they're actually seeing a
Speaker 2: lot more than what's going to be showing up in
Speaker 2: these videos. So you're gonna see some some lights in
Speaker 2: the sky, but just recognize that what we see on
Speaker 2: this video is probably less than what the people on
Speaker 2: the ground are actually seeing.
Speaker 1: All right, So we are going to go into full mode,
Speaker 1: so basically like a full full screen mode. Can you
Speaker 1: gotta see it?
Speaker 2: Yeah? What is Okay?
Speaker 5: That's it.
Speaker 2: So that's pretty short. A seventeen seconds is the first video.
Speaker 2: I guess what I would comment on this is that
Speaker 2: it's very symmetrical looking like in this first video, it's
Speaker 2: very symmetrical and like a B formation, So that's that's noteworthy.
Speaker 2: And then the other thing that's noteworthy is the witness
Speaker 2: is recording it. It says, what is that? So they
Speaker 2: at least he can't isn't able to identify it at
Speaker 2: that time.
Speaker 3: Okay, grader, I mean it's yeah, man, it's symmetrical right there.
Speaker 4: But why does it change shape? Like why does it
Speaker 4: become less of a like? Why does it lose its symmetricality?
Speaker 4: I don't know, Like, what's the word it's.
Speaker 2: It doesn't stay symmetry, It doesn't stay in that exact same.
Speaker 4: Yeah, why why not? I mean, what is this like
Speaker 4: a morphine? I mean, it's just like a uh a transformer.
Speaker 2: Well I would I would just say that a lot
Speaker 2: of people have pointed to that as an example of
Speaker 2: evidence that it's not a you know, fixed craft with
Speaker 2: fixed lights on it. So, you know, some people might
Speaker 2: be arguing that this is like a t R three
Speaker 2: B type craft, but as you'll see it in the videos,
Speaker 2: these lights do change in configurations, so it's not. We
Speaker 2: can we can rule out that it is a fixed
Speaker 2: body craft with fixed lights on it.
Speaker 3: And so why would why would the Aliens have big
Speaker 3: bright orange lights as uh like, why would like what
Speaker 3: would be the purpose of.
Speaker 2: That, Well, we can get to that later. Let's just
Speaker 2: go through the videos. I don't know. I can't. I'm
Speaker 2: not just I can't say what their purpose was.
Speaker 1: So this is a ventfite number two.
Speaker 3: Those are not a womb all right?
Speaker 1: I want to pause it right there, Right off the bat,
Speaker 1: we have someone saying those are not illom rounds. Now,
Speaker 1: why is it not showing you guys the videos?
Speaker 2: It was showing it, but now it's not.
Speaker 3: All right.
Speaker 6: I am just gonna go to the the read honestly
Speaker 6: for this one, because you have lead out here much better.
Speaker 3: There isn't anything in there that is.
Speaker 1: So why.
Speaker 2: Those are not illumin rounds because limb rounds fall?
Speaker 1: Okay, so those are not illum rounds because loom round ball.
Speaker 1: Why does he say that? If why can you explain, Grider,
Speaker 1: why a marine in the setting that that they're in
Speaker 1: would would say that so quickly, so assertively.
Speaker 4: I mean, I have no idea why you said that.
Speaker 4: But what he's saying, I mean, if that's at the
Speaker 4: beginning of the sighting, it's like these things fall pretty slowly.
Speaker 4: I mean they only fall it, you know, like four
Speaker 4: meters a second. You know, some even fall.
Speaker 2: You know, it wasn't the beginning of the sighting. So
Speaker 2: I can correct you right there, It wasn't the beginning.
Speaker 3: Of the sighting anyway when he looked at it, right.
Speaker 2: No, no, So if you look at the timeline, if
Speaker 2: you bring up the timeline that Corbell published.
Speaker 4: Line says these things were only up there for ten minutes,
Speaker 4: if you want to look at the official timeline, I
Speaker 4: have that that.
Speaker 1: Like, well, we'll get well, we'll get we'll get to.
Speaker 2: My point is if we that when the recording first
Speaker 2: started was not when the event first started. So this
Speaker 2: wasn't the beginning.
Speaker 5: Of the event.
Speaker 3: That guy's saying that how long has he been watching
Speaker 3: the flares?
Speaker 2: We don't don't we don't know.
Speaker 1: We don't know, Okay, and that's a you know what
Speaker 1: that's that that I would I would have to say
Speaker 1: that that is valid. We don't know how long he
Speaker 1: had the person has been watching. I mean, but it
Speaker 1: just seems weird that that's the first thing out of
Speaker 1: his mouth.
Speaker 4: That's the that's on camera, you know, like the first
Speaker 4: thing that's on camera. Like we don't know if that's
Speaker 4: the first thing out of his mouth, just the first
Speaker 4: thing on camera.
Speaker 3: The clip could be cut, you know. The thing is
Speaker 3: that like good point him? I mean Yeah, it's just good.
Speaker 3: But I think it's kind of looking into it too much.
Speaker 3: And he says, oh, well, you know they don't shoot
Speaker 3: enough five gun section, which is very very I mean
Speaker 3: in a five gun battery. It's true, a battery is
Speaker 3: you know, four artillery pieces, uh, two per two per platoon.
Speaker 3: But you know aircraft they always drop in five. Well
Speaker 3: not I take that back, not always, but typically they
Speaker 3: drop in five. Uh.
Speaker 4: And I'll have plenty of video evidence to show that
Speaker 4: you know that that's the case here.
Speaker 3: Once we get on farther down the line.
Speaker 1: So okay, and we're watching here for thirty six, I
Speaker 1: see no elevation drop, no visible elevation or smoke trails.
Speaker 1: I just want to ask, is that normal?
Speaker 2: I think it could be normal because this is only
Speaker 2: thirty seconds, and you're not going to see a lot
Speaker 2: of movement in thirty seconds, even if it were flares.
Speaker 2: And we don't have a point of reference, so we
Speaker 2: can't see the mountain range, so we can't really even
Speaker 2: measure if it was falling or not.
Speaker 4: And those are infrared flares, those are lou nineteen flares.
Speaker 4: And I have the documents to prove this, and I
Speaker 4: have the whole gestation that shows comparison side by side,
Speaker 4: like shooting side by side in the same video of
Speaker 4: infrared and normal. So those are IR flares and IR flares.
Speaker 4: They have a much smaller visible side.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're invisible to the naked eye. That would wait,
Speaker 2: they're not they're not. I IR flares.
Speaker 3: Not be fair.
Speaker 1: I AR flares are are I are flares? Uh naked
Speaker 1: to the invisible to the naked eye.
Speaker 4: Yes, okay, well let's just go on and squash this
Speaker 4: right now. The very last video that I posted, number
Speaker 4: thirty one, it's a one minute, zero eight second going
Speaker 4: to play that please if you can, and then we
Speaker 4: can come back to this, because that way we can
Speaker 4: go on and get this out of the way. This is
Speaker 4: IR verse.
Speaker 3: This is now. These are hand flares, Like I think
Speaker 3: these are hand flares. They may be out of like
Speaker 3: a some some some type of launcher, but it's definitely
Speaker 3: fire from the ground. But it's still it's thirty one yeah,
Speaker 3: and it's actually grider.
Speaker 2: Do you mind if we just stay focused on the
Speaker 2: videos and then we can come back, I mean, debate,
Speaker 2: you may point.
Speaker 3: We don't want that point to kind of you know,
Speaker 3: kind of.
Speaker 2: We're come back. We can come back to it. Grider
Speaker 2: claims their I are players. I claim that they're not flaes.
Speaker 1: I want to watch I want to watch the video.
Speaker 2: Okay, go ahead.
Speaker 1: Can you see it?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: No, can you see it?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 2: Yes, So give us some context, cure Wrider. What what
Speaker 2: are we looking at the content?
Speaker 1: I mean it's this is this is the video's these
Speaker 1: are I are flares.
Speaker 3: I are flares at the top, and then those at
Speaker 3: the top and then okay, okay, somebody fire them.
Speaker 4: Hold on, you'll see like another round of firing here
Speaker 4: in like a second.
Speaker 3: Right now, you'll see they're firing them, I think with
Speaker 3: their hand. They may be fire fireworks.
Speaker 2: No fireworks.
Speaker 3: Those are not fireworks. Now you're going to make me
Speaker 3: prove that flares are these are not those are not?
Speaker 1: Those aren't fireworks? Arthur, Yeah, I mean, Arthur, those are
Speaker 1: those are.
Speaker 3: Are at the top, and then actually.
Speaker 1: I think that's where they got if I'm not mistaken.
Speaker 1: If you guys look closely, I'm pretty sure the picture
Speaker 1: earlier is you could see the fucking men right there.
Speaker 1: This is from the picture I showed earlier.
Speaker 2: Is the description a description on that video.
Speaker 3: Look look, look, look, look.
Speaker 1: During the exact same spot we have we have by
Speaker 1: the way, by the way, we have over seven hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty people here really, so yeah, we were like
Speaker 1: shadow Band on YouTube, but we have a lot of people.
Speaker 3: So I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but but I okay, I want to go back
Speaker 1: to this video.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, those are fireworks. I don't Those are civilian fireworks.
Speaker 2: Those aren't military anything.
Speaker 3: Arthur, you're digging your own grave.
Speaker 2: Man right now. Well, what's the description of the event?
Speaker 2: Is there a description on this video?
Speaker 1: You can see and and and one of my main
Speaker 1: issues with the twenty nine pops case was that you
Speaker 1: could see two different types of lights. Now, the orange
Speaker 1: we see here, but we also see dimmer white lights
Speaker 1: that are in formation on the side. Now I'm not
Speaker 1: crediting Grider, but I am saying that there's two distinct
Speaker 1: sets of flares there in separate formations, and so it
Speaker 1: is possible and those those are very much different. Those
Speaker 1: those look very different.
Speaker 2: There. Yeah, there are different types of fireworks.
Speaker 3: Because warm up to Arthur Man, I got like.
Speaker 2: They make fireworks. If you didn't know that they make
Speaker 2: and what's the description of this video? Is there a description.
Speaker 1: Uh no, not they're shooting another Look, look they're shooting
Speaker 1: them in formation.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, those would be the worst fireworks ever.
Speaker 1: Man, Yeah they're not. It's like those are fireworks you're.
Speaker 3: Trying to celebrate, like you know, I don't know, I
Speaker 3: don't know. I can't even make a joke.
Speaker 1: Right now, but I will say, grinder, there's so much
Speaker 1: smoke in this picture, in this video that.
Speaker 3: Like, just like pasition to the lighting is the biggest thing.
Speaker 1: That when I come back to this, I'm like.
Speaker 3: Ah yeah, because so I would seem.
Speaker 4: Like, go back and look at the I R flares,
Speaker 4: you know, the ones in the back, they weren't.
Speaker 2: There, weren't weren't flares.
Speaker 1: Smoke from them, I'll bet you well. From this particular
Speaker 1: from this particular angle, we can see even from both
Speaker 1: both sets of flares I can see coming from them.
Speaker 1: But I can see that they're falling very quick. Not
Speaker 1: not quick. I would definitely say the orange colored flares
Speaker 1: fall very much faster. But these over here, I don't
Speaker 1: know if you guys can see my cursor, but these flares,
Speaker 1: they do maintain an altitude for a much longer a
Speaker 1: set of time. But I still see smoke trails coming
Speaker 1: from them. Now, I'm not just cutting in so again,
Speaker 1: situational could be different. I'm open to that. All I'm
Speaker 1: saying is there is something, there is something different about
Speaker 1: what we're seeing here and what we're seeing there. Right
Speaker 1: the however they drop them, if they are flares, they
Speaker 1: dropped them in some other way.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, And Mick West will say that the reason
Speaker 2: you can't see the smoke trails is because these quote
Speaker 2: unquote IR flares were launched six miles away from Camp Wilson,
Speaker 2: in the middle of a range between Camp Wilson and
Speaker 2: it's something called the training village. So do you kind
Speaker 2: of agree with that that narrative.
Speaker 3: No, I do not, Like I know nothing about what
Speaker 3: Mick West said.
Speaker 2: How far away do you think these I R flares,
Speaker 2: what you're calling IR flares were launched.
Speaker 3: No idea. I mean I would assume. I mean, basically,
Speaker 3: it's a question of altitude. I think with the I
Speaker 3: R flares, the IR flares, I think we're shot at
Speaker 3: a pretty high altitude or were dropped by the what
Speaker 3: I would prove to be MB twenty.
Speaker 4: Two ospray I think is the maybe AB two. It's
Speaker 4: basically the ospray. Yeah, like I have the documents and yeah,
Speaker 4: as far as all.
Speaker 2: Right, okay, so you don't you don't have a claim.
Speaker 2: You don't have a claim about the distance that these are.
Speaker 2: You're just leaving that open.
Speaker 3: No, I do not.
Speaker 4: But they have to be close enough to be to
Speaker 4: be photographed by the FOYA photographer, you know, the Marine
Speaker 4: Corps photographer who took the photos.
Speaker 2: That's seventeen miles yeah, at the training but the training
Speaker 2: village that the FOYA photos were taken at, whereas seventeen
Speaker 2: miles away from Camp Wilson.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that sounds good.
Speaker 2: Sure, So somewhere in the mid midpoint between Camp Wilson
Speaker 2: and the training village is where I guess most of
Speaker 2: the skeptics are saying these five quote unquote IR flares
Speaker 2: were dropped.
Speaker 3: You're debating me, man, me, I don't know what skeptics
Speaker 3: are saying.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so let's yeah, yeah, so so let's keep it
Speaker 1: to let's try to keep Mick West out of it
Speaker 1: as much as we can, just because we don't want
Speaker 1: to bring in uh, potential information that we don't all have.
Speaker 1: Because I don't have all Mick West's case file on
Speaker 1: this as well. All right, and so let's try to
Speaker 1: keep it to what the what the facts that we
Speaker 1: have are. Now, I'm going to restart this video in
Speaker 1: particular because I did mute it, so I want to
Speaker 1: uh unmute it and start it from the beginning. This
Speaker 1: is again.
Speaker 2: Wait, yeah, you're sharing it, but the audio is off.
Speaker 1: I get a re add it. Unfortunately, when you h
Speaker 1: can you hear it?
Speaker 2: I cannot. I can't see it either. Now you can't.
Speaker 3: It's moving.
Speaker 2: Actually, start from the beginning.
Speaker 3: Those are not allom.
Speaker 2: Round because the limb rounds fall.
Speaker 1: So hard to keep it m m.
Speaker 3: And nobody shoots in a five gun section.
Speaker 1: I want to bring one more thing up. So he said,
Speaker 1: no one shoots in a five gun A five guns section,
Speaker 1: five gun section. You grinder brought that up earlier. So
Speaker 1: it kind of goes to show you that these guys
Speaker 1: did either didn't know what was going on that night,
Speaker 1: or again, maybe they're accomplice is to uh like some
Speaker 1: sort of I don't want to say lie, but uh
Speaker 1: uh leaning home.
Speaker 3: To the home maybe uh maybe, I mean you'd be surprised,
Speaker 3: how you know, how little people pay attention. You know
Speaker 3: what I'm saying, I mean, right.
Speaker 1: Right, but they but so he but this this gentleman
Speaker 1: knows that they're they weren't shot, right, first of all,
Speaker 1: And you're saying that they weren't shot either. You're saying
Speaker 1: if these are flares, and they are flares, you're saying
Speaker 1: that they were dropped from an osprey.
Speaker 3: They were one dropped from an osprey.
Speaker 1: Not shot.
Speaker 3: I mean they were shot out of an osprey, but you.
Speaker 1: Know, but not shot from the ground, is what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: Not the five. No, definitely not the five that we see. Absolutely, okay,
Speaker 3: just thank you.
Speaker 1: For clearing that up.
Speaker 7: No, you can see like an outline or something.
Speaker 1: Again, I want to pause. I hate doing this. Can
Speaker 1: you both comment on that we know or a fact
Speaker 1: with our eyes? And like I did it last night,
Speaker 1: there was a full moon last night. I pointed my
Speaker 1: camera to the full moon. Even though I have an
Speaker 1: iPhone fifteen brand new, newest model. The moon shows up
Speaker 1: like a glowing ball of light. You can't get any definition.
Speaker 1: Saying they see an outline? Can you accommodate that, grider,
Speaker 1: what would make for an out What would accommodate for
Speaker 1: the outline that they're seeing? Because it sounds like they're
Speaker 1: saying they're seeing an outline of a craft.
Speaker 3: Yes, it will play I mean smoke like distance, you know.
Speaker 2: Okay, okay, And and I would say that they're telling
Speaker 2: the truth and they know what they're seeing, and that
Speaker 2: you know this highly credible military witness says he saw
Speaker 2: an outline. I believe he saw an outline.
Speaker 3: It's moving.
Speaker 1: Again. Take me to your leader. It's kind of on
Speaker 1: the nose.
Speaker 2: We got UFOs outside.
Speaker 7: Everyone's out here.
Speaker 1: Everybody's out here, all right, Grider, and are there that video?
Speaker 1: I've to be the testimony in it. Plus how for
Speaker 1: thirty six seconds we I mean we watched your video, Grinder,
Speaker 1: those in this video. This craft, I'm gonna I'm gonna
Speaker 1: kind of just like you know, roll it across. It
Speaker 1: doesn't seem like they're falling. It seems like they're actually
Speaker 1: moving unless the camera orientation is moving. It looks like
Speaker 1: moving up instead of down. That now, could that be wind?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 4: I mean, can you think about it, like both of you,
Speaker 4: they're dropped over like the top of a mountain, so
Speaker 4: you have the updraft, you know how you like you
Speaker 4: get turbulence when you like fly over, you know, like
Speaker 4: a mountain range. You get that updraft, that turbulence you
Speaker 4: know of air. It's the same thing. And also, I
Speaker 4: mean their parachute flares, they function like a hot air balloon.
Speaker 4: It's it's hot air going up into a parachute. It
Speaker 4: provides a lift would be mine.
Speaker 3: They answer.
Speaker 2: Parachute flaares one hundred percent go down all the time.
Speaker 2: They'd never go up. They're not designed to go up.
Speaker 2: They're not designed to hover. They're designed to go down.
Speaker 1: But we do know that sometimes the phosporus or whatever
Speaker 1: is burning in the parachute, it can act like a
Speaker 1: hot air balloon, right, which would allow it to maintain
Speaker 1: at least.
Speaker 2: That's kind of like a Chinese a Chinese lantern type idea.
Speaker 2: That's the idea of what you're kind of describing. These
Speaker 2: just don't have the same sort of set up as
Speaker 2: a Chinese lantern. The distance from the parachute to the
Speaker 2: flair that's pretty far, so it's not collecting hot air
Speaker 2: in the same way as the Chinese lantern does, so
Speaker 2: they're completely different. You might be getting some draft from
Speaker 2: the heat from the flare, but it's not gonna be
Speaker 2: enough to counteract the weight of the actual flare itself.
Speaker 1: Gorod or anything to comment. No, nope, all right, so
Speaker 1: let's move on. Then, all right the.
Speaker 2: Video three video damna video three?
Speaker 7: What is the sheet?
Speaker 1: All right? So you do get a frame of reference.
Speaker 2: Now it's not showing up in my camera. So that's interesting.
Speaker 2: At the very end, he says, now it's not showing
Speaker 2: up in my camera, and someone right next to him said, yeah,
Speaker 2: the same. So we got two people recording at the
Speaker 2: same time.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm, not being visible to the camera. Could that be?
Speaker 1: Could it be that the ir is is is playing
Speaker 1: tricks on the camera, ir Flair if it were to
Speaker 1: be a flare rider, I.
Speaker 4: Mean, I would think that if it's like, if it's
Speaker 4: a cell phone camera, cell phone cameras can see ir
Speaker 4: you know, that's like olkay. So back in the day,
Speaker 4: a big thing that I was trying to do is
Speaker 4: break the Cannonball Run, which is like going from the
Speaker 4: East coast to the West coast non stop as fast
Speaker 4: as possible, you know, and the car just NonStop, you know,
Speaker 4: going from the Red Ball Garage and downtown uh in
Speaker 4: a downtown uh downtown New York City to the port
Speaker 4: A Fino end on the West Coast and uh so,
Speaker 4: I like had built my car up with a bunch
Speaker 4: of anti speed enforcement countermeasures, and I had jammers, so
Speaker 4: they would jam laser, they would jam light R And
Speaker 4: what they did is they used infra red. They matched
Speaker 4: the pulse the IR pulse of like the cops gun,
Speaker 4: so that it kind of just like diffused it. And
Speaker 4: the way that I would test my jammers to see
Speaker 4: if they were working is I would pull out my
Speaker 4: my cell phone and I would just look with my
Speaker 4: camera and then I would use like a testerer to
Speaker 4: basically activate the jammers, and.
Speaker 3: I would be able to see the pulses of light.
Speaker 4: It's the same thing like you can see IR light,
Speaker 4: you know, just barely, but you can still see it
Speaker 4: with a cell phone camera. I'm not too sure about
Speaker 4: like normal cameras if you're able to see if they
Speaker 4: have IR filters, I doubt it, but I could be wrong.
Speaker 2: So but the I, the I can't see IR.
Speaker 3: The I can't snod, So that's not true. The eye
Speaker 3: can if it's in the eighth and fifty M. I
Speaker 3: don't know what NM stands for, it's like the measurement nanometer.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but if you go down to like seven fifty.
Speaker 4: Then it's completely invisible. I don't know what nanometer these are,
Speaker 4: you know, the the I R flares.
Speaker 1: Are though, So we and where I paused it. Uh, ironically,
Speaker 1: it kind of comes back into frame and we have
Speaker 1: a faint light but we're missing one, but we know
Speaker 1: where it would be be right about here. Oh I
Speaker 1: find that to be interesting. Let's play it through the
Speaker 1: rest of the video and there it comes.
Speaker 3: What is this?
Speaker 1: Shepa So, yeah, it gives us a frame of reference.
Speaker 2: Now it's not showing up in my camera.
Speaker 1: Okay, so we.
Speaker 2: Are commented on this, so let's go to the next Yeah, no, no.
Speaker 1: I don't I just wanted to see it again. This
Speaker 1: is the video four? Correct?
Speaker 2: If it says video four, then yeah, I think we
Speaker 2: were on video three, but now we're gonna be on four.
Speaker 1: Are you guys?
Speaker 2: Not with me?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 2: I'm with you, but I can't see it.
Speaker 1: That's the hardest part, guys, I'm so sorry, is trying
Speaker 1: to balance like getting these videos up and down.
Speaker 3: You're doing great, man, You're absolutely doing great time.
Speaker 1: Thank you. All right, So this is so we need
Speaker 1: to go back to what video for?
Speaker 3: All right?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, this one's interesting. Can you you guys can
Speaker 1: see it right?
Speaker 2: Yep?
Speaker 7: I told you research notis for real?
Speaker 1: Got some weird comments, there's more lights around it.
Speaker 5: Okay, that's it.
Speaker 1: All right? Okay, I want to throw it to I
Speaker 1: want to throw it to Arthur. Can you tell me
Speaker 1: what you think is significant about this clip?
Speaker 2: Well, Uh, the most important thing, which is in pretty
Speaker 2: much every clip, is that they're all baffled by what
Speaker 2: they're seeing. They're not able to identify what they're seeing. So,
Speaker 2: whether you want to argue this was Flar's or not,
Speaker 2: it's indisputable that the witnesses at the time of the event,
Speaker 2: while they're witnessing in real time, could not identify what
Speaker 2: they were seeing, even though they're trained military witnesses.
Speaker 1: Okay, and do you think it's odd that one of
Speaker 1: the military personnel talks about research into aliens? Do you
Speaker 1: think there could be a bias here? And maybe some
Speaker 1: degree of what Grider is saying makes sense when he
Speaker 1: says that a hoax could be bringing Maybe maybe a
Speaker 1: hoax wasn't planned, but they end up seeing weird lights
Speaker 1: in the sky right that they didn't understand or know
Speaker 1: about that it was going to happen. Right, they are
Speaker 1: actually just flares. But the the guy like me who's
Speaker 1: clearly in that that platoon or battalion or whatever, who
Speaker 1: does want to believe.
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, I think confirmation bias is something everyone has.
Speaker 2: I could definitely, I can definitely see that maybe one
Speaker 2: person who might be a respective person in the group
Speaker 2: might say that's a UFO. There's no way that's anything
Speaker 2: but a UFO. You could see how there could be
Speaker 2: some group group thing happening within within the you know,
Speaker 2: that little cluster there. But my pushback to that, which
Speaker 2: is important is that we don't just have one location.
Speaker 2: We have multiple locations hundreds of feet away from each
Speaker 2: other where you can hear the people commenting on the event,
Speaker 2: and uh, it would have to be some sort of
Speaker 2: mass hallucination at that point, because you can't you couldn't
Speaker 2: attribute that to like one individual starting up, you know,
Speaker 2: a thought within everyone else, because it's happening in two
Speaker 2: different locations far away from each other, so they're they're
Speaker 2: separated from one another, meaning that it's not just one
Speaker 2: person that's causing this.
Speaker 1: Okay, And and again you know I I I think
Speaker 1: that that's what's amazing about the military is is people
Speaker 1: from all different backgrounds. And I don't think just because
Speaker 1: you look into aliens and and you're into the topic
Speaker 1: means that you know nothing that you say about a
Speaker 1: sighting is credible. So Grider, this clip does it stand
Speaker 1: out at all to you?
Speaker 3: And besides the sparking, right, if I'm not mistaken, that's
Speaker 3: the one that it sparks right, you know because I
Speaker 3: was watching it. But I can see, you know, like yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: like my eyes are bad and you know, I mean
Speaker 3: I can't really tell, but those flashes I found out
Speaker 3: what those are. Those are chaff. That's what that is.
Speaker 3: It's chaff. And I've got lights.
Speaker 2: Where the running lights for the craft launching the shaft.
Speaker 3: You don't typically run with your lights on when you're
Speaker 3: training for combat.
Speaker 2: Yes, you absolutely do. No, you get you required a.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean run lights just not true. It's not true.
Speaker 4: When you're on a military base doing you know, doing
Speaker 4: an air training exercise, preparing for combat, you do not.
Speaker 4: You train for combat like you're in combat. You don't
Speaker 4: have your running lights on, you have them off. You
Speaker 4: absolutely run dark.
Speaker 3: Now, if they were to leave the restricted airs space
Speaker 3: and enter the civilian you know, air highways.
Speaker 4: I forgot what they call them. Uh then yeah, they
Speaker 4: absolutely would. They would turn on their ads B and
Speaker 4: they would turn on the running lights. Yeah, but absolutely.
Speaker 2: Definitely this is something we could look up.
Speaker 3: We could look I was gonna say, I can tell
Speaker 3: you because I've like I mean, because I've trained for combat,
Speaker 3: and that's you don't you were never running dark. I've
Speaker 3: been inside of an aircraft at night training like we've
Speaker 3: done sling loads, we've done airsoults. Not.
Speaker 2: We can come back to this an objective This is
Speaker 2: an objective fact that we could find this work.
Speaker 3: So it's not on the other This isn't an opinion.
Speaker 3: It's just not an opinion. You train like you fight.
Speaker 3: And those pilots are wearing nods, they're they're wearing a
Speaker 3: night vision goggles and they have well okay.
Speaker 2: So my my claim is that aircraft on twenty nine
Speaker 2: Palms would have running lights operational one hundred percent of
Speaker 2: the time, and the claim from writer is that sometimes
Speaker 2: they do not have their running lights.
Speaker 3: On all the time. Hey, there's a Foyer photo from
Speaker 3: from John Greenwald from this Foyer release where it shows
Speaker 3: an ospray flying with its lights off over the camera actually,
Speaker 3: I'll send it to you right.
Speaker 2: Now for photos. So if blinking running lights might not
Speaker 2: be captured in a photo.
Speaker 1: So I looked up. So I did look it up.
Speaker 1: So military aircraft actually aren't bound by FAA rules. They
Speaker 1: have their own set of rules to follow. Having said that,
Speaker 1: though their rules are basically followed fa rules with a
Speaker 1: few exceptions. Yes, one of those exceptions is for lights.
Speaker 1: Military aircraft can turn off their lights after dark, but
Speaker 1: only if they're actually flying a mission in an active
Speaker 1: war zone or if they're doing training in an area
Speaker 1: that's been cleared of other aircraft and that's happening to
Speaker 1: FAAR ninety one dot two.
Speaker 2: Okay, well I'm wrong, Thanks for the fact check. So
Speaker 2: you're right, Wright, it could have been an aircraft with
Speaker 2: no running lights launching checks.
Speaker 1: Anti collision lights need not be lit when the pilot
Speaker 1: in command determines that because operating conditions would being the
Speaker 1: interest of safety to turn the lights off. Those are
Speaker 1: other instances.
Speaker 3: Hey, So like my like A big part of my case,
Speaker 3: of my counterpoints is that there was a major air
Speaker 3: exercise going on at this exact same time. There was
Speaker 3: multiple air assets. I'm talking about helicopters, they were doing
Speaker 3: what's called a gosh, what's it called. I don't have
Speaker 3: the paper pulled up, but like they were doing a
Speaker 3: major air refueling. They were doing counter air, like counter
Speaker 3: air with like actual contractors flying like a HIND, which
Speaker 3: is a you know, which is a big chopper that
Speaker 3: you know is it's like the attack helicopter for the Russians,
Speaker 3: it's called the HIND, the twenty eight. They were flying
Speaker 3: an I twenty eight during this exercise as like an
Speaker 3: opposing force, as an OP four. They were also flying
Speaker 3: a couple of I think it was four different fighter jets,
Speaker 3: the F one fighter jet as like an opposing force.
Speaker 3: There was dozens of air assets that were flying helicopters,
Speaker 3: planes and you know jets that were flying within this
Speaker 3: airspace in this exact same hour time period, like right at.
Speaker 1: This I would need to see that, all right, So
Speaker 1: I guess we'll get it, and.
Speaker 2: I would not argue with the fact that there was
Speaker 2: training occurring at a military training base that's happening continuously
Speaker 2: all the time.
Speaker 1: Okay, this is location B Camp Wilson, So okay, okay,
Speaker 1: So the next video about to see is when we
Speaker 1: start seeing other flares in the same sky as the lights, Like,
Speaker 1: let's just call lights, say either way, uh, because that'd
Speaker 1: be siding with one of you. So I'm gonna pull
Speaker 1: this up. Let's add it in so you can see
Speaker 1: that orange light right away, right from right from there.
Speaker 7: Yeah, please tell me this at the end of the world.
Speaker 1: I just want to point out that that's a very
Speaker 1: odd statement for someone to say.
Speaker 3: That's clearly being funny.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, and here are a lot of people
Speaker 2: not why don't you pose it?
Speaker 1: Oh one second, I'll go back. I'll go back.
Speaker 2: Because a lot of people might not be able to
Speaker 2: see the five lights you got kind of pointed out
Speaker 2: to them. Yes, you got the two flares, go ahead, Yeah.
Speaker 1: So we have all right, so we have the two
Speaker 1: very very distinct flares. Now these be recognized, right.
Speaker 3: They they fired.
Speaker 4: Yeah, those are fired by artillery. Like those are actual
Speaker 4: like artillery or maybe even a mortar. They had artillery,
Speaker 4: and they had a couple of mortars that were you know,
Speaker 4: set up at this time period for this field training exercise.
Speaker 1: Okay, and these are the flares that you would have
Speaker 1: more training with, right, It's the.
Speaker 4: Same ones that we you know that we fire in combat.
Speaker 4: But yeah, those are what those are what indirect fire
Speaker 4: illumination rounds look like. Uh, mostly fired from like an
Speaker 4: eighty millimeter one twenty milimeter mortar are maybe even like
Speaker 4: a one twenty one oh five or one twenty millimeter howitzer.
Speaker 3: I don't know if they have one twenties and the
Speaker 3: marine corps, but probably the one of five.
Speaker 1: Okay, but right below it about maybe six inches you
Speaker 1: see the one two through for five lights And they're
Speaker 1: still here now they have significantly significantly either backed up
Speaker 1: or the orientation is just so dramatically different that we
Speaker 1: are that that the camera position is altering our perspective
Speaker 1: to a degree where we see where we think that
Speaker 1: it's further away. But still these things, uh grinder, I
Speaker 1: gotta ask players now, granted, if they were dropped from
Speaker 1: an osprey or not, why would they still all be
Speaker 1: in the same now that they could be falling together
Speaker 1: right at the same rate of speed. But b why
Speaker 1: why are they still in the same perfect formation and
Speaker 1: not not like we saw in the other videos when
Speaker 1: they start trailing out.
Speaker 3: They're not.
Speaker 4: If you go to if you want to quick go
Speaker 4: to picture number sixteen in the media tab, you can
Speaker 4: see the exact the exact photo of the flares, and
Speaker 4: you can see this is from the Foya the Yeah,
Speaker 4: this is from the Foyer release. And you see I've
Speaker 4: got a collage a pretty high rates.
Speaker 2: And I just want to preface I want to push
Speaker 2: back on on these Foya photos. I have a whole
Speaker 2: these are the photos here, These are Foya photos. I
Speaker 2: have a whole trunch of research that I hope we
Speaker 2: can get to, which I am claiming proof.
Speaker 1: I'll stay here. Oh goddamn night. Hey, all right, but
Speaker 1: let's go. Let's let's go.
Speaker 2: These are the Foyer photos taken from the training village
Speaker 2: seventeen miles away from Camp Wilson, allegedly at the same time.
Speaker 3: But I can argue this conspiracy angle.
Speaker 2: This is like the well, well, you can argue the
Speaker 2: points that I'll make. I'll make I'll make my specific
Speaker 2: points why I think hold on, hold on, and then
Speaker 2: you can retort those hold on?
Speaker 1: Are these I'm sorry, I I think I'm confused.
Speaker 4: The different photos of that night, of that exact night
Speaker 4: fire from the opposite side of that mountain. Uh, these
Speaker 4: were taken by a Marine Corps journalists or like it's
Speaker 4: like the job in the Marine Corps and maybe right
Speaker 4: right right, yeah, yeah, So you see the top three
Speaker 4: are the I R flares.
Speaker 2: And now they're not IR flares. IR flares aren't.
Speaker 3: No, they're not. I've already proven that, Arthur. I mean,
Speaker 3: I mean, I don't know how Okay, yeah, I don't think.
Speaker 3: I mean, I can go on and I have three
Speaker 3: more videos showing IR flares visible, and two of them
Speaker 3: are in a daylight setting.
Speaker 2: So if you want to now, I mean, check your sources.
Speaker 4: Okay, okay, we then let's go on and go to
Speaker 4: the videos right now, tylot, go to video number.
Speaker 3: It's right up. Go to video number fourteen, Video fourteen.
Speaker 3: This is why ATK this is a manufacturer of lou
Speaker 3: nineteen IR flares, and this.
Speaker 2: Is I wanted to seek the description. Let's start by
Speaker 2: looking at out.
Speaker 3: I want to look at the description, absolutely absolutely, and
Speaker 3: I'll find the point of drop while you show the description.
Speaker 2: Maybe so, for more than forty years.
Speaker 1: ATK, as you did, yeah, I will uh. For more
Speaker 1: than forty years, ATK has produced illuminating devices for search
Speaker 1: and rescue, military support, and border patrol. ATK flares are
Speaker 1: instrumental in providing warfighters with technology that gives them the
Speaker 1: cutting edge in the out a field aid search and
Speaker 1: rescue operators as they save lives, as well as many
Speaker 1: other applications produced to illuminate in both the visible and
Speaker 1: infrared spectrum. These innovative products are used by the government
Speaker 1: and commercial entities in more than twenty five countries.
Speaker 4: Ty, this is the wrong video. I'm sorry, man, Like
Speaker 4: I I I mean, I must have linked the wrong video.
Speaker 4: This is the the wrong Like, this isn't the right video.
Speaker 3: So wait, I mean you're probably talking about no I
Speaker 3: think that.
Speaker 4: I like, no, that's like a that's a flair burning
Speaker 4: on the ground that I included just to point out
Speaker 4: the fact that they only dropped these over deserts. If
Speaker 4: you give me a second, Well, if you give me, yeah,
Speaker 4: I'll go back to my YouTube and I'll find the
Speaker 4: specific video and we can go back.
Speaker 2: Uh yeah, well we can come back to this. Let's
Speaker 2: get through these videos. You know, we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 2: come back to a lot of stuff once we get
Speaker 2: through the videos.
Speaker 1: Right, right, So while you while you're doing that, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna pull the videos back up. Sorry, guys, Okay, location,
Speaker 1: this is this is the one after, right, I.
Speaker 2: Think it's location A, Location B or the last two
Speaker 2: videos and then the response video. Yeah, this is the
Speaker 2: last video.
Speaker 3: Of the Hey, I think they know we're looking at
Speaker 3: them anyway. Is that what? Those are flares? That we
Speaker 3: know those are flares? But what the fuck are those
Speaker 3: bright lights?
Speaker 2: Posets?
Speaker 3: Yeah, we know those are flare.
Speaker 2: So several of them say those are flares. We know
Speaker 2: those are flares, but what the fuck are those bright lights?
Speaker 2: I think it's exact quote.
Speaker 1: And again again where they're staying in that same formation.
Speaker 2: That go back a little bit. This isn't very clear
Speaker 2: right there.
Speaker 3: Go back.
Speaker 4: Here's one thing to point out to you is that
Speaker 4: when you're firing an indirect fire, when you're firing like
Speaker 4: an illumination round, it produces debris when it separates. When
Speaker 4: that round separates and opens up to where it's a
Speaker 4: parachute flair, you know, it's like there's some debris, like
Speaker 4: there's stuff that could get caught inside of an aircraft
Speaker 4: air intake that would bring up that would potentially bring
Speaker 4: an aircraft down, So they would never fire, they would
Speaker 4: never clear like an artillery gun to shoot an illumination
Speaker 4: round up over a potentially you know, manned or unmanned aircraft.
Speaker 3: It just would not happen. It would not happen. It
Speaker 3: would never happen.
Speaker 1: So what you're saying is you can see a light. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so so, and actually in this video one light does
Speaker 1: seem to have dropped exactly.
Speaker 2: And if you compare that to the famous photo the
Speaker 2: the low light iPhone phos that you were showing earlier,
Speaker 2: it's the same same configuration, yes, right here exactly. So
Speaker 2: that's this shape which is interesting. The Yeah, which is
Speaker 2: interesting because we have two videos of roughly the exact
Speaker 2: same time, because the flares are up in the air
Speaker 2: and that only lasted like one minute that they had
Speaker 2: footage of that. So why are we seeing a drastic
Speaker 2: change in the shape if, in other words the ship.
Speaker 2: The only reason this shape could be changing so drastically
Speaker 2: if it was at the same time, is because it's
Speaker 2: the function of perspective, meaning that the two different locations
Speaker 2: on the base or say like three hundred yards away
Speaker 2: from each other, to the left and right, And it's
Speaker 2: that perspective change that's causing the shift in the in
Speaker 2: the shape of the video, not the actual lights changing themselves.
Speaker 3: Hey, So, one thing I want to point out to
Speaker 3: the to the people that are watching, is that I'm
Speaker 3: not a debunker. I'm actually a believer. I'm a skeptic.
Speaker 3: But I've had in basic training, I had my own
Speaker 3: i had a triangle a triangular craft fly about thirty
Speaker 3: five feet over my head. So like, I'm not a debunker.
Speaker 3: You know, this is not I know it may seem
Speaker 3: like I am right now, but I just want to
Speaker 3: I probably should have said that at the beginning.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I mean, listen, I've I've had intelligence community
Speaker 1: people come up to me and tell me this is
Speaker 1: a training exercise and that I shouldn't be wasting my time,
Speaker 1: essentially multiple but then others that have said that there's
Speaker 1: something else going on here and that it is something.
Speaker 1: So it seems that there's a clear disconnect between this
Speaker 1: this cave uh and and and the the narrative that
Speaker 1: is that's going around. So I am just I there.
Speaker 1: I do want to get into the military response a
Speaker 1: little bit later and and and that aspect, but I'm
Speaker 1: sorry I did. Someone just walked in, so I kind
Speaker 1: of lost my train of thought there. But my my
Speaker 1: big thing about this is how are these guys, what
Speaker 1: is there any situation Grider, where these people stage at
Speaker 1: Camp Wilson would not be informed of a base wide drill.
Speaker 1: I mean, does that make sense to you?
Speaker 3: Want to get I have the exactly Okay, give me
Speaker 3: a second to pull up, so I have the exact
Speaker 3: number of aircraft that were in the air.
Speaker 2: You're diverting. His question is would the men at Camp
Speaker 2: Wilson be in your opinion, would the soldiers who are
Speaker 2: getting ready to go to bed that night be informed
Speaker 2: of a massive training exercise that night?
Speaker 1: That's the question.
Speaker 3: Yes, if they were not a part of it, probably not.
Speaker 3: Probably not like this, you know, like maybe the officers,
Speaker 3: but like why would they announce if there's other units,
Speaker 3: like they got done with their stuff for the day,
Speaker 3: Like why would they be Hey guys, you know you
Speaker 3: know y'all have been out training all day. You're tired.
Speaker 3: Oh we hey, you know, like let's have a deep
Speaker 3: briefing about what some other units doing. No, Like they
Speaker 3: wouldn't care. They wouldn't care at all.
Speaker 2: So you think if it was separate units, they wouldn't
Speaker 2: be in They wouldn't know a separate units.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well you don't.
Speaker 2: You don't know that it was absolutely separate units, but
Speaker 2: I mean in.
Speaker 3: Your unit would be out there.
Speaker 1: I just I just find it. And fifty. Again, that's
Speaker 1: what liberally we're saying fifty because I think that area
Speaker 1: I've been trying to look into it, but it houses
Speaker 1: I think Arthur and I what was it like, somewhere
Speaker 1: upwards of three hundred.
Speaker 2: I couldn't get you the exact numbers of people, but
Speaker 2: I would say in the hundreds that they witness.
Speaker 1: If it was full.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so.
Speaker 1: I think that, yeah, yeah, so you know, fair enough,
Speaker 1: fair enough. I'm just saying that it seems very, very
Speaker 1: weird that from the people that have come forward and
Speaker 1: from the sounds that you hear in some of the videos,
Speaker 1: like like the chaos that you can hear in the
Speaker 1: back not chaos. It's not like they're freaking out, but
Speaker 1: you can hear a lot of people, like you know,
Speaker 1: yelling and screaming. It just seems that there's a lot
Speaker 1: of people that were informed. And if we're to believe
Speaker 1: that this was a massive training exercise, right, a base
Speaker 1: wide training exercise that involved a convoy of fifty to
Speaker 1: seventy trucks, jets, helicopters, flares, more flares that somehow stay
Speaker 1: in a v for god knows how long. It just
Speaker 1: seems weird to me that the base wouldn't know that
Speaker 1: some sort of memo wouldn't go out saying, by the way,
Speaker 1: just so you know this is going to be happening
Speaker 1: at this hour, at this time, at this place, you know,
Speaker 1: you know, just be.
Speaker 3: For safety reasons for one, safety for what those guys are,
Speaker 3: Like those guys are on Camp Wilson or on at
Speaker 3: that exact same time. All right, So at the exact
Speaker 3: same time, at that exact time, right at right at
Speaker 3: eight o'clock, there was an air okay, what's called an
Speaker 3: eighty g R a d g R, an air delivered
Speaker 3: ground refueling exercise. There was what's called a farp F
Speaker 3: a r P, which is a Ford Arming Refueling point
Speaker 3: exercise which includes ground units going to secure and set
Speaker 3: up a refueling point. Uh. There was a there were
Speaker 3: two different objectives that were being uh you know, uh,
Speaker 3: that were being bounded down upon, that were being taken
Speaker 3: uh in some type of close quarters combat you know,
Speaker 3: training exercise. There was another a d g R, this
Speaker 3: one being a tar T a a R or a
Speaker 3: tilt rotor air to air refueling. So there was air
Speaker 3: to air refueling going on for the tilt rotor, which
Speaker 3: is osprey. Then there was a r h A a ARE,
Speaker 3: which was a helicopter air to air refueling, which is
Speaker 3: I mean, so there were three different types of refuel
Speaker 3: actually four different types of refueling exercises that were going on.
Speaker 3: And on top of that, there was close air, there
Speaker 3: was counter air that was going on, there was defensive
Speaker 3: Op four air that was in. I mean, this is
Speaker 3: like a major training event, guys. I mean, I'm talking
Speaker 3: about dozens of aircraft like in the air. You know there.
Speaker 3: I mean, there's no way that they didn't know. There's
Speaker 3: no way. I mean, there's just no way.
Speaker 2: So you're saying they did know.
Speaker 3: And again, there's no way that they didn't know. All
Speaker 3: these aircraft were in the air. Aircraft are allowed, helicopters.
Speaker 2: Who didn't know, There's no way who didn't know, do you?
Speaker 2: I mean the the Marines, so the witnesses. So you're
Speaker 2: saying the witnesses did know that there was a major
Speaker 2: exercise that night and are lying about it.
Speaker 1: They were don't try to make this way, well, well,
Speaker 1: circling back, I am not I'm not I'm speaking literally gibberish.
Speaker 1: Right now, that sounds like what you were just insinuating.
Speaker 1: I'm strictly Joe Rogan right now, that sounded like what
Speaker 1: you were saying. So I don't know what. Okay, So
Speaker 1: maybe there's just maybe their words just aren't coming out right.
Speaker 3: They were a part of the major training exercise like
Speaker 3: those like but you just told us. I'm saying that,
Speaker 3: like the Grand exercise, like that's what they're doing their training,
Speaker 3: like they're on that based training. They were in their downtime.
Speaker 3: They may not have been a part of like the
Speaker 3: air exercise, but they were absolutely a part of the
Speaker 3: overall training environment, like.
Speaker 2: You're training every single day writer, that's what they're there
Speaker 2: to do.
Speaker 3: They're training exactly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but that would also go against the notion. Hmm, okay,
Speaker 1: all right, all right, all right, there's that one more. Uh,
Speaker 1: there's a couple of photos I believe right now, I
Speaker 1: would like to show those photos for a specific Pleason video.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that covers all the videos of the event.
Speaker 2: There's some photos of the event as well, some low
Speaker 2: light photos. That's the response the response videos.
Speaker 1: So let's actually.
Speaker 7: So many helicopters.
Speaker 3: They're chasing some they're.
Speaker 7: They're going fast as hell too. They're in like a formation,
Speaker 7: so many helicopters.
Speaker 1: Twice they're.
Speaker 7: They're going fast as hell too. They're in like a formation.
Speaker 1: All right, I just wanted BEFO, you guys speak. I
Speaker 1: want to I want to note that what we hear
Speaker 1: is I don't want to get beamed up, right, So
Speaker 1: again some sort of reference to UFO. But we also
Speaker 1: hear one person speaking about a massive response. However, we
Speaker 1: don't see it. We don't see it specifically. We can
Speaker 1: hear it a little bit, but we don't know exactly
Speaker 1: what we're what we're seeing. There's some blinking lights and
Speaker 1: that that that right there? Does anyone know if that
Speaker 1: is right there in the lights?
Speaker 2: And no, But all you can see is some blinking lights,
Speaker 2: which is running lights for some sort of aircraft, probably helicopters.
Speaker 2: And so there's another example of the aircraft actually using
Speaker 2: their running lights night.
Speaker 3: So yeah, well, I mean we have a picture of
Speaker 3: one not using its lights or if it's in that
Speaker 3: fraction of a second, you.
Speaker 1: Know where the all right, and again we've established that
Speaker 1: they make that choice.
Speaker 3: Yes, it is possible if they're doing something as high
Speaker 3: risk as refueling, doing air to air helicopter at helicopter refueling,
Speaker 3: which is one of the most dangerous things that you
Speaker 3: can do in the military by far, you know, then
Speaker 3: they probably would have their running lights on.
Speaker 4: But if you want to go to twenty one and
Speaker 4: twenty two, you can go to either one. I have
Speaker 4: a like, I have two different collages of all the
Speaker 4: different aircraft that were in the area, and I'll as
Speaker 4: you go over them, I'll give you the number of
Speaker 4: them that were in the air at this exact moment.
Speaker 2: Well, we can get into the weeds there soon. But
Speaker 2: are we going to go over the witness testimony as well?
Speaker 1: Yes, I mean yes, I think you can do this
Speaker 1: justice without it.
Speaker 2: So let's go over the photos. Let's go over the
Speaker 2: photos and the low light photos. Do you have those?
Speaker 1: I can bring them up, Yeah, if you can, just
Speaker 1: so I can clear up my tab situation here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I can do that, no problem.
Speaker 1: So I again, this the massive response element. These people
Speaker 1: in the video, the video that we just watch specifically,
Speaker 1: they sound like they have no clue what's happening, and
Speaker 1: they say it looks like they're chasing something and then
Speaker 1: the beamed up thing. So again, are we dealing with
Speaker 1: multiple people hoaxing because these are different angles, clearly different
Speaker 1: people taking the videos. So I find it hard to
Speaker 1: believe that this would be a hoax being perpetrated through
Speaker 1: multiple people.
Speaker 2: That's a very good point, Ty, That's what I was
Speaker 2: trying to drive home, that we're not dealing And you
Speaker 2: could maybe make the argument that if it was one
Speaker 2: group of people at one place, that a hoax could
Speaker 2: be possible. But when you're talking about multiple locations not
Speaker 2: connected to each other, that chance of simultaneously multiple groups
Speaker 2: of people decided to do the exact same hoax at
Speaker 2: the same time, that seems very unlikely. At that point.
Speaker 3: I mean, you're like, you have no idea what these
Speaker 3: people were thinking. Yet we're talking about things that we
Speaker 3: have no way to prove that we have no You
Speaker 3: have no idea what what they were thinking or what
Speaker 3: they knew.
Speaker 1: We don't know, And that's a that's an absolutely fair point.
Speaker 1: So what did you want to what did you want
Speaker 1: to get by with the hot low resipics?
Speaker 2: Well, just that this is probably the most famous one
Speaker 2: and there is some sort of shading in the background
Speaker 2: of this triangle as you can see if the filter
Speaker 2: applied that there's some sort of looks like the outline
Speaker 2: of a craft. But maybe it's not. But there is
Speaker 2: some sort of something filter And a lot of people say, well,
Speaker 2: that's you know, smoke that's causing that outline to be
Speaker 2: a pure But I would say, smoke rises up. Smoke
Speaker 2: rises up, and you can clearly see that there is
Speaker 2: some sort of shading below the four top the four
Speaker 2: top lights.
Speaker 3: I mean, I don't know too much. I mean, like,
Speaker 3: can't that happen when I mean, when you're applying a
Speaker 3: filter like it, I mean, don't filters.
Speaker 2: You can even see it in the original. You can
Speaker 2: see it in the original.
Speaker 8: I mean that can be glare, that can be anything, right,
Speaker 8: I mean as a as a as an expert in
Speaker 8: photography myself, I would say that it could be an
Speaker 8: artifact of the camera and if the especially if they're.
Speaker 1: Uh using low exposure. But but and that would that
Speaker 1: it would it would give like some if this was moving,
Speaker 1: it would essentially give it some sort of motion blur,
Speaker 1: but it would it would be more in tune with
Speaker 1: the light of the the light that the it would
Speaker 1: be more it wouldn't be dark black like that. So right,
Speaker 1: But but I'm actually leaning to you, now yeah, well
Speaker 1: I'm leaning. I'm not, I'm not.
Speaker 2: It could it could be an artifact. I'll grant you
Speaker 2: that it could be an artifact of the camera.
Speaker 1: That could be the smoke.
Speaker 2: But I will all again, I will argue it against
Speaker 2: it being the smoke because smoke rises up and there
Speaker 2: would not be smoked below the lights if they were flares.
Speaker 3: What if there was a gust of wind, you know,
Speaker 3: there was a gust of wind, right could blow.
Speaker 2: If there was a gust of wind. Number oh you know, Okay,
Speaker 2: we can argue this point. It's not even that strong.
Speaker 2: But I would just say this, you know, looks like
Speaker 2: that it could be the outline of something. And I
Speaker 2: think that's interesting to at least note. And we'll just
Speaker 2: go through the different photos.
Speaker 3: I mean, it looks like the light from the flares
Speaker 3: like reflecting or glaring off of smoke. That's what it
Speaker 3: looks like to me.
Speaker 2: To me, it looks like Zeta reticulans projecting holograms.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, I mean, you know it's I
Speaker 3: the beholder, right, I mean, that's you know, it's our
Speaker 3: problem here.
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, so that's the most famous low light photo.
Speaker 2: But we'll get through all the Here's another one. You
Speaker 2: can kind of see it. It's much smaller in this photo,
Speaker 2: but you can see the structures as well.
Speaker 1: This one here. We do have a reference point. Can
Speaker 1: you go back? Yeah, we have a we just went back,
Speaker 1: all right, so we have a reference point.
Speaker 2: And whatever this this and we actually know exactly where
Speaker 2: this was taken, if you if I could bring up
Speaker 2: Google Earth, it's been it's been determined exactly where this was.
Speaker 1: Okay, and it seems like now this is where I
Speaker 1: get I get a little shaky because I'm not seeing
Speaker 1: those golden flares in the sky at this point. So
Speaker 1: have they either fallen down and gone away or have
Speaker 1: they not been shot yet?
Speaker 2: And they haven't been shot yet, because according to what
Speaker 2: the witnesses said, the flares shot up, the two flare
Speaker 2: shot up, and that the after about a minute, the
Speaker 2: five light formation disappeared.
Speaker 3: Hmmm, they said, floor out right. I just want to
Speaker 3: make that distinction that they said, quote unquote it blinked.
Speaker 3: The lights blinked out one by one.
Speaker 2: No, they did not say one by one.
Speaker 1: Well, we can get I got the documents right here, brother,
Speaker 1: hold on, yeah, if you want to pull them up.
Speaker 1: But I thought I wasn't saying I thought we listened
Speaker 1: all the testimony. I don't remember them saying blinking out.
Speaker 1: I remember them saying that they disappear. Yeah, that's what
Speaker 1: I remember too, That's what I remember. I'm the modeling.
Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, no, man, I've I've got the transcript. I'll
Speaker 4: take a screenshot of the transcript and then actually I'll
Speaker 4: find the clue.
Speaker 2: We're gonna be We're gonna be listening to the witnesses.
Speaker 3: So I know the pain's coming. Don't worry.
Speaker 1: Don't worry the pains companies.
Speaker 2: But we'll go through these other photos. This is another one,
Speaker 2: a low light photo. This is in this one. It's
Speaker 2: very symmetrical, extremely symmetrical. So that's just interesting.
Speaker 1: I will give you that that one seems to be taken.
Speaker 3: From a different things that is symmetrical for sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yes, again, it confuses me because what time.
Speaker 2: This is different to me? Yes, see the shapes are
Speaker 2: different between these two, yes, and the lighting is different,
Speaker 2: and the time of day it seems like it's a
Speaker 2: different time of day. It's different. Cameras different location, different camera.
Speaker 2: Here's one that's taken through a night vision goggles.
Speaker 1: I did see before.
Speaker 2: You can't really see anything. It's just a giant Can
Speaker 2: you go back?
Speaker 4: Actually a video there's actually like that's a video, not
Speaker 4: just a picture, Like that's an actual video.
Speaker 1: When did that?
Speaker 3: Ten seconds? I'll find the video clip.
Speaker 1: Hold on when we didn't get to that. I never
Speaker 1: saw that picture.
Speaker 2: This this night vision one the binocular.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's like through a PVS fourteen probably
Speaker 4: or a PVS seven.
Speaker 1: And is that trained on that object?
Speaker 2: This is l formation.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's coming out as just a big ball of light.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's from an angle. It's probably from the you know,
Speaker 3: the side of it. Maybe that that that could actually
Speaker 3: have been taken from like the helicopter that dropped it,
Speaker 3: you know, for all the window you can see the
Speaker 3: building the air.
Speaker 2: This is This is a building on the right. I
Speaker 2: think this is taken from it. You can see the
Speaker 2: mountain range.
Speaker 4: The buildings on top of the mountain. Okay, you could
Speaker 4: be right. That looks like it's higher an elevation. I
Speaker 4: mean that looks like an upward elevation. They have buildings
Speaker 4: on the side of the mountains you know down there?
Speaker 1: Yeah, and is that is that a is that a window?
Speaker 1: Or is this an that?
Speaker 3: Is that what that is?
Speaker 2: Yeah? I think the cell phone and they put it
Speaker 2: up to the night vision monocular or by night whatever.
Speaker 3: Does that not look like clouds?
Speaker 5: That?
Speaker 3: It's like some clouds to me?
Speaker 1: You see that, there are definitely some clouds.
Speaker 2: You see a little bit of clouds. A little whisky.
Speaker 1: Can I ask what your point with the cloud is.
Speaker 3: I'm just making the point for I can pull it
Speaker 3: out later, you know, when it you know it's I mean,
Speaker 3: just you.
Speaker 1: Know, just for future it's relevant, Okay, all right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I have.
Speaker 3: No idea when it will be relevant. I'm just making
Speaker 3: the point.
Speaker 2: Okay. Here's a photo of the guys out there watching it,
Speaker 2: and I'm just gonna count. I can see one, two, three,
Speaker 2: I can see four phones.
Speaker 3: And then.
Speaker 1: Count shadows to one. One shadow you can see has
Speaker 1: a is holding up a phone like this or holding
Speaker 1: something up. So there's another There's one, two, three, four,
Speaker 1: five people in the shot that we can't see, but
Speaker 1: we can see their shadows.
Speaker 2: And this is only one side. There's two sides to
Speaker 2: these bunks, and each one of these bunks and I
Speaker 2: think has at least probably like ten people in it.
Speaker 4: Maybe those things are huge. I mean, like I haven't
Speaker 4: been inside one of those. Those are specific like marine training,
Speaker 4: you know, uh huts or whatever. But you know they're
Speaker 4: like right, it's like the half half like cylinders.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Like we had like plywood b huts that are
Speaker 3: basically it's like a plywood shed basically, and like put
Speaker 3: Hesco barriers on the side of it, you know, just
Speaker 3: like big baskets filled with sand and then yeah, you
Speaker 3: know plywood roof. You know. Yeah, like that's what we had.
Speaker 3: Sounds like nice, but a lot more probably fit fifty people.
Speaker 1: I would say. It sounds like you guys got the
Speaker 1: ship end of the stick on that one.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean it's yeah, yeah, But I like the
Speaker 3: marine slept in the same things. You know.
Speaker 4: The ply would be huts down range, you know, but
Speaker 4: they had nice training you know, like when what we
Speaker 4: would go to the field, we would just be in
Speaker 4: inside of like our humbies sleeping.
Speaker 3: You know. We didn't have any of these nice you know,
Speaker 3: these really nice facilities.
Speaker 1: Okay. Uh So, something I brought up during the podcast
Speaker 1: that Arthur and I did was these guys are out
Speaker 1: there and they're skibbies. It's like they ran out there, right.
Speaker 1: So this is again bringing me back to the point
Speaker 1: that they it doesn't seem like they knew what was
Speaker 1: going on, that they're that this was a surprise to them,
Speaker 1: that holy like, hey, guys, get out here and check
Speaker 1: this out, right, and then everyone comes out looks like
Speaker 1: everyone's you know, if you're saying, you know, these men,
Speaker 1: if this is routine, right, YadA, YadA, YadA, it doesn't
Speaker 1: seem like they'd be that interested. They have other things
Speaker 1: to do, like maybe they want to catch rack, catch
Speaker 1: rack for the next day. I don't know, just how
Speaker 1: many times have you seen people come out like this.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's what we would would hang out outside.
Speaker 4: It's probably nice and cool. I doubt those things have
Speaker 4: air conditioning, I don't, you know. I mean it's probably
Speaker 4: I mean, I guess it was kind of pro like,
Speaker 4: probably pretty cool.
Speaker 3: But think about it.
Speaker 4: Okay, So there's at least a company, at least one
Speaker 4: company that's over one hundred and men, I mean probably
Speaker 4: one hundred and ten, you know, maybe maybe a little
Speaker 4: bit more, maybe closer to one fifty.
Speaker 3: And that's what maybe fifteen.
Speaker 4: Guys that are outside, you know, hanging out like they're
Speaker 4: probably smoking a cigarette. You know, it's like you're outside,
Speaker 4: you know, what else it's her to do, like, you know,
Speaker 4: go to But the lights are still.
Speaker 3: In the hut.
Speaker 2: And that's not what I see. That's not what I see.
Speaker 2: I see people barefoot. I see people standing in lines
Speaker 2: looking up at the sky holding their cell phones, pointing
Speaker 2: at the what I assume to be the five light formation.
Speaker 2: I don't see this as a routine, casual gathering outdoor.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's the last time you've been out in the
Speaker 4: field with like, you know, a group of like people
Speaker 4: in the military. You know, it's hang outside, you smoke,
Speaker 4: you hang out inside, and they're probably wearing their shower shoes.
Speaker 1: Like I don't. I don't take pictures of people smoking.
Speaker 3: They're taking pictures of like the flares.
Speaker 2: Why like I took I mean, I would they be
Speaker 2: taking pictures of flares in the first place.
Speaker 1: And I'm not I'm not trying to I'm not trying to.
Speaker 3: Battle, right, They're cool, Like they're cool, Like they're like,
Speaker 3: what else is they to take pictures of?
Speaker 4: You know, it's it's fun, you know, maybe the I
Speaker 4: don't know, you know, uh, you know, send to their
Speaker 4: uh look at this, this is cool, you know, send
Speaker 4: to you know, people like corbells, so that they can,
Speaker 4: you know, create a mass media frenzy over nothing.
Speaker 3: I mean, I don't know. I don't know. I don't
Speaker 3: know who can who can know what these men were thinking?
Speaker 2: Likes Well, you're you're certainly you know, suggesting you do
Speaker 2: know what they're thinking, and so I, you know, I
Speaker 2: I'll push.
Speaker 3: Back on that. I'm saying I'm doing the exact opposite, Arthur.
Speaker 3: I'm saying, we do not know. We have no way
Speaker 3: of knowing what they're thinking. I don't know how else to, like,
Speaker 3: can we put this on like a bit.
Speaker 2: But then you start creating narratives of what they might
Speaker 2: be thinking. It's okay, they're out there smoking. They're out
Speaker 2: there because it's too hot.
Speaker 3: Is that a narrative? I'll get Tony out of here.
Speaker 3: What he better be paying for that, right, you better
Speaker 3: be paying for that.
Speaker 2: I think that they're I think they're out there steering
Speaker 2: at the UFO. They're out there steering at the UFO.
Speaker 1: So again, this picture, in my in a neutral aspect,
Speaker 1: I just don't see that if this is a normal
Speaker 1: routine training exercise. I just I can't explain this picture.
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess I can. I guess, I guess
Speaker 1: I can. It's just it's not It's not a picture
Speaker 1: I would take, like in any circumstance of just people
Speaker 1: out in their underwear in the middle of the desert
Speaker 1: looking up at flares known.
Speaker 3: Flair would be surprised. What else would take pictures of,
Speaker 3: you know, when we're out there in the field, Like,
Speaker 3: I guess he's taking a picture of his friends looking
Speaker 3: at Flairs, like because he knows that he's probably Flairs.
Speaker 3: You know, he's probably taking a picture to laugh at him,
Speaker 3: you know later, like look at all you guys out there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I really want to stamp to you know.
Speaker 2: I completely disagree with this hoax idea that you keep
Speaker 2: saying that these are honorable men, they're not liars, they're
Speaker 2: not hoaxers, they're not manipulating what they saw. I think
Speaker 2: these are train marines. And I will continue to push
Speaker 2: back against your your accusations the guys or anything but trustworthy.
Speaker 3: See now you're making it about that. See that's a
Speaker 3: real bad that's a real evil stroll man I can
Speaker 3: tell that you really, you really think you're losing the
Speaker 3: the debate here Arthur to go that, look, well.
Speaker 2: It's because your entire your entire argument is based on
Speaker 2: these witnesses.
Speaker 3: It's not. No, it's not dude. That's a really low blow.
Speaker 2: But I mean, you know, well we can move on that.
Speaker 2: This is the last photo. We got two more. So
Speaker 2: here here's a couple more low light photos.
Speaker 3: I forgot the game where you like go under the bar, like,
Speaker 3: what is that called.
Speaker 2: Below the belt?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: No, no, ship, Yeah, no, I know what you're talking
Speaker 1: about that and you go like yeah, yeah, like what
Speaker 1: the hell is that called?
Speaker 7: What is it called?
Speaker 3: Just how you know?
Speaker 1: Just how in touch we are?
Speaker 3: I think we are lim limbo limbo.
Speaker 1: Yes, thank you guys, Thank you guys. The chat we
Speaker 1: have we have we have close to two thousand people watching,
Speaker 1: uh and only like twenty on YouTube. Yeah so literally
Speaker 1: YouTube mats me so much. It's so funny. But thank you.
Speaker 1: Please anyone who's watching, if you do, mind switching over
Speaker 1: from Twitter over to YouTube, uh and subscribe. I I
Speaker 1: know I'm pausing this a little bit, but it would
Speaker 1: really mean the world to me, uh, because I do
Speaker 1: try to bring content like this, give people platforms, uh,
Speaker 1: and to hear everybody out no matter what, no matter
Speaker 1: if it's Wick, Mick West, Stephen green Street, whether it's
Speaker 1: Robert Sallas, uh, Mario Woods. I have them all. So
Speaker 1: let's continue the debate. Guys.
Speaker 3: Oh, just like one more thing if I can do
Speaker 3: my own advertisement. So I'm gonna be here, okay, disclosure, Okay,
Speaker 3: a disclosure dinner with my disclosure whistleblower named Charles.
Speaker 4: We're gonna have you come to the you know, you
Speaker 4: come to the prison. We're gonna have grilled cheese off
Speaker 4: the radiator, you know, nice fancy meal. And for three
Speaker 4: thousand dollars you can have a talk with my my
Speaker 4: own disclosure whistleblower, all right, one on one, find out
Speaker 4: the real truths, and then afterwards.
Speaker 3: You go out and get shanked in on the basketball court.
Speaker 3: So three thousand dollars, I'll tell it. I'll knock it
Speaker 3: down to fifteen hundred for my friends on Twitter.
Speaker 1: All right, are you uh?
Speaker 3: Are you?
Speaker 1: Are you secretly doctor Greer?
Speaker 2: No, he's talking about this guy. You don't know about
Speaker 2: the prison whistle You'll.
Speaker 3: Get into it right now. That was the ke you know,
Speaker 3: let's let the joke marinate, all right. You know, I'll
Speaker 3: explain it to you later. But uh, doctor Greer, Hey,
Speaker 3: we could shift this in a doctor Greer and just
Speaker 3: get our hate on. You know, like I'm saying right now,
Speaker 3: I'm prore parachute flares. He does like career off the
Speaker 3: parachute flares.
Speaker 2: You know, I want to debunk that. We'll save that debunking.
Speaker 2: We'll save that debate for another day.
Speaker 3: But Arthur Man, you're just on the wrong side of
Speaker 3: all this.
Speaker 2: Man, Oh, you think everything is flares?
Speaker 3: I know. No, No, I do not. I do not.
Speaker 3: I absolutely do not believe you know, one verse of
Speaker 3: whatever you think. If I was a betting man, you
Speaker 3: know I bet the opposite.
Speaker 1: All right, Shots shots fired, right, I mean, he starts, no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: it's okay, It's okay. Shots fired real back in. We
Speaker 1: got two pictures in front of us, two photos nineteen
Speaker 1: seconds apart. We're flying high, all right.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 1: Why we don't know exactly in reference from when the videos?
Speaker 1: So Grider, A big thing that you talk about is
Speaker 1: that there's no video longer than thirty seconds. There is
Speaker 1: a video longer than thirty seconds. There's a thirty six
Speaker 1: second video. But I will agree with you in the
Speaker 1: sense that there are four to five videos that total,
Speaker 1: if you were to sequentially add them up, only add
Speaker 1: up to about three or to four minutes maybe, And
Speaker 1: you've hedged a lot on that aspect. I don't understand.
Speaker 1: So the pictures here that we're seeing, we don't know
Speaker 1: when they were taken in reference to when the videos
Speaker 1: were taken. This has caused a lot of frustration. So
Speaker 1: I wish we could get some of the metadata from
Speaker 1: the videos and photos so that we could start saying.
Speaker 3: Here's the thing, though, I just want to at a
Speaker 3: fact to this.
Speaker 2: These are the only two photos that we have metadata
Speaker 2: on because these weren't These didn't come from Corbell. These
Speaker 2: came from a Reddit users, another witness. So we have
Speaker 2: to intact metadata from the iCloud so we can be
Speaker 2: confident when these were taken.
Speaker 4: Okay, so these are the photos? Yeah, because someone just
Speaker 4: DM me. Goodness, someone just dm me uh And I
Speaker 4: took a look briefly at it. I think I think
Speaker 4: this is like on you know, the second Mickwest debunk.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, oh yeah, I'm a fed. Yeah, we're so delusional.
Speaker 1: But I started that comment.
Speaker 3: Oh it's cool, it's I mean's whatever, you know, it's
Speaker 3: I love that stuff. But yeah, so apparently these are
Speaker 3: the photos.
Speaker 4: No, No, I didn't, and I thought I only thought
Speaker 4: that because there's some erroneous work done by another.
Speaker 3: It's just not really. I'm okay, I take responsibilities. We'll
Speaker 3: go well, you know what, we're always trying to think
Speaker 3: outside the box.
Speaker 1: You know what, I'm the last, the last, the last
Speaker 1: twenty minutes of this.
Speaker 3: Well, well, you want to be cussing each other out,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying, Like, Yeah, we'll want to
Speaker 3: tell Arthur exactly what I think of a minute's freaking
Speaker 3: Cole's clearance rack attire? You know?
Speaker 1: Is that all that way into it?
Speaker 3: Oh, you're gonna find out.
Speaker 1: No, but I wanted to ask you a question about
Speaker 1: Ashton Forbes.
Speaker 3: No, I I defer. I've like, I really don't like
Speaker 3: to talk crap about people unless they're like right there.
Speaker 3: You know, if Ashton come on, like, we'll go back
Speaker 3: to the old days of me cussing them out, you know,
Speaker 3: and blowing up, and you can kick me out of
Speaker 3: the chat, you know, like I used to kick out
Speaker 3: of spaces, like we can go back to the old days.
Speaker 3: That's right. Now.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to know your views on it, all, right, Okay, anyway,
Speaker 1: so the metadata, the metadata would be very crucial to
Speaker 1: this case. Yes, in at least verifying when each video
Speaker 1: is taken, so that we could correspond and correlate that
Speaker 1: either you know, if there's overlap or or not, so
Speaker 1: that we could start piecing together timeframes. Grinder in your experience,
Speaker 1: Even if if flares were dropped from an osprey in
Speaker 1: this formation, how long would they stay in the air
Speaker 1: at alta minutes? Seven minutes? Okaytes, And that aligns with
Speaker 1: the research that we've done, that that Arthur and I
Speaker 1: have done.
Speaker 3: Now, okay, you guys, okay, you got a little research
Speaker 3: on your own.
Speaker 1: Okay, yes, so Arthur, yea, Arthur, Arthur, what what are
Speaker 1: the significance of these photos being nineteen seconds apart, uh
Speaker 1: taken by another user separate from the Corbell investigation?
Speaker 2: Well, they're they're very important for my research specifically because
Speaker 2: it's the only iPhone photos where we have a certainty
Speaker 2: what time they were taken. So later on I'll show
Speaker 2: that the Foya photos don't match up with the with
Speaker 2: the timeline from these two specific photos and in other words,
Speaker 2: the FOYA photos, which are you know, quote unquote debunking
Speaker 2: this case. We're taking much earlier and you can clearly
Speaker 2: see that the flares had burnt out at that point.
Speaker 3: So these are these are crucial. They took it earlier
Speaker 3: in preparation for the UFO that was going to appear
Speaker 3: like minutes later. Is that what? No?
Speaker 2: No, My My theory, I'll wrap it up pretty quickly
Speaker 2: is that there was a mass u ap siding at
Speaker 2: this base. It was an incursion by an unknown It
Speaker 2: caused a significant ruckus on the base with massive response,
Speaker 2: and that part of their information containment operation of this
Speaker 2: massive up siding was to at a later date stage
Speaker 2: a five light flare and a similar configuration so that
Speaker 2: at a later date that they could just publish those
Speaker 2: to instantly debunk the case before it gains traction.
Speaker 3: That's a that's a creative story.
Speaker 4: But how are you going to explain the fact that
Speaker 4: they had all these air assets scheduled for this exact
Speaker 4: time to be doing a training exercise where it was
Speaker 4: like literally they always.
Speaker 2: They're doing training exercises every day, every night.
Speaker 3: Aircraft like at this exact time, fifty aircraft, you know,
Speaker 3: multiple multiple altitudes, like stacked up at all I mean
Speaker 3: at all levels, coordinating with it. They're always training refueling point. Okay,
Speaker 3: well you know see.
Speaker 1: Well well let's let's let's let's let's stop flying guys.
Speaker 3: So I have the data, but you know, we're.
Speaker 2: Your point is that there was a training exercise that night,
Speaker 2: And I say, yes, there was a training exercise that night.
Speaker 2: There's training exercise.
Speaker 1: You're saying that all these.
Speaker 3: Air assets rushed into the area when I'm saying that
Speaker 3: they were they were scheduled to be in the area
Speaker 3: at that exact time.
Speaker 2: I had over Camp Wilson.
Speaker 3: Yes, over They were not over Camp Wilson, like they
Speaker 3: were over the training range. They were over the range
Speaker 3: like I have. I tried to pull out this you
Speaker 3: know proof earlier and I got shut down.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, I was gonna say this. If we're actually
Speaker 1: looking at this, this craft is far if sorry, I
Speaker 1: said craft, that's just that was my bad. This thing
Speaker 1: is over the mountain. It looks like to some degree,
Speaker 1: I would say that's.
Speaker 3: An aircraft off to the left too, right, like it's
Speaker 3: in that an aircraft. I have the ADSP data. I
Speaker 3: wonder you see that off to the left.
Speaker 1: I do see that off to the last.
Speaker 3: It's got to be an airplane, a civilian airliner.
Speaker 2: Oh, there's just a well how.
Speaker 1: Would that be how would that be cleared in that?
Speaker 3: I mean, that's probably way off.
Speaker 4: That's probably like okay, so o wait, so Camp Wilson
Speaker 4: is on like the bottom portion, like if you look
Speaker 4: at a map of twenty nine.
Speaker 3: In fact, I've got a map if you go to uh,
Speaker 3: if you go to number I have it right here.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well you know I don't really want your map go
Speaker 3: to a number eleven. Yes, yes, not.
Speaker 2: This is Camp Wilson. So this is Camp Wilson on
Speaker 2: the left, weiber eleven. It's the training village.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I've got a better map.
Speaker 1: He actually does have a really good map.
Speaker 3: You got six of them.
Speaker 2: So the foyer photos were taking from this training village
Speaker 2: seventeen miles away from Camp Wilson.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so look okay, so right there you see right
Speaker 3: there and like the bottom left and like the bottom
Speaker 3: see that, like that's where Camp Wilson is right there
Speaker 3: in that kind of that you know that bottom left
Speaker 3: area right there? Uh more clothes, I mean it's like
Speaker 3: in that pocket you see it? Okay, so dang, I
Speaker 3: wish you could see my so well.
Speaker 1: All right, bottom left, it draw me to where you
Speaker 1: are right there.
Speaker 4: It's like right, you know, like Camp Wilson in the
Speaker 4: airport and everything is that's right there in the right
Speaker 4: side of that uh tan area, that really khaki colored
Speaker 4: area that doesn't have any you know, circles over it
Speaker 4: or any it's like that. All the lines are around
Speaker 4: you see what I'm saying, But it's still marked off
Speaker 4: by that solid black line at the bottom.
Speaker 3: You see how it kind of there's a black line.
Speaker 2: It's really hard to describe. You'd have to put your
Speaker 2: cursor right there.
Speaker 1: To Yeah, I'm having a hard time with it. Well
Speaker 1: all right, all right, all right, you labeled them one, two, three, four, five, six,
Speaker 1: let's uh, let's stay on number one and guide me.
Speaker 3: Those are coordinators though with like the data that I had,
Speaker 3: like which you don't want to go in, which we
Speaker 3: don't want to get into right now.
Speaker 1: So no, we'll get into it here.
Speaker 3: Hold on, hold on, hold on, yeah, I mean probably
Speaker 3: let's go in and save this. And like I was
Speaker 3: just trying to show you guys where Camp Wilson. Is
Speaker 3: is what I was doing? All right?
Speaker 1: Well yeah he was too, to be fair, so but
Speaker 1: but you're right, this is it doesn't really give us
Speaker 1: a good clear picture of the the the terrain, the
Speaker 1: all around terrain.
Speaker 2: This is Camp Wilson as well.
Speaker 3: Right, hey, so hey, so go to uh go to
Speaker 3: uh number twenty. All right, number twenty.
Speaker 4: It's a four. It's a four collage in the top right,
Speaker 4: it's got a really good map. Uh that is the
Speaker 4: actual map that came with the Foyer request materials. So
Speaker 4: number twenty, it'll be like a couple of tables on
Speaker 4: the bottom and then a some type of chart where
Speaker 4: it you know, it has all the different activities that
Speaker 4: are going on during that time, and then the right
Speaker 4: will be a.
Speaker 3: Blue map says like be yeah, there we go. Is
Speaker 3: there any way you can zoom into the top right?
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, okay, I doesn't say it's not letting me zoom in.
Speaker 1: But I did actually add it into my photos. Let
Speaker 1: me see if I can, if I can get a
Speaker 1: better copy of it. Uppere No, it doesn't work, no,
Speaker 1: unfortunately not.
Speaker 4: I just sent it to the It's it's the newest
Speaker 4: thing on the media, and it should pull up like
Speaker 4: a full screen. It's really not very clear.
Speaker 2: But what did you say, Jeremy Corbell's retweeting us.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Hey, shout out to Jeremy Corbell.
Speaker 4: Jeremy Man, I'm sending right now, sending a high death
Speaker 4: version of it. Uh so it's it's taken a minute
Speaker 4: from my internet to send it.
Speaker 3: You know, don't have good high death version of the
Speaker 3: entire There we go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, I got it.
Speaker 3: And if you look at Camp Wilson is in the
Speaker 3: bottom left, you see right there in the middle, that's
Speaker 3: the range, all right, So that's that's where they do
Speaker 3: most of their dropping of like uh you know, aircraft
Speaker 3: like air to ground type of type of type of
Speaker 3: m armament. And this is the actually just from the
Speaker 3: foyer requests that I sent it to the media group
Speaker 3: group DM.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 1: Fuck me, I don't want to teach this so much time.
Speaker 3: No, no, like go to the go to the go
Speaker 3: to the media.
Speaker 1: No, I'm on it right now.
Speaker 3: You're there. And there's not two uh two blue maps
Speaker 3: that got sent.
Speaker 1: No, but it got sent to my phone. It's weird.
Speaker 1: I feel like an idiot right now. We're just holding
Speaker 1: everybody out.
Speaker 3: No, man, it's not you do it's X you know,
Speaker 3: it's they're always glitchen because I got them.
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm gonna yeah, oh wow, these are actually Yeah,
Speaker 1: I want you to do that real quick, please, just
Speaker 1: so we don't have any gaps and no problem. But yeah,
Speaker 1: so Jeremy, if Jeremy, if you watch, I would talk
Speaker 1: to you about this case and about a bunch of
Speaker 1: other things. That's what I'm I want is the metadata
Speaker 1: so that we can start start correlating whether or not
Speaker 1: that we have enough time in the videos add it
Speaker 1: up that don't overlap to to get near his seven
Speaker 1: minute time frame, because that could show us a lot
Speaker 1: if if we can show that these things stayed in
Speaker 1: formation for as close to seven minutes as possible, then
Speaker 1: and I mean for me, that says something because like
Speaker 1: like you said, hold on.
Speaker 3: Arthur, all right, So my wish if we're doing our
Speaker 3: you know, Jeremy Corbel, Jeanie in the bottle with I
Speaker 3: just want to I just want to party with Bob
Speaker 3: Bazaar and George Knapp for a week and I want
Speaker 3: let's go to the.
Speaker 4: Let's get it done. You know what I'm saying. That's
Speaker 4: all that I want actually more fun than all this stuff.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I retract my statement. I'm with Grider now. I
Speaker 1: just want to party with Corbel and and George.
Speaker 4: You know, George Knapp and Bob Bazaar threw down back
Speaker 4: in the day, right, I bet they tore Vegas up.
Speaker 4: I can't even imagine ohory days.
Speaker 3: All right, So look and you see, uh yeah, so
Speaker 3: in the bottom left there's like a blue Oh yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right.
Speaker 4: So right there is right there is Fob Wilson, and
Speaker 4: then there's the range and uh yeah, and then this
Speaker 4: range is where I'm pretty sure that's this, and then
Speaker 4: it looks like maybe Sunshine Peak is the same type
Speaker 4: of you know, topographical notation. I don't know what you
Speaker 4: would call that, you know, the map feature or whatever.
Speaker 3: The lines.
Speaker 4: It basically annotates where they can drop air to ground ordinance.
Speaker 4: You know, it's in a specific area because you know,
Speaker 4: you have to think when you're dropping air to ground ordinance,
Speaker 4: you have to worry and flares which in the year
Speaker 4: so the only figure that I was able to find
Speaker 4: was in the year twenty ten, they dropped close to
Speaker 4: twenty thousand flares, you know, twenty thousand lu to Lou
Speaker 4: nineteen flares over twenty nine palms.
Speaker 3: That's a lot.
Speaker 4: So that's a I mean, that's a lot of potential
Speaker 4: to start a fire, and so you would think, you know,
Speaker 4: that's why they keep it controlled in this one area
Speaker 4: right here would be my assumption. And then this night
Speaker 4: they had operations going on Objective A, Objective B. I
Speaker 4: think Objective B is possibly where the photo was taken
Speaker 4: from and where they had the refueling point set up,
Speaker 4: I'm pretty sure. And then they had something going on
Speaker 4: at Black Top two right over here, and you know
Speaker 4: there's Gaze Pass and Rainbow Canyon.
Speaker 3: You know, they're really creative with names, but.
Speaker 2: A lot of people might not understand how big this is.
Speaker 2: This is the largest, you know, square mile of largest
Speaker 2: marine base in the entire world, so they have an
Speaker 2: enormous amount of space to do their exercise.
Speaker 4: And one thing to point out is that look at
Speaker 4: so this photo right here, this is where this is
Speaker 4: where it was taken right here, So this is where
Speaker 4: the other photos. We got one photo right here, one
Speaker 4: photographer right here. Then we got the marines right here.
Speaker 4: And look where the right here is where the flares
Speaker 4: were dropped over.
Speaker 2: Now there's no legend on here. There's no legend. I
Speaker 2: don't see a legend for this.
Speaker 3: I'm telling you what it stands for. I mean, it
Speaker 3: says range. Right there.
Speaker 2: You're telling me without a legend, that you know what
Speaker 2: this map means.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's range right there. That's range.
Speaker 2: They're all ranges. It's a mountain range. I think that means.
Speaker 2: I think that means a mountain range. I think that's.
Speaker 1: Ire. But but, but but I did say earlier that
Speaker 1: Camp Wilson is where you stage before you go to
Speaker 1: the range. So that would align with what my cousin,
Speaker 1: who was stationed on the base set, So I.
Speaker 3: Don't know, downrange like downrange. Maybe that's what you meant.
Speaker 2: No, I think what he was saying is that this
Speaker 2: is a massive base and that Camp Wilson is where
Speaker 2: they stage and get ready. They don't actually launch munitions
Speaker 2: at Camp Wilson. They go off out further into.
Speaker 3: The base to launch their Yeah, right there, they launch
Speaker 3: it right over the range, right in the range.
Speaker 2: The mountain range. That's a mountain range, all right.
Speaker 1: So I think we have a dispute about that.
Speaker 3: This is a topographical map though this is like right.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say where would the mountain be that
Speaker 1: we're seeing, you know, so you know in all the videos,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, the pictures that we were just seeing. If
Speaker 1: you could with your cursor, could you show roughly where
Speaker 1: you where the mountain is in in in the.
Speaker 3: There's mountains like look, okay, so can you side by
Speaker 3: side this mountains?
Speaker 1: See this big ass hill to the left, Yeah.
Speaker 3: That's right there. It's where the range is. This. This
Speaker 3: is it.
Speaker 4: Like you can see the beginning of the topographical you
Speaker 4: know thing for a change in elevation right here, Like
Speaker 4: you can see that beginning right here, and then the
Speaker 4: range covers it up.
Speaker 3: You can see, look right there, there's more. There's more
Speaker 3: on the backside. This is the mountain range right here.
Speaker 4: This is not they wouldn't like, is there any other
Speaker 4: topographical feature that is annotated on this map.
Speaker 3: Range means range as in the range where you fire,
Speaker 3: where you drop like air to ground.
Speaker 2: And those are all ranges. Those are all a bunch
Speaker 2: of different ranges.
Speaker 4: I mean, I'm telling you that that would be incorrect. Uh,
Speaker 4: that would be incorrect as far as you know, as
Speaker 4: far as what the map shows.
Speaker 2: Up, well as far as the geography. Can you actually
Speaker 2: put both of our things up at the same time,
Speaker 2: this one as well as mine that I'm sharing that possible.
Speaker 4: I mean, look, there's like the city right there's probably
Speaker 4: the city of twenty nine Palms, and right here, like
Speaker 4: the whole point that we brought up this map for
Speaker 4: is to see the boundary and to see if that
Speaker 4: photo was taken from the opposite side of the mountain
Speaker 4: going back towards, and that means that the that the
Speaker 4: aircraft would have been flying right along here.
Speaker 3: I guess it would have been flying.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 4: And I've got the ADSB that I can pull up
Speaker 4: and that we'll see a plane flying right along here.
Speaker 4: But I've been wrong before.
Speaker 3: I could be wrong.
Speaker 1: There's no way, there's no way for me to pull
Speaker 1: both of them up.
Speaker 2: It's okay, I think we're in the weeds a little
Speaker 2: bit here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we need to So that's what I
Speaker 1: was gonna say, is I think we need to fly
Speaker 1: back a little bit and get back to Let's get back,
Speaker 1: Let's get off of that, Let's get off of that section.
Speaker 1: Where do you guys want to go next? The witnesses? Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're.
Speaker 6: Gonna be.
Speaker 3: No. So I mean just meaning like I'll let him
Speaker 3: drive the conversation. I mean, he knows the case.
Speaker 1: Better than I respect that friend, I really do. So
Speaker 1: where where am I going for this?
Speaker 2: Look in the media thread and then you should see
Speaker 2: right after I posted all the videos five witnesses.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: Okay, I gotta throw my taco meat on the on
Speaker 3: the of and so I'll be I'll still be listening,
Speaker 3: but give me like three minutes. I won't be speaking back.
Speaker 1: So far, guys. I was just saying, I was gonna say,
Speaker 1: do you guys want to take a take a quick five?
Speaker 1: We are two hours in.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I need to take a quick I think I
Speaker 2: think the audience.
Speaker 1: I think the audience would understand if we took a
Speaker 1: quick five minutes at two hours. Okay, yeah, and listen,
Speaker 1: listen we have we have roughly two thousand people here.
Speaker 1: Jeremy Corbel shared and gave us all credit for participating
Speaker 1: in this, so I expect that more people will be
Speaker 1: chiming in and coming in soon as as this develops. So, guys,
Speaker 1: we are in the middle. I don't care how long
Speaker 1: this goes. It's it's all for you, guys.
Speaker 3: Uh this I can go and beat Arthur up on
Speaker 3: that too, you know what I mean, we'll probably opposing
Speaker 3: points on it, right. I think it's a helicite.
Speaker 1: The jellyfish one is really interesting though.
Speaker 3: Well it's all right, Well, you know what I'm gonna have.
Speaker 2: I'll have another debate.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was gonna say, you guys are really fun.
Speaker 1: So all right, guys, we'll be right back after these messages.
Speaker 1: Terrible Biamine introducing the Ultimate cognitive enhancement solution viron Mind.
Speaker 1: A video is exclusively brought to you by our sponsor
Speaker 1: Adainier as unlock your brain's full potential with a powerful
Speaker 1: blend of nine meticulously selected plants and mushrooms, each backed
Speaker 1: by pear reviewed research for their cognitive boosting benefits and safety.
Speaker 1: Dentia herbls formula combines organic full spectrum powders and potent
Speaker 1: standardized extracts, ensuring that you receive the optimal concentration of
Speaker 1: each ingredient's cognitive enhancing compound, carefully selecting the most desirable
Speaker 1: parts of each plant and mushroom to create a harmonious
Speaker 1: blend that supports your mental clarity and folks, but that's
Speaker 1: not all. They infuse each bottle with personal intention of
Speaker 1: improving the lives, the minds, and overall greatness of each
Speaker 1: of their customers. Because of their commitment to your well
Speaker 1: being every step of the way. You're going to get
Speaker 1: an exclusive twenty five percent off your order via www
Speaker 1: dot Dentia Erbels dot com using our code Total Disclosure
Speaker 1: at checkouts. All the links will be in the description
Speaker 1: or on the screen
Podbean